[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]I assume it will have that famous copy of "The Pet Goat" in a special case due to its historical significance?dave123321Ultra is now interested Who is Ultra?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
That's odd that a man who can't read is getting a library named after him.
[spoiler] I kid, I kid [/spoiler]
[QUOTE="danjammer69"][QUOTE="BossPerson"]Not trying to be a smartass. But I need to ask: Would you prefer to have lived or have had your family continue to live under Sadaam Hussein? I understand that the country was left in a terrible state, both politically and physically. But were Iraqis better off having Hussein left in power? This is an honest question, I am not trying to infer anything. I didn't live there. I only had the media and my own personal knowledge of Iraq to form judgment.id rather saddam be toppled by his own people instead of a US invasion, even a Syrian scenario (which an arab spring style uprising would have most likely turned into) would be preferable to the mess that is the Iraq War As for the question, I would have preferred the US not invade and leave Saddam in power (hoping he would be deposed by his own people). Well, I appreciate the honest answer. It was hard for me to phrase that without it sounding like I know better or was saying that the US 'saved' Iraq.idk, as an Iraqi, I feel like I have the right to ride the Bush hate train until Im dead
BossPerson
He's not a war criminal. And he didn't cause the recession, it happened due to factors outside of his control.Keep telling yourself that and maybe it'll come true, but probably not. So Bush was tried and convicted as a war criminal? I must have missed that extremely important event in history.[QUOTE="whipassmt"]
[QUOTE="Aljosa23"]
Despite being a war criminal and bringing about the biggest recession in a century he did a lot of good in Africa WRT HIV. Pretty bad President overall, though.
Aljosa23
So when we decide to go to war does it turn into an awesome strategy game where we get to direct troops? Otherwise it seems like a heap of money wasted on something stupid and pointless.Today is the opening day for the George W. Bush Presidential Library and Museum in Dallas, Texas (I believe it is located on the campus of Southern Methodist University, which is where Bush's wife Laura went to college).
staffers at the Clinton presidential library expect that Bill Clinton will visit the Bush library and will want some renovations to be done to the Clinton library.
One of the more interesting features of the Bush library is an interactive feature where users get to step into Bush's shoes and get to make important decisions that Bush made. The visitor will hear information that Bush's aides and advisors gave him before making various decisions, and then the user will be asked to make a decision. After the visitor decides, Bush's image appears on screen and explains what decision he made and why. To me that feature sounds kind of cool, it's like your being president for a little bit and making a decision at a historical "decision point".
whipassmt
I doubt we invaded Iraq for oil. Why invade a country for oil, causing a war that would likely destroy or damage many oil refineries? Wouldn't it be easier for the U.S. to have cut a deal with Saddam if the U.S. really wanted oil, like for instance: The U.S. will end UN sanctions against Iraq, support Iraq in the territorial dispute with Iran over the Shat al-Arab and sell Iraq some military equipment if Iraq sells us oil?
.
themajormayor
I doubt we invaded Iraq for oil. Why invade a country for oil, causing a war that would likely destroy or damage many oil refineries? Wouldn't it be easier for the U.S. to have cut a deal with Saddam if the U.S. really wanted oil, like for instance: The U.S. will end UN sanctions against Iraq, support Iraq in the territorial dispute with Iran over the Shat al-Arab and sell Iraq some military equipment if Iraq sells us oil? I just thought it was a funny picture.[QUOTE="themajormayor"]
.
whipassmt
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]I doubt we invaded Iraq for oil. Why invade a country for oil, causing a war that would likely destroy or damage many oil refineries? Wouldn't it be easier for the U.S. to have cut a deal with Saddam if the U.S. really wanted oil, like for instance: The U.S. will end UN sanctions against Iraq, support Iraq in the territorial dispute with Iran over the Shat al-Arab and sell Iraq some military equipment if Iraq sells us oil? I just thought it was a funny picture. oh okay. Does Australia have a lot of oil?[QUOTE="themajormayor"]
.
themajormayor
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]I doubt we invaded Iraq for oil. Why invade a country for oil, causing a war that would likely destroy or damage many oil refineries? Wouldn't it be easier for the U.S. to have cut a deal with Saddam if the U.S. really wanted oil, like for instance: The U.S. will end UN sanctions against Iraq, support Iraq in the territorial dispute with Iran over the Shat al-Arab and sell Iraq some military equipment if Iraq sells us oil? I just thought it was a funny picture. A lot of people think we really did invade Iraq to steal their oil, so posting that will make a lot of people assume you think that too.[QUOTE="themajormayor"]themajormayor
[QUOTE="JML897"][QUOTE="lamprey263"]it's supposed to have the largest collection of coloring books and books with picturescomp_atkins:lol: . surprised none of you all beat me to the punch, nothing but sillyness can come from this news, the Bush Library is such an oxymoron
Leaving aside your thoughts about the Afghanistan/Iraq wars, Can Republicans on this board mention 3 substantial accomplishments for President W. Bush? 1) ??? 2) ??? 3) ???Master_Live
Gas prices went down under Bush when the economy was in freefall. :P
Seriously though I'm a democrat, but I'll give this a shot however I'm going to require that the word substantial be removed.
1. He helped fund green energy jobs in this country which has been ramped up by Obama.
2. The economic stimulous act of 2008Â has been pretty well excepted as a helpful thing by economists.
3. .........I got nothing.
honestly that would be awesomeThe only thing that will make this library worth it is to put "haters gonna hate" as their official motto.
one_plum
[QUOTE="one_plum"]honestly that would be awesomeThe only thing that will make this library worth it is to put "haters gonna hate" as their official motto.
Serraph105
hasn't there been talks of this for a while now? I'm just basing this off the fact of memories of hearing Conan make Bush Library jokes months, maybe years ago.
Nayway, this isn't really surprising, since evry other president has gotten one.
Almost forgot about that. Another way to say it is "he showed he was a really really helpful friend of Wall Street."2. The economic stimulous act of 2008Â has been pretty well excepted as a helpful thing by economists.
Serraph105
As long as you can express that hate without flying planes into buildings or bombing marathons, then have a blast.... :PLostProphetFLCLI see what you did there
Bush's presidency was a disaster, but Obama's is looking to be far worse. With regards to his legacy, Bush will benefit greatly because he will be remembered as the president who was not as bad as Obama.Laihendi->implying all other presidents were at least as bad as Obama
idk, as an Iraqi, I feel like I have the right to ride the Bush hate train until Im dead
Not trying to be a smartass. But I need to ask: Would you prefer to have lived or have had your family continue to live under Sadaam Hussein? I understand that the country was left in a terrible state, both politically and physically. But were Iraqis better off having Hussein left in power? This is an honest question, I am not trying to infer anything. I didn't live there. I only had the media and my own personal knowledge of Iraq to form judgment.id rather saddam be toppled by his own people instead of a US invasion, even a Syrian scenario (which an arab spring style uprising would have most likely turned into) would be preferable to the mess that is the Iraq War As for the question, I would have preferred the US not invade and leave Saddam in power (hoping he would be deposed by his own people). An honest few questions? Are you of the thought process that the results of an internal uprising, like the syrian scenario, would of been in favor of who you are and/or retain affiliations towards in Iraq? With so many failed assassination attempts on saddam and his brothers it would seem it would of merely been more of the same based on who took him down no?Hey at least Bush got rid of the sanctions on Iraq. And Saddam Hussein. That's a plus right?[QUOTE="BossPerson"]
idk, as an Iraqi, I feel like I have the right to ride the Bush hate train until Im dead
whipassmt
Leaving aside your thoughts about the Afghanistan/Iraq wars, Can Republicans on this board mention 3 substantial accomplishments for President W. Bush? 1) ??? 2) ??? 3) ???Master_Live
I'm not really a Republican as much as I'm just more conservative yet do not like the Republican party but...
