Do Atheists have any reason to be moral?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-58188738395f3
deactivated-58188738395f3

1161

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 deactivated-58188738395f3
Member since 2008 • 1161 Posts

Many religious people say that Atheists have no reason to be moral. Do you think that's true?

Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#2 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
Obviously not, or athiests would all be in prison for various crimes.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
No, not really. I don't like to see others suffering because it makes me miserable. Now, it's possible that my upbringing in a Christian country had some role in that, but I don't think there are many examples in humanity or in nature of people or animals causing suffering without any reason.
Avatar image for rs0101
rs0101

136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 rs0101
Member since 2008 • 136 Posts
yup obviously cuz u need to have read the bible to feel sorry, feel compasionate, feel remorse and all human emotions only infests itself into sum1 after readin the bible ............
Avatar image for -Sun_Tzu-
-Sun_Tzu-

17384

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 -Sun_Tzu-
Member since 2007 • 17384 Posts
Believing in a religion is not a requirement for one to believe in respect and compassion.
Avatar image for rzepak
rzepak

5758

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 rzepak
Member since 2005 • 5758 Posts
Religion has nothing to do with morality. If I was to follow THE BOOK id be stoning women and killing gay people now. Atheists are people and thus they have a moral code.
Avatar image for rs0101
rs0101

136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 rs0101
Member since 2008 • 136 Posts
Religion has nothing to do with morality. If I was to follow THE BOOK id be stoning women and killing gay people now. Atheists are people and thus they have a moral code.rzepak
LOL. Yea i recall doesnt it say in the bible that women should follow their mens orders and are not allowed to speak in church bcuz its a sin. Is that wut christians mean by morals?
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
Ehm, my morals have nothing to do with religion.
Avatar image for jimmyjammer69
jimmyjammer69

12239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 jimmyjammer69
Member since 2008 • 12239 Posts
In fact, hasn't religion caused more hatred and division between cultures than any other factor? (apart from potatoes, obviously)
Avatar image for ElectronicMagic
ElectronicMagic

5412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 ElectronicMagic
Member since 2005 • 5412 Posts
There's no right, there's no wrong, there's only popular opinion. Morality is relative.
Avatar image for jasperrussell
jasperrussell

1960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#11 jasperrussell
Member since 2005 • 1960 Posts

kids need to be told how to behave because they haven't developed empathy and social conscious. Religion is a great answer for "why should I?" but then again, so is, "because Santa won't bring you any presents".

Fortunately about the time they work out Santa is fake, they have the brain capacity to know hurting others isn't nice. And a few years after that is the crucial religious questioning, hence all these OT topics.

Avatar image for Ninja-Hippo
Ninja-Hippo

23434

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#12 Ninja-Hippo
Member since 2008 • 23434 Posts
Not at all. The idea that religious people only behave morally because they want to go to heaven is completely false. You behave that way because it's the right thing to do, and because it's how you would want others to treat you, not because you REALLY want to go nuts and murder everyone but that would ruin your chances of going to heaven.
Avatar image for BiancaDK
BiancaDK

19092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#13 BiancaDK
Member since 2008 • 19092 Posts

o_0

obviously.

/puzzled by question.

Avatar image for biggest_loser
biggest_loser

24508

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 60

User Lists: 0

#14 biggest_loser
Member since 2007 • 24508 Posts
They're human - well ....lol - so they have to moral!
Avatar image for Thinker_reborn
Thinker_reborn

676

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Thinker_reborn
Member since 2008 • 676 Posts
Obviously not, or athiests would all be in prison for various crimes.ithilgore2006
But they obviously fear law.:?
Avatar image for aliblabla2007
aliblabla2007

16756

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#16 aliblabla2007
Member since 2007 • 16756 Posts
I believe that morality is completely subjective and dependent on what a human thinks is right. However, I also believe that it's better to do something beneficial (for all involved parties) than it is to do something detrimental, and some things that most would consider "moral" sometimes matches with what is beneficial.
Avatar image for AirGuitarist87
AirGuitarist87

9499

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#18 AirGuitarist87
Member since 2006 • 9499 Posts
[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"]Obviously not, or athiests would all be in prison for various crimes.Thinker_reborn
But they obviously fear law.:?

