This topic is locked from further discussion.
Am I missing something here? Oh, I see now. The comma before the and. Yes, I do use that.However, my punctuation skillusually sucks.
In recent years, the serial comma has fallen out of fashion. It is an archaic hallmark of a lost era. If the AP Stylebook advises against using the comma, so be it.
i imagine myself saying the sentence, and if i put a pause in there, i'll put a comma. so sometimes i do, sometimes i do. but generally, i think i do.
i imagine myself saying the sentence, and if i put a pause in there, i'll put a comma. so sometimes i do, sometimes i do. but generally, i think i do.
needled24-7
Do what???
[QUOTE="needled24-7"]
i imagine myself saying the sentence, and if i put a pause in there, i'll put a comma. so sometimes i do, sometimes i do. but generally, i think i do.
WhiteKnight77
Do what???
use the oxford commarelevant!
I use it. Not because it can make a sentence funny, but because I like how it looks or something. (and might've been how I was taught)
That second sentence is flawed. It should be more like "We invited the strippers; JFK and Stalin." Or "We invited the strippers. JFK and Stalin." As it stands it's a list with three items. Strippers, JFK and Stalin.Funny you should ask, I just found this:
Acemaster27
That second sentence is flawed. It should be more like "We invited the strippers; JFK and Stalin." Or "We invited the strippers. JFK and Stalin." As it stands it's a list with three items. Strippers, JFK and Stalin. I don't know about using a full stop, but I would say "... the strippers, namely JFK and Stalin."[QUOTE="Acemaster27"]
Funny you should ask, I just found this:
PS2_ROCKS
That second sentence is flawed. It should be more like "We invited the strippers; JFK and Stalin." Or "We invited the strippers. JFK and Stalin." As it stands it's a list with three items. Strippers, JFK and Stalin.PS2_ROCKSWith the Oxford comma, it is a list of three items. Without the Oxford comma, it remains a list of three items but could be misunderstood as naming the invited strippers JFK and Stalin. There's also absolutely no need for a full stop. Did you fail middle school English or something?
[QUOTE="WhiteKnight77"]
[QUOTE="needled24-7"]
i imagine myself saying the sentence, and if i put a pause in there, i'll put a comma. so sometimes i do, sometimes i do. but generally, i think i do.
needled24-7
Do what???
use the oxford commaReread what you wrote.
[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"]That second sentence is flawed. It should be more like "We invited the strippers; JFK and Stalin." Or "We invited the strippers. JFK and Stalin." As it stands it's a list with three items. Strippers, JFK and Stalin.scorch-62With the Oxford comma, it is a list of three items. Without the Oxford comma, it remains a list of three items but could be misunderstood as naming the invited strippers JFK and Stalin. There's also absolutely no need for a full stop. Did you fail middle school English or something? Did I fail middle school English? What kind of question is that? Just because it's not necessary doesn't mean it's incorrect. Think before you type. It makes you look less ignorant.
Did I fail middle school English? What kind of question is that? Just because it's not necessary doesn't mean it's incorrect. Think before you type. It makes you look less ignorant.PS2_ROCKSHey, I wasn't the one who suggested a full stop in the middle of a sentence that was trying to describe a list.
[QUOTE="PS2_ROCKS"]Did I fail middle school English? What kind of question is that? Just because it's not necessary doesn't mean it's incorrect. Think before you type. It makes you look less ignorant.scorch-62Hey, I wasn't the one who suggested a full stop in the middle of a sentence that was trying to describe a list. I was re-writing the second sentence to make it fit the picture depicting the strippers as being JFK and Stalin. As it stands, I suppose the second sentence is open for interpretation but personally I don't think I've ever had a problem with a sentence that lacked the Oxford Comma.
From what I read, it's an American practice only.I use it because I was taught to use it, and it honestly makes sense why it should be there. I didn't know that some people have stopped using it.
CJL182
I do use it although I grew up being taught that it was not proper and occasionally I let it drop because to my eye it still looks out of place to have it there.
Nah I use the LJ comma.....Run to the store and get me some potatoes.....a butane......peas....and milk please.LJS9502_basic:lol:
[QUOTE="Tylendal"]Of course I use a comma before "and". If you don't, this is what happens. "I'd like to thank my parents, Elvis and Jesus." Always use commas.SolidSnake35What about in the sentence I used? "The door was wooden, red and old." It's not necessary. It's only necessary when the sentence is ambiguous to begin with.Well, if someone wants to be technical and annoyingly pedantic then in any sentence like yours the "red and old" part would be a specification or a clarification of the term before the comma.
But of course I dont use the Oxford comma so.... I dont really care.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment