Does being anti-gay make someone a bad person?

  • 95 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for mrduckbears3
mrduckbears3

133

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 5

Poll Does being anti-gay make someone a bad person? (52 votes)

Yes 40%
No 62%

you'd be surprised at how many people say No but what do you think? obviously i think it does

 • 
Avatar image for Ring_of_fire
Ring_of_fire

15880

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 Ring_of_fire
Member since 2003 • 15880 Posts

Yes, it does.

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#52 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

@vfibsux said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

No. It makes them intolerant. But not necessarily "bad"...which is of course also subjective more or less.

You cannot make a blanket statement like this without defining "anti-gay". I do not believe homosexuality is natural or normal, but I certainly "tolerate" it. Who am I to tell others what to do with their life when it does not hurt anyone else? If that is being intolerant then you just redefined the word.

Intolerant does not mean you tell others what to do....I think it's you that is trying to redefine the word.

You are 100% wrong.

tol·er·ateˈtäləˌrāt/verb

  1. 1.allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53  Edited By LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180106 Posts

@vfibsux said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

@vfibsux said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

No. It makes them intolerant. But not necessarily "bad"...which is of course also subjective more or less.

You cannot make a blanket statement like this without defining "anti-gay". I do not believe homosexuality is natural or normal, but I certainly "tolerate" it. Who am I to tell others what to do with their life when it does not hurt anyone else? If that is being intolerant then you just redefined the word.

Intolerant does not mean you tell others what to do....I think it's you that is trying to redefine the word.

You are 100% wrong.

tol·er·ateˈtäləˌrāt/verb

  1. 1.allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.

Wrong.

Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs,

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#54 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

@AmazonTreeBoa said:

No it doesn't make you a bad person. Naturally gays and gay sympathisers will try to paint you as satan himself, but no it doesn't make you a bad person.

But Satan is pro-gay.

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55  Edited By dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts

MW says

1

: unable or unwilling to endure

2

a : unwilling to grant equal freedom of expression especially in religious matters

b : unwilling to grant or share social, political, or professional rights : bigoted

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#57 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

@vfibsux said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

@vfibsux said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

No. It makes them intolerant. But not necessarily "bad"...which is of course also subjective more or less.

You cannot make a blanket statement like this without defining "anti-gay". I do not believe homosexuality is natural or normal, but I certainly "tolerate" it. Who am I to tell others what to do with their life when it does not hurt anyone else? If that is being intolerant then you just redefined the word.

Intolerant does not mean you tell others what to do....I think it's you that is trying to redefine the word.

You are 100% wrong.

tol·er·ateˈtäləˌrāt/verb

  1. 1.allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.

Wrong.

Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs,

Let's play an inference game here.....

1. Read your definition of intolerant.

2. See the word tolerate in your definition.

3. Look at the definition of tolerate.

4. Slap yourself for proving me right.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#58 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts

I love dictionary-slinging arguments. They accomplish so much.

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#59  Edited By vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

@foxhound_fox said:

I love dictionary-slinging arguments. They accomplish so much.

Language is everything dude. If you want to call someone intolerant for their beliefs know what it fucking means first.

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts

Yeah words have meanings for a reason foxy

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180106 Posts

@vfibsux said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

Wrong.

Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs,

Let's play an inference game here.....

1. Read your definition of intolerant.

2. See the word tolerate in your definition.

3. Look at the definition of tolerate.

4. Slap yourself for proving me right.

@vfibsux said:

Language is everything dude. If you want to call someone intolerant for their beliefs know what it fucking means first.

LOL the irony.....considering your response here. Anyway....your usage is wrong above.

Avatar image for Nonstop-Madness
Nonstop-Madness

12861

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#62 Nonstop-Madness
Member since 2008 • 12861 Posts

No. It does not make someone a bad person.

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63  Edited By dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts

Wrong usage but not actually redefining, would you agree lj?

Avatar image for vfibsux
vfibsux

4497

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 52

User Lists: 0

#64 vfibsux
Member since 2003 • 4497 Posts

@LJS9502_basic said:

@vfibsux said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

Wrong.

Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs,

Let's play an inference game here.....

1. Read your definition of intolerant.

2. See the word tolerate in your definition.

3. Look at the definition of tolerate.

4. Slap yourself for proving me right.

@vfibsux said:

Language is everything dude. If you want to call someone intolerant for their beliefs know what it fucking means first.

LOL the irony.....considering your response here. Anyway....your usage is wrong above.

The definition of intolerant: Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs

The definition of tolerant: showing willingness to allow the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with.

The definition of tolerate: allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now how on Earth can you take the three definitions above and call someone who does not agree with homosexuality but allows it to exist unabated intolerant? I am done with this stupid ass argument, critical thinking dude....get some.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180106

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180106 Posts

@vfibsux said:

@LJS9502_basic said:

@vfibsux said:

Let's play an inference game here.....

1. Read your definition of intolerant.

2. See the word tolerate in your definition.

3. Look at the definition of tolerate.

4. Slap yourself for proving me right.

@vfibsux said:

Language is everything dude. If you want to call someone intolerant for their beliefs know what it fucking means first.

LOL the irony.....considering your response here. Anyway....your usage is wrong above.

The definition of intolerant: Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs

The definition of tolerant: showing willingness to allow the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with.

The definition of tolerate: allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Now how on Earth can you take the three definitions above and call someone who does not agree with homosexuality but allows it to exist unabated intolerant? I am done with this stupid ass argument, critical thinking dude....get some.

Sorry dude. Pointing out that someone is not defining something correctly is not intolerance. Likewise if I said 2 and 2 is five and you said it's four....that would not be intolerance. For someone that just told Fox words are important....you play fast and loose with them.

Avatar image for branketra
branketra

51726

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 9

#66 branketra
Member since 2006 • 51726 Posts

Really, it does not.

Avatar image for AmazonTreeBoa
AmazonTreeBoa

16745

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 AmazonTreeBoa
Member since 2011 • 16745 Posts

@foxhound_fox said:

@AmazonTreeBoa said:

No it doesn't make you a bad person. Naturally gays and gay sympathisers will try to paint you as satan himself, but no it doesn't make you a bad person.

But Satan is pro-gay.

Avatar image for dave123321
dave123321

35554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 dave123321
Member since 2003 • 35554 Posts

So do we agree that the part or one definition of intolerance can involve an active blockade.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

i can't tell if vfibsux is actually retarded or if it's an act

Avatar image for lightleggy
lightleggy

16090

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 65

User Lists: 0

#70 lightleggy
Member since 2008 • 16090 Posts

Unless they go out of their way to attack gays, I don't think it's something bad.

Avatar image for MystikFollower
MystikFollower

4061

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 MystikFollower
Member since 2009 • 4061 Posts

No. It does not. However, I'm speaking of conservative Christians who hold the traditional view of marriage and simply don't believe God blesses a marriage between the same sex. That view does not make you a bad person unless you want to call all orthodox Christians bad people.... However there are bad people who go out of their way to spout bigotry and hate towards people because they are gay, but I don't make the mistake of lumping them all together as bigots.

Avatar image for Ghost120x
Ghost120x

6060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 Ghost120x
Member since 2009 • 6060 Posts

No. Actions make you a bad person, not beliefs. If they treat others poorly because of their lifestyle then they would be a bad person.

Avatar image for Tigarian
Tigarian

215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#73  Edited By Tigarian
Member since 2005 • 215 Posts
@lostrib said:

@elkoldo said:

I believe homosexuality is a sickness, a disease.I hope that belief doesn't meke me a bad person.

I remember being banned from a certain site, for simply calling a homo dude "******".

I was just kidding around.

Go call a black person the N-word and then try and tell them you were just kidding around. See how that goes


Are you implying a black person would automatically react violently? Because if so that's racist.

Disagreeing with someones lifestyle doesn't make you a bad person. Acting hatefully towards someone does.

Avatar image for lostrib
lostrib

49999

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 lostrib
Member since 2009 • 49999 Posts

@Tigarian said:
@lostrib said:

@elkoldo said:

I believe homosexuality is a sickness, a disease.I hope that belief doesn't meke me a bad person.

I remember being banned from a certain site, for simply calling a homo dude "******".

I was just kidding around.

Go call a black person the N-word and then try and tell them you were just kidding around. See how that goes

Are you implying a black person would automatically react violently? Because if so that's racist.

Disagreeing with someones lifestyle doesn't make you a bad person. Acting hatefully towards someone does.

I didn't say anything remotely close to that.

Avatar image for Fightingfan
Fightingfan

38011

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Fightingfan
Member since 2010 • 38011 Posts

What does Anti-gay mean?

Do I care what others do? No.

Do I want my son to be gay? Of course not.

Avatar image for Nengo_Flow
Nengo_Flow

10644

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Nengo_Flow
Member since 2011 • 10644 Posts

@ReadingRainbow4 said:

Not at all.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

Yup. It's not treating someone as their own kingdom of ends, it's not virtuous to try to impose your own values on someone else, it makes homosexuals feel bad about themselves unnecessarily and sometimes attempt suicide, it doesn't respect individuals' right to make their own decisions about their own lives, it doesn't respect their ability to have their own personal relationship with god(s). Pretty much every ethical system that doesn't rely on an explicit dogma against homosexuality will say being homophobic makes you a bad person when critically applied to the issue.

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
Braun_Roid_Rage

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Braun_Roid_Rage
Member since 2013 • 790 Posts

Obviously no.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#79  Edited By GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

@Ghost120x said:

No. Actions make you a bad person, not beliefs. If they treat others poorly because of their lifestyle then they would be a bad person.

Somebody can definitely be bad person because of their beliefs (depending on what those beliefs are).

For instance, somebody who believes that [insert group] deserves to be tortured and killed would qualify as a bad person in my book. Or to use a less extreme example: someone that thinks that hurting people's feelings is enjoyable would also be a pretty bad person.

Avatar image for Tigarian
Tigarian

215

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 Tigarian
Member since 2005 • 215 Posts
@GreySeal9 said:

@Ghost120x said:

No. Actions make you a bad person, not beliefs. If they treat others poorly because of their lifestyle then they would be a bad person.

Somebody can definitely be bad person because of their beliefs (depending on what those beliefs are).


Namely if they disagree with yours amirite?

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#81 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

@Tigarian said:
@GreySeal9 said:

@Ghost120x said:

No. Actions make you a bad person, not beliefs. If they treat others poorly because of their lifestyle then they would be a bad person.

Somebody can definitely be bad person because of their beliefs (depending on what those beliefs are).

Namely if they disagree with yours amirite?

That's some stellar reading comprehension you have.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#82 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts
@lightleggy said:

Unless they go out of their way to attack gays, I don't think it's something bad.


I do think being anti-gay is definitely "bad" but it doesn't necessarily make one a bad person.

Avatar image for HoolaHoopMan
HoolaHoopMan

14724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 HoolaHoopMan
Member since 2009 • 14724 Posts

Its not a positive character trait that's for sure. I'll go out on a limb and say that anyone who votes to suppress marriage equality or supports an employer's ability to fire someone simply for their orientation is an asshole.

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
Braun_Roid_Rage

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Braun_Roid_Rage
Member since 2013 • 790 Posts

@Makhaidos said:

Not necessarily. If they were raised in Buttfuck, Arizona, where Jesus is the only philosopher recognized within fifty miles as having been real, then the person may just be ignorant.

Saying someone is ignorant for their religious beliefs is pretty ignorant, brah.

Avatar image for curono
curono

7722

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 21

User Lists: 0

#85  Edited By curono
Member since 2005 • 7722 Posts

One extremely bad quality does not make you a bad person.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#86  Edited By deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

Not necessarily, unless they act on those feelings and try to bully or otherwise negatively affect gay people. That includes being homophobic on a website such as this. Best to keep your negative, ignorant comments to yourself.

Naturally people who are bigoted or prejudiced won't think they are bad for having such feelings, but they've probably bee brought up that way.

Avatar image for Makhaidos
Makhaidos

2162

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Makhaidos
Member since 2013 • 2162 Posts

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Makhaidos said:

Not necessarily. If they were raised in Buttfuck, Arizona, where Jesus is the only philosopher recognized within fifty miles as having been real, then the person may just be ignorant.

Saying someone is ignorant for their religious beliefs is pretty ignorant, brah.

Their religious beliefs are pretty damn ignorant, brah. Take young earth creationism, for example.

Avatar image for deactivated-5b78379493e12
deactivated-5b78379493e12

15625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#88 deactivated-5b78379493e12
Member since 2005 • 15625 Posts

@elkoldo said:

I believe homosexuality is a sickness, a disease.I hope that belief doesn't meke me a bad person.

I remember being banned from a certain site, for simply calling a homo dude "******".

I was just kidding around.

Homosexuality is as much a disease as social conservatism is a disease.

Avatar image for Master_Live
Master_Live

20550

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 7

#89 Master_Live
Member since 2004 • 20550 Posts

But couldn't God be gay?

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#90 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

@Braun_Roid_Rage said:

@Makhaidos said:

Not necessarily. If they were raised in Buttfuck, Arizona, where Jesus is the only philosopher recognized within fifty miles as having been real, then the person may just be ignorant.

Saying someone is ignorant for their religious beliefs is pretty ignorant, brah.

So no religious belief can be ignorant? Brilliant logic there "brah."

And as for people saying one harmful belief does not make you a bad person, I disagree. Doing bad things perpetually makes you a bad person, at least in that regard. Not saying you can't be a good person in other respects, but at least in one certain respect it does make you a bad person. I would also say that holding prejudicial beliefs gives you an overall bad character. Again, not that someone who has a bad character can't do good things, but if you cultivate hate in yourself, even if just in relation to a single issue, it will color your character accordingly.

Avatar image for Braun_Roid_Rage
Braun_Roid_Rage

790

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91  Edited By Braun_Roid_Rage
Member since 2013 • 790 Posts

@theone86: Thanks brah, I already knew I was brilliant though.

It's good to see common sense win out on the poll so far.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92  Edited By coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

ignorance, stupidity, or malevolence

choose one

Avatar image for t1striker
t1striker

1549

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#93 t1striker
Member since 2003 • 1549 Posts

I don't think it necessarily makes you a bad person, but I wouldn't consider it a great trait to have. I don't hate gays in the least, but when I think about what they do I kinda want to puke. I say live and let live. Now if you go up to a gay guy, and talk a lot of crap, and/or physically hurt them in anyway that makes you a bad person, but if you believe that being gay is terrible, but you don't act out to try to hurt them I don't consider you a bad person.

As long as nobody is hurting someone, I really don't give a crap what someone thinks.

Avatar image for LordQuorthon
LordQuorthon

5803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 LordQuorthon
Member since 2008 • 5803 Posts

@foxhound_fox said:

To anyone who holds such a position:

Agreed. If you know you have a certain number of rights (let's call that X), actually wanting another person to have X - Y rights just because of their race, religion, or sexual orientation makes you a jerk.

Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#95 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts

@Master_Live said:

@whiskeystrike said:
@SolidSnake35 said:

I'm not anti-gay. I'm anti-pro-gay.

Do the anti and pro cancel each other out? So now you're just gay?

Actually, the anti is like a (-1) and the pro a (1) so when you multiply them you still get (-1).

No, I'm anti-pro-gay. Not anti-gay. I think the pro-gay side should shut up. Homophobia is no more serious than the other myriad of issues that plague society.