This topic is locked from further discussion.
What "war"? Not only is the US, and other NATO countries losing in Afghanistan, but it is impossible to "win" against terrorism.
I'm starting to have my doubts about Afghanistan. I thought the argument for staying there was good, but now what they're saying is that there are no insurgents in Afghanistan and they have all moved to Pakistan, which is exactly what we heard about Afghanistan after we went to Iraq. I'm just really starting to wonder if this isn't turning into war for the sake of war, and if we wouldn't be doing more to curb terrorism by just pulling out altogether, perhaps then we wouldn't be seen so much as foreign invaders.
Tell me what there is to win. Now look at what we stand to lose.
xXBuffJeffXx
Well, the initial goal was to capture Bin Laden, which is something I doubt will be accomplished soon. So in the meantime, it does feel like a war without any ultimate goals as some people already said that terrorism cannot be entirely beaten.
Depends on what we are fighting for. If the war only has to do with disrupting and ultimately defeating Al Qaeda in the region, then we are winning. If we are fighting for a sustainable, democratic Afghan government, then no, we are not winning, although that doesn't mean it can't be won. -Sun_Tzu-
Well, does that mean we're endlessly going to be chasing Al-Queda around the region? If we're spending money and lives chasing them for an infinite amount of time are we really winning?
[QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]Depends on what we are fighting for. If the war only has to do with disrupting and ultimately defeating Al Qaeda in the region, then we are winning. If we are fighting for a sustainable, democratic Afghan government, then no, we are not winning, although that doesn't mean it can't be won. theone86
Well, does that mean we're endlessly going to be chasing Al-Queda around the region? If we're spending money and lives chasing them for an infinite amount of time are we really winning?
It depends on how one thinks the war should be fought. Either you do counter-terrorism, which is very cheap and doesn't take that many troops to do, and it basically just consists of hunting down Al Qaeda and either capturing them or killing them. Or you could do counter-insurgency/nation building, which is much more expensive and would require a lot more troops. Right now we are sort of doing nation building-lite.Fighting Al Qaeda and any other absurd, backwards organization that sees itself at war with civilization doesn't have to be expensive, it's just that right now we are fighting it in an expensive manner because we are doing much more than merely fighting Al Qaeda.
[QUOTE="biggest_loser"]How the hell do you measure it and decide when its won? duxupThe score in the right hand corner of the screen.
We aren't winning the war on terror.. We are the terrorists.[QUOTE="EMOEVOLUTION"][QUOTE="Snipes_2"]
I think we're winning the war on Terror. It can never Truly be won though. There will always be another Al Qaeda.
rawr_xd
Please tell me you're joking... ? You should move elsewhere if that is your view on the U.S. We may not be the best country in the world in terms of a lot of scattered things, but we are not terrorists. You should be ashamed of yourself.
The US is worse than most terrorist groups. I don't think I can count on both hands the number of democratically elected government America has had a hand in toppling where as I can't think of any democratic government that have been toppled by a terrorist group.its not a war. war would require us fighting a nation's army, that we are not doing. its counter insurgency. it can never be won. the fact that we are there in the first place means that we are loosing. loosing lives ( both of our own troops and any civilian casualties) , resources and money.
short answer: we are loosing everything and winning nothing.
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="rawr_xd"] We aren't winning the war on terror.. We are the terrorists.EMOEVOLUTION
Please tell me you're joking... ? You should move elsewhere if that is your view on the U.S. We may not be the best country in the world in terms of a lot of scattered things, but we are not terrorists. You should be ashamed of yourself.
I'm not joking. Invasion of IRAQ? Invasion of Afghanistan.. and for what we didn't even get Bin Laden.. the guy who did this.. instead we destabilized a country and further contributed to the suffering of it's population.Yeah, I mean they'd be so much better off if we'd just let the Taliban fire rockets into schools just because they were teaching little girls other things besides the Koran and homemaking.
For every home built there is US pilot who rather than return his payload to base drops it on first thing he sees
for every act of kindness from US troops there is an idiot who shoots first asks questions latter
for every American life lost 10 taliban lives are lost but also tens of civilian lives
sadly US generals dont understand that this is not conventional war
US Army is fighting against guerrilla using tactics designed to counter Russian or Chinese Attack
So are you winning no not really ,in all honesty you are getting your ass kicked by ppl who never lost to anybody in their history
and as long as you think that good ol US of A cant do no wrong this war will be reality of poor Americans
pecanin
Uhhh...you have no clue. Please, just stop.
[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]
No one ever wins in war, it always results with alot of resources and lives lost on both sides, and nothing practical gained.
Asim90
Listen to this guy
Tell that to the survivors of the Holocaust and WWII...
[QUOTE="supergamer514"]
I think that it's pretty much even right now. :|
You're so wrong. Here's the thing... nothing is happening there. People are dying, and dying, and dying... yet nothing is getting done. The United States has lost approxamately 12,000 soldiers, while Afghansitan has lost close to 90,000 fghters. We are tearing them to shreds, but still nothing is getting done.
You have no idea what your talking about and stop picking numbers at random the us has lost no where near 12,000 soldiersyou would have to great a nation where islam is very opresed to stop it . YOu would need to take away there right and treat them poorly
I say this, pull out
Let the Middle East handle its self
They either kill each other, or they wise up before the all die, this was no one else can say anyone else killed them.
Or let Russia go in there and do em in.
America will never 'win' the war in Afghanistan.. it is up to Afghan people to end the Taliban. But America is helping them greatly yes, and keeping pressure on the Taliban.
And what happens when anarchy breaks out in the middle east and the Taliban march en masse on Pakistan and ignite a massive, nuclear war?I say this, pull out
Let the Middle East handle its self
They either kill each other, or they wise up before the all die, this was no one else can say anyone else killed them.
Or let Russia go in there and do em in.
DazedDarkness
[QUOTE="DazedDarkness"]And what happens when anarchy breaks out in the middle east and the Taliban march en masse on Pakistan and ignite a massive, nuclear war? I don't see any reason why the Taliban would ignite a massive nuclear war. Unlike Al Qaeda, the members of the Taliban would rather live than die for some crazy, global jihad.I say this, pull out
Let the Middle East handle its self
They either kill each other, or they wise up before the all die, this was no one else can say anyone else killed them.
Or let Russia go in there and do em in.
Doctor-McNinja
For every home built there is US pilot who rather than return his payload to base drops it on first thing he sees
for every act of kindness from US troops there is an idiot who shoots first asks questions latter
for every American life lost 10 taliban lives are lost but also tens of civilian lives
sadly US generals dont understand that this is not conventional war
US Army is fighting against guerrilla using tactics designed to counter Russian or Chinese Attack
So are you winning no not really ,in all honesty you are getting your ass kicked by ppl who never lost to anybody in their history
and as long as you think that good ol US of A cant do no wrong this war will be reality of poor Americans
For every post I read in a thread, there are hundreds of them were people just make stuff up.That can be true, but not always. WW2 had some practical results.No one ever wins in war, it always results with alot of resources and lives lost on both sides, and nothing practical gained.
DoomZaW
last i saw, Taliban controls over 80% of Afghanistan. Some say, "When the general asks for more men, that means he is losing the war".
And some say, "when the general asks for more men, and the president won't send them, he must not care about winning."last i saw, Taliban controls over 80% of Afghanistan. Some say, "When the general asks for more men, that means he is losing the war".
mixedplanet
And some say, "when the general asks for more men, and the president won't send them, he must not care about winning." i am sorry, what?[QUOTE="mixedplanet"]
last i saw, Taliban controls over 80% of Afghanistan. Some say, "When the general asks for more men, that means he is losing the war".
aransom
[QUOTE="DoomZaW"]That can be true, but not always. WW2 had some practical results. It plunged the world into a 60 year long near nuclear conflict that was responsible for more deaths and hardship than both world wars combined?No one ever wins in war, it always results with alot of resources and lives lost on both sides, and nothing practical gained.
dsmccracken
And some say, "when the general asks for more men, and the president won't send them, he must not care about winning." So where exactly are those 30,000 troops going? Or maybe you are talking about George W. Bush.[QUOTE="mixedplanet"]
last i saw, Taliban controls over 80% of Afghanistan. Some say, "When the general asks for more men, that means he is losing the war".
aransom
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment