Do you belive in God or Do you belive in Science ?

I believe in the fact of evolution, but before evolution, I just don't know.bastards12345

[QUOTE="bastards12345"]I believe in the fact of evolution, but before evolution, I just don't know.Captain_Swosh69

[QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"][QUOTE="bastards12345"]I believe in the fact of evolution, but before evolution, I just don't know.Hewkii

Evolution requires non-living matter to turn into a living thing, this has never been observed.

Thats all I gotta say, I think you know which side im on.

Evolution requires non-living matter to turn into a living thing, this has never been observed.

Thats all I gotta say, I think you know which side im on.

qwerty2305

[QUOTE="qwerty2305"]

Evolution requires non-living matter to turn into a living thing, this has never been observed.

Thats all I gotta say, I think you know which side im on.

Captain_Swosh69

[QUOTE="qwerty2305"]

Evolution requires non-living matter to turn into a living thing, this has never been observed.

Thats all I gotta say, I think you know which side im on.

Captain_Swosh69

No. Im just saying I think its more likely for a higher power to have created us.

Evolution requires non-living matter to turn into a living thing. Is that what you really believe? Because this defy's all scientific laws. A non-living thing cant just suddenly for no reason turn into a living thing.

[QUOTE="Captain_Swosh69"][QUOTE="qwerty2305"]

Evolution requires non-living matter to turn into a living thing, this has never been observed.

Thats all I gotta say, I think you know which side im on.

qwerty2305

No. Im just saying I think its more likely for a higher power to have created us.

Evolution requires non-living matter to turn into a living thing. Is that what you really believe? Because this defy's all scientific laws. A non-living thing cant just suddenly for no reason turn into a living thing.

p.s. i dont know if its scientifically acceptable to say the first simple cell ever existed is the result of evolution. see that i just put that sentence nicely than just say nonliving thing to living things.

I believe in both!! :oFlaming_Ape

I believe a little bit in both.Superironic

Evolution requires non-living matter to turn into a living thing, this has never been observed.

Thats all I gotta say, I think you know which side im on.

qwerty2305

science has revealed far more about the workings of the universe than god ever has.comp_atkins

I would be very interested in hearing your reasoning on that.

So where is the "Both" option in the poll? I believe in both. I know God made everything including science. Why can't they go together? Plus, a lot of times science changes due to new discoveries and better ways to gauge/test things. To me, that sums it up. God is perfect, he made science but our science hasn't reached the level of His which is why a lot of things change in sciecne as we perfect it (it being all the different ways of testing stuff and the like). So yeah, both is my answer.nickdastick

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]science has revealed far more about the workings of the universe than god ever has.nickdastick

I would be very interested in hearing your reasoning on that.

Have you been skipping science class since primary school?

Science definitely. We are in the age of technology. We are too smart to believe in story tales made up hundreds of years ago. daniel52587

[QUOTE="nickdastick"]

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]science has revealed far more about the workings of the universe than god ever has.Marx_Brother

I would be very interested in hearing your reasoning on that.

Have you been skipping science class since primary school?

Okay, obviously you didn't read my previous post that was RIGHT above this one. I asked that because I was wondering what he would say. If you believe in God at all then more than likely you would have a different view on his phrase. For me, the statement, "science has shown us more about the universe" is totally opinion based. I believe that God allows us to discover the things we do because we were created in His image. So being made by Him would mean that what we discover was because of Him. Edison made the light bulb after failing a lot. He kept trying and trying and thought of new things and he could think of new ways because of how his brain was wired and I believe we are all made by God. So Edison was given the abilities he had from God which allowed him to think of the different ways he could possibly make a light bult which led him to think of the one that did it. So to answer you question, no I did not skip science class in fact, my mom has a Masters in Zoology and is about half a year from her PHD in Educational Science. Maybe you should ask my reasoning before you make that kind of snide, cavalier remark.

[QUOTE="daniel52587"]Science definitely. We are in the age of technology. We are too smart to believe in story tales made up hundreds of years ago. mohan88

If you don't have a belief in God. This thread is less of a topic and more of a "my opinion is right" thread. I respect everyones opinion but why can't they respect mine? If I just said God rocks and science sucks, then people would bash me and say how I am wrong. Usually forums are for discussion and not just bashing due to certain beliefs. Oh, and the topic maker usually is a little less bias... Put a both on there man, or change your topic to what to you believe in more. Just put both since I'm sure many people believe they go hand in hand.

[QUOTE="mohan88"][QUOTE="daniel52587"]Science definitely. We are in the age of technology. We are too smart to believe in story tales made up hundreds of years ago. nickdastick

If you don't have a belief in God. This thread is less of a topic and more of a "my opinion is right" thread. I respect everyones opinion but why can't they respect mine? If I just said God rocks and science sucks, then people would bash me and say how I am wrong. Usually forums are for discussion and not just bashing due to certain beliefs. Oh, and the topic maker usually is a little less bias... Put a both on there man, or change your topic to what to you believe in more. Just put both since I'm sure many people believe they go hand in hand.

I respect your opinion, but there is no proof God yet....mohan88

dude the way I see it is that were only human, who are we to judge God, its God that judges us.

[QUOTE="mohan88"]I respect your opinion, but there is no proof God yet....AB_Uppercut

dude the way I see it is that were only human, who are we to judge God, its God that judges us.

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]science has revealed far more about the workings of the universe than god ever has.nickdastick

I would be very interested in hearing your reasoning on that.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/God

God:

1.the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.

Owned by a dictionary...

[QUOTE="AB_Uppercut"]

[QUOTE="mohan88"]I respect your opinion, but there is no proof God yet....mohan88

dude the way I see it is that were only human, who are we to judge God, its God that judges us.

ah yes science :) You know we have free will we can believe in what we want, people have choice and religion does not force you -especially mine- to follow it. I actually believe in all the Holy books that were given to mankind all those thousands of years ago I mean they were actually way too advanced for that time and what these books prophesied actually did come true, its just over time most of these Holy books got tainted by mankind and thats why people get confused when they read them.

In fact there is only one holy book that is still exactly the same as it was first given and you know what, 80% of what that book says is 100% true and the other 20% is in the unknown.

I'm not lieing when I say this but when I was 10 I read in that Holy book that the universe is expanding and then when I was 16 and in school I was learning science and about the universe, and my teacher said that the unverse is expanding. I was like :o

[QUOTE="nickdastick"]

[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]science has revealed far more about the workings of the universe than god ever has.comp_atkins

I would be very interested in hearing your reasoning on that.

  If it/He/She actually exists.. Even then the being most likely sees us as ants if not specs of dust in existance..  With the massive amounts of matter in the universe I think its rediculous to say we are the only ones alone..  There are 4 to 5 billion stars in our galaxy, each may have up to dozens of planets around them..  Our galaxy is considered quite average some are larger to 8 or 10 billion stars..  Now we have SEEN at least a estimated 125 BILLION galaxies through the hubble telescope..

   Top that we have found numerous evidence on how matter is changed in the universe, by the fusion reaction of Suns.. Infact our brightest minds out there believe we are all made from stardust, matter left over from dead stars..   No its not to say science knows all, because we as a spieces do not..  Gravity, evolution, genetics, even our planets weather is still a mystery for us.. But instead of trying to make up some bs, science waits and is willing to scrap the entire idea of a theory in proof of another..    Hell we don't even know what 70% of our universe is made of, we only have accounted 30% of matter that is relaly needed to keep galaxies together instead of flinging apart..

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/God

God:

1.the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.

Owned by a dictionary...

a55assin

[QUOTE="a55assin"]

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/God

God:

1.the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.

Owned by a dictionary...

rimnet00

It better have...or else I'd have bitten into every single poster commenting on this topic...

[QUOTE="mohan88"][QUOTE="AB_Uppercut"]

[QUOTE="mohan88"]I respect your opinion, but there is no proof God yet....AB_Uppercut

dude the way I see it is that were only human, who are we to judge God, its God that judges us.

ah yes science :) You know we have free will we can believe in what we want, people have choice and religion does not force you -especially mine- to follow it. I actually believe in all the Holy books that were given to mankind all those thousands of years ago I mean they were actually way too advanced for that time and what these books prophesied actually did come true, its just over time most of these Holy books got tainted by mankind and thats why people get confused when they read them.

In fact there is only one holy book that is still exactly the same as it was first given and you know what, 80% of what that book says is 100% true and the other 20% is in the unknown.

I'm not lieing when I say this but when I was 10 I read in that Holy book that the universe is expanding and then when I was 16 and in school I was learning science and about the universe, and my teacher said that the unverse is expanding. I was like :o

..............   Yeah so what?  Notrodomus was the exact same, and he was wrong on the world coming to an end..  The guy that wrote 20 thousand leagues under the sea was right in some plaecs but was wrong in many other places as well..  

   NO I REPEAT NO SCRIPTURE that dates as far back as your hinting is pure.. Because in the end you are reading something that has been translated hundreds of times, which regardless if it was not changed purposely would still be different..   This is also doing the stretch that man kind isn't infact bias and would change the meaning to their own bias, which thye most likely indeed have..

   Hell the majority of ALL RELIGIOUS communities can not agree on the true meaning of passages in religious scriptures..

[QUOTE="DrDoomed"]Both are real aint they? but science aint that religious or entropicmohan88

Prove God doesn't exist...then we'll talk

And I doubt there will ever be real proof...I think the only ones who ever actually knew for sure were those with Jesus. And near-death experience victoms.

i wouldn't say they are neccessarily mutually exclusive.romocop33