This topic is locked from further discussion.
People only oppose Obama because they don't like women and people only oppose Hillary because they don't like black people.Dracargen
try saying that again
And it would be so revolutionary because many years ago blacks and women were treated to be inadequate to white men.
[QUOTE="Dracargen"]People only oppose Obama because they don't like women and people only oppose Hillary because they don't like black people.haggard_korn
try saying that again
Okay.
People only oppose Obama because they don't like women and people only oppose Hillary because they don't like black people.Dracargen
And it would be so revolutionary because many years ago blacks and women were treated to be inadequate to white men.
haggard_korn
Many years ago Christians were being fed to lions for entertainment. Nobody makes a big deal when they're elected for president.:?
[QUOTE="haggard_korn"][QUOTE="Dracargen"]People only oppose Obama because they don't like women and people only oppose Hillary because they don't like black people.Dracargen
try saying that again
Okay.
People only oppose Obama because they don't like women and people only oppose Hillary because they don't like black people.Dracargen
oppose - be against; express opposition to
So that be like me saying "I don't support Obama, because I don't like women" or "I don't support Hiliary because I don't like blacks"
And even after your grammatical mistakes, thats a false statement. I don't support either of them, because they support big government, spending money we don't have, and collecting taxes. Not because they are black, or a woman.
It will always be the rich that governs. This a critical flaw in liberal/capitalistic democracies...jointed
I'd say the UK isn't as rigid an oligarchy as the US.
[QUOTE="haggard_korn"][QUOTE="Dracargen"]People only oppose Obama because they don't like women and people only oppose Hillary because they don't like black people.Dracargen
try saying that again
Okay.
People only oppose Obama because they don't like women and people only oppose Hillary because they don't like black people.Dracargen
yea!! uhhh try switching the names around. Last time I checked obama wasn't a woman, and hilary wasn't black.
[QUOTE="jointed"]It will always be the rich that governs. This a critical flaw in liberal/capitalistic democracies...bradleybhoy
I'd say the UK isn't as rigid an oligarchy as the US.
I'd agree...
I Blame it partially on the idiotic "candidate" system.
[QUOTE="bradleybhoy"][QUOTE="jointed"]It will always be the rich that governs. This a critical flaw in liberal/capitalistic democracies...jointed
I'd say the UK isn't as rigid an oligarchy as the US.
I'd agree...
I Blame it partially on the idiotic "candidate" system.
Indeed, I'm also glad that in Britain there's been so much scrutiny over who's funding politicians.
You can be a millionaire and middle class. Upper classes are generally people with Lord/Ladyships and things like that, but can be in fact quite poor.Oriental_Jams
I wouldn't say so anymore. America doesn't even have a royal aristocracy. And Britain's is basically obselete now anyway. Cash dictates class nowadays imo.
Well I'm Canadian but lets assume I'm American...
I could honestly care less about race/gender. I want Obama to win or even Hilary because I hate Republicans. Personally I'm not crazy about Democrats but as long as a more liberally-minded politician wins the White House, I think the world would be a better place.
[QUOTE="Oriental_Jams"]You can be a millionaire and middle class. Upper classes are generally people with Lord/Ladyships and things like that, but can be in fact quite poor.bradleybhoy
I wouldn't say so anymore. America doesn't even have a royal aristocracy. And Britain's is basically obselete now anyway. Cash dictates class nowadays imo.
True. But I think we're just seeing the disappearance of the upper-class, with it being replaced by the upper-middle-class.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment