[QUOTE="Fightingfan"]
[QUOTE="ad1x2"]Kind of pointless since the Supreme Court declared laws against consentual sodomy unconstitutional a few years ago with Lawrence v. Texas. Some areas may still have them on the books but good luck enforcing them. Even the military isn't allowed to punish troops for consensual sodomy anymore despite it still being part of the UCMJ.worlock77
There's a grey area if they can get the supreme court to this it's a... forget the exact word, but when something is generally considered "out of the norm" it's not protected under the 1st amendment.
Scat porn is illegal in the United States, and viewing of the content can lead to an arrest. I forge the exact legal name - I'll think about it in a sec.
^^
Obscenity. If the can prove it's generally unacceptable by the majority pop they can make it illegal.
What you're talking about is something entirely different from what the topic is about. Distributing obscene materials is not the same thing as consenting adults engaging in private acts behind closed doors. And anti-sodomy laws, such as the one proposed here, have been ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court.
And no, it takes a little more to have something ruled "obscene" than just being unacceptable by the majority. Were that the case then untold scores of books, music, films, games, etc would have been declared obscene by now. (re:Â http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Miller_test)
If two consenting adults wanted to take a poop on each other and film it and distribute it via the internet they can be prosecuted if the act can be proved it was done within the United States. Regardless if the act was between two consenting adults or not it's illegal.http://www.dailydot.com/news/2-girls-1-cup-defense-obscenity/
*After reading your link the law seems like complete bullshit. Who are you(SC) to say what's art and what's not art?Â
Log in to comment