Healthcare reform effects start today

  • 154 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#1 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

http://christiancentury.org/blogs/archive/2010-09/real-reform-today

Here are the benefits we currently have from the healthcare reform:

Insurance companies can't exclude children based on preexisting conditions.

Certain preventive procedures have to be covered without co-payments.

Young adults (up to age 26) can stay on their parents' plans.

You can't get dropped from coverage when you get sick.

You can switch plans and keep your doctor.

You have the right to appeal claims decisions to a third party.

Lifetime benefit limits are no more.

Rebate checks are being sent to help fill the Medicare donut hole.

More detailed article

EVERYBODY PANIC

Avatar image for kipohippo021
kipohippo021

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#2 kipohippo021
Member since 2010 • 3895 Posts
Oh noes! Thats terrible. :P
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

I guess that explains the minor rate jumps.

Avatar image for black_cat19
black_cat19

8212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#4 black_cat19
Member since 2006 • 8212 Posts

Oh my God, all of that sounds TERRIBLE! The US is DOOMED!!!

D:

Avatar image for Theokhoth
Theokhoth

36799

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Theokhoth
Member since 2008 • 36799 Posts

I guess that explains the minor rate jumps.

coolbeans90
The rate jumps are due to insurance companies, not the law (the rates were going up before the law was even in effect). They're raising premiums to feed the "more expensive care" myth and get people to go against the bill, because the ones hurt the most by this bill are the insurance companies.
Avatar image for kipohippo021
kipohippo021

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#6 kipohippo021
Member since 2010 • 3895 Posts
[QUOTE="black_cat19"]

Oh my God, all of that sounds TERRIBLE! The US is DOOMED!!!

D:

Quick, hide your money! Obama is coming to take it!
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

I guess that explains the minor rate jumps.

Theokhoth

The rate jumps are due to insurance companies, not the law (the rates were going up before the law was even in effect). They're raising premiums to feed the "more expensive care" myth and get people to go against the bill, because the ones hurt the most by this bill are the insurance companies.

No, these regulations will cost insurance companies money (money is why the insurance industry was pulling these stunts to begin with) and to cover their anticipated losses, they raise rates. It's a little too late for the insurance companies to stop the bill. Furthermore, the individual mandate pretty much guarantees that the insurance companies won't lose out.

Avatar image for xJust_CraZyx
xJust_CraZyx

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#8 xJust_CraZyx
Member since 2009 • 221 Posts
[QUOTE="kipohippo021"][QUOTE="black_cat19"]

Oh my God, all of that sounds TERRIBLE! The US is DOOMED!!!

D:

Quick, hide your money! Obama is coming to take it!

damn right he is.
Avatar image for Tauruslink
Tauruslink

6586

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#9 Tauruslink
Member since 2005 • 6586 Posts

Wow what Washington idiot thought that any of those things would be a good idea?! :x

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#10 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

I guess that explains the minor rate jumps.

Theokhoth
The rate jumps are due to insurance companies, not the law (the rates were going up before the law was even in effect). They're raising premiums to feed the "more expensive care" myth and get people to go against the bill, because the ones hurt the most by this bill are the insurance companies.

Er all those changes WILL increase the cost.:|
Avatar image for kipohippo021
kipohippo021

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#11 kipohippo021
Member since 2010 • 3895 Posts
[QUOTE="xJust_CraZyx"][QUOTE="kipohippo021"][QUOTE="black_cat19"]

Oh my God, all of that sounds TERRIBLE! The US is DOOMED!!!

D:

Quick, hide your money! Obama is coming to take it!

damn right he is.

We need to find these muslim socialists and burn them with fire. Burn them with fire i say!
Avatar image for black_cat19
black_cat19

8212

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 black_cat19
Member since 2006 • 8212 Posts

[QUOTE="black_cat19"]

Oh my God, all of that sounds TERRIBLE! The US is DOOMED!!!

D:

kipohippo021

Quick, hide your money! Obama is coming to take it!

Too late, he already came and went. :cry:

He just showed up, smiled and said hi, and then proceeded to take everything; there was literally nothing I could do, that charismatic son of a... :x

Avatar image for Travo_basic
Travo_basic

38751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#13 Travo_basic
Member since 2003 • 38751 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

I guess that explains the minor rate jumps.

