[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]
[QUOTE="MannyDelgado"]The issue is not per se that you are disagreeing with me; the issue is that you are disagreeing with meusing purely verbal, nonempirical reasoning against rigorous scientific studies, which is a pretty arrogant and stupid thing to do.
MannyDelgado
I just provided you with a link in which its not just drought, its a drought that is reaching historical levels.http://www.climatecentral.org/news/ongoing-coverage-of-historic-drought-in-us/ as stated here.. And yet again your not helping you stand when all your doing is flinging insults at me when I in no way meant to offend you.. Yet again, SETTLE DOWN.
The fact that you consider that compelling evidence for your claims about crop yields is sufficient reason for me not to waste any more of my time on you. The figure is TS.7 in the IPCC AR4 report, by the way, if you want to look it up. I only have a paper copy here so I can't post it.What your speaking of is recording based upon 2007 studies, not longterm.. And if we are on the same page it specifically has these crops suffering immensely for the most part based around lack of percipitation, as shown win the lighter collored dots in graph B and C.... That is the only thing argued, that temperature may indeed be postiive if thats the only thing that changes.. But it isn't, the climate change is leading to radical diferences weather, namely in rainfall.. This is of course that I am looking at the correct document from the IPCC.. And of course you can consider A RECORD drought as a BIG hit in crop yields and will most definitely skew the data.. This isn't just any average drought this is being compared to the DUSTBOWL of the 1930s.. That is the point I am trying to argue that your oversimplifying it because even a few degrees can lead to wildly weather patterns and we are seeing this possibly now if we are to accept this drought is a symptom.. So agree to disagree..
Log in to comment