Economy Adds 216,000 Jobs in March, Unemployment Drops to 8.8%

  • 126 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Yeah, it's politics, but it's kind of dissapointing (though expected) to see regular people constantly playing politics. They don't really have any reason to. Atleast politicians hav a personal interest in playing politics.

Wasdie

Overall, politicians in general have done an AMAZING job over the decades of convincing people that THEIR SIDE is the only one comprised of the good guys. I find people become loyal to 'their side' in the same way that a die-hard sports fan is loyal to their team. Unfortunately, with politics, the winning and losing of games translates into real life issues that affect people's lives directly.

Well if I didn't convince you that my way is better, why the hell would you vote for me? This works for both sides. The right and the left have completely different ideas about how to approach the situation and they have to do the best they can to convince you their method is the best.

I can't disagree with that. The point I was trying to make is that I get the sense that the majority of people just AUTOMATICALLY base their opinion on an issue based on what 'their side' says, rather than hearing both sides and then deciding for themselves. Even if people did this, over time they would probably see that they are more likely to agree with one side or the other, but not 100% of the time, as seems to be the case now.

(I'm not sure if that came out just right).

Avatar image for YellowOneKinobi
YellowOneKinobi

4128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 YellowOneKinobi
Member since 2011 • 4128 Posts

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Yeah, it's politics, but it's kind of dissapointing (though expected) to see regular people constantly playing politics. They don't really have any reason to. Atleast politicians hav a personal interest in playing politics.

GreySeal9

Overall, politicians in general have done an AMAZING job over the decades of convincing people that THEIR SIDE is the only one comprised of the good guys. I find people become loyal to 'their side' in the same way that a die-hard sports fan is loyal to their team. Unfortunately, with politics, the winning and losing of games translates into real life issues that affect people's lives directly.

And they've mostly done this through igniting culture wars instead of basing it on policy issues.

Yes, sir. Divide and conquer!

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#53 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]Overall, politicians in general have done an AMAZING job over the decades of convincing people that THEIR SIDE is the only one comprised of the good guys. I find people become loyal to 'their side' in the same way that a die-hard sports fan is loyal to their team. Unfortunately, with politics, the winning and losing of games translates into real life issues that affect people's lives directly.

YellowOneKinobi

Well if I didn't convince you that my way is better, why the hell would you vote for me? This works for both sides. The right and the left have completely different ideas about how to approach the situation and they have to do the best they can to convince you their method is the best.

I can't disagree with that. The point I was trying to make is that I get the sense that the majority of people just AUTOMATICALLY base their opinion on an issue based on what 'their side' says, rather than hearing both sides and then deciding for themselves. Even if people did this, over time they would probably see that they are more likely to agree with one side or the other, but not 100% of the time, as seems to be the case now.

(I'm not sure if that came out just right).

The general popluation has always been very polarized.

America really has it difficult as there is no real one culture that dominates the majority of the population. This really polarizes things over values, culture, and morals.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#54 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

[QUOTE="YellowOneKinobi"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Yeah, it's politics, but it's kind of dissapointing (though expected) to see regular people constantly playing politics. They don't really have any reason to. Atleast politicians hav a personal interest in playing politics.

Wasdie

Overall, politicians in general have done an AMAZING job over the decades of convincing people that THEIR SIDE is the only one comprised of the good guys. I find people become loyal to 'their side' in the same way that a die-hard sports fan is loyal to their team. Unfortunately, with politics, the winning and losing of games translates into real life issues that affect people's lives directly.

Well if I didn't convince you that my way is better, why the hell would you vote for me? This works for both sides. The right and the left have completely different ideas about how to approach the situation and they have to do the best they can to convince you their method is the best.

But as I said in my last post, they don't really do much in the way of explaining why their way is better via explaining policy. They instead ignite culture wars and get some people to despise the other side so much that they always vote the lesser of two evils without holding anybody accountable.

That being said, I'm not in any way against voting the lesser of two evils in general as I find alternative parties to be seriously one-dimensional.

Avatar image for superfluidity
superfluidity

2163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 superfluidity
Member since 2010 • 2163 Posts

As long as it's the economy adding jobs, and not states or federal governments creating the jobs through public works, it's a good thing.

Keeping taxes low on businesses is really the only thing a government can do that's not to extreme during a recession. Some could also argue for increased tariffs and quotas on trade to promote nation wide businesses.

One must wonder, which is better for the country in the short term? Slightly higher prices as a result of increased demand of US made products, or lower prices at the possible cost of jobs.

Just things to ponder about.

Also with economics there is no such thing as a solution, only a compromise. An economic stimulus bill will have major compromises later. The government can't solve anything. The best thing they can do is tip the favor of the economy one way or another with taxes, quotas, and tariffs. They can't just pass a job stimulus bill and it will work. More often than not it doesn't work.

A lot of people refuse to believe that basic supply and demand economics do not work. They want to believe that there is a pure solution to the problem. That belief is exactly why economic politics are so messy.

Wasdie

Quantitative easing is considered largely responsible for the economic growth and job creation of the past year, read any business news site and you will find this to be the view held by most investors, business people and economists. The fear is that once that stops, so will the recent trend of improvement.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="superfluidity"]

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

As long as it's the economy adding jobs, and not states or federal governments creating the jobs through public works, it's a good thing.

Keeping taxes low on businesses is really the only thing a government can do that's not to extreme during a recession. Some could also argue for increased tariffs and quotas on trade to promote nation wide businesses.

One must wonder, which is better for the country in the short term? Slightly higher prices as a result of increased demand of US made products, or lower prices at the possible cost of jobs.

Just things to ponder about.

Also with economics there is no such thing as a solution, only a compromise. An economic stimulus bill will have major compromises later. The government can't solve anything. The best thing they can do is tip the favor of the economy one way or another with taxes, quotas, and tariffs. They can't just pass a job stimulus bill and it will work. More often than not it doesn't work.

A lot of people refuse to believe that basic supply and demand economics do not work. They want to believe that there is a pure solution to the problem. That belief is exactly why economic politics are so messy.

Quantitative easing is considered largely responsible for the economic growth and job creation of the past year, read any business news site and you will find this to be the view held by most investors, business people and economists. The fear is that once that stops, so will the recent trend of improvement.

i do frequent business and economic sites and have not found that to be the case at all.
Avatar image for majoras_wrath
majoras_wrath

6062

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 majoras_wrath
Member since 2005 • 6062 Posts
The first couple posts made me :lol: Unemployment is going down, BUT ITS OBVIOUSLY NOT OBAMA. Because, obviously, Obama only causes people to lose their jobs. Even I'm not his biggest fan, but christ, give the partisian spin a rest.
Avatar image for superfluidity
superfluidity

2163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 superfluidity
Member since 2010 • 2163 Posts

i do frequent business and economic sites and have not found that to be the case at all.surrealnumber5

In just the past couple of days I've read these:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/42362299

http://www.businessinsider.com/7-problems-that-could-derail-the-global-recovery-2011-3

It's an almost daily topic.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="superfluidity"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

i do frequent business and economic sites and have not found that to be the case at all.

In just the past couple of days I've read these:

http://www.cnbc.com/id/42362299

http://www.businessinsider.com/7-problems-that-could-derail-the-global-recovery-2011-3

It's an almost daily topic.

the only time i view anything cnbc is when schiff is there to lay down the law.
Avatar image for superfluidity
superfluidity

2163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 superfluidity
Member since 2010 • 2163 Posts

the only time i view anything cnbc is when schiff is there to lay down the law. surrealnumber5

It's common knowledge that the government has injected hundreds of billions of dollars into the economy recently, creating artificial growth in an effort to lessen the impact of the recession. I'm not saying whether or not I agree with the policy or anything, but that is absolutely the biggest thing on most investors' radar right now. When that stops or changes it will have a major impact on the economy.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#61 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

Good. I contributed to that 216k so everyone lay some praise on me.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] the only time i view anything cnbc is when schiff is there to lay down the law. superfluidity

It's common knowledge that the government has injected hundreds of billions of dollars into the economy recently, creating artificial growth in an effort to lessen the impact of the recession. I'm not saying whether or not I agree with the policy or anything, but that is absolutely the biggest thing on most investors' radar right now. When that stops or changes it will have a major impact on the economy.

there are many, many economists that see both QE1 and QE2 as devistating for nemerous reasons. the biggest being inflation that happens when ever the money supply is increased, and some have attributed the fall of egypt to the falling dollar and their relative increase in food prices. it is harder to find investers that were against the interjection of cash into the market but it is all to easy to find economists that are/were against it.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#63 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

Good. I contributed to that 216k so everyone lay some praise on me.

sonicare
congrats, work is good for you. sadly i just read a study that shows most young kids wont have a single job till post college. it showed employment rates for kids 16-21 has gone from 36% to 15% in the last six years. i fear for those that follow me.
Avatar image for superfluidity
superfluidity

2163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 superfluidity
Member since 2010 • 2163 Posts

there are many, many economists that see both QE1 and QE2 as devistating for nemerous reasons. the biggest being inflation that happens when ever the money supply is increased, and some have attributed the fall of egypt to the falling dollar and their relative increase in food prices. it is harder to find investers that were against the interjection of cash into the market but it is all to easy to find economists that are/were against it.

surrealnumber5

It has major inflationary consequences but the goal is short-term stability to ride out the storm. I'm not saying I'm for or against it, I'm not that knowledgeable about it, I just know that it's held responsible for current economic trends.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#65 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

there are many, many economists that see both QE1 and QE2 as devistating for nemerous reasons. the biggest being inflation that happens when ever the money supply is increased, and some have attributed the fall of egypt to the falling dollar and their relative increase in food prices. it is harder to find investers that were against the interjection of cash into the market but it is all to easy to find economists that are/were against it.

superfluidity

It has major inflationary consequences but the goal is short-term stability to ride out the storm. I'm not saying I'm for or against it, I'm not that knowledgeable about it, I just know that it's held responsible for current economic trends.

granted i mostly read into the economic theories i ascribe to, and according to that school injecting money only keeps the market from reallocating resources to where they should be, the bust is just normalizing after an artificial boom, if you prop up the but you only make things worse. i do keep up with other schools but i am not too keen on some of their figure heads such as Paul Krugman and his constant violation of the broken window fallacy.

but yes what we have today for better or worse is solely because of the actions yesterday.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#66 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

When unemployment rises, it's because of Obama's bad policies. When it goes down, it is despite Obama's policies. But, that's what I expected when I saw the thread title, then who had created the thread.Engrish_Major

Did I not say it was good news? I believe I did.

Then I gave my opinion on what has been hindering job growth. The majority of the bashing isn't coming from me. It's not like the criticism is unwarranted.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

My city jobsstill not hiring IT for almost 2 years now. And I checked it almost everyday. It is sad those said numbers doesn't include me.

magicalclick
move to maryland
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="magicalclick"]

My city jobsstill not hiring IT for almost 2 years now. And I checked it almost everyday. It is sad those said numbers doesn't include me.

move to maryland

Which, ironically, is mostly recession-proof because of the presence of the federal government and the associated contractors in the greater DC area.
Avatar image for Necrifer
Necrifer

10629

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Necrifer
Member since 2010 • 10629 Posts

That would be cruel if this is a joke.

Anyway, good to see.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#72 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="magicalclick"]

My city jobsstill not hiring IT for almost 2 years now. And I checked it almost everyday. It is sad those said numbers doesn't include me.

Engrish_Major

move to maryland

Which, ironically, is mostly recession-proof because of the presence of the federal government and the associated contractors in the greater DC area.

i take pride in saying my company does not have a single account with mr fed, and that the owner is another libertarian accountant

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

Yes, and how many workers are currently discouraged? Discouraged workers don't count as being part of the workforce. Or how many workers are only able to find part-time work, when they'd rather be working full-time?

Answer: Lots.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

i take pride in saying my company does not have a single account with mr fed, and that the owner is another libertarian accountant

surrealnumber5
Sure, but your suggestion about Maryland was about the strong market there, correct? Unless I read your comment's purpose wrong if it was to invite him to your company. A huge part of the reason that Maryland has good employment numbers (compared to the rest of the nation) is because of the federal government.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

The partisanship concerning reports about numbers is terrible. Look at MSNBC's front page right now:

The first link below the headline... more partisanship :roll:

Things can't just be news anymore. There always has to be spin, doesn't there...

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

i take pride in saying my company does not have a single account with mr fed, and that the owner is another libertarian accountant

Sure, but your suggestion about Maryland was about the strong market there, correct? Unless I read your comment's purpose wrong if it was to invite him to your company. A huge part of the reason that Maryland has good employment numbers (compared to the rest of the nation) is because of the federal government.

there are lots of IT jobs here on both sides of the coin.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]

The partisanship concerning reports about numbers is terrible. Look at MSNBC's front page right now:

The first link below the headline... more partisanship :roll:

Things can't just be news anymore. There always has to be spin, doesn't there...

nah msnbc is not bias or maybe a little but nothing compared to fox.... yea it is sick, and it is one of the reasons why, news tends to make people dumber. the only thing worse than the "news" are the pundits
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
there are lots of IT jobs here on both sides of the coin. surrealnumber5
Of course there are. But there's no debate that the government is a major contributor to the job stability in the region.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]

i take pride in saying my company does not have a single account with mr fed, and that the owner is another libertarian accountant

Engrish_Major
Sure, but your suggestion about Maryland was about the strong market there, correct? Unless I read your comment's purpose wrong if it was to invite him to your company. A huge part of the reason that Maryland has good employment numbers (compared to the rest of the nation) is because of the federal government.

A strong market for jobs... because the Federal Government has such a huge influence in the surrounding area. It's kind of a bad thing that that area is "recession-proof" because of the government. That means that the government doesn't tighten it's belt like the rest of the country knows it has to during a recession.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#80 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]there are lots of IT jobs here on both sides of the coin. Engrish_Major
Of course there are. But there's no debate that the government is a major contributor to the job stability in the region.

and i am not going to debate that, it does not mean i agree with its size or overall effect on the countries economy.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
nah msnbc is not bias or maybe a little but nothing compared to fox.... yea it is sick, and it is one of the reasons why, news tends to make people dumber. the only thing worse than the "news" are the punditssurrealnumber5
One of the things I hate most is the mixture with commentary into the news. It's the same now on all mediums (though slightly less so in print, depending on the source). But the internet sources and TV sources are the worst. You can't get news without some spin or commentary mixed in. Journalistic ethics used to dictate that commentary needed to be a separate entity from the reporting, as commentary immediately puts a bias in your reportage. But every other time I read an article on MSNBC (others as well, I'm just singling them out here), I end up rolling my eyes as I'm reading because they have to put their opinion or witty comments within the body of the news.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]

The partisanship concerning reports about numbers is terrible. Look at MSNBC's front page right now:

The first link below the headline... more partisanship :roll:

Things can't just be news anymore. There always has to be spin, doesn't there...

surrealnumber5

nah msnbc is not bias or maybe a little but nothing compared to fox.... yea it is sick, and it is one of the reasons why, news tends to make people dumber. the only thing worse than the "news" are the pundits

MSNBC is incredibly biased... it's not much different from Fox. The only difference is that Fox News is the most-watched news network, while MSNBC is in dead last. So people pay more attention to Fox New's gaffs. Also, younger people (like those likely to be on youtube and internet forums) are more likely to be liberal. Therefore, they are more likely to bash Fox News than other news networks. So you hear about Fox's bias a lot more.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
A strong market for jobs... because the Federal Government has such a huge influence in the surrounding area. It's kind of a bad thing that that area is "recession-proof" because of the government. That means that the government doesn't tighten it's belt like the rest of the country knows it has to during a recession. BMD004
It has though. I know that the agency I work for has received plenty of hardship in the last couple of years. There are many contracts that would have gone to private contractors in the past that are not nowadays, and have to be done by government employees (which effectively doubles their job duties). And, at the same time, none of them are getting raises anytime within the next couple of years. They most certainly are tightening their belts. I see it first-hand.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#84 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"]nah msnbc is not bias or maybe a little but nothing compared to fox.... yea it is sick, and it is one of the reasons why, news tends to make people dumber. the only thing worse than the "news" are the punditsEngrish_Major
One of the things I hate most is the mixture with commentary into the news. It's the same now on all mediums (though slightly less so in print, depending on the source). But the internet sources and TV sources are the worst. You can't get news without some spin or commentary mixed in. Journalistic ethics used to dictate that commentary needed to be a separate entity from the reporting, as commentary immediately puts a bias in your reportage. But every other time I read an article on MSNBC (others as well, I'm just singling them out here), I end up rolling my eyes as I'm reading because they have to put their opinion or witty comments within the body of the news.

100% agreed, its why i mostly try to find the source material these days, it may take some time but at least you get the raw info. like a week or so here someone was saying ronpaul voted to subsidize oil companies, and i asked the person for a link, it went to liberalwin.com or something. after some digging i found the actual bill and it turns out the vote was for a tax cut. tax cuts and subsidies are not the same thing but one was spun into the other, or revenues and expense. the right does more social fear mongering than spin. if we let this happen than this and next thing you know we will all be having sex with dogs and eating babies, we cant let gay couples abort.

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts
[QUOTE="BMD004"]A strong market for jobs... because the Federal Government has such a huge influence in the surrounding area. It's kind of a bad thing that that area is "recession-proof" because of the government. That means that the government doesn't tighten it's belt like the rest of the country knows it has to during a recession. Engrish_Major
It has though. I know that the agency I work for has received plenty of hardship in the last couple of years. There are many contracts that would have gone to private contractors in the past that are not nowadays, and have to be done by government employees (which effectively doubles their job duties). And, at the same time, none of them are getting raises anytime within the next couple of years. They most certainly are tightening their belts. I see it first-hand.

If they are tightening their belts, then how is it recession-proof?
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#86 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"]

The partisanship concerning reports about numbers is terrible. Look at MSNBC's front page right now:

The first link below the headline... more partisanship :roll:

Things can't just be news anymore. There always has to be spin, doesn't there...

BMD004

nah msnbc is not bias or maybe a little but nothing compared to fox.... yea it is sick, and it is one of the reasons why, news tends to make people dumber. the only thing worse than the "news" are the pundits

MSNBC is incredibly biased... it's not much different from Fox. The only difference is that Fox News is the most-watched news network, while MSNBC is in dead last. So people pay more attention to Fox New's gaffs. Also, younger people (like those likely to be on youtube and internet forums) are more likely to be liberal. Therefore, they are more likely to bash Fox News than other news networks. So you hear about Fox's bias a lot more.

expect 30-80% of every one of my posts to be satirical

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts

SOURCE

Well this is good news. I hope the administrations doesn't screw this up with anymore bad policy.

airshocker

Ah yes the rule of thumb for this year. Obama is not responsible for anything good that happens, but is accountable for everything bad that happens.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#88 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

SOURCE

Well this is good news. I hope the administrations doesn't screw this up with anymore bad policy.

sSubZerOo

Ah yes the rule of thumb for this year. Obama is not responsible for anything good that happens, but is accountable for everything bad that happens.

Isn't that the rule of thumb for every single president ever?

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="surrealnumber5"] nah msnbc is not bias or maybe a little but nothing compared to fox.... yea it is sick, and it is one of the reasons why, news tends to make people dumber. the only thing worse than the "news" are the punditssurrealnumber5

MSNBC is incredibly biased... it's not much different from Fox. The only difference is that Fox News is the most-watched news network, while MSNBC is in dead last. So people pay more attention to Fox New's gaffs. Also, younger people (like those likely to be on youtube and internet forums) are more likely to be liberal. Therefore, they are more likely to bash Fox News than other news networks. So you hear about Fox's bias a lot more.

expect 30-80% of every one of my posts to be satirical

I was confused at your opinion... now it all makes sense lol.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
If they are tightening their belts, then how is it recession-proof?BMD004
The term is used in support of the buffer that government employment and the associated contractors have because of the presence of the largest employer in the country. Note that unemployment did increase here along with the rest of the country - just not as much. Note that the unemployment rate in the District itself was double-digits for a while. And I just know my personal experience (so take that with a grain of salt). I've been at my current job for 5 years, and I know that there are many things we don't do today that we would have a few years ago, such as purchasing certain equipment, the amount (or lack of) raises, what contracts get approved, and so-on. It's changed quite a bit. So while less money may be spent today than a similar day in 2006, it's still being spent. So, at least the feds are supporting a good job market in one way or another.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#91 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

We must be on OT. A thread about actual good news turned quickly into a generic "let's bash Obama" thread.Engrish_Major

Actually the majority here defend him. So I don't know what you are talking about.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"] We must be on OT. A thread about actual good news turned quickly into a generic "let's bash Obama" thread.Espada12

Actually the majority here defend him. So I don't know what you are talking about.

Maybe read the posts that I quoted in that very post, and you'll know exactly what I'm talking about.
Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#93 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

The partisanship concerning reports about numbers is terrible. Look at MSNBC's front page right now:

The first link below the headline... more partisanship :roll:

Things can't just be news anymore. There always has to be spin, doesn't there...

Engrish_Major

"Waits for theokoth to run in defending this while damning fox news and republicans", honestly though I'm not surprised by this headline and hopefully there are reasons to make alot more of them.

Avatar image for Espada12
Espada12

23247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#94 Espada12
Member since 2008 • 23247 Posts

[QUOTE="Espada12"]

[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"] We must be on OT. A thread about actual good news turned quickly into a generic "let's bash Obama" thread.Engrish_Major

Actually the majority here defend him. So I don't know what you are talking about.

Maybe read the posts that I quoted in that very post, and you'll know exactly what I'm talking about.

I did, the part I'm addressing is the "We must be on OT" part. It doesn't take a genius to see where most people's political leanings are here.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#96 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

I don't see unemployment at that level.Hemmaroids

What you see is not relevant since you're only one person and can hardly account for the entire nation.

Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#97 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
I don't see unemployment at that level.Hemmaroids
its u3 unemployment, it blocks out a lot of the unemployed
Avatar image for jshaas
jshaas

2411

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#98 jshaas
Member since 2003 • 2411 Posts

[QUOTE="jshaas"][QUOTE="BrianB0422"]Go Team Obama!airshocker

Like it was because of them that these jobs opened up. This is a great sign though. I hope and pray that we see the same at the end of this month, and every month through the end of the year.

We're going to need years of this kind of activity for our economy to get back to full-strength.

We probably could have had these results a year earlier if the President didn't d*** around with the travesty of healthcare "reform".

I agree, but if we see this continue through the end of the year we can actually say we're coming out of this recession. Blows my mind that some "experts" think we're out of it already!
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

Good news.

*inserts partisan rant*

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38930

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#100 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38930 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

[QUOTE="jshaas"] Like it was because of them that these jobs opened up. This is a great sign though. I hope and pray that we see the same at the end of this month, and every month through the end of the year.jshaas

We're going to need years of this kind of activity for our economy to get back to full-strength.

We probably could have had these results a year earlier if the President didn't d*** around with the travesty of healthcare "reform".

I agree, but if we see this continue through the end of the year we can actually say we're coming out of this recession. Blows my mind that some "experts" think we're out of it already!

by the definition of recession, we've been out of it for many months now. putting the people's role in quotes does not take away their expert status. :P