The rate jumps are due to insurance companies, not the law (the rates were going up before the law was even in effect). They're raising premiums to feed the "more expensive care" myth and get people to go against the bill, because the ones hurt the most by this bill are the insurance companies.

Er all those changes WILL increase the cost.:|

Yep, starting in January for me.
Avatar image for kipohippo021
kipohippo021

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#14 kipohippo021
Member since 2010 • 3895 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

I guess that explains the minor rate jumps.

The rate jumps are due to insurance companies, not the law (the rates were going up before the law was even in effect). They're raising premiums to feed the "more expensive care" myth and get people to go against the bill, because the ones hurt the most by this bill are the insurance companies.

Er all those changes WILL increase the cost.:|

But it dosent need to make it more expensive for people as well. Those companies are rich already. Raising rates kinda defeats the purpose of this all.
Avatar image for xJust_CraZyx
xJust_CraZyx

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#15 xJust_CraZyx
Member since 2009 • 221 Posts

[QUOTE="xJust_CraZyx"][QUOTE="kipohippo021"] Quick, hide your money! Obama is coming to take it!kipohippo021
damn right he is.

We need to find these muslim socialists and burn them with fire. Burn them with fire i say!

burn them?

I say:

Avatar image for Travo_basic
Travo_basic

38751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#16 Travo_basic
Member since 2003 • 38751 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] The rate jumps are due to insurance companies, not the law (the rates were going up before the law was even in effect). They're raising premiums to feed the "more expensive care" myth and get people to go against the bill, because the ones hurt the most by this bill are the insurance companies.kipohippo021
Er all those changes WILL increase the cost.:|

But it dosent need to make it more expensive for people as well. Those companies are rich already. Raising rates kinda defeats the purpose of this all.

It's all business to them.
Avatar image for CRS98
CRS98

9036

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 0

#17 CRS98
Member since 2004 • 9036 Posts
Wow, that sounds pretty goo- I mean bad!
Avatar image for MAILER_DAEMON
MAILER_DAEMON

45906

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#18 MAILER_DAEMON
Member since 2003 • 45906 Posts
There's a lot of snark in this thread... as though people are trying bait people. Instead, I'll just say that my belief was that reform needed to happen, such as things like this. What got pushed through Congress goes too far. That is all. An opinion hated by opinionated people and fellow moderators alike! :shock:
Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#19 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
Up to 26 still on parents' insurance...wow :? At what age is someone an adult now?
Avatar image for xJust_CraZyx
xJust_CraZyx

221

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#20 xJust_CraZyx
Member since 2009 • 221 Posts

There's a lot of snark in this thread... as though people are trying bait people. Instead, I'll just say that my belief was that reform needed to happen, such as things like this. What got pushed through Congress goes too far. That is all. An opinion hated by opinionated people and fellow moderators alike! :shock:MAILER_DAEMON

i completely agree with you mr moderator.

Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

Well freedom was good while it lasted. I should have to right to choose my own police department, to pay my own fire bill and pay for ALL levels of school. :evil:

Avatar image for Travo_basic
Travo_basic

38751

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#22 Travo_basic
Member since 2003 • 38751 Posts
Up to 26 still on parents' insurance...wow :? At what age is someone an adult now?rawsavon
I think 31 or 32.
Avatar image for timmy00
timmy00

15360

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#23 timmy00
Member since 2006 • 15360 Posts

Best thing I could find >_>

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#24 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] The rate jumps are due to insurance companies, not the law (the rates were going up before the law was even in effect). They're raising premiums to feed the "more expensive care" myth and get people to go against the bill, because the ones hurt the most by this bill are the insurance companies.kipohippo021
Er all those changes WILL increase the cost.:|

But it dosent need to make it more expensive for people as well. Those companies are rich already. Raising rates kinda defeats the purpose of this all.

Of course it does. Increased costs are ALWAYS passed on to the consumer.
Avatar image for JigglyWiggly_
JigglyWiggly_

24625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#25 JigglyWiggly_
Member since 2009 • 24625 Posts

[QUOTE="MAILER_DAEMON"]There's a lot of snark in this thread... as though people are trying bait people. Instead, I'll just say that my belief was that reform needed to happen, such as things like this. What got pushed through Congress goes too far. That is all. An opinion hated by opinionated people and fellow moderators alike! :shock:xJust_CraZyx

i completely agree with you mr moderator.

Kinky.
Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#26 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

Most Americans think Health care reform should have done more.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#27 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"] The rate jumps are due to insurance companies, not the law (the rates were going up before the law was even in effect). They're raising premiums to feed the "more expensive care" myth and get people to go against the bill, because the ones hurt the most by this bill are the insurance companies.kipohippo021
Er all those changes WILL increase the cost.:|

But it dosent need to make it more expensive for people as well. Those companies are rich already. Raising rates kinda defeats the purpose of this all.

No, the purpose wasn't to curb costs, the bill specifically targeted accessability to those who weren't already covered. Realisitcally, the health insurance industry has a MUCH lower profit margin than most other types of business. (3.3%) Raising rates just keeps the industry afloat. Affordability isn't going to be noticably altered by lowering the costs by 3.3% that insurance companies take in. There will have to be some other forms of cost cutting to make a significant difference.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#28 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

Most Americans think Health care reform should have done more.

Former_Slacker

Depending on what "more" consists of, I also think more should have been done.

Avatar image for wstfld
wstfld

6375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 wstfld
Member since 2008 • 6375 Posts
That is so socialist/Nazi/terrorist.
Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="Former_Slacker"]

Most Americans think Health care reform should have done more.

coolbeans90

Depending on what "more" consists of, I also think more should have been done.

_Only 25 percent of the "get-outs" favor requiring health insurance companies to sell coverage to people regardless of pre-existing medical conditions, while 54 percent of the "do-mores" support it. The law requires insurers to cover children regardless of health problems starting this year, and that protection is extended to people of all ages in 2014.

_Among those who want a law that does more, 68 percent favor requiring medium to large companies to provide insurance to their workers or pay a fine; that stands at 28 percent among those who want the government out. The law does not require employers to offer coverage, but it hits companies that have 50 or more workers with a penalty if any full-time employee gets a government subsidy for health insurance.

_The "get-outs" overwhelmingly reject the health care law's requirement that most Americans carry health insurance starting in 2014. But the "do-mores" are split, with 34 percent favoring the mandate, 33 percent opposing it, and 32 percent neutral.

Avatar image for rawsavon
rawsavon

40001

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#31 rawsavon
Member since 2004 • 40001 Posts
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]Up to 26 still on parents' insurance...wow :? At what age is someone an adult now?Travo_basic
I think 31 or 32.

Seems to be heading that way :lol:
Avatar image for kipohippo021
kipohippo021

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#32 kipohippo021
Member since 2010 • 3895 Posts

[QUOTE="kipohippo021"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Er all those changes WILL increase the cost.:|coolbeans90

But it dosent need to make it more expensive for people as well. Those companies are rich already. Raising rates kinda defeats the purpose of this all.

No, the purpose wasn't to curb costs, the bill specifically targeted accessability to those who weren't already covered. Realisitcally, the health insurance industry has a MUCH lower profit margin than most other types of business. (3.3%) Raising rates just keeps the industry afloat. Affordability isn't going to be noticably altered by lowering the costs by 3.3% that insurance companies take in. There will have to be some other forms of cost cutting to make a significant difference.

but more money means more coverage. So by raising prices, arent they kinda destroying the whole point? Some of those are well needed, but alot of those just are another exuse to raise prices.
Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="Former_Slacker"]

Most Americans think Health care reform should have done more.

Former_Slacker

Depending on what "more" consists of, I also think more should have been done.

_Only 25 percent of the "get-outs" favor requiring health insurance companies to sell coverage to people regardless of pre-existing medical conditions, while 54 percent of the "do-mores" support it. The law requires insurers to cover children regardless of health problems starting this year, and that protection is extended to people of all ages in 2014.

_Among those who want a law that does more, 68 percent favor requiring medium to large companies to provide insurance to their workers or pay a fine; that stands at 28 percent among those who want the government out. The law does not require employers to offer coverage, but it hits companies that have 50 or more workers with a penalty if any full-time employee gets a government subsidy for health insurance.

_The "get-outs" overwhelmingly reject the health care law's requirement that most Americans carry health insurance starting in 2014. But the "do-mores" are split, with 34 percent favoring the mandate, 33 percent opposing it, and 32 percent neutral.

Hmm I guess I don't quite line up with these "do-mores."

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#34 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="kipohippo021"] But it dosent need to make it more expensive for people as well. Those companies are rich already. Raising rates kinda defeats the purpose of this all. kipohippo021

No, the purpose wasn't to curb costs, the bill specifically targeted accessability to those who weren't already covered. Realisitcally, the health insurance industry has a MUCH lower profit margin than most other types of business. (3.3%) Raising rates just keeps the industry afloat. Affordability isn't going to be noticably altered by lowering the costs by 3.3% that insurance companies take in. There will have to be some other forms of cost cutting to make a significant difference.

but more money means more coverage. So by raising prices, arent they kinda destroying the whole point? Some of those are well needed, but alot of those just are another exuse to raise prices.

These regulatory measures used to protect certain groups of insured people (those who become sick) and provide coverage to groups of uninsured people will raise operating costs for the insurance companies. Insurance companies have rather narrow margins of profit. In order to survive, they can't go bankrupt. So to stay afloat, they find a solution to the problem. Raise premiums on people who already have them. The point of the bill wasn't to help people who already have insurance, it almost exclusively was purposed to expand the number of people covered.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#35 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts
[QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

[QUOTE="kipohippo021"] But it dosent need to make it more expensive for people as well. Those companies are rich already. Raising rates kinda defeats the purpose of this all. kipohippo021

No, the purpose wasn't to curb costs, the bill specifically targeted accessability to those who weren't already covered. Realisitcally, the health insurance industry has a MUCH lower profit margin than most other types of business. (3.3%) Raising rates just keeps the industry afloat. Affordability isn't going to be noticably altered by lowering the costs by 3.3% that insurance companies take in. There will have to be some other forms of cost cutting to make a significant difference.

but more money means more coverage. So by raising prices, arent they kinda destroying the whole point? Some of those are well needed, but alot of those just are another exuse to raise prices.

Quick question...how do you think increasing the medical costs for more people can be done without raising premiums? The money has to come from somewhere.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#36 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

I sure do love spending more on my premiums.

Avatar image for PannicAtack
PannicAtack

21040

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 PannicAtack
Member since 2006 • 21040 Posts

EVERYBODY PANIC

Theokhoth

I object to that! I'm not everybody, and everybody is not me!

Avatar image for kipohippo021
kipohippo021

3895

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 17

User Lists: 0

#38 kipohippo021
Member since 2010 • 3895 Posts

[QUOTE="kipohippo021"][QUOTE="coolbeans90"]

No, the purpose wasn't to curb costs, the bill specifically targeted accessability to those who weren't already covered. Realisitcally, the health insurance industry has a MUCH lower profit margin than most other types of business. (3.3%) Raising rates just keeps the industry afloat. Affordability isn't going to be noticably altered by lowering the costs by 3.3% that insurance companies take in. There will have to be some other forms of cost cutting to make a significant difference.

LJS9502_basic

but more money means more coverage. So by raising prices, arent they kinda destroying the whole point? Some of those are well needed, but alot of those just are another exuse to raise prices.

Quick question...how do you think increasing the medical costs for more people can be done without raising premiums? The money has to come from somewhere.

taxes, taxes from the rich. They shouldnt take more from the very people they are trying to help.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#40 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kipohippo021"] but more money means more coverage. So by raising prices, arent they kinda destroying the whole point? Some of those are well needed, but alot of those just are another exuse to raise prices.kipohippo021

Quick question...how do you think increasing the medical costs for more people can be done without raising premiums? The money has to come from somewhere.

taxes, taxes from the rich. They shouldnt take more from the very people they are trying to help.

So the rich should support others and others have no responsibility for their own life?:?
Avatar image for Serraph105
Serraph105

36092

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#41 Serraph105
Member since 2007 • 36092 Posts

Here are the benefits we currently have from the healthcare reform:

Insurance companies can't exclude children based on preexisting conditions.

Certain preventive procedures have to be covered without co-payments.

Young adults (up to age 26) can stay on their parents' plans.