He greatly increased the aid spending to Africa to help fight AIDS. Went from just several hundred million to several billion ending up with a total of $15 billion over the 8 years.
Lowered taxes on everybody and kept them lower. Disagree with it or not, it's still an accomplishment that was felt by every tax payer.
Early medicare reform which was very popular and did a lot of good for senior citizens.
Really any accomplishment of any president is going to be considered a failure with people who disagree. Things like No Child Left Behind and the wars were all bi-partisan. Actually No Child Left Behind increased total education funding to the highest levels they ever were while actually improving test scores. The only two standardized tests required by the acts are on reading and math, two areas where standardized tests are an accurate measure of one's ability. The reason schools hated it is because it had provisions that held the schools accountable. Unions and school administrators hated that and ran a massive campaign against it for that reason despite the increases in education.Â
It was also an accomplishment that no major terrorist attack happened on US soil after 9/11 and there was a very quick response to the presence of terrorist networks in Afghanistan. This was all prior to the invasion of Iraq which was just a bad move all together.Â
[QUOTE="BossPerson"][QUOTE="danjammer69"] Not trying to be a smartass. But I need to ask: Would you prefer to have lived or have had your family continue to live under Sadaam Hussein? I understand that the country was left in a terrible state, both politically and physically. But were Iraqis better off having Hussein left in power? This is an honest question, I am not trying to infer anything. I didn't live there. I only had the media and my own personal knowledge of Iraq to form judgment.CreasianDevailiid rather saddam be toppled by his own people instead of a US invasion, even a Syrian scenario (which an arab spring style uprising would have most likely turned into) would be preferable to the mess that is the Iraq War As for the question, I would have preferred the US not invade and leave Saddam in power (hoping he would be deposed by his own people). An honest few questions? Are you of the thought process that the results of an internal uprising, like the syrian scenario, would of been in favor of who you are and/or retain affiliations towards in Iraq? With so many failed assassination attempts on saddam and his brothers it would seem it would of merely been more of the same based on who took him down no?gotta be one of the most incoherent sentances ive ever read there's a difference between an armed uprising and an assassination attempt
[QUOTE="whipassmt"]Hey at least Bush got rid of the sanctions on Iraq. And Saddam Hussein. That's a plus right? well that's how Bush got rid of the sanctions. The sanctions on Iraq were placed there because of the regime, shortly after Bush got rid of the regime, most of the sanctions were lifted in May 2003, with the exception of sanctions that give the U.S. and the U.K. control over Iraq's oil revenue (that was lifted in December 2010, probably in conjunction with the drawdown of U.S. and U.K. forces in Iraq), and sanctions that require that Iraq pay 5% of their oil and natural gas revenue to Kuwait as reparations (this sanction is still in effect).[QUOTE="BossPerson"]
idk, as an Iraqi, I feel like I have the right to ride the Bush hate train until Im dead
TheWalkingGhost
This article, by Walter Russell Mead, written on March 12, 2003 (right before the war started) points out the humanitarian and strategic costs of "containment", the policy that the U.S. pursued against Iraq after the Gulf War and before the Iraq War, and might still be pursuing today if there was no Iraq War.
Things like No Child Left Behind and the wars were all bi-partisan. Actually No Child Left Behind increased total education funding to the highest levels they ever were while actually improving test scores. The only two standardized tests required by the acts are on reading and math, two areas where standardized tests are an accurate measure of one's ability. The reason schools hated it is because it had provisions that held the schools accountable. Unions and school administrators hated that and ran a massive campaign against it for that reason despite the increases in education.WasdieAs a teacher I'll stop you on that one. The reason teachers and schools dislike NCLB is because it forces the curriculum of the school to be based on the information presented on the test, and NOT the information that students need to be successful in college and professional life. Your conclusion is wrong, With the provisions attached to results it virtually assures that the only material presented to students is the material that will be on the test. That limits education and the variety of subjects and classes that can be offered.
