Hardcover vs Paperback

  • 90 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#51 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts

I like harcover more, but they usually tend to be much more expensive. Ergo, I go with paperbacks for the most part.

Avatar image for 1oh1nine1
1oh1nine1

779

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 1oh1nine1
Member since 2007 • 779 Posts

I hate hardcovers. I think they're unnecessarilyheavy, and I hate those jackets they put on them. They slip and slide around, it drives me crazy. Plus they're expensive. Paperbacks are cheaper, lighter (this is important, I often read in bed and hold the book up in the air), and not really all that less durable (though I take care of my books). Now, if you worry about them looking nice on a shelf, so do I. The books I like better, I get the larger, $15 paperbacks. You know, the ones with the nicer paper and better looking covers. The big paperbacks are my favorite form of book.

To those of you bashing e-books, I'd say they have their place too. I have a Kindle, and I love it. I buy books on it whenever I am very impatient, or there's an old-enough-to-be-free book that I want. I don't have any large book stores where I live that aren't an hour's drive away, so the Kindle has been pretty cool. My only regret is that it seems to be killing real book stores, now that Borders is going out of business. Needless to say, I visited two of their stores, and bought a bunch of paperbacks on sale.

Avatar image for OrkHammer007
OrkHammer007

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#53 OrkHammer007
Member since 2006 • 4753 Posts

Paperbacks are easier to carry and much easier to store. I have several boxes full of books that I have read, and since I quite frequently re-read books I like, it's a lot more convenient to store them and scrounge them up later.

Hardcovers are great to show off to friends, but hard to tote around and awkward to read in bed.

I haven't had any experience with e-books, but I can already see one problem I'd have: maps. If I'm reading a book with a map, I often shuffle back and forth between text and map to see where events in the story are taking place geographically. I don't see that happening with the same convenience with an e-book as with a paperback or hardcover.

Avatar image for immortality20
immortality20

8546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 36

User Lists: 0

#54 immortality20
Member since 2005 • 8546 Posts

Hardcover usually always come out first so if it's a book I want I'm usually getting that. But I perfer paperbacks, easier to hold and read.

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#55 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts
[QUOTE="OrkHammer007"]

Paperbacks are easier to carry and much easier to store. I have several boxes full of books that I have read, and since I quite frequently re-read books I like, it's a lot more convenient to store them and scrounge them up later.

Hardcovers are great to show off to friends, but hard to tote around and awkward to read in bed.

I haven't had any experience with e-books, but I can already see one problem I'd have: maps. If I'm reading a book with a map, I often shuffle back and forth between text and map to see where events in the story are taking place geographically. I don't see that happening with the same convenience with an e-book as with a paperback or hardcover.

In my experience the kindle isn't that bad. I feel that it could use a bit larger screen though, and it may sound funny seeing as how its an e-reader but I think it could also use a slightly faster CPU. Perhaps in the next iteration which doesn't sound too far off seeing as how the price dropped not long ago.
Avatar image for Dawq902
Dawq902

6796

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#56 Dawq902
Member since 2007 • 6796 Posts

E-book. So much more convienent. Don't have to hold the book open, no crease in the middle, cheaper books, and it is also much faster reasing.

But out of hardcover vs paperback I prefer hardcover.

Avatar image for FragStains
FragStains

20668

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 FragStains
Member since 2003 • 20668 Posts
I rarely prefer hardcovers. Paperback are flexible and less valuable. They are also less expensive, and being a cheap bastard, I appreciate that attribute.
Avatar image for spazzx625
spazzx625

43433

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 54

User Lists: 0

#58 spazzx625
Member since 2004 • 43433 Posts
I prefer digital books now but I favor paperback for physical media.
Avatar image for Novemberrr
Novemberrr

163

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 Novemberrr
Member since 2011 • 163 Posts
I'm a big fan of paperbacks because of the convenience and they are cheaper too. :P
Avatar image for --Anna--
--Anna--

4636

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 --Anna--
Member since 2007 • 4636 Posts

I prefer paperback most of the time, except book with a lot of photos in them.

