What a piece of shit.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="dave123321"]I would thumbs down shadows comment if I could nomsayin
Be respectful of different points of view.Â
Shut up bruce[QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"]Geez, way too have an overreaction. What exactly about my comment makes me "pompous" and on my high horse? I'm not the one trying to boast about how many times I've blown people and been blown.[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
You need to brush up on your OT-esque, or come off that high horse, or both.
And fvck off while you're at it.
Pompous ass.
And is that an epileptic period or a failed ellipsis?
Â
HoolaHoopMan
Are you really so insecure that the very hint of anyone "challenging" you is enough to warrant what you said? Really?
You're kind of a cvnt, you know that?You're kind of a cvnt, you know that?[QUOTE="HoolaHoopMan"][QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"] Geez, way too have an overreaction. What exactly about my comment makes me "pompous" and on my high horse? I'm not the one trying to boast about how many times I've blown people and been blown.
Are you really so insecure that the very hint of anyone "challenging" you is enough to warrant what you said? Really?
worlock77
[QUOTE="Laihendi"]Criminalizing oral and anal sex against minors and non-consenting adults is not a big deal.JDWolfieI didn't bother to read the article but the sub-title said he wants to make oral sex between two consenting adults a felony. later on the article says that he only wants to apply the law if the sodomy is between non-consenting adults, against children or done in public. Overall I think the article is a bit poorly written, among other things it mentions a website but does not give the websites name or link to the site.
I didn't bother to read the article but the sub-title said he wants to make oral sex between two consenting adults a felony. later on the article says that he only wants to apply the law if the sodomy is between non-consenting adults, against children or done in public. Overall I think the article is a bit poorly written, among other things it mentions a website but does not give the websites name or link to the site.[QUOTE="JDWolfie"][QUOTE="Laihendi"]Criminalizing oral and anal sex against minors and non-consenting adults is not a big deal.whipassmt
Considering the fact that as a state senator he blocked a measure to amend the law to only apply in those cases, and the fact that he's made statements against homosexuality, I doubt he truely means what he says there. Regardless if he were to get his way then the law can be used against consenting adults, and that possibility cannot be allowed.
If you read the article, it says the law he wants would only apply to minors, unconsenting adults, or in public.Â
Still stupid and redundant though. Pretty sure all are illegal to begin with.
Actually I don't know if sodomy against minors or sodomitical rape would be illegal under Virginia law if not for the anti-sodomy law. It's possible that the laws that ban rape or carnal intercourse with a minor may have been written in such a way that they apply only to sex proper (i.e. a sexual act that can lead to procreation), not to sodomy.If you read the article, it says the law he wants would only apply to minors, unconsenting adults, or in public.
Still stupid and redundant though. Pretty sure all are illegal to begin with.
SpartanMSU
If you read the article, it says the law he wants would only apply to minors, unconsenting adults, or in public.Â
Still stupid and redundant though. Pretty sure all are illegal to begin with.
SpartanMSU
No, it says that he would only apply the law to minors, unconsenting adults or in public. The law he wants, however, would apply to even consenting adults. He himself blocked a law that would only apply to minors and unconsenting adults. Despite what he might say now I think his intentions are pretty transparent.
Actually I don't know if sodomy against minors or sodomitical rape would be illegal under Virginia law if not for the anti-sodomy law. It's possible that the laws that ban rape or carnal intercourse with a minor may have been written in such a way that they apply only to sex proper (i.e. a sexual act that can lead to procreation), not to sodomy.[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]
If you read the article, it says the law he wants would only apply to minors, unconsenting adults, or in public.
Still stupid and redundant though. Pretty sure all are illegal to begin with.
whipassmt
You've got to be kidding...
[QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"]Geez, way too have an overreaction. What exactly about my comment makes me "pompous" and on my high horse? I'm not the one trying to boast about how many times I've blown people and been blown.
Are you really so insecure that the very hint of anyone "challenging" you is enough to warrant what you said? Really?
br0kenrabbit
If you think I make such posts as anything but tongue-in-cheek, you're doing OT wrong. But if you want to get literal, yes, if I received 10 years for each time I've gone down on a girl or she I then I would be in for a very, very long time. I'm nearing 40, I don't think that truth would change among most of my cohorts.
To come into a thread so late just to make such a snark comment is what pissed me off. Seriously, what do you think you added to the discussion? If you don't get it, I make these kinds of threads to poke fun at the situation, because that's how I keep from exploding from the stupidity of it.
Â
Fair enough, but I wasn't going out to get you - I was just pointing it out. Sorry if I upset you, then? Also, it seems everyone else has gotten a stiffy from the situation and added their own "input" in. I'll say this nicely, grow the fvck up.[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"][QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"]Geez, way too have an overreaction. What exactly about my comment makes me "pompous" and on my high horse? I'm not the one trying to boast about how many times I've blown people and been blown.
Are you really so insecure that the very hint of anyone "challenging" you is enough to warrant what you said? Really?
ShadowsDemon
If you think I make such posts as anything but tongue-in-cheek, you're doing OT wrong. But if you want to get literal, yes, if I received 10 years for each time I've gone down on a girl or she I then I would be in for a very, very long time. I'm nearing 40, I don't think that truth would change among most of my cohorts.
To come into a thread so late just to make such a snark comment is what pissed me off. Seriously, what do you think you added to the discussion? If you don't get it, I make these kinds of threads to poke fun at the situation, because that's how I keep from exploding from the stupidity of it.
Â
Fair enough, but I wasn't going out to get you - I was just pointing it out. Sorry if I upset you, then? Also, it seems everyone else has gotten a stiffy from the situation and added their own "input" in. I'll say this nicely, grow the fvck up.Heed your own advice.
Now that I've actually read the entire article, I think you guys are blowing things out of proportion. Although it's amazing how anal that Cuccinelli guy is regarding all of this. megagene
:| These things are already against the law under the existing rape laws in place.. This is a trojan horse..
Fair enough, but I wasn't going out to get you - I was just pointing it out. Sorry if I upset you, then? Also, it seems everyone else has gotten a stiffy from the situation and added their own "input" in. I'll say this nicely, grow the fvck up.[QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"][QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
If you think I make such posts as anything but tongue-in-cheek, you're doing OT wrong. But if you want to get literal, yes, if I received 10 years for each time I've gone down on a girl or she I then I would be in for a very, very long time. I'm nearing 40, I don't think that truth would change among most of my cohorts.
To come into a thread so late just to make such a snark comment is what pissed me off. Seriously, what do you think you added to the discussion? If you don't get it, I make these kinds of threads to poke fun at the situation, because that's how I keep from exploding from the stupidity of it.
Â
worlock77
Heed your own advice.
Then maybe you all shouldn't butt in with your pointless words of wisdom, trying to act as if you're the all knowing source of advice. You're just making the situation worse, and then trace it back to where it started. Very.....stupid.[QUOTE="nomsayin"]
[QUOTE="dave123321"]I would thumbs down shadows comment if I could wis3boi
Be respectful of different points of view.Â
no
It seems that even the thought of respecting the views of those who disagree with you scares you. May I ask why?Yeah, this. ShadowsDemon seems insecure because he doesn't get any action so he needs to lash out at others lmao Uh....no. I misread his comment. This isn't about not getting "any action". (I really don't care about it). End of story. It's pretty damn simple.[QUOTE="br0kenrabbit"]
I'm nearing 40, I don't think that truth would change among most of my cohorts.
Aljosa23
[QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"] Fair enough, but I wasn't going out to get you - I was just pointing it out. Sorry if I upset you, then? Also, it seems everyone else has gotten a stiffy from the situation and added their own "input" in. I'll say this nicely, grow the fvck up.ShadowsDemon
Heed your own advice.
Then maybe you all shouldn't butt in with your pointless words of wisdom, trying to act as if you're the all knowing source of advice. You're just making the situation worse, and then trace it back to where it started. Very.....stupid.You came in to this thread out of the blue, reacting in an overly hostile manner to an obviously tongue-in-cheek comment that had nothing to do with you, have not contributed anything to this thread and you're telling the rest of us that we should "grow the f*ck up"?Â
Then maybe you all shouldn't butt in with your pointless words of wisdom, trying to act as if you're the all knowing source of advice. You're just making the situation worse, and then trace it back to where it started. Very.....stupid.[QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
Heed your own advice.
worlock77
You came in to this thread out of the blue, reacting in an overly hostile manner to an obviously tongue-in-cheek comment that had nothing to do with you, have not contributed anything to this thread and you're telling the rest of us that we should "grow the f*ck up"?Â
I'm enjoying the angst
[QUOTE="megagene"]Now that I've actually read the entire article, I think you guys are blowing things out of proportion. Although it's amazing how anal that Cuccinelli guy is regarding all of this. worlock77
How so?
Not the brightest, eh?
[QUOTE="nomsayin"]Woman goes to dentist with semen residue. lolhow exactly would they arrest someone for that?Â
Fightingfan
[QUOTE="dave123321"]I would thumbs down shadows comment if I could nomsayin
Be respectful of different points of view.Â
Showing simple disapproval isn't disrespecting his right to hold a view.[QUOTE="megagene"]Now that I've actually read the entire article, I think you guys are blowing things out of proportion. Although it's amazing how anal that Cuccinelli guy is regarding all of this. worlock77
How so?
LOL geez, man. The puns bro, the puns! smhÂ
later on the article says that he only wants to apply the law if the sodomy is between non-consenting adults, against children or done in public. Overall I think the article is a bit poorly written, among other things it mentions a website but does not give the websites name or link to the site.
whipassmt
Virginia State Government Morality Roundup:
Cuccinelli hopes to protect anti-sodomy law
Virginia's McDonnell turns to high-powered defense attorney
New scandal revelations imperil Virginia's McDonnell
McDonnell allies 'privately express doubt' about his political survival
Cuccinelli struggles to steer clear of Virginia scandal
Cuccinelli keeps his focus on Virginia's anti-sodomy law
McDonnell 'directly intervened' to assist scandal-plagued benefactor
With Cuccinelli, the fine print matters
Then maybe you all shouldn't butt in with your pointless words of wisdom, trying to act as if you're the all knowing source of advice. You're just making the situation worse, and then trace it back to where it started. Very.....stupid.[QUOTE="ShadowsDemon"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
Heed your own advice.
worlock77
You came in to this thread out of the blue, reacting in an overly hostile manner to an obviously tongue-in-cheek comment that had nothing to do with you, have not contributed anything to this thread and you're telling the rest of us that we should "grow the f*ck up"?Â
It seems you forgot about your petty comments that you all posted. I don't claim to have wise words of wisdom, and I already apologised for what I said. I don't need your stupid and inane inputs that just provoke more hostility.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment