God the Creator?

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Silver_Dragon17"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]Yeah didn't mean to stereotype. It was only a example, Adam and Eve is anohter, so is Noahs Ark etc etc.Silver_Dragon17

Adam and Eve have not been proven or disproven, and niether has Noah's Ark.:|

Adam and Eve from simple genetics alone has contridicted it.. There is not enough in the gene pool tosurvive to todays race. Not to mention evolution which completely contridicts. Noah's Ark both science and common sense have proven it to be very questionable.. We would have trouble collecting all the species on the planet today, let alone a single guy trying to scale tens of thousands of miles over land that hasn't even been discovered at the time..

Lets not forget the vegetation and insects that would die out that would cause a extinction on mass levels because the food sources would be litteraly wiped out for thousands of animals.

Now accept this or not I am merely saying that science community has shown through their ideas to contridict ideas like this.

How does the gene pool disprove Adam and Eve?

That's if Evolution is true.;)

Questionable, yes, but disproven?

Insects also went onto the Ark; I'm not sure about plants.

Yeah clearly he collected MILLIONS OF INSECTS, one guy to fit on a ship.. Plants would die it would screw over tons of animals and insects.. WE CAN'T EVEN DO THIS today. The genetics disproves it because incestial offspring over and over again cause malformity and disfunction.

So yes in Science communities eyes these are disproven.. As I say again take this as fact or not because you odviouslly dont for the Science community.. Because they see Evolution as fact, it did happen. The theory is all about how it happened, why and a few other ideas..

Accept this if you want, I really don't care, but the science community as a majority believe in these ideas.

Yeah clearly he collected MILLIONS OF INSECTS, one guy to fit on a ship.. Plants would die it would screw over tons of animals and insects.. WE CAN'T EVEN DO THIS today. The genetics disproves it because incestial offspring over and over again cause malformity and disfunction.

So yes in Science communities eyes these are disproven.. As I say again take this as fact or not because you odviouslly dont for the Science community.. Because they see Evolution as fact, it did happen. The theory is all about how it happened, why and a few other ideas..

Accept this if you want, I really don't care, but the science community as a majority believe in these ideas.

sSubZerOo

You mean that whole "Twice the odds for a mutation to be passed from both parents in an incestial child" thing? That wouldn't come until long after Adam and Eve.

I don't think you know just how big the Ark was. . .and besides, some insects can survive on top of and under water, as well as plants, but I'm not going to argue about it.

I am aware of the majority of the scientific community accepting evolution as fact. As a creationist, I'm reminded of that ALL THE TIME. But I think I'll go with the part of the scientific community that is Creationist.

How the h*ll would noahas arc be true????? seriously getting 2 of all 10 billion species on one boat and destributing them accordingly.

plz watch this and you will understand the point i am trying to prove.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1074819989721659487&q=the+bible&total=31323&start=0&num=10&so=0&type=search&plindex=3

I don't believe in any form of deity('s). However, I can understand why someone would and respect their faith.dhyce

I'm sorry, but you're much too reasonable and tolerant to be posting on this board! I'm forced to revoke your license. :P

Very interesting.

Cmon Christians, even Muslims don't believe in the Noah Ark story (they just believe in the flood, which was a "local flood" not a worldwide, cause according to Bible geneology, the time the flood happened in the Bible..the Babylonian empire existed and didn't even get affected)

We all know the Bible is a bunch of plagarism. Here look, who can plagarism more than this?

http://youtube.com/watch?v=9dvupiOb6D4&mode=related&search=

I use to be strongly religious, but I'm not anymore. I believe a "form" of "God" exists - but for all I know, it could be an alien on a planet full of "alien Gods". I certainly don't believe God is a white man with a white beard in heaven waiting to strike people with lightning bolts. My ideals about God and creation go very indepth and would take far too long to explain through one post. I also don't believe the bible is accurate in the least, I've found many many contradictions in it - too many to be over-looked. _Marisa_

[QUOTE="_Marisa_"]I use to be strongly religious, but I'm not anymore. I believe a "form" of "God" exists - but for all I know, it could be an alien on a planet full of "alien Gods". I certainly don't believe God is a white man with a white beard in heaven waiting to strike people with lightning bolts. My ideals about God and creation go very indepth and would take far too long to explain through one post. I also don't believe the bible is accurate in the least, I've found many many contradictions in it - too many to be over-looked. Greatgone12

Did God create man, or did man create God? What do you believe?Constant-Ra1n

God created Man of course!

If the Man had created God, then we would know if God really exist instead than just believing it. And we would probably know all the Mysteries of the universe too...