Laws are in place to uphold that countries fundamental and moral principles, which is why they differ from country to country. Just because someone doesn't believe in a deity doesn't mean they don't have empathy or a conscience.
Avatar image for ElZilcho90
ElZilcho90

6157

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#19 ElZilcho90
Member since 2006 • 6157 Posts
They may not have a "reason", in the sense of the motivation of an afterlife. But this does not mean all athiests are immoral, they're motivated by other factors such as their own conscious and sense or morality, the laws of their country, etc.
Avatar image for DrSponge
DrSponge

12763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 DrSponge
Member since 2008 • 12763 Posts
Er...yes :| Edit: Yes to the thread title No to the original post I hate when people do that :x
Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts
I agree. Atheists have no reason to be moral, and yet, a surprising amount of them have morals. Go figure.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#22 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
Morals are a very subjective thing. What may be "moral" to one group, may not to another. That being said, different people have different motivations for behavior. Some people may not commit a crime because they feel it is immoral. Others may not commit one because they are concerned about the punishment for said crime.
Avatar image for II_Seraphim_II
II_Seraphim_II

20534

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#23 II_Seraphim_II
Member since 2007 • 20534 Posts
I agree. Atheists have no reason to be moral, and yet, a surprising amount of them have morals. Go figure.Genetic_Code
I guess that makes athiests better people :P We dont need to be threatened to be decent human beings :D
Avatar image for deactivated-5a79221380856
deactivated-5a79221380856

13125

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-5a79221380856
Member since 2007 • 13125 Posts
[QUOTE="Genetic_Code"]I agree. Atheists have no reason to be moral, and yet, a surprising amount of them have morals. Go figure.II_Seraphim_II
I guess that makes athiests better people :P We dont need to be threatened to be decent human beings :D

That would depend on your philosophy on morality. :o
Avatar image for david_is_basic
david_is_basic

11524

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 david_is_basic
Member since 2003 • 11524 Posts
No, some people are moral because they are good people by nature, not because of fear.
Avatar image for Bourbons3
Bourbons3

24238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#26 Bourbons3
Member since 2003 • 24238 Posts
No, that's not true at all. I take my morals from common sense. I don't need a book to tell me how I should act.
Avatar image for dracula_16
dracula_16

16545

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#28 dracula_16
Member since 2005 • 16545 Posts
I'd like to ask them the same thing. Why be moral when all you gotta is pray for forgiveness.
Avatar image for Stumpt25
Stumpt25

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#29 Stumpt25
Member since 2006 • 1482 Posts
No, that's not true at all. I take my morals from common sense. I don't need a book to tell me how I should act.Bourbons3
Obviously, Atheists can be VERY moral people and in many cases they can be even more moral than religious people. But I think the argument made by some religious people is this: 1. If you are an Atheist, you cannot believe in an OBJECTIVE MORALITY 2. If you do not believe in objective morality, you are limited to saying "In my opinion xyz is wrong and evil" rather than "xyz is wrong and evil" 3. This means, that if you are left to choose what you think is 'morally right', you are left to choose something that could conventionally be considered 'morally wrong' 4. If this happens, you could do evil. For example, Stalin probably thought that killing millions of people was a 'good' thing to do. However, if he had a sense of 'objective morality', as is seen in most religious texts, he wouldn't have killed so many people.
Avatar image for Stumpt25
Stumpt25

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#30 Stumpt25
Member since 2006 • 1482 Posts
I'd like to ask them the same thing. Why be moral when all you gotta is pray for forgiveness. dracula_16
Cause obviously, when you ask for forgiveness you have to actually mean it in your heart. If i don't ACTUALLY feel sorry for doing evil, it's not a real apology is it?
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#31 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
[QUOTE="Bourbons3"]No, that's not true at all. I take my morals from common sense. I don't need a book to tell me how I should act.Stumpt25
Obviously, Atheists can be VERY moral people and in many cases they can be even more moral than religious people. But I think the argument made by some religious people is this: 1. If you are an Atheist, you cannot believe in an OBJECTIVE MORALITY 2. If you do not believe in objective morality, you are limited to saying "In my opinion xyz is wrong and evil" rather than "xyz is wrong and evil" 3. This means, that if you are left to choose what you think is 'morally right', you are left to choose something that could conventionally be considered 'morally wrong' 4. If this happens, you could do evil. For example, Stalin probably thought that killing millions of people was a 'good' thing to do. However, if he had a sense of 'objective morality', as is seen in most religious texts, he wouldn't have killed so many people.

