[QUOTE="Nuck81"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] No I didn't get that from Wiki....I got it here..... And it states the opposite of your stance in this argument as to Oswald being capable.Srawman? Now you're being dishonest. Here's your words....
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
The amount of shots required and the weapon used would have to mean he was the most awesome shooter....LJS9502_basic
He was. He scored a 212 in Sharpshooting which is 12 points above the minimum to qualify for sniper, and received top ranks in speed shooting as well.
There were only three shots fired in 7 seconds, at only 75 feet, a lot closer than people think, and he missed with his first shot. It could have easily been done by just one guy.Nuck81
Damn dude can't you even remember your own stance for 30 minutes or so?
Where did I say he was an expert? I said gave his scores and said he was good enough to make the shot. Which history proves he was. You're arguing the strawman because you're desperate. You're desperate because you are getting run out of yet another thread. Just log out and cool off a while. Off-topic seems to be getting to you today. Not a straw man......you did paint him as an awesome shooter which is far from the truth and no one has ever been able to replicate what a less than talented marine was supposed to be able to do. Check your facts before you make claims. I said he was a good enough shooter to make the shots, you're exaggerations of my statements don't change this. Kennedy was killed by two shots, from behind, coming from a Rifle that was being held by Lee Harvey Oswald. You're uneducated opinion doesn't change these facts. You're insecurity will force you to continue digging yourself in a deeper hole of stupidity. You're dumbass ensures this pattern in every topic you post in.
Log in to comment