Ever seen what a Gigabyte looked like 20 years ago?

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for LikeHaterade
LikeHaterade

10645

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 LikeHaterade
Member since 2007 • 10645 Posts

http://www.custompc.co.uk/blogs/markcasey/files/2007/10/1gigvs1gig.jpg

Wow, we've come a long way. What's next??

Avatar image for KGB32
KGB32

4279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#2 KGB32
Member since 2007 • 4279 Posts
i think a good next step is to have a huge hard drive with wireless capability (like miles away and it still works) and you can have this device that you can use as a MP3 player, movie player, web browser, and you synch it with the hard drive miles away from it. idk.....
Avatar image for Patatopan
Patatopan

1890

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#4 Patatopan
Member since 2008 • 1890 Posts
I'm sure the times were consistent though, you wouldn't find a lot of stuff that would even be a full megabyte. Heck, i remember orgean trail's required at least 1 MB of RAM.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#5 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Next we need files that don't consume space. o.O
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

Man, dat was a shock. Imagine me carryin 120 of those things. The next thing u know USB will have 4 terabytes.999realthings

lol at your sig i saw that post last night

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#7 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38938 Posts

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

Avatar image for smg7618
smg7618

62

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#8 smg7618
Member since 2006 • 62 Posts
the sad thing is that isn't even the smallest card. my phone has a 1 gig micro sd card in it.
Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

comp_atkins

They probably didn't have a solid state GB then.

Avatar image for stevenk4k5
stevenk4k5

5608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 stevenk4k5
Member since 2005 • 5608 Posts
Goodness gracious, it looks like a car engine. :lol:
Avatar image for stevenk4k5
stevenk4k5

5608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#11 stevenk4k5
Member since 2005 • 5608 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

Engrish_Major

They probably didn't have a solid state GB then.

He meant comparing a present-day hard drive to that ancient, dinosaur era hard drive.

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts

i think a good next step is to have a huge hard drive with wireless capability (like miles away and it still works) and you can have this device that you can use as a MP3 player, movie player, web browser, and you synch it with the hard drive miles away from it. idk.....KGB32

best would be one like that conne ted to the internet like a personal file server so you could connect to it anywhere in the world aslong as you had an internet connection

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

Engrish_Major

They probably didn't have a solid state GB then.

solid state flash rewriteable memory was invented in 1983 so they could have had it if they wanted too the Intel 2816 was the first electronically erasable one but i can't find how much data the chip held though with it's predesesor the max they reached were millions of bits

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

markop2003

They probably didn't have a solid state GB then.

solid state flash rewriteable memory was invented in 1983 so they could have had it if they wanted too the Intel 2816 was the first electronically erasable one but i can't find how much data the chip held though with it's predesesor the max they reached were millions of bits

They could have, theoretically, but it probably was prohibitively expensive. That's why we don't have solid-state hard drives in our computers now.

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

stevenk4k5

They probably didn't have a solid state GB then.

He meant comparing a present-day hard drive to that ancient, dinosaur era hard drive.

I see. Makes sense.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#16 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
Woah, thats huge!
Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#17 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

Engrish_Major

They probably didn't have a solid state GB then.

solid state flash rewriteable memory was invented in 1983 so they could have had it if they wanted too the Intel 2816 was the first electronically erasable one but i can't find how much data the chip held though with it's predesesor the max they reached were millions of bits

They could have, theoretically, but it probably was prohibitively expensive. That's why we don't have solid-state hard drives in our computers now.

you're behind the times, solid state hard drives have been appearing in high end rigs over the past 2 years or so, i've seen someone who put 7 in their PC in RAID0, loaded in about 10 seconds

Avatar image for Engrish_Major
Engrish_Major

17373

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 Engrish_Major
Member since 2007 • 17373 Posts
[QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

markop2003

They probably didn't have a solid state GB then.

solid state flash rewriteable memory was invented in 1983 so they could have had it if they wanted too the Intel 2816 was the first electronically erasable one but i can't find how much data the chip held though with it's predesesor the max they reached were millions of bits

They could have, theoretically, but it probably was prohibitively expensive. That's why we don't have solid-state hard drives in our computers now.

you're behind the times, solid state hard drives have been appearing in high end rigs over the past 2 years or so, i've seen someone who put 7 in their PC in RAID0, loaded in about 10 seconds

Yeah, but how much do they cost? I explained that's why they're not in everyones' computers now.

Avatar image for markop2003
markop2003

29917

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 markop2003
Member since 2005 • 29917 Posts
[QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="markop2003"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

Engrish_Major

They probably didn't have a solid state GB then.

solid state flash rewriteable memory was invented in 1983 so they could have had it if they wanted too the Intel 2816 was the first electronically erasable one but i can't find how much data the chip held though with it's predesesor the max they reached were millions of bits

They could have, theoretically, but it probably was prohibitively expensive. That's why we don't have solid-state hard drives in our computers now.

you're behind the times, solid state hard drives have been appearing in high end rigs over the past 2 years or so, i've seen someone who put 7 in their PC in RAID0, loaded in about 10 seconds

Yeah, but how much do they cost? I explained that's why they're not in everyones' computers now.

not main stream, this was back when they were $600 a piece for a 64gb version, though they're dropping in price very quickly

Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#20 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts
I remember my old IBM XT from the mid 80's. and it's 80 MB harddrive was bigger than a mac mini is today.
Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#21 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38938 Posts
[QUOTE="stevenk4k5"][QUOTE="Engrish_Major"][QUOTE="comp_atkins"]

they should have compared hard drive to hard drive. not hard drive to solid state. thats on fair :P

Engrish_Major

They probably didn't have a solid state GB then.

He meant comparing a present-day hard drive to that ancient, dinosaur era hard drive.

I see. Makes sense.

yeah.. take like a single platter our of the hard drive in like an ipod. and highlight the size on that platter that would equate to 1GB of storage.

Avatar image for jpph
jpph

3337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#22 jpph
Member since 2005 • 3337 Posts

Next we need files that don't consume space. o.OSolidSnake35

that would be pretty awesome. does storage online take up space? it must do somewhere, but where??:?

Avatar image for stevenk4k5
stevenk4k5

5608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#23 stevenk4k5
Member since 2005 • 5608 Posts

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]Next we need files that don't consume space. o.Ojpph

that would be pretty awesome. does storage online take up space? it must do somewhere, but where??:?

Servers. :)

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38938

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#24 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38938 Posts
[QUOTE="jpph"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]Next we need files that don't consume space. o.Ostevenk4k5

that would be pretty awesome. does storage online take up space? it must do somewhere, but where??:?

Servers. :)

its still stored on disk on the servers...

Avatar image for stevenk4k5
stevenk4k5

5608

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#25 stevenk4k5
Member since 2005 • 5608 Posts
[QUOTE="stevenk4k5"][QUOTE="jpph"]

[QUOTE="SolidSnake35"]Next we need files that don't consume space. o.Ocomp_atkins

that would be pretty awesome. does storage online take up space? it must do somewhere, but where??:?

Servers. :)

its still stored on disk on the servers...

I know that... I thought it was pretty common knowledge that servers had hard drives which is why I didn't mention it.