Every atheist should read this book..

  • 113 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts
[QUOTE="metroidfood"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]

What da **** are you talking about? You think there's nothing "random" about evolution? You think hez a complete tool whoz disucussing that and no one else is ignorant enough?:lol: Loooooool look whoz the ignorant one!!!!

http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/EvolutionNotByChance.htm

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html

:roll::roll::roll:

Funky_Llama

"The theory of evolution -- and it is just that, a theory -- "

Stopped reading there. If they can't tell the difference between conjecture and scientific theory, then their attack on evolution is probably just as misconstrued and poorly researched.

Heh, me too. It's a natural reaction now to simply ignore anything full of crap enough to make that mistake.

It's even better when their second link refutes their argument. :P
Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]How about the fact that it's a ridiculous claim that anyone with even a basic understanding of evolution can easily refute? Christ, someone that ****ing clueless about evolution should NOT be writing a chapter of a book on it.Funky_Llama
What da **** are you talking about? You think there's nothing "random" about evolution? You think hez a complete tool whoz disucussing that and no one else is ignorant enough?:lol: Loooooool look whoz the ignorant one!!!!

http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/EvolutionNotByChance.htm

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html

:roll::roll::roll:

Did you even read that talkorigins article? Allow me to quote it: 'Conclusions of this FAQ: Genetic changes do not anticipate a species' needs, and those changes may be unrelated to selection pressures on the species. Nevertheless, evolution is not fundamentally a random process.' See that at the end there? Not a random process? :lol:

So where does the book which I suggested declare evolution to be random?:|

And secondly since there is so much talk on this issue and apparantly not a concrete answer, I wonder how ******* clueless he is for saying thatisnt he?:roll:

And wait, you didnt know about the chance evolution theory isnt it? Huh random internet guy thinking he knows it all!:lol:

Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#53 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]Who made an ad hominem attack? Me?SpaceMoose
Poe's law.

I don't understand. You must think I am stupid but really I don't get what you are saying.

Not to mention that I don't know what Poe's law is... :P

Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="metroidfood"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]

What da **** are you talking about? You think there's nothing "random" about evolution? You think hez a complete tool whoz disucussing that and no one else is ignorant enough?:lol: Loooooool look whoz the ignorant one!!!!

http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/EvolutionNotByChance.htm

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html

:roll::roll::roll:

Funky_Llama

"The theory of evolution -- and it is just that, a theory -- "

Stopped reading there. If they can't tell the difference between conjecture and scientific theory, then their attack on evolution is probably just as misconstrued and poorly researched.

Heh, me too. It's a natural reaction now to simply ignore anything full of crap enough to make that mistake.

And you didnt know that evolution is believed to happen by chance. And how confidently you quoted that thing, too funny to see someone gte owned like that.

"it's a ridiculous claim that anyone with even a basic understanding of evolution can easily refute? Christ, someone that ****ing clueless about evolution should NOT be writing a chapter of a book on it."

I cannot stop laughing at that.:lol:

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#55 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Looks like a complete waste of time. If this was actually proof of God, I would think it would be world-renowned by now. My guess is it is just a bunch of teleological arguments with some tautological misconceptions and straw-mans.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#56 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]What da **** are you talking about? You think there's nothing "random" about evolution? You think hez a complete tool whoz disucussing that and no one else is ignorant enough?:lol: Loooooool look whoz the ignorant one!!!!

http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/EvolutionNotByChance.htm

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html

:roll::roll::roll:

Stranger_4

Did you even read that talkorigins article? Allow me to quote it: 'Conclusions of this FAQ: Genetic changes do not anticipate a species' needs, and those changes may be unrelated to selection pressures on the species. Nevertheless, evolution is not fundamentally a random process.' See that at the end there? Not a random process? :lol:

So where does the book which I suggested declare evolution to be random?:|

And secondly since there is so much talk on this issue and apparantly not a concrete answer, I wonder how ******* clueless he is for saying thatisnt he?:roll:

And wait, you didnt know about the chance evolution theory isnt it? Huh random internet guy thinking he knows it all!:lol:

I already quoted where it says that. Go back to page one. There is a concrete answer to whether evolution is pure chance. And that answer is no. ;) 'chance evolution theory' as a phrase returns 106 results in Google. With duplicates omitted, there are just 11 results. Not very popular, it seems - care to tell me all about this fascinating theory? :roll:
Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"]

What da **** are you talking about? You think there's nothing "random" about evolution? You think hez a complete tool whoz disucussing that and no one else is ignorant enough?:lol: Loooooool look whoz the ignorant one!!!!

http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/EvolutionNotByChance.htm

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html

:roll::roll::roll:

metroidfood

"The theory of evolution -- and it is just that, a theory -- "

Stopped reading there. If they can't tell the difference between conjecture and scientific theory, then their attack on evolution is probably just as misconstrued and poorly researched.