You are way above the head of most people in this discussion. Good point, though.
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#32 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="Bourbons3"]No, that's not true at all. I take my morals from common sense. I don't need a book to tell me how I should act.Stumpt25
Obviously, Atheists can be VERY moral people and in many cases they can be even more moral than religious people. But I think the argument made by some religious people is this: 1. If you are an Atheist, you cannot believe in an OBJECTIVE MORALITY 2. If you do not believe in objective morality, you are limited to saying "In my opinion xyz is wrong and evil" rather than "xyz is wrong and evil" 3. This means, that if you are left to choose what you think is 'morally right', you are left to choose something that could conventionally be considered 'morally wrong' 4. If this happens, you could do evil. For example, Stalin probably thought that killing millions of people was a 'good' thing to do. However, if he had a sense of 'objective morality', as is seen in most religious texts, he wouldn't have killed so many people.

Yeah. It's quite a silly argument really.
Avatar image for super_mario_128
super_mario_128

23884

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 super_mario_128
Member since 2006 • 23884 Posts
Obviously not, or athiests would all be in prison for various crimes.ithilgore2006
Heh, way to end all arguments with the first post... Despite this being on the second page. :|
Avatar image for Stumpt25
Stumpt25

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#34 Stumpt25
Member since 2006 • 1482 Posts
[QUOTE="Stumpt25"][QUOTE="Bourbons3"]No, that's not true at all. I take my morals from common sense. I don't need a book to tell me how I should act.jointed
Obviously, Atheists can be VERY moral people and in many cases they can be even more moral than religious people. But I think the argument made by some religious people is this: 1. If you are an Atheist, you cannot believe in an OBJECTIVE MORALITY 2. If you do not believe in objective morality, you are limited to saying "In my opinion xyz is wrong and evil" rather than "xyz is wrong and evil" 3. This means, that if you are left to choose what you think is 'morally right', you are left to choose something that could conventionally be considered 'morally wrong' 4. If this happens, you could do evil. For example, Stalin probably thought that killing millions of people was a 'good' thing to do. However, if he had a sense of 'objective morality', as is seen in most religious texts, he wouldn't have killed so many people.

Yeah. It's quite a silly argument really.

Not really... it's fact...
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="Stumpt25"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="Stumpt25"] Obviously, Atheists can be VERY moral people and in many cases they can be even more moral than religious people. But I think the argument made by some religious people is this: 1. If you are an Atheist, you cannot believe in an OBJECTIVE MORALITY 2. If you do not believe in objective morality, you are limited to saying "In my opinion xyz is wrong and evil" rather than "xyz is wrong and evil" 3. This means, that if you are left to choose what you think is 'morally right', you are left to choose something that could conventionally be considered 'morally wrong' 4. If this happens, you could do evil. For example, Stalin probably thought that killing millions of people was a 'good' thing to do. However, if he had a sense of 'objective morality', as is seen in most religious texts, he wouldn't have killed so many people.

Yeah. It's quite a silly argument really.

Not really... it's fact...

Bang! Your hidden agenda has just been exposed. Oh, and no...it's not a fact :lol:
Avatar image for _______1_______
_______1_______

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#36 _______1_______
Member since 2008 • 721 Posts

Many religious people say that Atheists have no reason to be moral. Do you think that's true?

X4D

Hello there. :)

Atheists reason to be moral is that it feels good to do the right thing.

I think if there was a God, he would probably prefer the company of atheists, to those of religious faith, simply due to the atheists inner-driven desire to be good, in contrast to a person of faith, who most likely is only doing what they have been told to do, for the rewards they have been promised upon their physical demise. I think God would rather spend time with people that didn't need to be bribed into a compassionate lifestyle, as that seems to indicate emotional or "spirtual" weakness.

But since there is no God anyway, as everything is one, this doesn't really matter. My take on the subject is, that an atheist's reason to be moral is clearly superior to the reasons of religious people. It's an honorable person, who lives righteously by his own choosing, instead of being coerced with goodies and eternal pain-free parties at the end of the physical cycle.

Now, I'm not suggesting this is going to happen, because it won't, but, wouldn't it be funny if that was the test all along? If we all got to heaven one day and God tells the religious ones that they have failed due to the fact that they were so weak they needed to be bribed into righteousness, and he lets all the atheists in due to their unselfish dedication to living a respectable life, whether or not they were going to be rewarded? Of course this won't happen, but it's an amusing scenario nontheless. It's an ironic image that makes me laugh every time it pops into my mind. :lol:

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#37 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts
yup obviously cuz u need to have read the bible to feel sorry, feel compasionate, feel remorse and all human emotions only infests itself into sum1 after readin the bible ............rs0101
That's strange! I haven't read the bible but I have felt those things... Could you be... let's say... wrong? Let's put it in another way. Someone feels compassion about me. Will I appreciate it more if I know he is doing it just because his God told him so or because his own judgement and experiences have taught him so? Do those feelings have any meaning if they don't come out of each person's own consideration and care and come just from obeying a code of behaviour that only knows the words "must"? You'll rightfuly say that not everyone cares on his own and perhaps he should read the bible but that doesn't make atheists a moral threat.
Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#38 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"]Obviously not, or athiests would all be in prison for various crimes.Thinker_reborn
But they obviously fear law.:?

Yes, they're all just afraid of the law, they want nothing more than to commit crimes. Now religious people, on the other hand, they're definitely model citizens simply out of the goodness of their hearts, it's not like they're only following their respective book's "morals" so they can get into heaven or anything.
Avatar image for Stumpt25
Stumpt25

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#39 Stumpt25
Member since 2006 • 1482 Posts
[QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="Stumpt25"][QUOTE="jointed"] Yeah. It's quite a silly argument really.

Not really... it's fact...

Bang! Your hidden agenda has just been exposed. Oh, and no...it's not a fact :lol:

Tell me where i am factually incorrect and i'll accept how the arguement is silly. And don't act like you have a totally unbiased opinion.
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
the law...
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#41 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts
[QUOTE="dracula_16"]I'd like to ask them the same thing. Why be moral when all you gotta is pray for forgiveness. Stumpt25
Cause obviously, when you ask for forgiveness you have to actually mean it in your heart. If i don't ACTUALLY feel sorry for doing evil, it's not a real apology is it?

Well OBVIOUSLY (?) when a religious person says he/she feels something (remorse etc) he/she ALWAYS means it, but an atheist by far won't mean it... right? Well I hope you are one of those few religious people that mean what they say and confess cause honestly, I haven't met any. That kind of categorization is at least unfair.
Avatar image for Stumpt25
Stumpt25

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#42 Stumpt25
Member since 2006 • 1482 Posts
[QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"][QUOTE="ithilgore2006"]Obviously not, or athiests would all be in prison for various crimes.ithilgore2006
But they obviously fear law.:?

Yes, they're all just afraid of the law, they want nothing more than to commit crimes. Now religious people, on the other hand, they're definitely model citizens simply out of the goodness of their hearts, it's not like they're only following their respective book's "morals" so they can get into heaven or anything.

You're missing the strength of this guy's arguement, then you totally contradict yourself. Atheists CAN be moral AND afraid of law at the same time. in the same way Religious people CAN be moral AND want to go to heaven. It's not like without god, all religious people would turn into savages. And likewise, it's not like without the law that atheists can't be good... P.s. You have no idea how insulting it is to have you say that all good religious people are closet a-holes, just doing good for self interest.
Avatar image for ithilgore2006
ithilgore2006

10494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#43 ithilgore2006
Member since 2006 • 10494 Posts
[QUOTE="ithilgore2006"][QUOTE="Thinker_reborn"]But they obviously fear law.:?Stumpt25
Yes, they're all just afraid of the law, they want nothing more than to commit crimes. Now religious people, on the other hand, they're definitely model citizens simply out of the goodness of their hearts, it's not like they're only following their respective book's "morals" so they can get into heaven or anything.

