This topic is locked from further discussion.
No. It makes them intolerant. But not necessarily "bad"...which is of course also subjective more or less.
You cannot make a blanket statement like this without defining "anti-gay". I do not believe homosexuality is natural or normal, but I certainly "tolerate" it. Who am I to tell others what to do with their life when it does not hurt anyone else? If that is being intolerant then you just redefined the word.
Intolerant does not mean you tell others what to do....I think it's you that is trying to redefine the word.
You are 100% wrong.
tol·er·ateˈtäləˌrāt/verb
No. It makes them intolerant. But not necessarily "bad"...which is of course also subjective more or less.
You cannot make a blanket statement like this without defining "anti-gay". I do not believe homosexuality is natural or normal, but I certainly "tolerate" it. Who am I to tell others what to do with their life when it does not hurt anyone else? If that is being intolerant then you just redefined the word.
Intolerant does not mean you tell others what to do....I think it's you that is trying to redefine the word.
You are 100% wrong.
tol·er·ateˈtäləˌrāt/verb
Wrong.
Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs,
No it doesn't make you a bad person. Naturally gays and gay sympathisers will try to paint you as satan himself, but no it doesn't make you a bad person.
But Satan is pro-gay.
MW says
1
: unable or unwilling to endure
2
a : unwilling to grant equal freedom of expression especially in religious matters
b : unwilling to grant or share social, political, or professional rights : bigoted
No. It makes them intolerant. But not necessarily "bad"...which is of course also subjective more or less.
You cannot make a blanket statement like this without defining "anti-gay". I do not believe homosexuality is natural or normal, but I certainly "tolerate" it. Who am I to tell others what to do with their life when it does not hurt anyone else? If that is being intolerant then you just redefined the word.
Intolerant does not mean you tell others what to do....I think it's you that is trying to redefine the word.
You are 100% wrong.
tol·er·ateˈtäləˌrāt/verb
Wrong.
Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs,
Let's play an inference game here.....
1. Read your definition of intolerant.
2. See the word tolerate in your definition.
3. Look at the definition of tolerate.
4. Slap yourself for proving me right.
Wrong.
Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs,
Let's play an inference game here.....
1. Read your definition of intolerant.
2. See the word tolerate in your definition.
3. Look at the definition of tolerate.
4. Slap yourself for proving me right.
Language is everything dude. If you want to call someone intolerant for their beliefs know what it fucking means first.
LOL the irony.....considering your response here. Anyway....your usage is wrong above.
Wrong.
Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs,
Let's play an inference game here.....
1. Read your definition of intolerant.
2. See the word tolerate in your definition.
3. Look at the definition of tolerate.
4. Slap yourself for proving me right.
Language is everything dude. If you want to call someone intolerant for their beliefs know what it fucking means first.
LOL the irony.....considering your response here. Anyway....your usage is wrong above.
The definition of intolerant: Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs
The definition of tolerant: showing willingness to allow the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with.
The definition of tolerate: allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now how on Earth can you take the three definitions above and call someone who does not agree with homosexuality but allows it to exist unabated intolerant? I am done with this stupid ass argument, critical thinking dude....get some.
Let's play an inference game here.....
1. Read your definition of intolerant.
2. See the word tolerate in your definition.
3. Look at the definition of tolerate.
4. Slap yourself for proving me right.
Language is everything dude. If you want to call someone intolerant for their beliefs know what it fucking means first.
LOL the irony.....considering your response here. Anyway....your usage is wrong above.
The definition of intolerant: Not tolerant, especially: a. Unwilling to tolerate differences in opinions, practices, or beliefs
The definition of tolerant: showing willingness to allow the existence of opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with.
The definition of tolerate: allow the existence, occurrence, or practice of (something that one does not necessarily like or agree with) without interference.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now how on Earth can you take the three definitions above and call someone who does not agree with homosexuality but allows it to exist unabated intolerant? I am done with this stupid ass argument, critical thinking dude....get some.
Sorry dude. Pointing out that someone is not defining something correctly is not intolerance. Likewise if I said 2 and 2 is five and you said it's four....that would not be intolerance. For someone that just told Fox words are important....you play fast and loose with them.
No. It does not. However, I'm speaking of conservative Christians who hold the traditional view of marriage and simply don't believe God blesses a marriage between the same sex. That view does not make you a bad person unless you want to call all orthodox Christians bad people.... However there are bad people who go out of their way to spout bigotry and hate towards people because they are gay, but I don't make the mistake of lumping them all together as bigots.
I believe homosexuality is a sickness, a disease.I hope that belief doesn't meke me a bad person.
I remember being banned from a certain site, for simply calling a homo dude "******".
I was just kidding around.
Go call a black person the N-word and then try and tell them you were just kidding around. See how that goes
Are you implying a black person would automatically react violently? Because if so that's racist.
Disagreeing with someones lifestyle doesn't make you a bad person. Acting hatefully towards someone does.
I believe homosexuality is a sickness, a disease.I hope that belief doesn't meke me a bad person.
I remember being banned from a certain site, for simply calling a homo dude "******".
I was just kidding around.
Go call a black person the N-word and then try and tell them you were just kidding around. See how that goes
Are you implying a black person would automatically react violently? Because if so that's racist.
Disagreeing with someones lifestyle doesn't make you a bad person. Acting hatefully towards someone does.
I didn't say anything remotely close to that.
Yup. It's not treating someone as their own kingdom of ends, it's not virtuous to try to impose your own values on someone else, it makes homosexuals feel bad about themselves unnecessarily and sometimes attempt suicide, it doesn't respect individuals' right to make their own decisions about their own lives, it doesn't respect their ability to have their own personal relationship with god(s). Pretty much every ethical system that doesn't rely on an explicit dogma against homosexuality will say being homophobic makes you a bad person when critically applied to the issue.
No. Actions make you a bad person, not beliefs. If they treat others poorly because of their lifestyle then they would be a bad person.
Somebody can definitely be bad person because of their beliefs (depending on what those beliefs are).
For instance, somebody who believes that [insert group] deserves to be tortured and killed would qualify as a bad person in my book. Or to use a less extreme example: someone that thinks that hurting people's feelings is enjoyable would also be a pretty bad person.
No. Actions make you a bad person, not beliefs. If they treat others poorly because of their lifestyle then they would be a bad person.
Somebody can definitely be bad person because of their beliefs (depending on what those beliefs are).
Namely if they disagree with yours amirite?
No. Actions make you a bad person, not beliefs. If they treat others poorly because of their lifestyle then they would be a bad person.
Somebody can definitely be bad person because of their beliefs (depending on what those beliefs are).
Namely if they disagree with yours amirite?
That's some stellar reading comprehension you have.
Its not a positive character trait that's for sure. I'll go out on a limb and say that anyone who votes to suppress marriage equality or supports an employer's ability to fire someone simply for their orientation is an asshole.
Not necessarily. If they were raised in Buttfuck, Arizona, where Jesus is the only philosopher recognized within fifty miles as having been real, then the person may just be ignorant.
Saying someone is ignorant for their religious beliefs is pretty ignorant, brah.
Not necessarily, unless they act on those feelings and try to bully or otherwise negatively affect gay people. That includes being homophobic on a website such as this. Best to keep your negative, ignorant comments to yourself.
Naturally people who are bigoted or prejudiced won't think they are bad for having such feelings, but they've probably bee brought up that way.
Not necessarily. If they were raised in Buttfuck, Arizona, where Jesus is the only philosopher recognized within fifty miles as having been real, then the person may just be ignorant.
Saying someone is ignorant for their religious beliefs is pretty ignorant, brah.
Their religious beliefs are pretty damn ignorant, brah. Take young earth creationism, for example.
I believe homosexuality is a sickness, a disease.I hope that belief doesn't meke me a bad person.
I remember being banned from a certain site, for simply calling a homo dude "******".
I was just kidding around.
Homosexuality is as much a disease as social conservatism is a disease.
Not necessarily. If they were raised in Buttfuck, Arizona, where Jesus is the only philosopher recognized within fifty miles as having been real, then the person may just be ignorant.
Saying someone is ignorant for their religious beliefs is pretty ignorant, brah.
So no religious belief can be ignorant? Brilliant logic there "brah."
And as for people saying one harmful belief does not make you a bad person, I disagree. Doing bad things perpetually makes you a bad person, at least in that regard. Not saying you can't be a good person in other respects, but at least in one certain respect it does make you a bad person. I would also say that holding prejudicial beliefs gives you an overall bad character. Again, not that someone who has a bad character can't do good things, but if you cultivate hate in yourself, even if just in relation to a single issue, it will color your character accordingly.
@theone86: Thanks brah, I already knew I was brilliant though.
It's good to see common sense win out on the poll so far.
I don't think it necessarily makes you a bad person, but I wouldn't consider it a great trait to have. I don't hate gays in the least, but when I think about what they do I kinda want to puke. I say live and let live. Now if you go up to a gay guy, and talk a lot of crap, and/or physically hurt them in anyway that makes you a bad person, but if you believe that being gay is terrible, but you don't act out to try to hurt them I don't consider you a bad person.
As long as nobody is hurting someone, I really don't give a crap what someone thinks.
Agreed. If you know you have a certain number of rights (let's call that X), actually wanting another person to have X - Y rights just because of their race, religion, or sexual orientation makes you a jerk.
I'm not anti-gay. I'm anti-pro-gay.
Do the anti and pro cancel each other out? So now you're just gay?
Actually, the anti is like a (-1) and the pro a (1) so when you multiply them you still get (-1).
No, I'm anti-pro-gay. Not anti-gay. I think the pro-gay side should shut up. Homophobia is no more serious than the other myriad of issues that plague society.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment