do you believe in god or science?

Why not both?Dark__Link

Why not both?Dark__Link

Stole my answer.

[QUOTE="Dark__Link"]Why not both?Godly_Cure

Stole my answer.

"I believe in America."

Gotta love the Godfather.

[QUOTE="Godly_Cure"]

[QUOTE="Dark__Link"]Why not both?mohan88

Stole my answer.

Here we go again. Where's the option for "I don't give a ****" Anyway, here's an awesome picture:

Stop these evolution/religion threads already! Look what you did to this poor bunny...

Shame on you. :evil:

Both. They can tied together. The search for the truth applies science. So why not both?

Btw, I beieve in the here and now, until things are proven and disproven we only have so much basis to judge upon and believe.

And I believe in the Flying Spaghetti Monster.:P

God makes at least as much sense as the big bang (nothing existed, then an explosion that could not possibly have existed created everything. Great theory, huh?)Gallion-Beast

Hmm, let me think. Who's word should I trust? Primitive people from thousands of years ago, or a 21st century scientists with state-of-the-art technology? Hmm, I wonder. :roll:

[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"] God makes at least as much sense as the big bang (nothing existed, then an explosion that could not possibly have existed created everything. Great theory, huh?)agilefalcon16

Hmm, let me think. Who's word should I trust? Primitive people from thousands of years ago, or a 21st century scientists with state-of-the-art technology? Hmm, I wonder. :roll:

who says God couldn't have used the big bangas the methodto create the universe? Genesis isn't trying to teach scientific facts.

[QUOTE="agilefalcon16"]

[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"] God makes at least as much sense as the big bang (nothing existed, then an explosion that could not possibly have existed created everything. Great theory, huh?)jackelhunter

Hmm, let me think. Who's word should I trust? Primitive people from thousands of years ago, or a 21st century scientists with state-of-the-art technology? Hmm, I wonder. :roll:

who says God couldn't have used the big bangas the methodto create the universe? Genesis isn't trying to teach scientific facts.

Actually, EVIDENCE (or lack thereof, in this case) says God couldn't have used big bangs to create the universe.

More Awesome Ahead:

Here we go again. Where's the option for "I don't give a ****" Anyway, here's an awesome picture:

Headbanger88

wow that owns

[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"] God makes at least as much sense as the big bang (nothing existed, then an explosion that could not possibly have existed created everything. Great theory, huh?)agilefalcon16

Hmm, let me think. Who's word should I trust? Primitive people from thousands of years ago, or a 21st century scientists with state-of-the-art technology? Hmm, I wonder. :roll:

[QUOTE="jackelhunter"][QUOTE="agilefalcon16"]

[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"] God makes at least as much sense as the big bang (nothing existed, then an explosion that could not possibly have existed created everything. Great theory, huh?)agilefalcon16

Hmm, let me think. Who's word should I trust? Primitive people from thousands of years ago, or a 21st century scientists with state-of-the-art technology? Hmm, I wonder. :roll:

who says God couldn't have used the big bangas the methodto create the universe? Genesis isn't trying to teach scientific facts.

Actually, EVIDENCE (or lack thereof, in this case) says God couldn't have used big bangs to create the universe.

[QUOTE="jackelhunter"][QUOTE="agilefalcon16"]

[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"] God makes at least as much sense as the big bang (nothing existed, then an explosion that could not possibly have existed created everything. Great theory, huh?)agilefalcon16

Hmm, let me think. Who's word should I trust? Primitive people from thousands of years ago, or a 21st century scientists with state-of-the-art technology? Hmm, I wonder. :roll:

who says God couldn't have used the big bangas the methodto create the universe? Genesis isn't trying to teach scientific facts.

Actually, EVIDENCE (or lack thereof, in this case) says God couldn't have used big bangs to create the universe.

there isn't any proof that God could not have used the big bag to create the universe. oh, and what is this "proof" you speak of?

Here we go again. Where's the option for "I don't give a ****" Anyway, here's an awesome picture:

Headbanger88

[QUOTE="Headbanger88"]

Here we go again. Where's the option for "I don't give a ****" Anyway, here's an awesome picture:

KrayzieJ

Shanghai, Pearl Tower.

[QUOTE="Headbanger88"]

Here we go again. Where's the option for "I don't give a ****" Anyway, here's an awesome picture:

KrayzieJ

[QUOTE="KrayzieJ"][QUOTE="Headbanger88"]

Here we go again. Where's the option for "I don't give a ****" Anyway, here's an awesome picture:

Gallion-Beast

[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"][QUOTE="KrayzieJ"][QUOTE="Headbanger88"]

Here we go again. Where's the option for "I don't give a ****" Anyway, here's an awesome picture:

mohan88

Why not both?Dark__Link

indeed

I believe in science.

"There is no such thing as miracles or the supernatural... only cutting-edge technology." - Revolver Ocelot

Love that quote.

This would be the, what, third time this thread has been made?

My answer remains the same: they're not opposed.

I don't believe in Science. I don't worship Science. I don't believe the Son of Science died for my sins. Don't you see how the very question is flawed?

The question you asked is:

Do you believe in the process by which knowledge is acquired through observations and experiments or in a magic man in the sky that grants wishes?

The question does not make sense. You can have both. But what's the reason to believe in the latter? Hard evidence is the reason to believe scientists. What is the reason to believe an ancient fairy-tale?