Avatar image for drokmore
drokmore

1863

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#61 drokmore
Member since 2005 • 1863 Posts
paperback, just easier to hold. But really I mainly use Kindle these days.
Avatar image for Firebird-5
Firebird-5

2848

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#62 Firebird-5
Member since 2007 • 2848 Posts

sometimes new editions are only available in paperback - so if i'm going to buy a book and it's like that, then i'll get the paperback. i prefer hardbacks though.

Avatar image for Alter_Echo
Alter_Echo

10724

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#63 Alter_Echo
Member since 2003 • 10724 Posts

Movie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>E-Book>Hardcover>paperback.

In fact, my attention span was barely long enough to make this post.

Avatar image for Sandulf29
Sandulf29

14330

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 Sandulf29
Member since 2010 • 14330 Posts

Movie >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>E-Book>Hardcover>paperback.

In fact, my attention span was barely long enough to make this post.

Alter_Echo
I would go for the other way tho
Avatar image for DasBeerBoot
DasBeerBoot

261

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 DasBeerBoot
Member since 2011 • 261 Posts

Hardcover!

Avatar image for Crunchy_Nuts
Crunchy_Nuts

2749

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 Crunchy_Nuts
Member since 2010 • 2749 Posts
I buy an e-book version of every book I buy. If I really, really like it then I get a hard-cover as well.
Avatar image for DarthJohnova
DarthJohnova

4599

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#67 DarthJohnova
Member since 2010 • 4599 Posts

Well I buy all my University books in paperback as I don't mind if they get a little battered now and then, but the ones I want to keep and cherish I get in hardback. For example, my girlfriend and I are collecting these at the moment. They look so nice on the shelf :)

Avatar image for gmaster456
gmaster456

7569

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#68 gmaster456
Member since 2008 • 7569 Posts

Well I by all my University books in paperback as I don't mind if they get a little battered now and then, but the ones I want to keep and cherish I get in hardback. For example, my girlfriend and I are collecting these at the moment. They look so nice on the shelf :)

DarthJohnova

Thats a great looking collection. Great books too.

Avatar image for Dracula68
Dracula68

33109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 Dracula68
Member since 2002 • 33109 Posts
E-bookferrari2001
Wow, first post got it right. We could have locked the thread right after it!
Avatar image for fabz_95
fabz_95

15425

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 41

User Lists: 0

#70 fabz_95
Member since 2006 • 15425 Posts
I prefer paperbacks, when I'm in bed reading and the book falls on my face it doesn't hurt as much.
Avatar image for X-The-Doctor-X
X-The-Doctor-X

1268

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#71 X-The-Doctor-X
Member since 2010 • 1268 Posts

I like Hardcover better

Avatar image for MickeyTheNinja
MickeyTheNinja

3824

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 MickeyTheNinja
Member since 2007 • 3824 Posts
Doesn't matter to me, but like what someone else said, I like hardcover for short stories/comics and paperbacks for longer ones. It's easier to flip and maneuver compared to hardcovers. But hardcovers are always cooler and more durable.
Avatar image for hoola
hoola

6422

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 hoola
Member since 2004 • 6422 Posts

Doesn't matter to me as long as they are all in perfect condition and every book in the series is the exact same format. I can't STAND it when a new book in a series comes out and its cover design has changed. Just like the new A Song of Ice and Fire. I read all four books in paperback form and they all were the same design, then this new one comes out and is completely different, plus it is only in hardcover. It really, REALLY annoys me.

Also, I don't like hardcover books that are made cheaply and have low quality paper, like the new Terry Goodkind book The Omen Machine. I knew it was going to be cheap as soon as I saw the cover art and page length (unlike A Dance with Dragons, which had high quality paper and cardboard cover). Then, in The Sword of Truth series, the first 10 books were all the exact same height, then all of a sudden the 11th and last book in the series is .75 inches taller....Come On! Now every time I look at the series I just get annoyed.

Also, I have trouble reading books that are less than 600 pages. They usually feel rushed and incomplete to me.

Avatar image for sthadji
sthadji

4682

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#74 sthadji
Member since 2004 • 4682 Posts
Paperback. They're cheaper and you can roll the cover behind the page.
Avatar image for vguy555
vguy555

4625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#75 vguy555
Member since 2007 • 4625 Posts

Paperback just because they're cheaper.

Avatar image for deactivated-5e7f8a21de9dd
deactivated-5e7f8a21de9dd

4403

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 1

#76 deactivated-5e7f8a21de9dd
Member since 2008 • 4403 Posts

For large books I like hardcover, but for a 200 page or less book paperback is fine.

Avatar image for OrkHammer007
OrkHammer007

4753

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#77 OrkHammer007
Member since 2006 • 4753 Posts

Doesn't matter to me as long as they are all in perfect condition and every book in the series is the exact same format. I can't STAND it when a new book in a series comes out and its cover design has changed. Just like the new A Song of Ice and Fire. I read all four books in paperback form and they all were the same design, then this new one comes out and is completely different, plus it is only in hardcover. It really, REALLY annoys me.hoola

Standard publishing release practice has always had new novels by popular authors released first in hardcover, then in paperback a year later.

Avatar image for Aquat1cF1sh
Aquat1cF1sh

11096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#78 Aquat1cF1sh
Member since 2006 • 11096 Posts
I like both of them a lot but I think I prefer hardcovers.
Avatar image for Gorillanator
Gorillanator

867

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 Gorillanator
Member since 2009 • 867 Posts

Paperback, it's cheaper and more flexible. Plus, I am not a very big fan of those jacket things.

Avatar image for trick_man01
trick_man01

11441

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 14

User Lists: 0

#80 trick_man01
Member since 2003 • 11441 Posts
I've got a handful of hardbacks, but those are only for collecting. When I buy something I want to read I either buy paperback... or the Kindle version.
Avatar image for Michael0134567
Michael0134567

28651

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#81 Michael0134567
Member since 2008 • 28651 Posts

Hardcover.A lot harder to damage.

Avatar image for WSGRandomPerson
WSGRandomPerson

13697

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 18

User Lists: 0

#82 WSGRandomPerson
Member since 2007 • 13697 Posts
Hardcover if I can get it, but most books I buy only come in paperback. (The ones that are both; usually the hardback are rare to find or cost an obscene amount)
Avatar image for MathMattS
MathMattS

4012

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 59

User Lists: 0

#83 MathMattS
Member since 2009 • 4012 Posts

I prefer hardcover over paperback. More durable.

Avatar image for dkdk999
dkdk999

6754

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 dkdk999
Member since 2007 • 6754 Posts
I always go for paperback. New books are expensive enough paperback. And I don't like how alot of hardcover are giant.
Avatar image for fastesttruck
fastesttruck

25353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 fastesttruck
Member since 2005 • 25353 Posts
I like paperback since they take up less room and thats mostly what I have. But hardcovers can be nice for reading at a desk or in my case on the floor.
Avatar image for parkurtommo
parkurtommo

28295

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#86 parkurtommo
Member since 2009 • 28295 Posts

Hardcover, doesn't get ugly.

Avatar image for MissLibrarian
MissLibrarian

9589

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#87 MissLibrarian
Member since 2008 • 9589 Posts

I generally prefer paperbacks usually, they're just easier to hold/read, especially since I read in bed a lot.

However if there's a book I love enough to actually buy I'll invest in a hardback usually. Paperbacks seem to fall apart so quickly these days but, mind you, hardbacks aren't that well-made usually either.

Avatar image for aaronmullan
aaronmullan

33426

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 9

User Lists: 0

#88 aaronmullan
Member since 2004 • 33426 Posts
I like both actually. They both kind of have their benefits.
Avatar image for Dracula68
Dracula68

33109

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 Dracula68
Member since 2002 • 33109 Posts
I like paperback since they take up less room and thats mostly what I have. But hardcovers can be nice for reading at a desk or in my case on the floor. fastesttruck
Digital takes up even less room! I gave all my books away. I've seen the light!
Avatar image for Rusteater
Rusteater

4080

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#90 Rusteater
Member since 2004 • 4080 Posts

eBook