Genghis Khan killed 11.1% of the world's population

  • 82 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#51 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
[QUOTE="Tokugawa77"]So Hitler kills 12 million in the holocaust, we call him the most evil man to ever live. Chingis Khan kills 40 million and we call him a badass :P Another interesting fact- 60 million of today's modern human population are estimated to be direct decendents of the guy...Yeah I suppose he'd have to be a badass to get that much ass, if you get my drift.

Hitler targeted the Jews, homosexuals, the handicapped and Gypsies for extermination because they were everything wrong with Germany and his plans for a "master race." Genghis slaughtered every man, woman, child and animal in a town that refused to either unite with him or pay him tribute. Big difference.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="Tokugawa77"]So Hitler kills 12 million in the holocaust, we call him the most evil man to ever live. Chingis Khan kills 40 million and we call him a badass :P Another interesting fact- 60 million of today's modern human population are estimated to be direct decendents of the guy...Yeah I suppose he'd have to be a badass to get that much ass, if you get my drift.foxhound_fox
Hitler targeted the Jews, homosexuals, the handicapped and Gypsies for extermination because they were everything wrong with Germany and his plans for a "master race." Genghis slaughtered every man, woman, child and animal in a town that refused to either unite with him or pay him tribute. Big difference.

care to elaborate? both seem just as evil and cruel

Avatar image for xTheExploited
xTheExploited

12094

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 xTheExploited
Member since 2007 • 12094 Posts
i bet i could kick his ass.
Avatar image for Jd1680a
Jd1680a

5960

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#54 Jd1680a
Member since 2005 • 5960 Posts
I think the reason he killed so many is to prevent a Jehad. Killing so many people might have caused many to reconsider.
Avatar image for foxhound_fox
foxhound_fox

98532

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 13

User Lists: 0

#55 foxhound_fox
Member since 2005 • 98532 Posts
care to elaborate? both seem just as evil and cruelBossPerson
I thought I did already. Just because someone is a badass doesn't mean they aren't also excessively violent and cruel. Hitler targeted a specific group of people to be wiped off the face of the planet. Genghis wanted to conquer the world and killed anyone who stood in his way. There is a difference.
Avatar image for BossPerson
BossPerson

9177

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#56 BossPerson
Member since 2011 • 9177 Posts

[QUOTE="BossPerson"]care to elaborate? both seem just as evil and cruelfoxhound_fox
I thought I did already. Just because someone is a badass doesn't mean they aren't also excessively violent and cruel. Hitler targeted a specific group of people to be wiped off the face of the planet. Genghis wanted to conquer the world and killed anyone who stood in his way. There is a difference.

well imo neither of them are badasses, but yeah i see ur point

Avatar image for Tokugawa77
Tokugawa77

1554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#57 Tokugawa77
Member since 2009 • 1554 Posts
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"][QUOTE="Tokugawa77"]So Hitler kills 12 million in the holocaust, we call him the most evil man to ever live. Chingis Khan kills 40 million and we call him a badass :P Another interesting fact- 60 million of today's modern human population are estimated to be direct decendents of the guy...Yeah I suppose he'd have to be a badass to get that much ass, if you get my drift.

Hitler targeted the Jews, homosexuals, the handicapped and Gypsies for extermination because they were everything wrong with Germany and his plans for a "master race." Genghis slaughtered every man, woman, child and animal in a town that refused to either unite with him or pay him tribute. Big difference.

Like I said before, killing is killing. Today Genghis Khan would be charged with war crimes in the ICC, Hitler with genocide. As far as I know, both are punished equally.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
"if he is so cool why is he dead?"
Avatar image for masiisam
masiisam

5723

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 masiisam
Member since 2003 • 5723 Posts

Muhh..I would have kicked his ass...

Avatar image for DeX2010
DeX2010

3989

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 DeX2010
Member since 2010 • 3989 Posts

Of the time, of course.

Link

Seriously, for one man (and most likely his entire group of mongols) to kill 40 mil and for a full scale war (WW2) across the globe to get only 66 mil is.....amazing. In a bad way of course, but WW2 was a full scale war and it didnt do THAT much more in deaths....interestingly enough.

Thoughts?

kris9031998
22 Million is still a huge number of people. It represents roughly 1/4 of the UK's entire population.
Avatar image for -TheSecondSign-
-TheSecondSign-

9303

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#61 -TheSecondSign-
Member since 2007 • 9303 Posts

That certainly puts my accomplishments to shame.

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts
Being Arabic, it's pretty interesting how people feel when they hear of his bloody accomplishments... one more thing to relate with the Jewish people.
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#63 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

I think part of these deaths were due to plague and other diseases.

However it seems Khan is not really criticized for all these deaths, though if he were a white/European I bet there would be more criticism of him.

Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#64 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

Being Arabic, it's pretty interesting how people feel when they hear of his bloody accomplishments... one more thing to relate with the Jewish people.Victorious_Fize
Did Khan kill a lot of Arabs?

Avatar image for SamusFreak
SamusFreak

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 SamusFreak
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts

Being Arabic, it's pretty interesting how people feel when they hear of his bloody accomplishments... one more thing to relate with the Jewish people.Victorious_Fize

and its the nature of his accomplishment that makes me shake my head at it. They compare him to Hitler Hitler fought a major war with the other major powers of the world. Khan, went throughout largely peasant Asia, and butchered peasants. Most of the Juicy stuff, and the biggest accomplishments of that Empire, weren't even made by him, but by his sons. Why he's so revered, I'll never understand. Anyone can drive tanks over helpless people when there is no one to take out the tanks.

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"]Being Arabic, it's pretty interesting how people feel when they hear of his bloody accomplishments... one more thing to relate with the Jewish people.whipassmt

Did Khan kill a lot of Arabs?

Slaughter, yes. He practically annihilated our territory (extended from "al maghreb" [morroco and al andalus] to al mashreq [eastern side of things, baghdad, persia, damascus, and all that etc) and it has been a historic mess since then.
Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"]Being Arabic, it's pretty interesting how people feel when they hear of his bloody accomplishments... one more thing to relate with the Jewish people.SamusFreak

and its the nature of his accomplishment that makes me shake my head at it. They compare him to Hitler Hitler fought a major war with the other major powers of the world. Khan, went throughout largely peasant Asia, and butchered peasants. Most of the Juicy stuff, and the biggest accomplishments of that Empire, weren't even made by him, but by his sons. Why he's so revered, I'll never understand. Anyone can drive tanks over helpless people when there is no one to take out the tanks.

Indeed. Genghis Khan is no badass. A coward he is for killing women and children through his direct tongue.
Avatar image for Tokugawa77
Tokugawa77

1554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#68 Tokugawa77
Member since 2009 • 1554 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"]Being Arabic, it's pretty interesting how people feel when they hear of his bloody accomplishments... one more thing to relate with the Jewish people.SamusFreak

and its the nature of his accomplishment that makes me shake my head at it. They compare him to Hitler Hitler fought a major war with the other major powers of the world. Khan, went throughout largely peasant Asia, and butchered peasants. Most of the Juicy stuff, and the biggest accomplishments of that Empire, weren't even made by him, but by his sons. Why he's so revered, I'll never understand. Anyone can drive tanks over helpless people when there is no one to take out the tanks.

He unified the heavily divided Mongol tribes and conqured as far as Kazakhstan with an army dwarfed by every enemy they fought. etc, etc
Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts
I'll just leave this here and keep out of this thread. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Destruction_under_the_Mongol_Empire#Terror
Avatar image for whipassmt
whipassmt

15375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 24

User Lists: 0

#70 whipassmt
Member since 2007 • 15375 Posts

[QUOTE="whipassmt"]

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"]Being Arabic, it's pretty interesting how people feel when they hear of his bloody accomplishments... one more thing to relate with the Jewish people.Victorious_Fize

Did Khan kill a lot of Arabs?

Slaughter, yes. He practically annihilated our territory (extended from "al maghreb" [morroco and al andalus] to al mashreq [eastern side of things, baghdad, persia, damascus, and all that etc) and it has been a historic mess since then.

To be fair the Maghreb and most of the Mashreq was territory conquered by the Arabs (originally from Arabia), not their indigineous homeland.

And apparently I recently learned that Arabic has no letter "p", and that the English word farsi comes from the Arabic word Farsi (the actually Persian word is Parsi). this explains why an Egyptian foreign-Exchange student I meant kept saying "imbrove" rather than "improve".