You can't get dropped from coverage when you get sick.

You can switch plans and keep your doctor.

You have the right to appeal claims decisions to a third party.

Lifetime benefit limits are no more.

Rebate checks are being sent to help fill the Medicare donut hole.

More detailed article

EVERYBODY PANIC

Theokhoth

USA is going that way

Phoenix-Wright.jpg socialism picture by Serraph105

Avatar image for Pixel-Pirate
Pixel-Pirate

10771

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#42 Pixel-Pirate
Member since 2009 • 10771 Posts

Socialism! Socialism!

Soon God shall destroy the US with a flood.

Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#43 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="kipohippo021"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Quick question...how do you think increasing the medical costs for more people can be done without raising premiums? The money has to come from somewhere.LJS9502_basic

taxes, taxes from the rich. They shouldnt take more from the very people they are trying to help.

So the rich should support others and others have no responsibility for their own life?:?

"The 400 of us pay a lower part of our income in taxes than our receptionists do, or our cleaning ladies, for that matter. If you're in the luckiest 1 per cent of humanity, you owe it to the rest of humanity to think about the other 99 per cent."

"I happen to have a talent for allocating capital. But my ability to use that talent is completely dependent on the society I was born into. If I'd been born into a tribe of hunters, this talent of mine would be pretty worthless. I can't run very fast. I'm not particularly strong. I'd probably end up as some wild animal's dinner."

-Warren Buffett

Avatar image for wstfld
wstfld

6375

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#44 wstfld
Member since 2008 • 6375 Posts
[QUOTE="kipohippo021"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Quick question...how do you think increasing the medical costs for more people can be done without raising premiums? The money has to come from somewhere.LJS9502_basic

taxes, taxes from the rich. They shouldnt take more from the very people they are trying to help.

So the rich should support others and others have no responsibility for their own life?:?

Probably not, but unless we want tent cities and slums like a third world country its what has to happen.
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180203

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#45 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180203 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="kipohippo021"] taxes, taxes from the rich. They shouldnt take more from the very people they are trying to help.

wstfld

So the rich should support others and others have no responsibility for their own life?:?

Probably not, but unless we want tent cities and slums like a third world country its what has to happen.

The wealthy should pay a higher percentage in but that does not mean everyone else get a free ride at their expense either. That won't benefit the country.

Avatar image for UnknownSniper65
UnknownSniper65

9238

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#46 UnknownSniper65
Member since 2004 • 9238 Posts

It didn't go far enough and it is going to be the government's fault when health care companies ramp up premiums to turn customers against further reform.

Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#47 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

[QUOTE="wstfld"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]So the rich should support others and others have no responsibility for their own life?:?LJS9502_basic

Probably not, but unless we want tent cities and slums like a third world country its what has to happen.

The wealthy should pay a higher percentage in but that does not mean everyone else get a free ride at their expense either. That won't benefit the country.

Automakers shipping jobs over to Canada? We pay at least twice as much as the average of ALL other OECD countries, including us. This effects businesses heavily.

Avatar image for Former_Slacker
Former_Slacker

2618

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#48 Former_Slacker
Member since 2009 • 2618 Posts

It didn't go far enough and it is going to be the government's fault when health care companies ramp up premiums to turn customers against further reform.

UnknownSniper65

Or when they get pissed off to the point of throwing out those companies.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#49 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]

[QUOTE="wstfld"] Probably not, but unless we want tent cities and slums like a third world country its what has to happen. Former_Slacker

The wealthy should pay a higher percentage in but that does not mean everyone else get a free ride at their expense either. That won't benefit the country.

Automakers shipping jobs over to Canada? We pay at least twice as much as the average of ALL other OECD countries, including us. This effects businesses heavily.

There are other, more significant factors in play. 3.3% profiteering from insurance companies doesn't double the cost.

Avatar image for coolbeans90
coolbeans90

21305

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#50 coolbeans90
Member since 2009 • 21305 Posts

[QUOTE="UnknownSniper65"]

It didn't go far enough and it is going to be the government's fault when health care companies ramp up premiums to turn customers against further reform.

Former_Slacker

Or when they get pissed off to the point of throwing out those companies.

Funny how that works. The insurance companies now have everyone legally required to buy their stuff.