[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]
I find it hard to believe that there's ANYONE who doesn't like art, since "art" encompasses so many things. Music, movies, paintings. Hell, even COOKING can be considered an art.
That being said, yes I like the visual arts. I'm more inclined towards photography and movies, rather than paintings and drawing and sculpture, but I absolutely LOVE visual art.
Film-Guy
I'm not sure if you would know this, but who are some good photographers? I am trying to do some research into that subject. I've been using my camera more often and looking through my old National geographics to get some good pictures. Of course I could just look up best photographers, but I'm just interested in who are some you are into.
Oh jeeze...I don't even have a list of favourites.
Just gonna throw out some names here, not saying that they are my favourite photographers or anything. But they're good as **** and worth looking into.
Ansel Adams is probably the standard cliched name that gets thrown around, and he deserves it (even if he's not the best). His photographs are absolutely STUNNING both from an artistic and technical standpoint. And he's one of the most obvious choices for great photography, since he so well embraced both the artistic and scientific aspects. Most of his pictures are very pleasing from the start because he was thinking as an artist and had an eye for composition, but he gets remembered as one of the greats because he was also a NERD. He didn't stop at using the available methods to express his art, he helped to develop the "zone system". He did meticulous study of metering and responses of film to differing development. He was not only a visual artist with a keen eye for striking imagery, he was also a tech geek who spent a hell of a lot of time doing tech and lab work in order to develop a better way to make his art more effective.
HUGE thing there. I just want to point out that artists and scientists are seen as being different, opposing kinds of people. But goddamn Leonardo Da Vinci dealt with both arts and sciences as well. The two are NOT mutually exclusive, and being able to branch out can absolutely result in better art.
I also like James Nachtwey (even though he's primarily a photojournalist rather than a pure art photographer). He does stuff like go to areas of conflict and photograph the struggles going on. Even though that's more of a "documentary" thing rather than an "art" thing, I have absolutely no problem with calling the guy a great artist. His pictures are simply stunning, full of emotion, and unforgettable.
In the same category, I'd include Alfred Eisenstaedt (I actually have an Eisenstaedt print...probably paid too much for it, but I sure as hell don't want to get rid of it since it is a goddamn Eisenstaedt). Spent most of his career working for life magazine, and his **** is AMAZING. Produced some absolutely iconic photographs. A master of his craft, and a true artist, even if he wasn't primarily an "art photographer".
Also look up some Dorothea Lange.
I'm also a fan of the Westons (Edward is the famous one, but his son Brett also did some EXCELLENT work).
And I can't ignore Robert Mapplethorpe, even though his work is totally gay And I'm not using the word in a derogatory sense, I mean that it was REALLY totally gay It's still some EXCELLENT freaking stuff.
Anyway, I'm not saying that those folk are my favorites. I don't really have any favourites, I was just throwing out some names.
Log in to comment