[QUOTE="l4dak47"]They say it's wrong to force people to pay health insurance, but what of car insurance? Unless there's a distinct difference I'm not aware of? coolbeans90
I think I've discussed this analogy too many times to count. It's fundamentally broken on various different levels. Here are the bullet points:
1. There are differing legal circumstances with respect to these cases. The Federal Government via the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act mandates that people purchase health insurance. State governments individually mandate that drivers purchase car insurance. The Federal Government legally derives its power to regulate interstate commerce through the commerce clause in the constitution, and is also to some degree limited by it. State governments are not bounded by the commerce clause in that respect.
2. One is not legally required to purchase car insurance by mere virtue of existence, unlike the health care bill.
3. People do not own the roads they drive on. In order to use them, they agree to abide by certain rules, similarly to a ToU. People may not run red lights, are required to have a license and are also to have insurance. One voluntarily agrees to these in order to drive on roads which do not belong exclusively to you. There isn't a parallel to this with respect to health care.
exactly. Healthcare and car insuriance are two totally different things. I dont understand how anyone could compare just being alive to owning a car and driving. Driving is a privilage not a right.
Log in to comment