I just googled to find articles to own that funky guy's chance thing. I dont know about the credibility or anything of those sites..
Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

[QUOTE="SpaceMoose"][QUOTE="Teenaged"]Who made an ad hominem attack? Me?Teenaged

Poe's law.

I don't understand. You must think I am stupid but really I don't get what you are saying.

Not to mention that I don't know what Poe's law is... :P

You are welcome. :D
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#59 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="metroidfood"]

"The theory of evolution -- and it is just that, a theory -- "

Stopped reading there. If they can't tell the difference between conjecture and scientific theory, then their attack on evolution is probably just as misconstrued and poorly researched.

Stranger_4

Heh, me too. It's a natural reaction now to simply ignore anything full of crap enough to make that mistake.

And you didnt know that evolution is believed to happen by chance. And how confidently you quoted that thing, too funny to see someone gte owned like that.

"it's a ridiculous claim that anyone with even a basic understanding of evolution can easily refute? Christ, someone that ****ing clueless about evolution should NOT be writing a chapter of a book on it."

I cannot stop laughing at that.:lol:

Um, anyone who believes evolution is chance is wrong - and even one of your quoted links agrees with me. Again, did you even read the thing? :lol:
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#60 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="metroidfood"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]

What da **** are you talking about? You think there's nothing "random" about evolution? You think hez a complete tool whoz disucussing that and no one else is ignorant enough?:lol: Loooooool look whoz the ignorant one!!!!

http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/EvolutionNotByChance.htm

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/chance/chance.html

:roll::roll::roll:

Stranger_4

"The theory of evolution -- and it is just that, a theory -- "

Stopped reading there. If they can't tell the difference between conjecture and scientific theory, then their attack on evolution is probably just as misconstrued and poorly researched.

I just googled to find articles to own that funky guy's chance thing. I dont know about the credibility or anything of those sites..

Do I have to say it again? One of your quoted articles said that IT WAS NOT CHANCE. Capiche? It agreed with me. ;) And as for the other one... :lol:
Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

I just googled to find articles to own that funky guy's chance thing. I dont know about the credibility or anything of those sites..Stranger_4

If you're not going to bother checking the crediblity of the sources you're using to back up your own argument, then I think this image is deserved.

Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
Ugh...I don't think thats there necessarily a contradiction between science and faith (except in extreme cases), but that has no bearing on why I'm an athiest.
Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Did you even read that talkorigins article? Allow me to quote it: 'Conclusions of this FAQ: Genetic changes do not anticipate a species' needs, and those changes may be unrelated to selection pressures on the species. Nevertheless, evolution is not fundamentally a random process.' See that at the end there? Not a random process? :lol:Funky_Llama
So where does the book which I suggested declare evolution to be random?:|

And secondly since there is so much talk on this issue and apparantly not a concrete answer, I wonder how ******* clueless he is for saying thatisnt he?:roll:

And wait, you didnt know about the chance evolution theory isnt it? Huh random internet guy thinking he knows it all!:lol:

I already quoted where it says that. Go back to page one. There is a concrete answer to whether evolution is pure chance. And that answer is no. ;) 'chance evolution theory' as a phrase returns 106 results in Google. With duplicates omitted, there are just 11 results. Not very popular, it seems - care to tell me all about this fascinating theory? :roll:

Evolution is genrally believed to have happened by chance. darwin believed that as well, just how ******* clueless you are dear God, I'll rather not waste my time replying to you anymore no offence.
Avatar image for porky_ownsu
porky_ownsu

1287

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 porky_ownsu
Member since 2008 • 1287 Posts

this thread is degrading into a troll war....

stupid christians pissed off and atheists stating facts..

....

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

And you didnt know that evolution is believed to happen by chance. And how confidently you quoted that thing, too funny to see someone gte owned like that.

"it's a ridiculous claim that anyone with even a basic understanding of evolution can easily refute? Christ, someone that ****ing clueless about evolution should NOT be writing a chapter of a book on it."

I cannot stop laughing at that.:lol:

Stranger_4
Says the guy who ha sno idea how evolution occurs.
Avatar image for unholymight
unholymight

3378

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 unholymight
Member since 2007 • 3378 Posts
God does not exist; there is as much proof for him as there is for Santa Claus.
Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"][QUOTE="metroidfood"]

"The theory of evolution -- and it is just that, a theory -- "

Stopped reading there. If they can't tell the difference between conjecture and scientific theory, then their attack on evolution is probably just as misconstrued and poorly researched.

Funky_Llama

I just googled to find articles to own that funky guy's chance thing. I dont know about the credibility or anything of those sites..

Do I have to say it again? One of your quoted articles said that IT WAS NOT CHANCE. Capiche? It agreed with me. ;) And as for the other one... :lol:

It is inconceivable for these measures to have been planned and executed by a mere blind collusion of chances

Ya that's what it says and where does it say that evolution happened by chance, it's saying something can it not?:|

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]So where does the book which I suggested declare evolution to be random?:|

And secondly since there is so much talk on this issue and apparantly not a concrete answer, I wonder how ******* clueless he is for saying thatisnt he?:roll:

And wait, you didnt know about the chance evolution theory isnt it? Huh random internet guy thinking he knows it all!:lol:

Stranger_4

I already quoted where it says that. Go back to page one. There is a concrete answer to whether evolution is pure chance. And that answer is no. ;) 'chance evolution theory' as a phrase returns 106 results in Google. With duplicates omitted, there are just 11 results. Not very popular, it seems - care to tell me all about this fascinating theory? :roll:

Evolution is genrally believed to have happened by chance. darwin believed that as well, just how ******* clueless you are dear God, I'll rather not waste my time replying to you anymore no offence.

Okay, I have just two questions.

1. Can you prove that evolution is chance?

2. Can you prove that Darwin believed it was chance?

I await your response. Oh wait, you don't want to reply to me. Honestly, you could have done a more convincing job of running away. :lol:

Avatar image for Shad0ki11
Shad0ki11

12576

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Shad0ki11
Member since 2006 • 12576 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]So where does the book which I suggested declare evolution to be random?:|

And secondly since there is so much talk on this issue and apparantly not a concrete answer, I wonder how ******* clueless he is for saying thatisnt he?:roll:

And wait, you didnt know about the chance evolution theory isnt it? Huh random internet guy thinking he knows it all!:lol:

Stranger_4

I already quoted where it says that. Go back to page one. There is a concrete answer to whether evolution is pure chance. And that answer is no. ;) 'chance evolution theory' as a phrase returns 106 results in Google. With duplicates omitted, there are just 11 results. Not very popular, it seems - care to tell me all about this fascinating theory? :roll:

Evolution is genrally believed to have happened by chance. darwin believed that as well, just how ******* clueless you are dear God, I'll rather not waste my time replying to you anymore no offence.

Explain why you think Evolution is a matter of chance then.

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#70 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]I just googled to find articles to own that funky guy's chance thing. I dont know about the credibility or anything of those sites..Stranger_4
Do I have to say it again? One of your quoted articles said that IT WAS NOT CHANCE. Capiche? It agreed with me. ;) And as for the other one... :lol:

It is inconceivable for these measures to have been planned and executed by a mere blind collusion of chances

Ya that's what it says and where does it say that evolution happened by chance, it's saying something can it not?:|

Right there. Come on, it's staring you in the face. :lol: That quote refers to evolution. It is claiming that it is a 'mere blind collusion of chances.'
Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts
God does not exist; there is as much proof for him as there is for Santa Claus.unholymight
Santa Claus is real though.
Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"]

And you didnt know that evolution is believed to happen by chance. And how confidently you quoted that thing, too funny to see someone gte owned like that.

"it's a ridiculous claim that anyone with even a basic understanding of evolution can easily refute? Christ, someone that ****ing clueless about evolution should NOT be writing a chapter of a book on it."

I cannot stop laughing at that.:lol:

BumFluff122
Says the guy who ha sno idea how evolution occurs.

I never claimed to be an expert but I am reading up on it, it's just that I find it so boring that it's gonna take some time to get a significant knowledge of it.:P
Avatar image for TheDawnofFlames
TheDawnofFlames

409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 TheDawnofFlames
Member since 2009 • 409 Posts
[QUOTE="unholymight"]God does not exist; there is as much proof for him as there is for Santa Claus.BumFluff122
Santa Claus is real though.

I'd say there is more proof for Santa Clause. I mean at least he lives in the North Pole. That's on Earth, people. Earth. Let's believe in Santa.
Avatar image for SSBFan12
SSBFan12

11981

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 SSBFan12
Member since 2008 • 11981 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"]

Seriousy this CAN change your mind, it's simply a brilliant work and well worth a purchase trust me.

http://www.amazon.com/Revelation-Rationality-Knowledge-Truth-Mirza/dp/1853726400

You can also read it online here but I would really suggest to buy it and read it fully from scratch.

While it's gonna take a long time to read it, if someone found it helpful, do report back.:)

No why would a book change my mind on being atheist.
Avatar image for TheDawnofFlames
TheDawnofFlames

409

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 TheDawnofFlames
Member since 2009 • 409 Posts
[QUOTE="BumFluff122"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]

And you didnt know that evolution is believed to happen by chance. And how confidently you quoted that thing, too funny to see someone gte owned like that.

"it's a ridiculous claim that anyone with even a basic understanding of evolution can easily refute? Christ, someone that ****ing clueless about evolution should NOT be writing a chapter of a book on it."

I cannot stop laughing at that.:lol:

Stranger_4
Says the guy who ha sno idea how evolution occurs.

I never claimed to be an expert but I am reading up on it, it's just that I find it so boring that it's gonna take some time to get a significant knowledge of it.:P

Yeah, I'd have to agree that fairy tales can be more interesting.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#76 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
Evolution is genrally believed to have happened by chance. darwin believed that as well, just how ******* clueless you are dear God, I'll rather not waste my time replying to you anymore no offence.Stranger_4

You really need to pick up a biology textbook that isn't "Of Pandas And People."

Darwin discovered evidence that lead him to believe that nature had a way of choosing those fit to survive. This is his theory of natural selection. He never was able to find evidence for evolution but hypothesized that it existed based on his findings for natural selection. And later down the road, when the fossil record started being formed, his hypothesis was proven right and thus the beginnings of the theory of evolution began.

Your misconceptions about evolution and your complete lack of understanding of the scientific method is what is not worth replying to anymore... but I will continue because you deserve to not be ignorant of these kinds of things... which drive the world to bigger and better things. Hell, evolutionary theory is what drives a lot of the anti-biotic industry and cancer research. Go ahead and keep denying it... I hope you never need chemo therapy because understanding evolution and genetics is what makes it possible.
Avatar image for Teenaged
Teenaged

31764

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#77 Teenaged
Member since 2007 • 31764 Posts
[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="SpaceMoose"] Poe's law.metroidfood

I don't understand. You must think I am stupid but really I don't get what you are saying.

Not to mention that I don't know what Poe's law is... :P

You are welcome. :D

Thanks. :D

So... spacemoose was being sarcastic? Still I don't detect what he was being sarcastic about. :P

Avatar image for Blood-Scribe
Blood-Scribe

6465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 Blood-Scribe
Member since 2007 • 6465 Posts

[QUOTE="BumFluff122"][QUOTE="unholymight"]God does not exist; there is as much proof for him as there is for Santa Claus.TheDawnofFlames
Santa Claus is real though.

I'd say there is more proof for Santa Clause. I mean at least he lives in the North Pole. That's on Earth, people. Earth. Let's believe in Santa.

And the milk and cookies are gone in the morning whenever I leave them for Santa. They were intended for Santa, so Santa must have eaten them. He obviously exists by virtue of inference, and any disputes against that are nothing more than appeals to magic.

Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]I already quoted where it says that. Go back to page one. There is a concrete answer to whether evolution is pure chance. And that answer is no. ;) 'chance evolution theory' as a phrase returns 106 results in Google. With duplicates omitted, there are just 11 results. Not very popular, it seems - care to tell me all about this fascinating theory? :roll:Funky_Llama
Evolution is genrally believed to have happened by chance. darwin believed that as well, just how ******* clueless you are dear God, I'll rather not waste my time replying to you anymore no offence.

Okay, I have just two questions.

1. Can you prove that evolution is chance?

2. Can you prove that Darwin believed it was chance?

I await your response. Oh wait, you don't want to reply to me. Honestly, you could have done a more convincing job of running away. :lol:

Epic failure of a comback.

That was never the point to prove any of that crap, you said a guy has to be simply a ******* clueless tool to even think about evolution by chance. Now dont damage control by going off topic.:lol::lol::lol:

Avatar image for Montaya
Montaya

4269

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Montaya
Member since 2005 • 4269 Posts
Rationality isnt facts so i dont think it will do a very good job.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]Evolution is genrally believed to have happened by chance. darwin believed that as well, just how ******* clueless you are dear God, I'll rather not waste my time replying to you anymore no offence.Stranger_4
Okay, I have just two questions.

1. Can you prove that evolution is chance?

2. Can you prove that Darwin believed it was chance?

I await your response. Oh wait, you don't want to reply to me. Honestly, you could have done a more convincing job of running away. :lol:

Epic failure of a comback.

That was never the point to prove any of that crap, you said a guy has to be simply a ******* clueless tool to even think about evolution by chance. Now dont damage control by going off topic.:lol::lol::lol:

Hmm, I don't remember saying this. Could you quote where I said it? :P

Anyway, on a serious note - can't prove your claims? You lose then. ;)

Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts

[QUOTE="Stranger_4"]Evolution is genrally believed to have happened by chance. darwin believed that as well, just how ******* clueless you are dear God, I'll rather not waste my time replying to you anymore no offence.foxhound_fox

You really need to pick up a biology textbook that isn't "Of Pandas And People."

Darwin discovered evidence that lead him to believe that nature had a way of choosing those fit to survive. This is his theory of natural selection. He never was able to find evidence for evolution but hypothesized that it existed based on his findings for natural selection. And later down the road, when the fossil record started being formed, his hypothesis was proven right and thus the beginnings of the theory of evolution began.

Your misconceptions about evolution and your complete lack of understanding of the scientific method is what is not worth replying to anymore... but I will continue because you deserve to not be ignorant of these kinds of things... which drive the world to bigger and better things. Hell, evolutionary theory is what drives a lot of the anti-biotic industry and cancer research. Go ahead and keep denying it... I hope you never need chemo therapy because understanding evolution and genetics is what makes it possible.

I dont deny evolution and am trying to understand it more.:)

But what I was responding to was funky's statement that somebody has to be clueless to talk about evolution by chance.

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#84 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
But what I was responding to was funky's statement that somebody has to be clueless to talk about evolution by chance.Stranger_4
Which of course it justified given that a basic understanding of evolution reveales that it it NOT BY CHANCE. See, I even wrote the important bits on caps. Aren't I helpful? :roll:
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#85 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
But what I was responding to was funky's statement that somebody has to be clueless to talk about evolution by chance.Stranger_4
Which of course it justified given that a basic understanding of evolution reveales that it it NOT BY CHANCE. See, I even wrote the important bits on caps. Aren't I helpful? :roll:
Anyway, you were quite happy to argue that evolution is by chance. And yet suddently now you've focussed on something more trivial why could that be? Oh, I know - it's because you were wrong.
Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Do I have to say it again? One of your quoted articles said that IT WAS NOT CHANCE. Capiche? It agreed with me. ;) And as for the other one... :lol:Funky_Llama
It is inconceivable for these measures to have been planned and executed by a mere blind collusion of chances

Ya that's what it says and where does it say that evolution happened by chance, it's saying something can it not?:|

Right there. Come on, it's staring you in the face. :lol: That quote refers to evolution. It is claiming that it is a 'mere blind collusion of chances.'

It is just talking about "mere blind collusion of chances". It is not claiming it to be and you know that. There's no point in this arguemnt now as you will not admit I know that your statement of him being clueless based on that part was completely off the charts.

Ask anyone else over there lol.

Avatar image for BumFluff122
BumFluff122

14853

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#87 BumFluff122
Member since 2004 • 14853 Posts

I dont deny evolution and am trying to understand it more.:)

But what I was responding to was funky's statement that somebody has to be clueless to talk about evolution by chance.

Stranger_4
Perhaos then you should read more about evolution and come to a conclusion why he would say somethign like that as well as every other evolutionist in these forums.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]Evolution is genrally believed to have happened by chance. darwin believed that as well, just how ******* clueless you are dear God, I'll rather not waste my time replying to you anymore no offence.Stranger_4
Okay, I have just two questions.

1. Can you prove that evolution is chance?

2. Can you prove that Darwin believed it was chance?

I await your response. Oh wait, you don't want to reply to me. Honestly, you could have done a more convincing job of running away. :lol:

Epic failure of a comback.

That was never the point to prove any of that crap, you said a guy has to be simply a ******* clueless tool to even think about evolution by chance. Now dont damage control by going off topic.:lol::lol::lol:

Insisting that something is a failure does not make it so, just so you know
Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

It is just talking about "mere blind collusion of chances". It is not claiming it to be and you know that. There's no point in this arguemnt now as you will not admit I know that your statement of him being clueless based on that part was completely off the charts.

Ask anyone else over there lol.

Stranger_4
Actually, Funky Llama is right.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#90 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]It is inconceivable for these measures to have been planned and executed by a mere blind collusion of chances

Ya that's what it says and where does it say that evolution happened by chance, it's saying something can it not?:|

Stranger_4

Right there. Come on, it's staring you in the face. :lol: That quote refers to evolution. It is claiming that it is a 'mere blind collusion of chances.'

It is just talking about "mere blind collusion of chances". It is not claiming it to be and you know that. There's no point in this arguemnt now as you will not admit I know that your statement of him being clueless based on that part was completely off the charts.

Ask anyone else over there lol.

Yes it is. It's implying that evolution is claimed to be that. Just read the Goddamn thing and it's obvious. Still, at least we're in agreement about something - this argument has been pretty ****ing pointless. :roll:
Avatar image for Blood-Scribe
Blood-Scribe

6465

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 Blood-Scribe
Member since 2007 • 6465 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"][QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Okay, I have just two questions.

1. Can you prove that evolution is chance?

2. Can you prove that Darwin believed it was chance?

I await your response. Oh wait, you don't want to reply to me. Honestly, you could have done a more convincing job of running away. :lol:

xaos

Epic failure of a comback.

That was never the point to prove any of that crap, you said a guy has to be simply a ******* clueless tool to even think about evolution by chance. Now dont damage control by going off topic.:lol::lol::lol:

Insisting that something is a failure does not make it so, just so you know

But this is the internet. And he used the word "epic."

Clearly he must be right.

Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts

[QUOTE="Stranger_4"]But what I was responding to was funky's statement that somebody has to be clueless to talk about evolution by chance.Funky_Llama
Which of course it justified given that a basic understanding of evolution reveales that it it NOT BY CHANCE. See, I even wrote the important bits on caps. Aren't I helpful? :roll:

"Chance is certainly a factor in evolution, but there are also non-random evolutionary mechanisms. Random mutation is the ultimate source of genetic variation, however natural selection, the process by which some variants survive and others do not, is not random."

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/misconceps/ICchance.shtml

:roll:

Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]But what I was responding to was funky's statement that somebody has to be clueless to talk about evolution by chance.Stranger_4

Which of course it justified given that a basic understanding of evolution reveales that it it NOT BY CHANCE. See, I even wrote the important bits on caps. Aren't I helpful? :roll:

"Chance is certainly a factor in evolution, but there are also non-random evolutionary mechanisms. Random mutation is the ultimate source of genetic variation, however natural selection, the process by which some variants survive and others do not, is not random."

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/misconceps/ICchance.shtml

:roll:

I rest my case. Let's look back to how the article described evolution: 'a random collusion of chances'. Even these quotes you've provided prove that evolution is more than that. Now perhaps you can accept that you're wrong and stop wasting my time.
Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]But what I was responding to was funky's statement that somebody has to be clueless to talk about evolution by chance.Stranger_4

Which of course it justified given that a basic understanding of evolution reveales that it it NOT BY CHANCE. See, I even wrote the important bits on caps. Aren't I helpful? :roll:

"Chance is certainly a factor in evolution, but there are also non-random evolutionary mechanisms. Random mutation is the ultimate source of genetic variation, however natural selection, the process by which some variants survive and others do not, is not random."

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/misconceps/ICchance.shtml

:roll:

Mutations: Random, Not evolution Natural Selection: Not random, Driving force of evolution All clear? :)
Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#95 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts
[QUOTE="Stranger_4"]

[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"]Which of course it justified given that a basic understanding of evolution reveales that it it NOT BY CHANCE. See, I even wrote the important bits on caps. Aren't I helpful? :roll:Funky_Llama

"Chance is certainly a factor in evolution, but there are also non-random evolutionary mechanisms. Random mutation is the ultimate source of genetic variation, however natural selection, the process by which some variants survive and others do not, is not random."

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/misconceps/ICchance.shtml

:roll:

I rest my case. Let's look back to how the article described evolution: 'a random collusion of chances'. Even these quotes you've provided prove that evolution is more than that. Now perhaps you can accept that you're wrong and stop wasting my time.

Can you tell me the paragraph no. of that as I have not yet found that quote and would be easier if you give the paragraph number.
Avatar image for Grouchu
Grouchu

7118

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#96 Grouchu
Member since 2003 • 7118 Posts
Reading is for suckers.
Avatar image for Funky_Llama
Funky_Llama

18428

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#97 Funky_Llama
Member since 2006 • 18428 Posts
[QUOTE="Funky_Llama"][QUOTE="Stranger_4"]"Chance is certainly a factor in evolution, but there are also non-random evolutionary mechanisms. Random mutation is the ultimate source of genetic variation, however natural selection, the process by which some variants survive and others do not, is not random."

http://evolution.berkeley.edu/evosite/misconceps/ICchance.shtml

:roll:

Stranger_4
I rest my case. Let's look back to how the article described evolution: 'a random collusion of chances'. Even these quotes you've provided prove that evolution is more than that. Now perhaps you can accept that you're wrong and stop wasting my time.

Can you tell me the paragraph no. of that as I have not yet found that quote and would be easier if you give the paragraph number.

Oh, I knew - it was rather obvious that you hadn't read it. ;) Anyway, just press ctrl-f and search for 'random collusion'. It's about 11/12 paragraphs from the bottom.
Avatar image for Euroshinobi
Euroshinobi

3299

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#98 Euroshinobi
Member since 2009 • 3299 Posts
im not reading that crap, just let it go, stop trying to convert atheist
Avatar image for -Jiggles-
-Jiggles-

4356

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#99 -Jiggles-
Member since 2008 • 4356 Posts

It's been over a century since natural selection was first proposed and creationists are still bickering on about how it is random?

They never learn. :roll:

Avatar image for Stranger_4
Stranger_4

752

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 Stranger_4
Member since 2009 • 752 Posts

So here's the thing in what context it was said.

"On the one hand the nuclei and the protoplasm in the cellular chambers are fortified by this impervious double protective layer of lipids against the possible penetration of the surrounding plasma. On the other hand they need a constant supply of energy to be transported across the lipid covers. To meet this essential requirement, the measures taken by nature are so amazingly profound and intricate as boggles the mind.

It is inconceivable for these measures to have been planned and executed by a mere blind collusion of chances. In fact, the intricate internal structure and order of arrangement of the transporter protein, which delivers glucose molecules to the cells, had to be exactly designed to do the needful. Again, complementary measures had to be taken for each recipient cell to harmonize perfectly with the working of the transporter protein. As some readers unfamiliar with scientific terminology may find it difficult to keep track of this subject, every effort is being made to make it generally comprehensible even for the lay reader."

This is said under the chaper, "survival by accident or chance".Now it wasnt refering to the whole evolution was it?:roll:

And it furthur says,

"It is evolution of course, but not blind evolution. At every cross-section of their journey, it was never the living who made their choices as to the bearing they should take. There was no fixed destination, if there was no conscious Designer and Creator of life. Hence, every step which life took, could have moved in any direction. A single step to be taken in the right direction is an outside chance. For each step to move invariably in the right direction, a billion times over and to pursue unfalteringly the course which could only lead to the creation of man, is something so bizarre and unreal that even the phantom figures of fairy tales would not believe in it. Yet, there are some scientists who do!"