You're missing the strength of this guy's arguement, then you totally contradict yourself. Atheists CAN be moral AND afraid of law at the same time. in the same way Religious people CAN be moral AND want to go to heaven. It's not like without god, all religious people would turn into savages. And likewise, it's not like without the law that atheists can't be good... P.s. You have no idea how insulting it is to have you say that all good religious people are closet a-holes, just doing good for self interest.

I was just throwing his argument back at him, seeing as I felt fairly insulted myself that he claimed they're merely "afraid of the law". No need to take it as a blanket statement.
Avatar image for _______1_______
_______1_______

721

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 _______1_______
Member since 2008 • 721 Posts

[QUOTE="rs0101"]yup obviously cuz u need to have read the bible to feel sorry, feel compasionate, feel remorse and all human emotions only infests itself into sum1 after readin the bible ............Teenaged
That's strange! I haven't read the bible but I have felt those things... Could you be... let's say... wrong? Let's put it in another way. Someone feels compassion about me. Will I appreciate it more if I know he is doing it just because his God told him so or because his own judgement and experiences have taught him so? Do those feelings have any meaning if they don't come out of each person's own consideration and care and come just from obeying a code of behaviour that only knows the words "must"? You'll rightfuly say that not everyone cares on his own and perhaps he should read the bible but that doesn't make atheists a moral threat.

Hello there. :)

You are on the right track. Compassion that comes from an individual's own motivation is genuine. Compassion that comes from indoctrination is about as flimsy as the pages of the book they got their "morals" from.

Avatar image for Stumpt25
Stumpt25

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#45 Stumpt25
Member since 2006 • 1482 Posts
[QUOTE="Stumpt25"][QUOTE="dracula_16"]I'd like to ask them the same thing. Why be moral when all you gotta is pray for forgiveness. Teenaged
Cause obviously, when you ask for forgiveness you have to actually mean it in your heart. If i don't ACTUALLY feel sorry for doing evil, it's not a real apology is it?

Well OBVIOUSLY (?) when a religious person says he/she feels something (remorse etc) he/she ALWAYS means it, but an atheist by far won't mean it... right? Well I hope you are one of those few religious people that mean what they say and confess cause honestly, I haven't met any. That kind of categorization is at least unfair.

huh? did i ever say that atheists can't give a genuine apology? secondly, how do you know whether a religious person asked for forgiveness dishonestly? Did they say to you "I prayed for forgiveness for committing adultery but i didn't mean it lol!" or something...... just seems wierd thing for you to know....
Avatar image for deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
deactivated-5901ac91d8e33

17092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#46 deactivated-5901ac91d8e33
Member since 2004 • 17092 Posts
[QUOTE="Stumpt25"][QUOTE="jointed"][QUOTE="Stumpt25"] Not really... it's fact...

Bang! Your hidden agenda has just been exposed. Oh, and no...it's not a fact :lol:

Tell me where i am factually incorrect and i'll accept how the arguement is silly. And don't act like you have a totally unbiased opinion.

You're the one trying to mask your posts with objectivity...not me ;) Your argument isn't about facts, so it's impossible for you to be factually incorrect, or correct for that matter.
Avatar image for Mr_sprinkles
Mr_sprinkles

6461

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Mr_sprinkles
Member since 2005 • 6461 Posts
[QUOTE="Bourbons3"]No, that's not true at all. I take my morals from common sense. I don't need a book to tell me how I should act.Stumpt25
Obviously, Atheists can be VERY moral people and in many cases they can be even more moral than religious people. But I think the argument made by some religious people is this: 1. If you are an Atheist, you cannot believe in an OBJECTIVE MORALITY 2. If you do not believe in objective morality, you are limited to saying "In my opinion xyz is wrong and evil" rather than "xyz is wrong and evil" 3. This means, that if you are left to choose what you think is 'morally right', you are left to choose something that could conventionally be considered 'morally wrong' 4. If this happens, you could do evil. For example, Stalin probably thought that killing millions of people was a 'good' thing to do. However, if he had a sense of 'objective morality', as is seen in most religious texts, he wouldn't have killed so many people.

