[QUOTE="cametall"]I think Casey killed her daughter by accident. She supposedly used chemicals (maybe meds, maybe chloroform) to put the kid to sleep. It's possible she gave Caylee too much and she OD'd. The defense is putting up some interesting stuff: the grandmother's testimony, the meter reader's whacked out story (supposedly he found Caylee's body one or two months before he called 911, possibly moved the body, possibly placed the duct tape on the skull, suggestions by his ex-wive(s) he is probably the murderer), the pool theory (which I think is a crock of crap). wow. . . . Sounds crazy. . .One of the most out of pocket cases around. .
I've been watching the trial off and on. It keeps receiving new twists, i.e. with the claim that Caylee drowned, to Casey's accusations that her father and brother sexually abused her, to the abrupt recess that happened today. Still, it seems to me that the majority of evidence points to Casey. It'll be interesting to see how the trial pans out.
Don't care don't care don't care. I am so damn sick of the case, I really fail to see why it has received so much damn attention considering the number of cases like this. I'm so sick of all the talking heads blathering about on the news. Really says a lot about how terrible our media is.
I've been watching some. The defense has been pretty weak and is coming off as desperate now with her mother claiming that she made the chloroform searches, but I don't think the theory of either side is correct. I think she doped her kid with chloroform so that she could go out partying and accidentally ended up killing her. I don't think that it was pre-meditated or that she drowned in a pool.
If it doesn't fit, you must acquit. Oh wait, this is not the same trial. Hopefully the prosecution doesn't have an OJ jury. Where you ignore all the obvious evidence and hand down a not guilty verdict.
I've been watching some. The defense has been pretty weak and is coming off as desperate now with her mother claiming that she made the chloroform searches, but I don't think the theory of either side is correct. I think she doped her kid with chloroform so that she could go out partying and accidentally ended up killing her. I don't think that it was pre-meditated or that she drowned in a pool. Commander-Gree
Yeah same here. Maybe not necessarily that, but some stupid event caused her accidental death because the entire family is off their rocker. She can probably be charged with negligence, but I don't think she intended on murdering her child. Either way, I hate that family. They can leave for one of the other eight Orange counties. >.>
I've been watching some. The defense has been pretty weak and is coming off as desperate now with her mother claiming that she made the chloroform searches, but I don't think the theory of either side is correct. I think she doped her kid with chloroform so that she could go out partying and accidentally ended up killing her. I don't think that it was pre-meditated or that she drowned in a pool. Commander-Gree
Hopefully not. . Idk, I just hope the mother really didn't do anything silly to hurt the child. .
If it doesn't fit, you must acquit. Oh wait, this is not the same trial. Hopefull the prosecution doesn't have an OJ jury. Where you ignore all the obvious evidence and hand down a not guilty verdict.
DroidPhysX
I wouldn't say that the evidence is obvious. It's pretty much all circumstantial.
If it doesn't fit, you must acquit. Oh wait, this is not the same trial. Hopefull the prosecution doesn't have an OJ jury. Where you ignore all the obvious evidence and hand down a not guilty verdict.
-Sun_Tzu-
I wouldn't say that the evidence is obvious. It's pretty much all circumstantial. You could say that.
Log in to comment