Dog chokes baby to death for his birthday

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"] Read the article dumbass, it says the dog was called onion. and it says it on the very end, there was literally no reason to say the dog name, specially at the end of the article when everything had already been said, if the name would have been legit, they would have mentioned earlier in the article when they gave a detailed description of the dog, even his age. its a fake.lightleggy

You're a f*cking moron. Really, you are.

I never claimed it was real slapnut. If you recall (doubtful, as you've probably not even read my posts), I stated that it being the Daily Mail makes its credibilty suspect. But you, however, are an moron for presuming that the dog's name, "Onion" (not an uncommon word as it turns out), is evidence of a link to The Onion.

And yet when babies kill small cats or dogs they don't just "put the baby down." If somethings wrong 99% of the time it's a persons fault.

[QUOTE="tocool340"]

*Sigh* And the dog will most likely get put down for something he was never trained for. Least they could do is give it to the pound. No reason to give it the death penalty for its owners carelessness....

lightleggy

[QUOTE="lightleggy"][QUOTE="worlock77"]

You're a f*cking moron. Really, you are.

worlock77

I never claimed it was real slapnut. If you recall (doubtful, as you've probably not even read my posts), I stated that it being the Daily Mail makes its credibilty suspect. But you, however, are an moron for presuming that the dog's name, "Onion" (not an uncommon word as it turns out), is evidence of a link to The Onion.

[QUOTE="worlock77"]

[QUOTE="lightleggy"] Ohhhh your argument was so good, I loved that part when you totally didn't addressed what I said and just proceeded to call me an idiot. First of all it's dailymail, not the most credible source out there pal, secondly the sentence "the dog was named onion" popping out at the end of the article for no apparent reason, and you still believe its real? You are the idiot sir, not me. you are just butthurt that you've lost and now you pull the "im just gonna call you an idiot because I really have nothing else to do, I was crushed by what you said"lightleggy

I never claimed it was real slapnut. If you recall (doubtful, as you've probably not even read my posts), I stated that it being the Daily Mail makes its credibilty suspect. But you, however, are an moron for presuming that the dog's name, "Onion" (not an uncommon word as it turns out), is evidence of a link to The Onion.

Ok Bronie, please point to The Onion article that was the source of this one.

The Daily Mail isn't any less 'authentic' than any other newspaper. Perhaps it has right wing spin and you guys don't like that; the Guardian is horribly left. They're both abhorrent for the same reason that neither have a middle ground. Calling them out because you don't like them, which is what loopy-left liberals like to do, isn't exactly a valid reason to question its authenticity. Particularly when they're dealing with a dead baby...lacking in authenticity, really?!

But I digress, terrible story; clearly not fake, why is this even being discussed?

The Daily Mail isn't any less 'authentic' than any other newspaper. Perhaps it has right wing spin and you guys don't like that; the Guardian is horribly left. They're both abhorrent for the same reason that neither have a middle ground. Calling them out because you don't like them, which is what loopy-left liberals like to do, isn't exactly a valid reason to question its authenticity. Particularly when they're dealing with a dead baby...lacking in authenticity, really?!

But I digress, terrible story; clearly not fake, why is this even being discussed?

DarthJohnova

Well I don't know about the Guardian, but the Daily Mail has lost several libel suits for making sh*t up.

[QUOTE="DarthJohnova"]

The Daily Mail isn't any less 'authentic' than any other newspaper. Perhaps it has right wing spin and you guys don't like that; the Guardian is horribly left. They're both abhorrent for the same reason that neither have a middle ground. Calling them out because you don't like them, which is what loopy-left liberals like to do, isn't exactly a valid reason to question its authenticity. Particularly when they're dealing with a dead baby...lacking in authenticity, really?!

But I digress, terrible story; clearly not fake, why is this even being discussed?

worlock77

Well I don't know about the Guardian, but the Daily Mail has lost several libel suits for making sh*t up.