Glenn Beck brings a firearm to a movie theater, give your thoughts

  • 97 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Ghost_702
Ghost_702

7405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#51 Ghost_702
Member since 2006 • 7405 Posts

If he had the proper paperwork and went through the process to possess a gun legally and carry it on him to public locations, then I am fine with it. Sometimes (although rarely), I will see people walking around with a holstered pistol at their waist, but where I live it is legal to do that. Some locations, such as schools, don't allow it though for fairly obvious reasons.

Avatar image for Oblivionfan10
Oblivionfan10

6327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#52 Oblivionfan10
Member since 2008 • 6327 Posts
umm there's nothing wrong with it.....he has the appropriate permits......so be it...Omni-Slash
But oh no, a libertarian with conservative leanings did it. Whiny liberals have to complain about something
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#53 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

You know you're scraping bottom when you can't even manufacture controversy and take to just doing legal stuff to get attention.

Avatar image for Oblivionfan10
Oblivionfan10

6327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#54 Oblivionfan10
Member since 2008 • 6327 Posts

You know you're scraping bottom when you can't even manufacture controversy and take to just doing legal stuff to get attention.

duxup
Actually, he has been planning this for awhile now. This is part of his Rise Against Socialism plan. He is encouraging citizens to go against Obama's plans..... I say; hey, can't be worse than what happened at the RNC in St Paul back in September
Avatar image for duxup
duxup

43443

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#55 duxup
Member since 2002 • 43443 Posts

[QUOTE="duxup"]

You know you're scraping bottom when you can't even manufacture controversy and take to just doing legal stuff to get attention.

Oblivionfan10

Actually, he has been planning this for awhile now. This is part of his Rise Against Socialism plan. He is encouraging citizens to go against Obama's plans..... I say; hey, can't be worse than what happened at the RNC in St Paul back in September

He has been planning on doing something perfectly legal for a while? He doesn't do those things often?

Avatar image for Oblivionfan10
Oblivionfan10

6327

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#56 Oblivionfan10
Member since 2008 • 6327 Posts
[QUOTE="duxup"]

[QUOTE="Oblivionfan10"][QUOTE="duxup"]

You know you're scraping bottom when you can't even manufacture controversy and take to just doing legal stuff to get attention.

Actually, he has been planning this for awhile now. This is part of his Rise Against Socialism plan. He is encouraging citizens to go against Obama's plans..... I say; hey, can't be worse than what happened at the RNC in St Paul back in September

He has been planning on doing something perfectly legal for a while? He doesn't do those things often?

I don't know what the deal is. I think he just wants to show his rights and everybody's rights
Avatar image for PB1to5
PB1to5

169

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 PB1to5
Member since 2007 • 169 Posts

He's the heir to oreillys conservative throne.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#58 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="Jfisch93"]

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"] Out of curiosity, who would be your top 4-5 NON-CRAZY Republicans?nocoolnamejim

Well I wanted Guliani or Huckabee as a presidential candidate, not McCain. I don't like how the media turns Dems. into gods and the GOP in to nuts. The media IS dem. biased, though.

Got any evidence to support that assertion?

I don't get the assertation that Mike Huckabee is somehow a moderate. Mr. fair tax, religious extremist, Mike Huckabee is, for some reason, pointed to as a solution to the nutty Republicans out there when, as far as I can tell, he's nuttier than most of them. Hell, I'd rather vote for Mitt Romeny than Mike Huckabee if given the choice only between the two.

And I don't get why McCain is pointed to as part of the problem, probably it's because he lost the election. In reality, McCain is probably more moderate than either of the two you listed. My biggest problem with him is that when the Republican Party told him to fall in line he did. He flip-flopped on social issues where he had previously stated he was more left-leaning, he went out and got the biggest right wing nut there is for a running mate, and after the elections when the Republicans decided they were going to vote as a single body rather than letting their senators decide for themselves how best to serve their constituents he went right along with the flow. Mr. Maverick my ass.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#59 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="SunofVich"] Isn't CNN also liberal biased.duxup

These days if you're not hearing an exact echo of your own thoughts it is a clear sign of bias.

That response is full of win.

By the way, just days after he goes on an insane rant at one of his callers for disagreeing with him he carries a gun into a movie theater like that's a GOOD thing? I think that just supports many anti-gun assertations that emotionally unbalanced people can get guns too easily and carry them into places where they have the potential to do mass harm.

Avatar image for Sajo7
Sajo7

14049

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#60 Sajo7
Member since 2005 • 14049 Posts
Good for him?
Avatar image for TSNAKE617
TSNAKE617

5494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 TSNAKE617
Member since 2008 • 5494 Posts

I think that it should be allowed, if you have a decent record.

Avatar image for jer_1
jer_1

7451

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 jer_1
Member since 2003 • 7451 Posts

[QUOTE="sonicare"][QUOTE="-Sun_Tzu-"]If he had the appropriate permits then this is a non-story. -Sun_Tzu-
Unless that movie theatre had specific laws prohibiting firearms. It is a private business.

Well...if he was operating under the law then this is a non-story :P

Agreed, this is such a waste of time. Why not worry about a real issue if you're gonna waste your time to worry? How about worry about how much this government is spying on you and your family through you phones and blackberry's, ya know, real problems they dont really talk about or want you to talk about...

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

I believe to the fullest that people should be allowed to own firearms. Should they be allowed to carry them in public? Well that is depatable, I am split on the issue.

Curlyfrii87

Agreed... I have several guns myself, and i don't plan on giving up that right. However, why allow guns in restaurants... :|

In case of criminally bad service?
Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#64 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
[QUOTE="Jfisch93"]

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"][QUOTE="Jfisch93"]

Ugh... if only we could get respectable people to represent the republican party...democrats are having a field day because the only republicans in the news are the crazy ones.

Out of curiosity, who would be your top 4-5 NON-CRAZY Republicans?

Well I wanted Guliani or Huckabee as a presidential candidate, not McCain. I don't like how the media turns Dems. into gods and the GOP in to nuts. The media IS dem. biased, though.

..... They don't need help from the media to do that.. We have known for awhile that the GOP are nuts to begin with.. Not a single of the canidates accepted evolution, they are not only extremist in their views but they are backwards and clearly are grasping on ideals that are not true or do not work..
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#65 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

I don't get the assertation that Mike Huckabee is somehow a moderate. Mr. fair tax, religious extremist, Mike Huckabee is, for some reason, pointed to as a solution to the nutty Republicans out there when, as far as I can tell, he's nuttier than most of them. Hell, I'd rather vote for Mitt Romeny than Mike Huckabee if given the choice only between the two.

theone86

Be his political views as they may, I remain of the opinion that Mike Huckabee is quite possibly the most fundamentally decent person in all of politics today, and I have a healthy respect for him just for that.

Avatar image for RazerBlade13
RazerBlade13

3822

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#66 RazerBlade13
Member since 2008 • 3822 Posts

Beck is borderline psychopathic. He seems a little over the top for me.

Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#67 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]

I don't get the assertation that Mike Huckabee is somehow a moderate. Mr. fair tax, religious extremist, Mike Huckabee is, for some reason, pointed to as a solution to the nutty Republicans out there when, as far as I can tell, he's nuttier than most of them. Hell, I'd rather vote for Mitt Romeny than Mike Huckabee if given the choice only between the two.

GabuEx

Be his political views as they may, I remain of the opinion that Mike Huckabee is quite possibly the most fundamentally decent person in all of politics today, and I have a healthy respect for him just for that.

What does that mean, fundamentally decent? All I know is his stance on issues and the statements he has made, which include calling out homosexuality as morally wrong, saying he doesn't support women serving in the military, supporting the teaching of evolution in schools, and the aforementioned fair tax system, which I think is one of the worst ideas for tax reform perhaps ever.

Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

I woud say given Glenn Beck's recent antics it's lucky that nobody ticked him off while he was at the movies.

Avatar image for D_Battery
D_Battery

2478

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#69 D_Battery
Member since 2009 • 2478 Posts

[QUOTE="GabuEx"]

[QUOTE="theone86"]

I don't get the assertation that Mike Huckabee is somehow a moderate. Mr. fair tax, religious extremist, Mike Huckabee is, for some reason, pointed to as a solution to the nutty Republicans out there when, as far as I can tell, he's nuttier than most of them. Hell, I'd rather vote for Mitt Romeny than Mike Huckabee if given the choice only between the two.

theone86

Be his political views as they may, I remain of the opinion that Mike Huckabee is quite possibly the most fundamentally decent person in all of politics today, and I have a healthy respect for him just for that.

What does that mean, fundamentally decent? All I know is his stance on issues and the statements he has made, which include calling out homosexuality as morally wrong, saying he doesn't support women serving in the military, supporting the teaching of evolution in schools, and the aforementioned fair tax system, which I think is one of the worst ideas for tax reform perhaps ever.

I disagree strongly with most of what Mike Huckabee supports, but I'd have to agree (with GabuEx). After listening to him talk, I feel that he is a humble and reasonably level-headed person, which is unusual in the world of politics. In particular, the Republican primaries really proved this to me; at one point the question was "who would Ronald Reagan support were he alive?" McCain and Romney blathered on about how Reagan would pick them for all their conservative values and whatever other arrogant, rhetorical BS. Mike Huckabee on the other hand thought it was silly to speak on behalf of a dead person.

Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#70 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

What does that mean, fundamentally decent? All I know is his stance on issues and the statements he has made, which include calling out homosexuality as morally wrong, saying he doesn't support women serving in the military, supporting the teaching of evolution in schools, and the aforementioned fair tax system, which I think is one of the worst ideas for tax reform perhaps ever.

theone86

Just listen to the guy. I've tried to dislike him. It just doesn't work. Among all the vipers in the pit of politics, I cannot help but feel that Mike Huckabee is just a plain good and principled guy. Would I want him as president? Perhaps not, but he is easily the candidate whom I would most like to sit down to dinner with.

People are not just the sum of their views, and the sooner people realize that, the better.

Avatar image for Wii_Gamer_277
Wii_Gamer_277

1795

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Wii_Gamer_277
Member since 2009 • 1795 Posts
Why would you need a firearm in a movie theater ? Carrying weapons in public is just asking for trouble if you ask me.
Avatar image for simpsons_28
simpsons_28

2538

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#72 simpsons_28
Member since 2008 • 2538 Posts

What do I think?

Becks got ballz

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#73 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]

What does that mean, fundamentally decent? All I know is his stance on issues and the statements he has made, which include calling out homosexuality as morally wrong, saying he doesn't support women serving in the military, supporting the teaching of evolution in schools, and the aforementioned fair tax system, which I think is one of the worst ideas for tax reform perhaps ever.

GabuEx

Just listen to the guy. I've tried to dislike him. It just doesn't work. Among all the vipers in the pit of politics, I cannot help but feel that Mike Huckabee is just a plain good and principled guy. Would I want him as president? Perhaps not, but he is easily the candidate whom I would most like to sit down to dinner with.

People are not just the sum of their views, and the sooner people realize that, the better.

Please Gabu...for the love of god don't bring us back to the "Which candidate would you want to sit down and have a beer with?" days. I seem to distinctly recall a time when there was a certain Texan who was regarded as a dimwitted but ultimately harmless "moderate" who would be a great president. I agree with you that Huck strikes me as kind of a funny, amusing guy to hang out with. But then again, so is Xaos or Jandurin and I wouldn't want either of them within spitting distance of our nuclear arsenal. They'd probably fire one at the Saudies just for the "lulz". :P
Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#74 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts
i like my guns but im not bringing them on my dates..
Avatar image for Ontain
Ontain

25501

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#75 Ontain
Member since 2005 • 25501 Posts

Personally, I don't care what the democrats are going to say, Glenn was allowed to do that under the second ammendment. I wish that people would admit that there are responsible gun holders, but *sarcasm*NO. ALL gun holders are EVIL! EVIL TO THE CORE!*sarcasm off*

Your thoughts on the subject.

Pyro767
I don't think anyone denies that there are responsible gun owners. it's keeping the unresponsible ones away from guns that is important but sadly we've seen that they can get guns (legally) pretty easy anyway because there are loopholes (like gun shows)
Avatar image for Commander-Gree
Commander-Gree

4929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 Commander-Gree
Member since 2009 • 4929 Posts

Reminds me of this incident. Personally I am not a fan of people having the right to carry firearms with them.

Avatar image for weezyfb
weezyfb

14703

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#77 weezyfb
Member since 2009 • 14703 Posts

Reminds me of this incident. Personally I am not a fan of people having the right to carry firearms with them.

Commander-Gree
o yeah i remember that.
Avatar image for GabuEx
GabuEx

36552

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 27

User Lists: 0

#78 GabuEx
Member since 2006 • 36552 Posts

Please Gabu...for the love of god don't bring us back to the "Which candidate would you want to sit down and have a beer with?" days. I seem to distinctly recall a time when there was a certain Texan who was regarded as a dimwitted but ultimately harmless "moderate" who would be a great president. I agree with you that Huck strikes me as kind of a funny, amusing guy to hang out with. But then again, so is Xaos or Jandurin and I wouldn't want either of them within spitting distance of our nuclear arsenal. They'd probably fire one at the Saudies just for the "lulz". :Pnocoolnamejim

Like I said:

Would I want him as president? Perhaps notGabuEx

I'm just protesting against the accusation that I saw a lot during the election that Mike Huckabee is some sort of insane religious zealot. Disagree with the man's politics as you will - I obviously do - but in the case of Mike Huckabee,turning that disagreement into actual dislike of the person himself is just plain impossible for me. I really don't think people are being fair when their evaluation of a human being is based 100% on their political views.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="theone86"]

What does that mean, fundamentally decent? All I know is his stance on issues and the statements he has made, which include calling out homosexuality as morally wrong, saying he doesn't support women serving in the military, supporting the teaching of evolution in schools, and the aforementioned fair tax system, which I think is one of the worst ideas for tax reform perhaps ever.

GabuEx

Just listen to the guy. I've tried to dislike him. It just doesn't work. Among all the vipers in the pit of politics, I cannot help but feel that Mike Huckabee is just a plain good and principled guy. Would I want him as president? Perhaps not, but he is easily the candidate whom I would most like to sit down to dinner with.

People are not just the sum of their views, and the sooner people realize that, the better.

I'm sure his claim that gay marriage would end civilization was made from a sincere and, to his mind, principled perspective. Nonetheless, I can't ascribe fundamental decency to someone who would say that and who feels that my existence is innately immoral.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
I agree with you that Huck strikes me as kind of a funny, amusing guy to hang out with. But then again, so is Xaos or Jandurin and I wouldn't want either of them within spitting distance of our nuclear arsenal. They'd probably fire one at the Saudies just for the "lulz". :Pnocoolnamejim
This is because of my provocative post from Gamespot's Comic-Con coverage yesterday, isn't it?
Avatar image for Solid_Snake325
Solid_Snake325

6091

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#81 Solid_Snake325
Member since 2006 • 6091 Posts
Lol what is it with you guys and Glenn Beck? I've seen alot of topics about him lately..
Avatar image for avatar_genius
avatar_genius

8056

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 avatar_genius
Member since 2009 • 8056 Posts

I think he was trying to prove a point.

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#83 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]I agree with you that Huck strikes me as kind of a funny, amusing guy to hang out with. But then again, so is Xaos or Jandurin and I wouldn't want either of them within spitting distance of our nuclear arsenal. They'd probably fire one at the Saudies just for the "lulz". :Pxaos
This is because of my provocative post from Gamespot's Comic-Con coverage yesterday, isn't it?

*snickers* Nah. I found that post funny. That was because of your stated desire to be an agent of chaos. ;) And, aside from the fact that mass death and destruction and the possible launch of WWIII is inherently unfunny, the idea of you or Jandurin firing just a single nuke at the Saudis and then going into a press conference and explaining that you did it "because they're a bunch of dicks" is one that brings a smile onto my face despite it being an overall boring day today.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]I agree with you that Huck strikes me as kind of a funny, amusing guy to hang out with. But then again, so is Xaos or Jandurin and I wouldn't want either of them within spitting distance of our nuclear arsenal. They'd probably fire one at the Saudies just for the "lulz". :Pnocoolnamejim
This is because of my provocative post from Gamespot's Comic-Con coverage yesterday, isn't it?

*snickers* Nah. I found that post funny. That was because of your stated desire to be an agent of chaos. ;) And, aside from the fact that mass death and destruction and the possible launch of WWIII is inherently unfunny, the idea of you or Jandurin firing just a single nuke at the Saudis and then going into a press conference and explaining that you did it "because they're a bunch of dicks" is one that brings a smile onto my face despite it being an overall boring day today.

Honestly, my press conference in that case would probably just consist of a smug smirk and the word "PWNED!"
Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#85 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"] Honestly, my press conference in that case would probably just consist of a smug smirk and the word "PWNED!"

Yeah, I suppose I could see that scenario too.
Avatar image for aliasfreak
aliasfreak

2878

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 aliasfreak
Member since 2004 • 2878 Posts

Wow, lots of Glenn Beck hate here. People keep saying that there is no reason to take a gun to a movie theater or restaurant, but he has a good comeback to that one. Does violence happen only at places where you expect violence to ensue? Did people think that shooting would ensue at an Amish school? How about Virginia Tech? The point is, the need to protect yourself can arise ANYWHERE. How can all of you people miss this? Maybe your hatred prevents you from logical thought.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

Wow, lots of Glenn Beck hate here. People keep saying that there is no reason to take a gun to a movie theater or restaurant, but he has a good comeback to that one. Does violence happen only at places where you expect violence to ensue? Did people think that shooting would ensue at an Amish school? How about Virginia Tech? The point is, the need to protect yourself can arise ANYWHERE. How can all of you people miss this? Maybe your hatred prevents you from logical thought.

aliasfreak
Yes, if everyone was armed and there was a massive crossfire, we'd all be much safer than with one insane gunman
Avatar image for battlefront23
battlefront23

12625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#88 battlefront23
Member since 2006 • 12625 Posts

[QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

I believe to the fullest that people should be allowed to own firearms. Should they be allowed to carry them in public? Well that is depatable, I am split on the issue.

Curlyfrii87

Agreed... I have several guns myself, and i don't plan on giving up that right. However, why allow guns in restaurants... :|

One thing, did the article explain what type of gun he brought to the theater? And secondly, I think a law-abiding citizen should be allowed to bring a gun anywhere he or she wishes. Cause after all, they are LAW-abiding, and thus would not do anything illegal with the gun besides maybe self-defense. I see nothing wrong in that.
Avatar image for Commander-Gree
Commander-Gree

4929

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Commander-Gree
Member since 2009 • 4929 Posts

[QUOTE="Curlyfrii87"]

[QUOTE="DarkGamer007"]

I believe to the fullest that people should be allowed to own firearms. Should they be allowed to carry them in public? Well that is depatable, I am split on the issue.

battlefront23

Agreed... I have several guns myself, and i don't plan on giving up that right. However, why allow guns in restaurants... :|

One thing, did the article explain what type of gun he brought to the theater? And secondly, I think a law-abiding citizen should be allowed to bring a gun anywhere he or she wishes. Cause after all, they are LAW-abiding, and thus would not do anything illegal with the gun besides maybe self-defense. I see nothing wrong in that.

Well the problem is there is no guarantee that whoever is given a gun will remain responsible. They may have never broken a single law in ther life, but one thing might make them snap.

Avatar image for agturboninja
agturboninja

670

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 50

User Lists: 0

#90 agturboninja
Member since 2006 • 670 Posts

What if there is some hag that speaks on their cellphone?

Avatar image for nocoolnamejim
nocoolnamejim

15136

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 22

User Lists: 0

#91 nocoolnamejim
Member since 2003 • 15136 Posts

[QUOTE="battlefront23"][QUOTE="Curlyfrii87"]

Agreed... I have several guns myself, and i don't plan on giving up that right. However, why allow guns in restaurants... :|

Commander-Gree

One thing, did the article explain what type of gun he brought to the theater? And secondly, I think a law-abiding citizen should be allowed to bring a gun anywhere he or she wishes. Cause after all, they are LAW-abiding, and thus would not do anything illegal with the gun besides maybe self-defense. I see nothing wrong in that.

Well the problem is there is no guarantee that whoever is given a gun will remain responsible. They may have never broken a single law in ther life, but one thing might make them snap.

Such as a contrary opinion from a caller from Massachusetts where Glenn Beck is concerned.
Avatar image for theone86
theone86

22669

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#92 theone86
Member since 2003 • 22669 Posts

[QUOTE="nocoolnamejim"]Please Gabu...for the love of god don't bring us back to the "Which candidate would you want to sit down and have a beer with?" days. I seem to distinctly recall a time when there was a certain Texan who was regarded as a dimwitted but ultimately harmless "moderate" who would be a great president. I agree with you that Huck strikes me as kind of a funny, amusing guy to hang out with. But then again, so is Xaos or Jandurin and I wouldn't want either of them within spitting distance of our nuclear arsenal. They'd probably fire one at the Saudies just for the "lulz". :PGabuEx

Like I said:

Would I want him as president? Perhaps notGabuEx

I'm just protesting against the accusation that I saw a lot during the election that Mike Huckabee is some sort of insane religious zealot. Disagree with the man's politics as you will - I obviously do - but in the case of Mike Huckabee,turning that disagreement into actual dislike of the person himself is just plain impossible for me. I really don't think people are being fair when their evaluation of a human being is based 100% on their political views.

You're right, out of all the people I would have expected to stand up for Obama in that case the last person I would have expected to do it would be Mike Huckabee, and I'll admit I never saw that interview before. I know I was going insane at times wondering when someone on the left was going to say what i just saw Huckabee say. It's still hard for me to contemplate, though, how someone who is speaking so empathetically about minority issues here is not just totally the opposite in terms of where he stands on homosexuality, but also so radically different in terms of rhetoric. Would I say he speaks reasonably? Yes. Would I say he's not a zealot? Mmmmmm...I dunno about that, which is the strange part because you would expect a zealot to be unreasonable, yet there he is. I think it's a sad indicator of where politics in this country stand, both in the partisan rhetoric and political maneuvering of people other than Huckabee and in the fact that peolpe like Huckabee who seem to base their decisions on reason still believe that their own moral compass can dictate politics. At the very least, I think it's important for people to speak candidly about issues and to stop blowing non-issues like Jeremiah Wright out of proportion. I can respect Huckabee for doing that, if for nothing else.

Avatar image for deactivated-59d151f079814
deactivated-59d151f079814

47239

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#93 deactivated-59d151f079814
Member since 2003 • 47239 Posts
People need to seriously stop taking the 2nd amendment so direclty.. The government has already clamped down on it long ago, the word "arms" can be used for basically any amount of weapon out there.. For a theater I see absolutely no reason why some one would carry a weapon, infact I think there would be a greater chance of some one getting hurt due to an accident and misuse.. Than a crazed gunmen coming in.
Avatar image for TheShadowLord07
TheShadowLord07

23083

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 TheShadowLord07
Member since 2006 • 23083 Posts

if he'a allow to bring a gun to a theater does that mean he can bring one to an airport? after all he's got a permit to own one.

Avatar image for deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
deactivated-57af49c27f4e8

14149

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 33

User Lists: 0

#95 deactivated-57af49c27f4e8
Member since 2005 • 14149 Posts

you should be able to have certain firearms for protection - and you know people have brought guns to the theater before. but do you really NEED to? i really really doubt you need that kind of self protection in a public area. oh well, hopefully the extra weight threw his hip out.

Avatar image for XBebop
XBebop

1414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 XBebop
Member since 2003 • 1414 Posts
What an idiot, absolutely no reason to take a gun to a theaterToriko42
What if the theater's in the ghetto?
Avatar image for XBebop
XBebop

1414

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 XBebop
Member since 2003 • 1414 Posts
[QUOTE="Commander-Gree"]

[QUOTE="battlefront23"] One thing, did the article explain what type of gun he brought to the theater? And secondly, I think a law-abiding citizen should be allowed to bring a gun anywhere he or she wishes. Cause after all, they are LAW-abiding, and thus would not do anything illegal with the gun besides maybe self-defense. I see nothing wrong in that.nocoolnamejim

Well the problem is there is no guarantee that whoever is given a gun will remain responsible. They may have never broken a single law in ther life, but one thing might make them snap.

Such as a contrary opinion from a caller from Massachusetts where Glenn Beck is concerned.

Actually, she was very ill-informed. I don't blame Beck for going off on her.