Girls Fishing For Compliments Unappreciation Thread

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Again, I'm not defending the TC. That being said finding a relative to be good looking does not mean that they are being considered as a potential mate as LJ seemed to imply.

guitarman89

I never said that. I said I had a few who were "attractive". And by that I meant good looking. There's nothing more to it. Completely different from being attracted to someone.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="Optical_Order"]

See FD's post at the top of this page.

LJS9502_basic

Again, I'm not defending the TC. That being said finding a relative to be good looking does not mean that they are being considered as a potential mate as LJ seemed to imply.

But he didn't say that. He said that he has a few relatives that he thinks are kinda good looking.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="guitarman89"]

you're telling me you don't have any relatives you find good looking?

I am not defending the TC's "goddess" comment since that's kind of weird, but finding a relative good looking/=/looking at them as potential mates.

[QUOTE="guitarman89"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] He did initially mention being attracted to a relative FYI...which is what I'm referencing...Nibroc420

I never said that. I said I had a few who were "attractive". And by that I meant good looking. There's nothing more to it. Completely different from being attracted to someone.

Sounds like you have poor reading comprehension. He said that they were kinda good looking.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] No. They're family. I don't look at them as potential mates.:|CreasianDevaili

I am not defending the TC's "goddess" comment since that's kind of weird, but finding a relative good looking/=/looking at them as potential mates.

Not always.

Let's not attribute your inability to seperaten the context of saying someone is "good looking" onto me.

Sounds like you have poor reading comprehension. He said that they were kinda good looking.

GreySeal9

ORLY?

I never said that. I said I had a few who were "attractive" .

guitarman89

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Again, I'm not defending the TC. That being said finding a relative to be good looking does not mean that they are being considered as a potential mate as LJ seemed to imply.

GreySeal9

But he didn't say that. He said that he has a few relatives that he thinks are kinda good looking.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Sounds like you have poor reading comprehension. He said that they were kinda good looking.

Nibroc420

ORLY?

I never said that. I said I had a few who were "attractive" .

guitarman89

And he explained exactly what he meant, hence your poor reading comprehension.

[QUOTE="guitarman89"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] He did initially mention being attracted to a relative FYI...which is what I'm referencing...Nibroc420

I never said that. I said I had a few who were "attractive". And by that I meant good looking. There's nothing more to it. Completely different from being attracted to someone.

You got me. I stay up all night dreaming about how hot my cousin is. Can't get her off my mind. I even wank to pictures of her on a nightly basis. Best part of all: she's 6.

Was just trying to defend my honor on here because I felt some stuff was being taken out of context. but now I see there's no chance of that happening.

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I am not defending the TC's "goddess" comment since that's kind of weird, but finding a relative good looking/=/looking at them as potential mates.

Not always.

Let's not attribute your inability to seperaten the context of saying someone is "good looking" onto me.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] He did initially mention being attracted to a relative FYI...which is what I'm referencing...LJS9502_basic

But he didn't say that. He said that he has a few relatives that he thinks are kinda good looking.

I'm not going to get into some semantical misinterpretation of his words because that is not fair.

He clearly was making a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

But he didn't say that. He said that he has a few relatives that he thinks are kinda good looking.

GreySeal9

I'm not going to get into some semantical misinterpretation of his words because that is not fair.

He clearly was making a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

But he didn't say that. He said that he has a few relatives that he thinks are kinda good looking.

GreySeal9

I'm not going to get into some semantical misinterpretation of his words because that is not fair.

He clearly was making a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="Optical_Order"]

See FD's post at the top of this page.

Frame_Dragger

Again, I'm not defending the TC. That being said finding a relative to be good looking does not mean that they are being considered as a potential mate as LJ seemed to imply.

greyseal, again I will just direct you to one of FD's post. ^^

[QUOTE="guitarman89"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] He did initially mention being attracted to a relative FYI...which is what I'm referencing...LJS9502_basic

I never said that. I said I had a few who were "attractive". And by that I meant good looking. There's nothing more to it. Completely different from being attracted to someone.

Bent out of shape? I wouldn't say so. But I felt the TC was getting treated a bit unfairly.

Is this an unofficial incest thread? o_O

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="guitarman89"]

I never said that. I said I had a few who were "attractive". And by that I meant good looking. There's nothing more to it. Completely different from being attracted to someone.

guitarman89

Bent out of shape? I wouldn't say so. But I felt the TC was getting treated a bit unfairly.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] That wasn't all he said....though when one is noticing a relative in a physical way.....it's generally not innocent. He did use the word attractive just a few posts ago....and attractive is a derivation of the same verb as attraction. Which is sexual......LJS9502_basic

I'm not going to get into some semantical misinterpretation of his words because that is not fair.

He clearly was making a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

I read the entire thread. It doesn't matter what he got upset over. What matters is what he said and he clearly made a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

It's not like he's being aggressive towards you, so I don't know why you keep trying to stick a certain stance to him when he explained the context of his remarks. Don't you think it would be fair to let him explain himself instead of trying to stick a stance on him that he doesn't agree is his stance. Why in the world would you know more about his stance than he does?

Is this an unofficial incest thread? o_O

soulless4now

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] He did initially mention being attracted to a relative FYI...which is what I'm referencing...LJS9502_basic

But he didn't say that. He said that he has a few relatives that he thinks are kinda good looking.

And I actually did say kinda good looking. And that's what I meant when I said attractive. I've always used the two interchangeably

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

Again, I'm not defending the TC. That being said finding a relative to be good looking does not mean that they are being considered as a potential mate as LJ seemed to imply.

Optical_Order

greyseal, again I will just direct you to one of FD's post. ^^

What do you think that proves? Frame Dragger is also ignoring the distinctions that guitarman made.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I'm not going to get into some semantical misinterpretation of his words because that is not fair.

He clearly was making a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

GreySeal9

I read the entire thread. It doesn't matter what he got upset over. What matters is what he said and he clearly made a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

It's not like he's being aggressive towards you, so I don't know why you keep trying to stick a certain stance to him when he explained the context of his remarks. Don't you think it would be fair to let him explain himself instead of trying to stick a stance on him that he doesn't agree is his stance. Why in the world would you know more about his stance than he does?

Thank you. I feel I'm getting treated exactly the same way as the TC, which I should have expected. I love how many assumptions people have made about my feelings towards relatives and my character. It's like they think I support incest.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] That wasn't all he said....though when one is noticing a relative in a physical way.....it's generally not innocent. He did use the word attractive just a few posts ago....and attractive is a derivation of the same verb as attraction. Which is sexual......Nibroc420

I'm not going to get into some semantical misinterpretation of his words because that is not fair.

He clearly was making a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

Just so you know, I don't really take your trolling seriously.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

But he didn't say that. He said that he has a few relatives that he thinks are kinda good looking.

guitarman89

And I actually did say kinda good looking. And that's what I meant when I said attractive. I've always used the two interchangeably

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I'm not going to get into some semantical misinterpretation of his words because that is not fair.

He clearly was making a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

I read the entire thread. It doesn't matter what he got upset over. What matters is what he said and he clearly made a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

It's not like he's being aggressive towards you, so I don't know why you keep trying to stick a certain stance to him when he explained the context of his remarks. Don't you think it would be fair to let him explain himself instead of trying to stick a stance on him that he doesn't agree is his stance. Why in the world would you know more about his stance than he does?

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] No he wasn't. He got upset over everyone mentioning saying a sister had a body of a goddess was inappropriate. You really shouldn't come in at the tail end of conversations and assume you know the entire story.guitarman89

I read the entire thread. It doesn't matter what he got upset over. What matters is what he said and he clearly made a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

It's not like he's being aggressive towards you, so I don't know why you keep trying to stick a certain stance to him when he explained the context of his remarks. Don't you think it would be fair to let him explain himself instead of trying to stick a stance on him that he doesn't agree is his stance. Why in the world would you know more about his stance than he does?

Thank you. I feel I'm getting treated exactly the same way as the TC, which I should have expected. I love how many assumptions people have made about my feelings towards relatives and my character. It's like they think I support incest.

I'm sure most users wiill get what you were actually trying to say. I can see why people were picking on the TC because his description was too strong and kind of strange, but I can't for the life of me see why people are picking on you even when you've explained yourself repeatedly.

[QUOTE="Optical_Order"]

[QUOTE="Frame_Dragger"] Far be it from me to defend LJ directly or through implication, but this is SPECIFCIALLY about, "has the body of a goddess"... tehn Guitarman using the terms "hot", and "attractive". Otherwise, I don't think anyone is disagreeing with you.GreySeal9

greyseal, again I will just direct you to one of FD's post. ^^

What do you think that proves? Frame Dragger is also ignoring the distinctions that guitarman made.

No.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] No he wasn't. He got upset over everyone mentioning saying a sister had a body of a goddess was inappropriate. You really shouldn't come in at the tail end of conversations and assume you know the entire story.CreasianDevaili

I read the entire thread. It doesn't matter what he got upset over. What matters is what he said and he clearly made a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

It's not like he's being aggressive towards you, so I don't know why you keep trying to stick a certain stance to him when he explained the context of his remarks. Don't you think it would be fair to let him explain himself instead of trying to stick a stance on him that he doesn't agree is his stance. Why in the world would you know more about his stance than he does?

There is a seperation between the two and I've said that from the very beginning. :?

[QUOTE="guitarman89"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] That wasn't all he said....though when one is noticing a relative in a physical way.....it's generally not innocent. He did use the word attractive just a few posts ago....and attractive is a derivation of the same verb as attraction. Which is sexual......LJS9502_basic

And I actually did say kinda good looking. And that's what I meant when I said attractive. I've always used the two interchangeably

What I meant was if I had feelings subconsciously or unconsciously, I was not aware of them. I don't believe I have them, then again if I did, I wouldn't know would I? They're unconscsious lol.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="Optical_Order"]

greyseal, again I will just direct you to one of FD's post. ^^

Optical_Order

What do you think that proves? Frame Dragger is also ignoring the distinctions that guitarman made.

No.

What a well-reasoned response. :roll:

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="guitarman89"]

And I actually did say kinda good looking. And that's what I meant when I said attractive. I've always used the two interchangeably

guitarman89

What I meant was if I had feelings subconsciously or unconsciously, I was not aware of them. I don't believe I have them, then again if I did, I wouldn't know would I? They're unconscsious lol.

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I read the entire thread. It doesn't matter what he got upset over. What matters is what he said and he clearly made a seperation between sexual attraction and casually finding someone to be good looking.

It's not like he's being aggressive towards you, so I don't know why you keep trying to stick a certain stance to him when he explained the context of his remarks. Don't you think it would be fair to let him explain himself instead of trying to stick a stance on him that he doesn't agree is his stance. Why in the world would you know more about his stance than he does?

There is a seperation between the two and I've said that from the very beginning. :?

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] Would be so easy if you could at the very least demonstrate that there is a real seperation between the two. I don't think you can entirely, which is why you avoid it. Yet if you could, then that be it. So why not? Unless you can't? Yeah that is an attempt to provoke. CreasianDevaili

There is a seperation between the two and I've said that from the very beginning. :?

[QUOTE="guitarman89"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] You also mentioned not acting on feelings subconsciously or consciously....so explain those feelings then if they weren't sexual?LJS9502_basic

What I meant was if I had feelings subconsciously or unconsciously, I was not aware of them. I don't believe I have them, then again if I did, I wouldn't know would I? They're unconscsious lol.

Obviously I can't say I don't, you can't say you don't either. They're unconscious. Nobody knows.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="guitarman89"]

What I meant was if I had feelings subconsciously or unconsciously, I was not aware of them. I don't believe I have them, then again if I did, I wouldn't know would I? They're unconscsious lol.

guitarman89

Obviously I can't say I don't, you can't say you don't either. They're unconscious. Nobody knows.

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

There is a seperation between the two and I've said that from the very beginning. :?

LJS9502_basic

Can you actually show me where I said "you're wrong"?

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] Would be so easy if you could at the very least demonstrate that there is a real seperation between the two. I don't think you can entirely, which is why you avoid it. Yet if you could, then that be it. So why not? Unless you can't? Yeah that is an attempt to provoke. CreasianDevaili

There is a seperation between the two and I've said that from the very beginning. :?

I have explained my stance.

It is possible to find one to be good looking and not be sexually attracted to them. There are several instances in which I think somebody is good looking but am not sexually attracted to them.

So where do you need clarification?

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

There is a seperation between the two and I've said that from the very beginning. :?

GreySeal9

I have explained my stance.

It is possible to find one to be good looking and not be sexually attracted to them. There are several instances in which I think somebody is good looking but am not sexually attracted to them.

So where do you need clarification?

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

There is a seperation between the two and I've said that from the very beginning. :?

GreySeal9

I have explained my stance.

It is possible to find one to be good looking and not be sexually attracted to them. There are several instances in which I think somebody is good looking but am not sexually attracted to them.

So where do you need clarification?

Yeah, that's what I f*cking quoted for you 10 minutes ago.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] I just want you to explain your stance. I don't want you to just say what it is, but explain it. Because I explained mine and you said I couldn't find the "seperation", unlike yourself. So where am I so wrong to ask you to EXPLAIN your understanding? Or am I wrong to ever expect it because you just don't feel like going into detail?LJS9502_basic

I have explained my stance.

It is possible to find one to be good looking and not be sexually attracted to them. There are several instances in which I think somebody is good looking but am not sexually attracted to them.

So where do you need clarification?

I've all ready said good looking does not always equal sexual attraction.

He has all ready explained what he meant by attractive. Why you keep ignoring his distinctions is beyond me.

He used hot in the context of saying that some guys think their cousins are hot, which is not inaccurate.

He might have been defensive of the TC, but that does not mean that he finds his relatives sexually attractive. He has all ready said that he doesn't to his awareness.

I'm not trying to say "you're wrong". I just don't like how guitarman is being misrepresented. It's not like he's being a dick or anything, so I think it is appropriate to actually listen to him without insisting that you think you know his stance better than him.

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] I just want you to explain your stance. I don't want you to just say what it is, but explain it. Because I explained mine and you said I couldn't find the "seperation", unlike yourself. So where am I so wrong to ask you to EXPLAIN your understanding? Or am I wrong to ever expect it because you just don't feel like going into detail?Optical_Order

I have explained my stance.

It is possible to find one to be good looking and not be sexually attracted to them. There are several instances in which I think somebody is good looking but am not sexually attracted to them.

So where do you need clarification?

Yeah, that's what I f*cking quoted for you 10 minutes ago.

Calm down.

What are you talking about?

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I have explained my stance.

It is possible to find one to be good looking and not be sexually attracted to them. There are several instances in which I think somebody is good looking but am not sexually attracted to them.

So where do you need clarification?

GreySeal9

I've all ready said good looking does not always equal sexual attraction.

He has all ready explained what he meant by attractive. Why you keep ignoring his distinctions is beyond me.

He used hot in the context of saying that some guys think their cousins are hot, which is not inaccurate.

He might have been defensive of the TC, but that does not mean that he finds his relatives sexually attractive. He has all ready said that he doesn't to his awareness.

I'm not trying to say "you're wrong". I just don't like how guitarman is being misrepresented. It's not like he's being a dick or anything, so I think it is appropriate to actually listen to him without insisting that you think you know his stance better than him.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"] I just want you to explain your stance. I don't want you to just say what it is, but explain it. Because I explained mine and you said I couldn't find the "seperation", unlike yourself. So where am I so wrong to ask you to EXPLAIN your understand? Or am I wrong to ever expect it because you just don't feel like doing into detail?CreasianDevaili

Who said anything about complimenting anyone? All I'm saying is that finding someone good looking doesn't always have to be sexual? Do you think it does?

[QUOTE="guitarman89"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"] So you can't say you don't either. Which is why I said you excused the comments made in the OP. Though frankly one should not look at relatives as good looking nor attractive. Sure it's okay to not find your family butt ugly....but when you start noticing looks....that's getting beyond familiar feelings. LJS9502_basic

Obviously I can't say I don't, you can't say you don't either. They're unconscious. Nobody knows.

Hot to me is just a way to describe how good looking someone is. It does not always mean you desire sexual relations with the person. When it gets to the point that you desire to have sexual relations with the person is when it gets beyond the scope of family interactions.

For some people, maybe hot is that point, but for me it's not. If you disagree with me, then you have a different definition of the word hot.

[QUOTE="Optical_Order"]

[QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

I have explained my stance.

It is possible to find one to be good looking and not be sexually attracted to them. There are several instances in which I think somebody is good looking but am not sexually attracted to them.

So where do you need clarification?

GreySeal9

Yeah, that's what I f*cking quoted for you 10 minutes ago.

Calm down.

What are you talking about?

I'm not worked up. It was funny. I quoted one of framedragger's posts for you that stated pretty much exactly what you just said.

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="guitarman89"]

Obviously I can't say I don't, you can't say you don't either. They're unconscious. Nobody knows.

guitarman89

Hot to me is just a way to describe how good looking someone is. It does not always mean you desire sexual relations with the person. When it gets to the point that you desire to have sexual relations with the person is when it gets beyond the scope of family interactions.

For some people, maybe hot is that point, but for me it's not.

[QUOTE="guitarman89"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]You also used the word hot earlier for a response to defending the OP. Finding a relative "hot" isn't beyond the scope of family interactions?LJS9502_basic

Hot to me is just a way to describe how good looking someone is. It does not always mean you desire sexual relations with the person. When it gets to the point that you desire to have sexual relations with the person is when it gets beyond the scope of family interactions.

For some people, maybe hot is that point, but for me it's not.

No. You keep trying to box him into the way that you think about certain words.

Why? Why not just live with the fact that you guys think about the word in a different way?

[QUOTE="CreasianDevaili"][QUOTE="GreySeal9"]

There is a seperation between the two and I've said that from the very beginning. :?

I have explained my stance.

It is possible to find one to be good looking and not be sexually attracted to them. There are several instances in which I think somebody is good looking but am not sexually attracted to them.

So where do you need clarification?