does anyone seriously believe that the earth is only a few thousand years old?

[QUOTE="pseudodog07"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="pseudodog07"]In a way, the Earth, as far as man is concerned, could be rather new. Because before the Earth as we know it, it was Pangea which is an entirely different place. Then eventually it becomes the world we know it today which, if you wanted to, could be considered very recent. The same could be said for the creation of man.notconspiracy

That's the only one I know of. But, my point is that man and the world as we know it was created recently.

What I'm saying is, it's only as old as since the day God created it. Not as old as what was before which was empty and void, becuase God's spirit had not yet moved across the waters.

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="pseudodog07"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"][QUOTE="pseudodog07"]In a way, the Earth, as far as man is concerned, could be rather new. Because before the Earth as we know it, it was Pangea which is an entirely different place. Then eventually it becomes the world we know it today which, if you wanted to, could be considered very recent. The same could be said for the creation of man.pseudodog07

That's the only one I know of. But, my point is that man and the world as we know it was created recently.

What I'm saying is, it's only as old as since the day God created it. Not as old as what was before which was empty and void, becuase God's spirit had not yet moved across the waters.

do you believe that humans and apes share a common ancestor? if not, would you like to discuss it?

do you believe that humans and apes share a common ancestor? if not, would you like to discuss it?notconspiracy

They do share a common ancestor, but those prior to us were not men, therefore man was not created yet.

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]do you believe that humans and apes share a common ancestor? if not, would you like to discuss it?pseudodog07

They do share a common ancestor, but those prior to us were not men, therefore man was not created yet.

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]do you believe that humans and apes share a common ancestor? if not, would you like to discuss it?pseudodog07

They do share a common ancestor, but those prior to us were not men, therefore man was not created yet.

Please...please please please...just research a tiny bit into evolution and the fossil records before you make statements like that again.

[QUOTE="pseudodog07"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]do you believe that humans and apes share a common ancestor? if not, would you like to discuss it?Judza

They do share a common ancestor, but those prior to us were not men, therefore man was not created yet.

Please...please please please...just research a tiny bit into evolution and the fossil records before you make statements like that again.

I think I was clear. The days of creation were determined by God of the Bible, not fossil records. I don't dispute the fossil records, but believe that creation of Earth and man as we know them occured only 1000s of years ago.

[QUOTE="Judza"][QUOTE="pseudodog07"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]do you believe that humans and apes share a common ancestor? if not, would you like to discuss it?pseudodog07

They do share a common ancestor, but those prior to us were not men, therefore man was not created yet.

Please...please please please...just research a tiny bit into evolution and the fossil records before you make statements like that again.

I think I was clear. The days of creation were determined by God of the Bible, not fossil records. I don't dispute the fossil records, but believe that creation of Earth and man as we know them occured only 1000s of years ago.

The debate over the begining of man is not what this thread is about.Kokiri-Kid

It sure seemed that way to me. So, your'e saying someone can't argue a Christian viewpoint of the question around here?

[QUOTE="Judza"][QUOTE="pseudodog07"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]do you believe that humans and apes share a common ancestor? if not, would you like to discuss it?pseudodog07

They do share a common ancestor, but those prior to us were not men, therefore man was not created yet.

Please...please please please...just research a tiny bit into evolution and the fossil records before you make statements like that again.

I think I was clear. The days of creation were determined by God of the Bible, not fossil records. I don't dispute the fossil records, but believe that creation of Earth and man as we know them occured only 1000s of years ago.

Who is God of the Bible? Us, the ones who created it?

[QUOTE="pseudodog07"][QUOTE="Judza"][QUOTE="pseudodog07"]

[QUOTE="notconspiracy"]do you believe that humans and apes share a common ancestor? if not, would you like to discuss it?unholymight

They do share a common ancestor, but those prior to us were not men, therefore man was not created yet.

Please...please please please...just research a tiny bit into evolution and the fossil records before you make statements like that again.

I think I was clear. The days of creation were determined by God of the Bible, not fossil records. I don't dispute the fossil records, but believe that creation of Earth and man as we know them occured only 1000s of years ago.

Who is God of the Bible? Us, the ones who created it?

Nope, it's the other way around.

[QUOTE="Kokiri-Kid"]

The debate over the begining of man is not what this thread is about.pseudodog07

It sure seemed that way to me. So, your'e saying someone can't argue a Christian viewpoint of the question around here?

You misunderstand. Of course you can argue a Christian viewpoint, but not if you are arguing something completely deiiferent than your opponent. This thread isn't about how humans began, its about how Earth began.

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?PHPSESSID=a2ce345c74faea0e651928f66a336c92&board=12.0

Link256

OMG i read a little of that, that site is incredible! they say its all a conspiracy and that the earth is flat

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_Earth

oh, ok. i'm going to trust some wikipedia source. brightpc12-return

yes, its brrighter to beleive in scientific sources than in the bible, because the bible doesnt prove anything it says, but science is full of profs and demostrations, but of course they are very long and boring to read....

can pc12-return tell me why should i beleive in the Bible, a 2000 y.o. book over the most advanced scientific theories?

mike huckabee probably does. he also believes that the earth is flat and is balanced on the back of a tortoise. maximusmmii

Wouldn't be the least bit suprised.