@mark1974 said:
@Riverwolf007 said:
@mark1974 said:
@Riverwolf007: Huh? You just asked me why Brussels was attacked by saying, "Brussels interferes with the middle east?" in regards to my explanation why Japan and China are not attacked. The other things you state are not my personal opinion one way or the other.
Brussels has been a haven of acceptance for the people of middle east but it did not help them one bit.
terrorists attacked them the same as they attack everyone else.
the Brussels attacks show exactly what the problem here is.
Terrorists are assholes.
well i have always believed that is relative to the observer but the important thing here is you guys better start looking at how the destabilization of europe is going to work out in the long run.
how long will it be before france decides the only way this problem can be fixed is to occupy belgum for its own good?
i know france has a certain reputation but i can assure you that is bullshit. the french have almost always fielded effective combat forces and have no problem whatsoever projecting their power and if you have a terror factory next door at some point the obvious fix is to knock down the factory.
belgum has shown they can't fix the problem or are unwilling to and in fact seem to go out of their way to make it even worse as shown here.
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/12/17/world/europe/belgium-says-law-limiting-raids-may-have-allowed-suspect-in-paris-attacks-to-escape.html
and here.
http://www.politico.eu/article/belgium-terror-attacks-questioned-salah-abdeslam-for-only-one-hour-before-terror-attacks/
if you guys think what's left of the european nation states can't be plunged into war over things like this then you read different history books than the ones i do.
the orban vid i posted above is basically the hungarian prime minister drawing a line in the sand and daring the e.u. to cross it.
it takes very little imagination to see where this stuff leads.
hopefully i'm wrong.
Log in to comment