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"][QUOTE="whipassmt"] Did Khan kill a lot of Arabs?

whipassmt

Slaughter, yes. He practically annihilated our territory (extended from "al maghreb" [morroco and al andalus] to al mashreq [eastern side of things, baghdad, persia, damascus, and all that etc) and it has been a historic mess since then.

To be fair the Maghreb and most of the Mashreq was territory conquered by the Arabs (originally from Arabia), not their indigineous homeland.

And apparently I recently learned that Arabic has no letter "p", and that the English word farsi comes from the Arabic word Farsi (the actually Persian word is Parsi). this explains why an Egyptian foreign-Exchange student I meant kept saying "imbrove" rather than "improve".

To even draw a comparison is extremely insulting. Don't try to make the tired "nobody is truly Arab but the people of the Gulf" as to make someone other than them (khalijis) a foreign. The Prophet himself was not a true Arab, he was an Adnani Arab, essentially an Arabized man, or tracing to an Arabized person (which he does: Ishmael), much like all the Arabs in Syria, Egypt, and everywhere else in the world. At the days of the Abbasid caliphate, most people embraced Islam and all were united with each other, in case you thought the Arabic empire that represented Syria, Egypt, Al Maghreb, among others, merely subjugated them and represented Khaliji Arabs.

FYI, to be an Arabic is no more than to speak Arabic, although it would require somewhat a general approval out of beforehand Arabs (mostly adherence to cultural norms and joining out of good faith). This, coming from an Azdi Arabic.

Indeed, there is no letter "P" in Arabic, so it's normal to see an Arabic English speaker have a problem with it among other letters.

Persians are not Arabs, but they are considered on the Eastern side of things (eastern = mashreq), and are our brothers regardless of dictatorial asshats and fitan.

Avatar image for SamusFreak
SamusFreak

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 SamusFreak
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts

[QUOTE="SamusFreak"]

[QUOTE="Victorious_Fize"]Being Arabic, it's pretty interesting how people feel when they hear of his bloody accomplishments... one more thing to relate with the Jewish people.Tokugawa77

and its the nature of his accomplishment that makes me shake my head at it. They compare him to Hitler Hitler fought a major war with the other major powers of the world. Khan, went throughout largely peasant Asia, and butchered peasants. Most of the Juicy stuff, and the biggest accomplishments of that Empire, weren't even made by him, but by his sons. Why he's so revered, I'll never understand. Anyone can drive tanks over helpless people when there is no one to take out the tanks.

He unified the heavily divided Mongol tribes and conqured as far as Kazakhstan with an army dwarfed by every enemy they fought. etc, etc

Vast armies of rabble are easy to manipulate and conquer, many far more honorable men did the same. Many did so far more outnumbered, Khan was outnumbered, but not dwarfed. He faced enemies that were disorganized/poorly organized, that made many mistakes and poor judgement calls. far more often, he used cruel and brutal tactics against their peoples to beat them into submission, than actually besting them in bouts on the battlefield. He got far in his time, but what I said was true, the greatest extensions into Asia, Europe, and the Middle East were achieved long after his death, the Empire saw it's greatest expansion near the end of the 13th Century, he about a half century before it.

Avatar image for Tokugawa77
Tokugawa77

1554

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#73 Tokugawa77
Member since 2009 • 1554 Posts

[QUOTE="Tokugawa77"][QUOTE="SamusFreak"]

and its the nature of his accomplishment that makes me shake my head at it. They compare him to Hitler Hitler fought a major war with the other major powers of the world. Khan, went throughout largely peasant Asia, and butchered peasants. Most of the Juicy stuff, and the biggest accomplishments of that Empire, weren't even made by him, but by his sons. Why he's so revered, I'll never understand. Anyone can drive tanks over helpless people when there is no one to take out the tanks.

SamusFreak

He unified the heavily divided Mongol tribes and conqured as far as Kazakhstan with an army dwarfed by every enemy they fought. etc, etc

Vast armies of rabble are easy to manipulate and conquer, many far more honorable men did the same. Many did so far more outnumbered, Khan was outnumbered, but not dwarfed. He faced enemies that were disorganized/poorly organized, that made many mistakes and poor judgement calls. far more often, he used cruel and brutal tactics against their peoples to beat them into submission, than actually besting them in bouts on the battlefield. He got far in his time, but what I said was true, the greatest extensions into Asia, Europe, and the Middle East were achieved long after his death, the Empire saw it's greatest expansion near the end of the 13th Century, he about a half century before it.

Half of the empire was created by Genghis, and he laid teh basis for future conquests. Do you really think his successors were any less brutal? If anything, many were much less successful, launching ill-fated invasions of Japan, Vietnam, Jakarta, and the Holy Land. Genghis Khan faced actual empires- you are forgetting that at the time, the mongols were just nomadic tribes, no one could have forseen their swift rise. It was Genghis who organized them into a fearsome fighting unit, and cemented them as a nation for the first time in their history.
Avatar image for SamusFreak
SamusFreak

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 SamusFreak
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts

[QUOTE="SamusFreak"]

[QUOTE="Tokugawa77"] He unified the heavily divided Mongol tribes and conquered as far as Kazakhstan with an army dwarfed by every enemy they fought. etc, etcTokugawa77

Vast armies of rabble are easy to manipulate and conquer, many far more honorable men did the same. Many did so far more outnumbered, Khan was outnumbered, but not dwarfed. He faced enemies that were disorganized/poorly organized, that made many mistakes and poor judgement calls. far more often, he used cruel and brutal tactics against their peoples to beat them into submission, than actually besting them in bouts on the battlefield. He got far in his time, but what I said was true, the greatest extensions into Asia, Europe, and the Middle East were achieved long after his death, the Empire saw it's greatest expansion near the end of the 13th Century, he about a half century before it.

Half of the empire was created by Genghis, and he laid teh basis for future conquests. Do you really think his successors were any less brutal? If anything, many were much less successful, launching ill-fated invasions of Japan, Vietnam, Jakarta, and the Holy Land. Genghis Khan faced actual empires- you are forgetting that at the time, the mongols were just nomadic tribes, no one could have forseen their swift rise. It was Genghis who organized them into a fearsome fighting unit, and cemented them as a nation for the first time in their history.

We were talking about Ghenghis specifically, I did not say they were better men, did better, or were better. Simply that he died far before the empire saw it's greatest expanse. I have not disputed anything that he did, simply looked down upon the methods, and stated the truth, they are nothing special, nothing unique, and when it comes to battle, others have done the same with greater odds. Ghenghis did go against empires, such as the Jin Dynasty, they outnumbered him, but unless you would be mistaken to call them competent, intelligent, and organized, then it's not hard to see how he defeated them. The actions of the Jin Dynasty afterwards is facepalm worthy, and shows how stuipd they were.

He fought Empires yes,but most were complete jokes.

To that you probably think " well, he still beat them" And, that is the basis for this topic. I, and the other gentlemen, simply have stated what I have said above. If the kill count he achieved is all we are looking at and admiring then by all means, he by a very wide margin, is the cruelest and most sadistic bastard of a conquer in the history of the world. to my knowledge at least.

Avatar image for JasonDarksavior
JasonDarksavior

9323

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 38

User Lists: 0

#75 JasonDarksavior
Member since 2008 • 9323 Posts
Never knew the Black Plague started killing the Mongols first.
Avatar image for V4LENT1NE
V4LENT1NE

12901

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#76 V4LENT1NE
Member since 2006 • 12901 Posts
What a total bad ass.
Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
So? The strong have always rules over the weak
Avatar image for T_REX305
T_REX305

11304

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 T_REX305
Member since 2010 • 11304 Posts

He was probably related to Chuck Norris.kuraimen

Actually from a documentary I saw, 1 in 200 men living today could be related to him somehow. :P

Avatar image for deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988

5396

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 deactivated-5d0e4d67d0988
Member since 2008 • 5396 Posts

What's with the double posting in this thread.

After reading that, Chuck Norris who?

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#80 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

What a jerk. His ancestors should have to pay reparations. Because today there are peopel that are living off the benefits that caused. As per my liberal friends, these descendants must pay reparations. Reparations damn it!

Avatar image for Victorious_Fize
Victorious_Fize

6128

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 Victorious_Fize
Member since 2011 • 6128 Posts

What a jerk. His ancestors should have to pay reparations. Because today there are peopel that are living off the benefits that caused. As per my liberal friends, these descendants must pay reparations. Reparations damn it!

sonicare
Nobody said anything about reparations... you might want to... not venerate him instead?
Avatar image for Eponique
Eponique

17918

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#82 Eponique
Member since 2007 • 17918 Posts
He killed 11% of the world, and 11% of the world is related to him. Existence of souls confirmed?