You might want to capitalize that BushEverytime I see bush it just reminds me what a crock of shit our government is.
junglist101
Â
[QUOTE="Master_Live"]Leaving aside your thoughts about the Afghanistan/Iraq wars, Can Republicans on this board mention 3 substantial accomplishments for President W. Bush? 1) ??? 2) ??? 3) ???Wasdie
I'm not really a Republican as much as I'm just more conservative yet do not like the Republican party but...
He greatly increased the aid spending to Africa to help fight AIDS. Went from just several hundred million to several billion ending up with a total of $15 billion over the 8 years.
Lowered taxes on everybody and kept them lower. Disagree with it or not, it's still an accomplishment that was felt by every tax payer.
Early medicare reform which was very popular and did a lot of good for senior citizens.
Really any accomplishment of any president is going to be considered a failure with people who disagree. Things like No Child Left Behind and the wars were all bi-partisan. Actually No Child Left Behind increased total education funding to the highest levels they ever were while actually improving test scores. The only two standardized tests required by the acts are on reading and math, two areas where standardized tests are an accurate measure of one's ability. The reason schools hated it is because it had provisions that held the schools accountable. Unions and school administrators hated that and ran a massive campaign against it for that reason despite the increases in education.
It was also an accomplishment that no major terrorist attack happened on US soil after 9/11 and there was a very quick response to the presence of terrorist networks in Afghanistan. This was all prior to the invasion of Iraq which was just a bad move all together.
One of the more overlooked accomplishments of No Child Left Behind was that it mandated a study by the Dept. of Education on sexual abuse in public schools. The study found that one tenth of all public school students (4.5 million students) were victims of "teachers or other school officials" in the decade surveyed by the Dept. of Ed.All the books will have pictures.
One of the more interesting features of the Bush library is an interactive feature where users get to step into Bush's shoes and get to make important decisions that Bush made. The visitor will hear information that Bush's aides and advisors gave him before making various decisions, and then the user will be asked to make a decision. After the visitor decides, Bush's image appears on screen and explains what decision he made and why. To me that feature sounds kind of cool, it's like your being president for a little bit and making a decision at a historical "decision point".
Â
whipassmt
This is shit on so many levels, the most obvious being that no president is just some impartial spectator who just listens to everything, weighs it as objectively as possible, and then simply makes a decision. Â First off he appointed most of the people he's listening to, and secondly there are multiple accounts from staffers of him listening to the advice being given in the briefings, then going behind closed doors with Rumsfeld and Cheney and completely ignoring what their opponents were saying. Â Seriously, f*ck this whole exhibit with a pinecone.
They should of named a golf course after him.seahorse123
Or a detox center.
I'm not really a Republican as much as I'm just more conservative yet do not like the Republican party but...
He greatly increased the aid spending to Africa to help fight AIDS. Went from just several hundred million to several billion ending up with a total of $15 billion over the 8 years.
Lowered taxes on everybody and kept them lower. Disagree with it or not, it's still an accomplishment that was felt by every tax payer.
Early medicare reform which was very popular and did a lot of good for senior citizens.
Really any accomplishment of any president is going to be considered a failure with people who disagree. Things like No Child Left Behind and the wars were all bi-partisan. Actually No Child Left Behind increased total education funding to the highest levels they ever were while actually improving test scores. The only two standardized tests required by the acts are on reading and math, two areas where standardized tests are an accurate measure of one's ability. The reason schools hated it is because it had provisions that held the schools accountable. Unions and school administrators hated that and ran a massive campaign against it for that reason despite the increases in education.Â
It was also an accomplishment that no major terrorist attack happened on US soil after 9/11 and there was a very quick response to the presence of terrorist networks in Afghanistan. This was all prior to the invasion of Iraq which was just a bad move all together.Â
Wasdie
Yeah, the low taxes were felt by every taxpayer in that they contributed to a massive defecit and when the economy crashed and we actually needed government spending the well was completely dry. Â That a policy is significant in scope does not actually make it an accomplishment. Â By that logic the Holocaust was a massive accomplishment.
Medicare reform was popular amongst seniors because it helped them with their medical expenses. Â It was massively unpopular with everyone else (including conservatives) not simply because it didn't affect them directly at the time, but also because it was unfunded and basically tied the government to shelling out huge amounts of money to prescription drug corporations without being able to shop for lower drug prices.
NCLB ties funding directly to test scores, which leads to teaching to the test and which has been massively unsuccessful in raising overall math and science comprehension, and which also cuts funding to schools that need it the most. Â Schools which already have high math and science scores, and typically have relatively high funding to begin with, get more funding and underfunded schools with low math and science scores get even less funding. Â NCLB is considered a massive failure by education experts on both sides of the aisle.
This last part is shit and you should feel bad for making this argument.  The most obvious point here is that you're selectively taking one point in time as the sample for when to measure terrorist attacks, the period after 9/11.  I'm sad that I actually have to point out that 9/11 DID occur during his presidency and therefore if we're going to talk about the frequency of terrorist attacks happening on his watch we should really be including 9/11 with that.  It's also relevant that terrorist attacks are inherently unpredictable and it's not really within any president's power to be able to completely prevent every possible terrorist attack.  We should also note that we don't have a specific number of attempted terrorist attacks that were foiled during his presidency, so to say that  no terrorist attakcs occured on his watch would be tantamount to saying it never snowed in July on his watch.  Furthermore, if we did know every terrorist attack that was planned and thrarted it still doesn't tell us how it was thwarted.  Every thwarted attempt could have absolutely nothing to do with anything Bush did, so to ascribe such success in thwarting them to him is inherently fallacious.
You say you don't like Republicans, but you seem pretty intent on towing the party line even at the expense of basic logic. Â This is becoming a pretty common tactic amongst Republicans, to profess a complete disgust with the party even while completely agreeing with everything it does.
[QUOTE="Wasdie"]
[QUOTE="Master_Live"]Leaving aside your thoughts about the Afghanistan/Iraq wars, Can Republicans on this board mention 3 substantial accomplishments for President W. Bush? 1) ??? 2) ??? 3) ???whipassmt
I'm not really a Republican as much as I'm just more conservative yet do not like the Republican party but...
He greatly increased the aid spending to Africa to help fight AIDS. Went from just several hundred million to several billion ending up with a total of $15 billion over the 8 years.
Lowered taxes on everybody and kept them lower. Disagree with it or not, it's still an accomplishment that was felt by every tax payer.
Early medicare reform which was very popular and did a lot of good for senior citizens.
Really any accomplishment of any president is going to be considered a failure with people who disagree. Things like No Child Left Behind and the wars were all bi-partisan. Actually No Child Left Behind increased total education funding to the highest levels they ever were while actually improving test scores. The only two standardized tests required by the acts are on reading and math, two areas where standardized tests are an accurate measure of one's ability. The reason schools hated it is because it had provisions that held the schools accountable. Unions and school administrators hated that and ran a massive campaign against it for that reason despite the increases in education.
It was also an accomplishment that no major terrorist attack happened on US soil after 9/11 and there was a very quick response to the presence of terrorist networks in Afghanistan. This was all prior to the invasion of Iraq which was just a bad move all together.
One of the more overlooked accomplishments of No Child Left Behind was that it mandated a study by the Dept. of Education on sexual abuse in public schools. The study found that one tenth of all public school students (4.5 million students) were victims of "teachers or other school officials" in the decade surveyed by the Dept. of Ed.Â
That really doesn't justify NCLB as a whole. Â They could have just as easily carried out that study without tacking it to the bill as a whole, in fact the fact that they tacked a good provision on to a bad bill probably helped that bill pass.
Do you think the life of an Iraqui is worse than it was 10 years ago? If not, than you can't ride the bush hate train.idk, as an Iraqi, I feel like I have the right to ride the Bush hate train until Im dead
BossPerson
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment