Gallup Poll - Muslims are religious group LEAST likely to support violence

  • 111 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#1 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
[quote="Gallup"] In sharp contrast with Americans who identify themselves with other faith groups, Muslim Americans are more likely to say military attacks on civilians are never justified (78%) than sometimes justified (21%). Respondents from other faith groups, particularly Mormon Americans, are more likely to say military attacks are sometimes justified than never justified. The opinions of Americans who don't identify themselves with any religion are more in line with those of Muslim Americans, but they are also more divided. There is wider agreement that attacks on civilians by individuals or small groups are never justified. At least 7 in 10 American adults from all major religious groups agree that these attacks are never justified, but Muslim Americans again are most opposed, with 89% rejecting such attacks.

 Link to full article Don't know if this will change anyone's views on the subject, but I found this poll interesting and thought I'd get OT's thoughts. Are American Muslims different than those in other parts of the world or can these results be extrapolated to assume that Muslims worldwide are generally more opposed to violence and terrorism than other major religious groups? Another interesting poll result. The religious group, besides Muslims, in the U.S. most likely to believe that Muslims have no sympathy for Al Qaeda? Jewish Americans.
Avatar image for alexside1
alexside1

4412

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 alexside1
Member since 2006 • 4412 Posts
I can smell the ownage in the air with the anti-Muslim groups.
Avatar image for Planet_Pluto
Planet_Pluto

2235

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 Planet_Pluto
Member since 2011 • 2235 Posts

A poll of Muslim Americans.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#5 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60663 Posts

makes sense, as Muslims have been the subject of military attacks resulting in "collateral damage" for about a decade now.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#6 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

A poll of Muslim Americans.

Planet_Pluto

That's not just a little detail too...

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#7 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

makes sense, as Muslims have been the subject of military attacks resulting in "collateral damage" for about a decade now.

mrbojangles25

Yeah the 3 Islamic factions in Iraq slaughtering each other for a couple of years were "collateral damage."

Avatar image for UniverseIX
UniverseIX

989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 UniverseIX
Member since 2011 • 989 Posts
well.. it's like that the majority of the people who took this poll will never be put in the position where they'd have to kill somebody. so it's easy to answer this way. don't think it's worth a whole lot.
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#9 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

Maybe the others are more open minded.
These studies are all silly.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#10 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Also on the subject, all major religions, cultures, or any group of people would resort to violence when pushed enough. History has proven that.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#11 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Doesn't matter, it won't stop Islamophobes. Then again, reason and evidence never stop bigotry. Cases in point: racism, sexism, homophobia, and Islamophobia.
Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#12 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

A poll of Muslim Americans.

Planet_Pluto

That is true, but polls like this dispell the notion that there's something inherently violent about Islam.

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#13 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Doesn't matter, it won't stop Islamophobes. Then again, reason and evidence never stop bigotry. Cases in point: racism, sexism, homophobia, and Islamophobia.chessmaster1989

That's a pretty quick and rash generalization. I know a lot of people who hate Christianity with a passion and would do anything to see church disbanded in a heartbeat. It works both ways, just one is a much easier topic for the media and whatnot than the other.

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

First of all, this a completely biased poll. There are several reasons for this.

1. The are Muslim-Americans. These are Muslims who liked America enough to move there. They aren't the "violent" Muslims that are extreme in their ways.

2. They are Muslims who have seen so much war and blood of innocent civilians. They would be much more sympathetic to the cause than other people.

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#15 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

I'm not trying to poo poo this poll, but it's possible that American Muslims might be more sensititve about this question when they answer it in light of the way alot of ignorant people percieve them.

Avatar image for mrbojangles25
mrbojangles25

60663

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#16 mrbojangles25
Member since 2005 • 60663 Posts

[QUOTE="mrbojangles25"]

makes sense, as Muslims have been the subject of military attacks resulting in "collateral damage" for about a decade now.

Wasdie

Yeah the 3 Islamic factions in Iraq slaughtering each other for a couple of years were "collateral damage."

I see your point, but that is not relevant to the article, the poll specifically focused on military attacks with the possibility of civilian death.But yeah, the tribal warfare aspect and the misleading title of the thread and article are a bit funky lol

Also on the subject, all major religions, cultures, or any group of people would resort to violence when pushed enough. History has proven that.

Wasdie

Pretty much this; anyone can play nice when needed, but likewise when need, they can turn violent when called upon by the Pope, Llama, Imam, or what have you. Muslims are the violent flavor of the decade at the moment because there has been a widespread call to arms by fundamentalist, but I have no doubt if churches and the pope were to do the same a lot of Christians would get uppity and violent as well.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#17 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Doesn't matter, it won't stop Islamophobes. Then again, reason and evidence never stop bigotry. Cases in point: racism, sexism, homophobia, and Islamophobia.Wasdie

That's a pretty quick generalization. I know a lot of people who hate Christianity with a passion and would do anything to see church disbanded in a heartbeat. It works both ways, just one is a much easier topic for the media and whatnot than the other.

Well, I could certainly add Christianophobes/religionophobes to the list of cases that prove my point. :P

Not sure how exactly what you said runs against what I said though (in reference to the bolded), or how this is a case of "it working both ways"...

Avatar image for GreySeal9
GreySeal9

28247

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#18 GreySeal9
Member since 2010 • 28247 Posts

First of all, this a completely biased poll. There are several reasons for this.

1. The are Muslim-Americans. These are Muslims who liked America enough to move there. They aren't the "violent" Muslims that are extreme in their ways.

2. They are Muslims who have seen so much war and blood of innocent civilians. They would be much more sympathetic to the cause than other people.

BMD004

How do those factors make the poll biased?

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#19 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

First of all, this a completely biased poll. There are several reasons for this.

1. The are Muslim-Americans. These are Muslims who liked America enough to move there. They aren't the "violent" Muslims that are extreme in their ways.

2. They are Muslims who have seen so much war and blood of innocent civilians. They would be much more sympathetic to the cause than other people.

BMD004

Err, not all Muslim Americans are recent immigrants so neither statement is valid... :?

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#20 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

First of all, this a completely biased poll. There are several reasons for this.

1. The are Muslim-Americans. These are Muslims who liked America enough to move there. They aren't the "violent" Muslims that are extreme in their ways.

2. They are Muslims who have seen so much war and blood of innocent civilians. They would be much more sympathetic to the cause than other people.

GreySeal9

How do those factors make the poll biased?

The poll isn't biased, but it's not a sample of all Muslims which the topic title suggests.

Also we have to remember that the fundamentalist Mulism are not the ones who have migrated to the US like they are in Europe. Instead we have to deal with the fundamentalist Christians. That's why Christianity looks so bad sometimes.

Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#21 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts

[QUOTE="Wasdie"]

Also on the subject, all major religions, cultures, or any group of people would resort to violence when pushed enough. History has proven that.

mrbojangles25

Pretty much this; anyone can play nice when needed, but likewise when need, they can turn violent when called upon by the Pope, Llama, Imam, or what have you. Muslims are the violent flavor of the decade at the moment because there has been a widespread call to arms by fundamentalist, but I have no doubt if churches and the pope were to do the same a lot of Christians would get uppity and violent as well.

Oh the majority for sure. Do you know Zimbardo? In such a case the situation would determine what people would do, not the characters of the people themselves. Religious roleplay is super strong.

Avatar image for chaoscougar1
chaoscougar1

37603

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 12

User Lists: 0

#22 chaoscougar1
Member since 2005 • 37603 Posts
Where are Buddhist's?
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#23 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

A poll of Muslim Americans.

Planet_Pluto

Thought this as well.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#24 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Where are Norse pagans? I bet they'd win as the most violent group. 100% in favor of use of violence. Yeaaaaaaah 8)
Avatar image for KungfuKitten
KungfuKitten

27389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 42

User Lists: 0

#25 KungfuKitten
Member since 2006 • 27389 Posts
Where are Buddhist's?chaoscougar1
And the Sikhs?
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#26 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts
Also, doesn't the fact that these are Muslim Americans suggest that the reasons for Muslim terrorism are more closely related to cultural/political values than to religious ones? And yet people will continue to blame Islam. Meh...
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#27 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
Since most everyone seems to be either ignoring or at least missing a part of my post... [quote="nocoolnamejim"] Are American Muslims different than those in other parts of the world or can these results be extrapolated to assume that Muslims worldwide are generally more opposed to violence and terrorism than other major religious groups?

My post explicitly called out the question on whether the subgroup of American Muslims is representative of Muslims as a whole worldwide and the very first sentence I quoted from the poll results clearly states "Muslim Americans". In no way did I attempt to mislead anyone.
Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#28 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

Also, doesn't the fact that these are Muslim Americans suggest that the reasons for Muslim terrorism are more closely related to cultural/political values than to religious ones? And yet people will continue to blame Islam. Meh...chessmaster1989

Well Islam is cultural/political. No seperation of church and state and their religous writings detail exactly how to live their lives.

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#29 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
Also, doesn't the fact that these are Muslim Americans suggest that the reasons for Muslim terrorism are more closely related to cultural/political values than to religious ones? chessmaster1989
This is the conclusion that I would draw as well, that Islam is no more inherently violent than any other religion but that certain conditions can lead to extremism.
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#30 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Also, doesn't the fact that these are Muslim Americans suggest that the reasons for Muslim terrorism are more closely related to cultural/political values than to religious ones? And yet people will continue to blame Islam. Meh...Wasdie

Well Islam is cultural/political. No seperation of church and state and their religous writings detail exactly how to live their lives.

My point is, much of the Middle East culturally treats Islam differently from how Muslims in the US do. That cultural difference is what spawns violence. Should we blame Islam, or the cultural differences? (In my opinion) in light of the millions of peaceful Muslims, the answer is clear.

I don't blame Christianity or any other religion for acts of extremism by its members. Islam is no different.

Avatar image for Gallion-Beast
Gallion-Beast

35803

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 Gallion-Beast
Member since 2005 • 35803 Posts
"Respondents from other faith groups, particularly Mormon Americans, are more likely to say military attacks are sometimes justified than never justified." Huh? This seems to imply Mormons are most likely to okay with violence against civilians, whereas the actual figures show them as the second least likely...
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#32 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
[QUOTE="Gallion-Beast"]"Respondents from other faith groups, particularly Mormon Americans, are more likely to say military attacks are sometimes justified than never justified." Huh? This seems to imply Mormons are most likely to okay with violence against civilians, whereas the actual figures show them as the second least likely...

That's from a response to a different question in the article. Earlier table up. If you click the link you can see which question that's in reference to.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

First of all, this a completely biased poll. There are several reasons for this.

1. The are Muslim-Americans. These are Muslims who liked America enough to move there. They aren't the "violent" Muslims that are extreme in their ways.

2. They are Muslims who have seen so much war and blood of innocent civilians. They would be much more sympathetic to the cause than other people.

GreySeal9

How do those factors make the poll biased?

Biased wasn't really the right word... but it does nothing to prove the points that people are drawing from it.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

How do those factors make the poll biased?

GreySeal9

Biased wasn't really the right word... but it does nothing to prove the points that people are drawing from it.

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

First of all, this a completely biased poll. There are several reasons for this.

1. The are Muslim-Americans. These are Muslims who liked America enough to move there. They aren't the "violent" Muslims that are extreme in their ways.

2. They are Muslims who have seen so much war and blood of innocent civilians. They would be much more sympathetic to the cause than other people.

chessmaster1989

Err, not all Muslim Americans are recent immigrants so neither statement is valid... :?

That doesn't matter. Most have family still living in the Middle East and are "connected" to that part of the world. For example, I'm from New Orleans but I live in Houston. All of my extended family lives in New Orleans. When Katrina hit, I was affected greatly by it even though it wasn't direct. I feel way more in regards to Katrina than other people without that connection.

When Muslims hear about all of the civilians killed in their family's home country, they feel very sympathetic. They would be more likely to feel empathy for those civilians than the average American.

Avatar image for Wolls
Wolls

19119

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#35 Wolls
Member since 2005 • 19119 Posts
Hmm well it is possible that Muslim american would be less hasty in telling someone they would use violence because of their already persecuted culture however this poll is still kinda interesting
Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#36 Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]Also, doesn't the fact that these are Muslim Americans suggest that the reasons for Muslim terrorism are more closely related to cultural/political values than to religious ones? And yet people will continue to blame Islam. Meh...Wasdie

Well Islam is cultural/political. No seperation of church and state and their religous writings detail exactly how to live their lives.

Almost all religions have traditions of religious writings that dictate in detail how followers are supposed to live their lives.

The extent to which there is a separation between church and state in nations where Muslims live varies from country to country. You're likely refering to countries in the Arab world. There is only one problem with that. The Arab world accounts for roughly 20% of muslims, so its pretty ridiculous to base ANY universal perceptions about the religion on that part of the world alone.

More than 30% of the Muslims in the world live in India, Bangladesh, or Indonesia and all three are secular democracies.

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#37 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

Most have family still living in the Middle East and are "connected" to that part of the world

BMD004

Can you back that statement up?

And this poll is about civilians in general, not specifically related to the Middle East.

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#38 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

Most have family still living in the Middle East and are "connected" to that part of the world

chessmaster1989

Can you back that statement up?

And this poll is about civilians in general, not specifically related to the Middle East.

It's just common sense. Unless their grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, etc. all moved to the U.S. (which is extremely unlikely), then they still have family in the Middle East. And no, not all Muslims are from the Middle East... but most are. It's not often that a white guy grows up as Muslim. Some black people do, but it is still rare.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

Americans are great people and before we became an isolationist welfare state we were getting many great hard workers from other nations as well.

Avatar image for fueled-system
fueled-system

6529

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 fueled-system
Member since 2008 • 6529 Posts

Isn't this the definition of a biased poll?

Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#41 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

Most have family still living in the Middle East and are "connected" to that part of the world

BMD004

Can you back that statement up?

And this poll is about civilians in general, not specifically related to the Middle East.

It's just common sense. Unless their grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, etc. all moved to the U.S. (which is extremely unlikely), then they still have family in the Middle East. And no, not all Muslims are from the Middle East... but most are. It's not often that a white guy grows up as Muslim. Some black people do, but it is still rare.

Incorrect. Only 20% of Muslims live in the Middle East, so your conjecture that most Muslim Americans have relatives in the Middle East does not seem reasonable.

By the way, re: black people growing up Muslim, 15% of the world's Muslim population lives in sub-Saharan Africa, and I'm guessing most of them are black.

Avatar image for Seiki_sands
Seiki_sands

1973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#42 Seiki_sands
Member since 2003 • 1973 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

Most have family still living in the Middle East and are "connected" to that part of the world

BMD004

Can you back that statement up?

And this poll is about civilians in general, not specifically related to the Middle East.

It's just common sense. Unless their grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, etc. all moved to the U.S. (which is extremely unlikely), then they still have family in the Middle East. And no, not all Muslims are from the Middle East... but most are. It's not often that a white guy grows up as Muslim. Some black people do, but it is still rare.

Again, most muslims do not live in the middle east and haven't for a long time. The are 160,000,000 in India alone and more than another 140,000,000 in Bangladesh and another 200,000,000 in Indonesia.

The middle east accounts for about 20% of muslims. There are more muslims in Russia than Jordan and Libya combined. There are more muslims in the rest of Europe than in Oman, Palestine, Lebanon, The United Arab Emirates, and Syria combined.

Avatar image for cosmicimam
cosmicimam

25

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 cosmicimam
Member since 2011 • 25 Posts
In other news, American-Muslims fear being sent to Guantanamo bay.
Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"][QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

Can you back that statement up?

And this poll is about civilians in general, not specifically related to the Middle East.

chessmaster1989

It's just common sense. Unless their grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, etc. all moved to the U.S. (which is extremely unlikely), then they still have family in the Middle East. And no, not all Muslims are from the Middle East... but most are. It's not often that a white guy grows up as Muslim. Some black people do, but it is still rare.

Incorrect. Only 20% of Muslims live in the Middle East, so your conjecture that most Muslim Americans have relatives in the Middle East does not seem reasonable.

By the way, re: black people growing up Muslim, 15% of the world's Muslim population lives in sub-Saharan Africa, and I'm guessing most of them are black.

I'm talking about Americans here. But anyway, fair enough. My point still stands. The Middle East and Africa are parts of the world with a lot of violence. The ones who are here in America are the ones who got away from all of that. You cannot compare the Muslims in America to the Muslims who live in those countries.

Plus, a lot of Americans are fed up with the wars in the Middle East, and would be more likely to allow the killing of civilians out of desperation if it would help their cause to end terrorism.

It's more of a political, emotional issue than a religious one.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
sounds about right
Avatar image for chessmaster1989
chessmaster1989

30203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#46 chessmaster1989
Member since 2008 • 30203 Posts

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="BMD004"]It's just common sense. Unless their grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, etc. all moved to the U.S. (which is extremely unlikely), then they still have family in the Middle East. And no, not all Muslims are from the Middle East... but most are. It's not often that a white guy grows up as Muslim. Some black people do, but it is still rare.BMD004

Incorrect. Only 20% of Muslims live in the Middle East, so your conjecture that most Muslim Americans have relatives in the Middle East does not seem reasonable.

By the way, re: black people growing up Muslim, 15% of the world's Muslim population lives in sub-Saharan Africa, and I'm guessing most of them are black.

I'm talking about Americans here. But anyway, fair enough. My point still stands. The Middle East and Africa are parts of the world with a lot of violence. The ones who are here in America are the ones who got away from all of that. You cannot compare the Muslims in America to the Muslims who live in those countries.

Plus, a lot of Americans are fed up with the wars in the Middle East, and would be more likely to allow the killing of civilians out of desperation if it would help their cause to end terrorism.

It's more of a political, emotional issue than a religious one.

It's true, you can't compare Muslims in the US to Muslims in the Middle East, but what this poll does suggest that Islam itself isn't actually a violent religion, as many people take Muslim extremism to suggest (not saying that you believe that, of course).

I know you're talking about Americans, but I still don't see support for your claim that the Muslims here are ones who fled from violence in the Middle East/Africa. You've just been claiming that's the case without really supporting it... Though I suppose it's not that relevant a point regardless because my above statement about its implications for the "violence" of Islam still hold.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180060

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180060 Posts
I don't think anyone accused Muslim Americans of being pro violence....
Avatar image for Blue-Sky
Blue-Sky

10381

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#48 Blue-Sky
Member since 2005 • 10381 Posts

There are nearly 2 billion Muslims in the world

the terrorist organizations don't even make up 0.001% of that.

Avatar image for BMD004
BMD004

5883

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 BMD004
Member since 2010 • 5883 Posts

[QUOTE="BMD004"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

Incorrect. Only 20% of Muslims live in the Middle East, so your conjecture that most Muslim Americans have relatives in the Middle East does not seem reasonable.

By the way, re: black people growing up Muslim, 15% of the world's Muslim population lives in sub-Saharan Africa, and I'm guessing most of them are black.

chessmaster1989

I'm talking about Americans here. But anyway, fair enough. My point still stands. The Middle East and Africa are parts of the world with a lot of violence. The ones who are here in America are the ones who got away from all of that. You cannot compare the Muslims in America to the Muslims who live in those countries.

Plus, a lot of Americans are fed up with the wars in the Middle East, and would be more likely to allow the killing of civilians out of desperation if it would help their cause to end terrorism.

It's more of a political, emotional issue than a religious one.

It's true, you can't compare Muslims in the US to Muslims in the Middle East, but what this poll does suggest that Islam itself isn't actually a violent religion, as many people take Muslim extremism to suggest (not saying that you believe that, of course).

I know you're talking about Americans, but I still don't see support for your claim that the Muslims here are ones who fled from violence in the Middle East/Africa. You've just been claiming that's the case without really supporting it... Though I suppose it's not that relevant a point regardless because my above statement about its implications for the "violence" of Islam still hold.

But my point is that it doesn't do anything to prove anything about violence. All it does is talk about killing of innocent civilians. My point is that the killing of innocent Muslim civilians happens a lot in that part of the world. A lot of Muslims have had to deal with that. The Muslims in America are sympathetic when it comes to the killing of civilians because so many Muslims have been killed that way from different wars and oppressive regimes. Americans don't really deal with that. Most Americans don't even realize just how many civilians have been killed from the wars over there. All this poll shows is that Americans, regardless of religion, generally don't like the killing of innocent civilians, and Muslims REALLY don't like the killing of innocent civilians, because they have a connection to their people being killed.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#50 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

There are nearly 2 billion Muslims in the world

the terrorist organizations don't even make up 0.001% of that.

Blue-Sky

i clicked around on a few sites and islamcovers between 21-23% of the worlds population.

2billion/.21 = 9.5 billion

2 billion / .23 = 8.7 billion

so according to you there are between 8.7 and 9.5 billion people on this planet.