[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"][QUOTE="mindstorm"][QUOTE="mrbojangles25"][QUOTE="ff7isnumbaone"][QUOTE="edguybglover"] do you play with yourself? you know what i mean
seriously i used to be against abortions but than my bestie told me i shouldnt be as im just as bad as them.... i mean i ahem play with myself alot and yeah i agree as long as im doing that than i shouldnt be judging people who abort as its exactly the same thing just done differently
xNJN
wrong. You were not planning to have kids and you can't accidently have kids. Therefore, its nothing like abortion. sperm is sperm without the female.
lots of people have sex and dont "plan" on having kids, either through being stupid (no protection, prevention) or through bad luck (faulty condom)
plus you, you know, might get it on the keyboard then youre girlfriend goes to check her email, scratches herself down there and blammo! she is pregnant!
They shouldn't have sex if they are not ready then... And as for the illustration, that would be a super rare occurence and she still shouldn't have an abortion...
i would agree with you a few hundred years ago, but the fact is we have contraceptives and as a result it is ok to have sex for fun and/or as a physical expression for love.
The way I see it is this: humans want to have sex on a basic level, and this instinct often wins over. 100+ years ago, this is fine; you found a partner, and you needed those 5 or more kids to help you on the farm or run your business. Not only that, but it was cheap to raise a family.
Now, the instinct is still there, but the practicality is not.
In short, the reality of life is trying to curtail instinct, but instinct aint having any part of it. While human nature is telling a woman she is ready for a child, reality is t elling her she isnt. She doesnt want a kid while she is taking college ****s living in an apartement with a casual boyfriend; she wants a kid after she has worked for 10 years and is married to the right man.
Sex cant wait. Procreation can.
With that said, it should be OK to give into instinct nowadays due to various preventative measures, including condoms and, in some (and hopefully only serious) cases, abortion.
I'd like to know where you pulled that steaming pile of fail from...
I pulled it from a little place called real world experience.
With that said, why is it fail?
Its fact: 150 years ago or more, most females would be married and bearing children by the time theyre 18 or even younger. Most families had three or more children, and they would have likely given birth to a total of five children since it was common to have them die in the first few years of life.
Back then, instinct (the desire and enjoyment of sex) coincided with religion (no abortion, sex with marriage only, etc) so you could have your cake and eat it too.
Now, however, people still want the cake but its frowned upon for a variety of reasons. Women (and men) dont want to get married right away. The first person I knew of to get married was 24 years old, and that seems young not only to me but to everyone I know. And no one I know has planned to have a baby yet. Planned childbrirth has gone from something that occurs during a woman's teens to something that waits until the late-20s. Then you got religion: people want to have sex, but its frowned upon and people make this gigantic tragedy out of a situation that really isnt that bad; you get pregnant, and you keep it or get rid of it. Simple. And you wont even get pregnant if you take a couple simple precautions (condoms, pills, etc).
I guess what I am saying is that, unlike the past few years, I think its time to move on. We can all have our cake and eat it too, again. It is safe to have sex so long as youre careful.
Log in to comment