Did Jesus Christ Sin? (Poll)

My answer is 'no'; I do not believe He did. According to the Scriptures...
(Hebrews 4:14-15) - "Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession. {15} For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin."

Naturally, some would disagree with me. If so, what are your reasons to believe that way?
Please Note: This topic's purpose is evangelism. Please keep the discussion around Christian/religious based topics; i.e. God, the Bible, Creation vs. Evolution, etc., and, of course, the poll question. Thank you.
In Christ,
Crushmaster.

Considering how easy it is to sin, most likely.

Well his wife was a prostitute so i would think so.

Well, isn't everyone born with original sin?

My answer is 'no'; I do not believe He did. According to the Scriptures...
(Hebrews 4:14-15)- "Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession. {15} For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin."

Naturally, some would disagree with me. If so, what are your reasons to believe that way?
In Christ,
Crushmaster.

Crushmaster

Gah, can we please stop saying this! If it's according to the scriptures, who's to say he wasn't tainted by humans needs? Who's to say that the one making the scriptures purposely made it seem like he was a perfect sinless creature, when in fact, he could have sin behind peoples back?

My answer is yes. I do not believe that someone can truly be able to go through life without sinning at least once, even if it's a small lie.....

Besides, Crush, what is the actual point of this thread?chessmaster1989

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"]

My answer is 'no'; I do not believe He did. According to the Scriptures...
(Hebrews 4:14-15)- "Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession. {15} For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin."

Naturally, some would disagree with me. If so, what are your reasons to believe that way?
In Christ,
Crushmaster.

tocool340

Gah, can we please stop saying this! If it's according to the scriptures, who's to say he wasn't tainted by humans needs? Who's to say that the one making the scriptures purposely made it seem like he was a perfect sinless creature, when in fact, he could have sin behind peoples back?

My answer is yes. I do not believe that someone can truly be able to go through life without sinning at least once, even if it's a small lie.....

Well his wife was a prostitute so i would think so.

BumFluff122

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

Well his wife was a prostitute so i would think so.

Crushmaster

I don't think that he is real but nobody is perfect so he must have sinned.

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Besides, Crush, what is the actual point of this thread?Funky_Llama

There's no point to this thread, though. If you're a Christian, you say Jesus never sinned. If you're not, you say Jesus did/there is no objective sin/there is no way of knowing/Jesus did not (would have a lot of explaining to do).

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

Well his wife was a prostitute so i would think so.

Crushmaster

His girlfriend then. That Mary Magdasomething. You know, you've seen the Da Vinci Code.

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Besides, Crush, what is the actual point of this thread?Funky_Llama

I believe He lived a life without sin. That is what the Word of God reveals.

2Co 5:20 Now then we are ambassadors for Christ, as though God did beseech you by us; we pray you in Christ's stead, be ye reconciled to God.
2Co 5:21 For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.

1Pe 2:21 For even hereunto were ye called: because Christ also suffered for us, leaving us an example, that ye should follow his steps:
1Pe 2:22 Who did no sin, neither was guile found in his mouth:

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Besides, Crush, what is the actual point of this thread?Crushmaster

You didn't answer my question as to what the purpose of this thread is... >_>

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

Well his wife was a prostitute so i would think so.

XanderKage

His girlfriend then. That Mary Magdasomething. You know, you've seen the Da Vinci Code.

The Da Vinci Code is fiction and without historical support.

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

Well his wife was a prostitute so i would think so.

BumFluff122

Care to provide historical evidence to support that assertion?

he was married to Mary Magdalen. BumFluff122

Crushmaster, I'm glad that you're attempting to have a discussion, but this part of your post still concerns me:

Please Note: This topic's purpose is evangelism.

Crushmaster

Hence, you're not really looking for discussion at all. But, I'll bite. If the Bible is to be believed, then no, Jesus Christ did not commit sin.

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"] he was married to Mary Magdalen. Crushmaster

You didn't answer my question as to what the purpose of this thread is... >_>chessmaster1989

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"] You didn't answer my question as to what the purpose of this thread is... >_>Crushmaster

...that really doesn't answer the question. What is your purpose specifically in discussing whether or not Jesus sinned? And, what is the purpose of such discussion, since it is impossible to determine the answer from historical evidence?

Ok, I want to say that I am a Christian and I say yes. In the New Testament, people like to glorify Jesus as God, as god himself, the perfect savior, but what people like to ignore is his human/mortal nature. In the New testament, there are passages where Jesus's human nature is reflected with his action, such as him not being aware of whos around him, or when he left his parents for 3 days to the holy temple. His parents were pissed. He was scold for those things. So yes because though he is the son of god in flesh form, he is human too and most people disregard that and I don't knoe why :roll: These are examples of how people misunderstand the testement and like to sugar coat it as their own. Basically they are not happy if its not what they want to hear

[QUOTE="blackregiment"]

[QUOTE="XanderKage"]

His girlfriend then. That Mary Magdasomething. You know, you've seen the Da Vinci Code.

Tezcatlipoca666

The Da Vinci Code is fiction and without historical support.

Sorta like the Bible?

:P

:lol: this post wins.

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"] he was married to Mary Magdalen. chessmaster1989

That OT facepalm pic would be appropriate right about now.

chessmaster1989

[QUOTE="blackregiment"]

[QUOTE="XanderKage"]

His girlfriend then. That Mary Magdasomething. You know, you've seen the Da Vinci Code.

Tezcatlipoca666

The Da Vinci Code is fiction and without historical support.

Sorta like the Bible?

:P

LOLz, man, nice responce.

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"]
He wasn't married.

blackregiment

Care to provide historical evidence to support that assertion?

[QUOTE="blackregiment"]

[QUOTE="XanderKage"]

His girlfriend then. That Mary Magdasomething. You know, you've seen the Da Vinci Code.

Tezcatlipoca666

The Da Vinci Code is fiction and without historical support.

Sorta like the Bible?

:P

...that really doesn't answer the question. What is your purpose specifically in discussing whether or not Jesus sinned? And, what is the purpose of such discussion, since it is impossible to determine the answer from historical evidence? chessmaster1989

Ok, I want to say that I am a Christian and I say yes. In the New Testament, people like to glorify Jesus as God, as god himself, the perfect savior, but what people like to ignore is his human/mortal nature. In the New testament, there are passages where Jesus's human nature is reflected with his action, such as him not being aware of whos around him, or when he left his parents for 3 days to the holy temple. His parents were pissed. He was scold for those things. So yes because though he is the son of god in flesh form, he is human too and most people disregard that and I don't knoe why :roll: These are examples of how people misunderstand the testement and like to sugar coat it as their own. Basically they are not happy if its not what they want to hearKamekazi_69

[QUOTE="tocool340"]

[QUOTE="Crushmaster"]

My answer is 'no'; I do not believe He did. According to the Scriptures...
(Hebrews 4:14-15)- "Seeing then that we have a great high priest, that is passed into the heavens, Jesus the Son of God, let us hold fast our profession. {15} For we have not an high priest which cannot be touched with the feeling of our infirmities; but was in all points tempted like as we are, yet without sin."

Naturally, some would disagree with me. If so, what are your reasons to believe that way?
In Christ,
Crushmaster.

BumFluff122

Gah, can we please stop saying this! If it's according to the scriptures, who's to say he wasn't tainted by humans needs? Who's to say that the one making the scriptures purposely made it seem like he was a perfect sinless creature, when in fact, he could have sin behind peoples back?

My answer is yes. I do not believe that someone can truly be able to go through life without sinning at least once, even if it's a small lie.....

I don't accept that premise. There are over 4000 Old Testament manuscripts or fragments. 25,000 New Testament manuscripts or fragments, thousands of lectionaries, numerous early Bible versions, and thousands of writings from the early Church leaders, that support the text we have today. In fact, the entire New Testament can be reconstructed, minus about a dozen verses from the writing of the early Church leaders, alone. This evidence supports the text we have today to an over 95% accuracy. The differences are mainly in punctuation and spelling and none of the differences affect any important Christian doctrine.

Here is some more information.

http://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-corrupted.html

Watch 'The Lost Tomb of Jesus' on youtube. Apparently his family plot has been found. Mary Magdallen is one of the tombs in the plot. She was not a member of his immediate family. Therefor she must have been his wife. They also had a son together that was withheld from the Romans and the scripture so as to protect him. BumFluff122

uhh... nooo he didNOT

I don't accept that premise. There are over 4000 Old Testament manuscripts or fragments. 25,000 New Testament manuscripts or fragments, thousands of lectionaries, numerous early Bible versions, and thousands of writings from the early Church leaders, that support the text we have today. In fact, the entire New Testament can be reconstructed, minus about a dozen verses from the writing of the early Church leaders, alone. This evidence supports the text we have today to an over 95% accuracy. The differences are mainly in punctuation and spelling and none of the differences affect any important Christian doctrine.

Here is some more information.

http://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-corrupted.html

blackregiment

[QUOTE="blackregiment"]

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"]he was married to Mary Magdalen.

BumFluff122

Care to provide historical evidence to support that assertion?

That has also been totally discredited. Still waiting for your historical evidence....

My purpose is to provide a Christian-based topic to discuss, in hopes the Lord will perhaps use me and my comrades to bring souls to Christ.

As to the purpose, it is not necessarily impossible. After all, the Bible contains a good deal of history in it, and it has been proven to be the most accurate historical document in existence.

Crushmaster

uhh... nooo he didNOTlegolas95

[QUOTE="blackregiment"]

I don't accept that premise. There are over 4000 Old Testament manuscripts or fragments. 25,000 New Testament manuscripts or fragments, thousands of lectionaries, numerous early Bible versions, and thousands of writings from the early Church leaders, that support the text we have today. In fact, the entire New Testament can be reconstructed, minus about a dozen verses from the writing of the early Church leaders, alone. This evidence supports the text we have today to an over 95% accuracy. The differences are mainly in punctuation and spelling and none of the differences affect any important Christian doctrine.

Here is some more information.

http://www.gotquestions.org/Bible-corrupted.html

BumFluff122

Reread my post. The Bible we have today is the inerrant, inspired Word of God.

I disagree. As you stated in your OP, your goal is evangelism, which isn't a discussion at all. Eddie5vs1