hidden assumptions in number 4- that there is an objective morality, and that people who believe in objective morality have the right version of it. :P
Avatar image for -Jiggles-
-Jiggles-

4356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 -Jiggles-
Member since 2008 • 4356 Posts

Despite what many people believe, religion didn't "invent" morality. What people think is "moral" is a simple biological instinct early man had that would ensure the survival of themselves and others around them. After all, if you killed all your tribesmen just for the heck of it, then who's going to help you hunt that Wooly Mammoth for food? Who are you going to reproduce with? Who's going to help protect you from Sabretooth Cats or other human tribes?

I'm not saying that the entirety of morality was based off the works of cavemen, but that what we see as "right" or "wrong" is based off of our own biological intelligence as to what would benefit you and the others around you more. The use of a caveman example is just a representation of humanity at it's most basic form. When society had evolved towards something greater, so had morality; the ideas of stealing, rape, etc being "wrong" by most societies was taken into consideration and now most people across the world find such actions to be wrong. Not all groups do, however, since morality is subjective.

Also, who cares if somebody has "a reason" to be moral or not? The fact that said people are acting moral (regardless of believing in a religion or not) shows that they have enough intelligence and willpower to overcome such a primitive mindset. I'd respect somebody more if they followed moral guidelines because they felt it was right rather than if they followed moral guidelines because they feared punishment if they didn't.

Avatar image for Stumpt25
Stumpt25

1482

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#49 Stumpt25
Member since 2006 • 1482 Posts
[QUOTE="Stumpt25"][QUOTE="Bourbons3"]No, that's not true at all. I take my morals from common sense. I don't need a book to tell me how I should act.Mr_sprinkles
Obviously, Atheists can be VERY moral people and in many cases they can be even more moral than religious people. But I think the argument made by some religious people is this: 1. If you are an Atheist, you cannot believe in an OBJECTIVE MORALITY 2. If you do not believe in objective morality, you are limited to saying "In my opinion xyz is wrong and evil" rather than "xyz is wrong and evil" 3. This means, that if you are left to choose what you think is 'morally right', you are left to choose something that could conventionally be considered 'morally wrong' 4. If this happens, you could do evil. For example, Stalin probably thought that killing millions of people was a 'good' thing to do. However, if he had a sense of 'objective morality', as is seen in most religious texts, he wouldn't have killed so many people.

hidden assumptions in number 4- that there is an objective morality, and that people who believe in objective morality have the right version of it. :P

Ok, fair game - 4 is subjective. The other 3 are objective though. 4 only serves as it's logical conclusion --> What i would take away from the equation is 'as is seen in most religious texts', because arguably you could disagree with the morality in religious texts but save that discussion for another time.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#50 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts
[QUOTE="Teenaged"][QUOTE="Stumpt25"] Cause obviously, when you ask for forgiveness you have to actually mean it in your heart. If i don't ACTUALLY feel sorry for doing evil, it's not a real apology is it?Stumpt25
Well OBVIOUSLY (?) when a religious person says he/she feels something (remorse etc) he/she ALWAYS means it, but an atheist by far won't mean it... right? Well I hope you are one of those few religious people that mean what they say and confess cause honestly, I haven't met any. That kind of categorization is at least unfair.

huh? did i ever say that atheists can't give a genuine apology? secondly, how do you know whether a religious person asked for forgiveness dishonestly? Did they say to you "I prayed for forgiveness for committing adultery but i didn't mean it lol!" or something...... just seems wierd thing for you to know....

It's not all that hard to "read" one's behaviour and I'm not talking about people that are complete strangers to me! Religion is much like a parent. When a child has his parents reminder constantly telling him "do this" "do that" he won't learn to have morals "inside" him but more likely seek out for the parent's consulting. Isn't it time people, like the grown ups they are, acted without the constant reminder of god. OBVIOUSLY (!) some people have felt that are ready to act and to answer to themselves alone. Not because that gives them freedom to do ANYTHING but because they feel mature enough to lead a life without God's watch.