Here's a question about Government, Military, justice and whats acceptable

  • 79 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#1 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

It's no secret that this world has many problems.
I want to live in a better world, as I'm sure you do as well. So why can't we have that better world?
What is it that holds us back? If the leaders of our countries are working toward a better, peaceful world, why can't we ever seem to achieve it?

If everyone I loved was in the same building and it got blown up by someone, then I went on a vandetta and killed that murderer, do you think I'd be a hero? Would I get a medal?
Of course not. I'd be thrown in jail.
Then why should the Government and Military be any different? Why is it ok for the Military to invade other countries using the excuse that they're just fighting back/defending their country? Then they get praise for doing it. Celebrated for murdering people. And not all of them would be bad. Some would no doubt be defending their own country and family.

Doesn't sound right, does it?
There are many other things that don't sound right when you really think about it and see the bigger picture.

Avatar image for turtlethetaffer
turtlethetaffer

18973

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 144

User Lists: 0

#2 turtlethetaffer
Member since 2009 • 18973 Posts

I would say ultimatley it's lust for power. No matter how many people agree to be equal, one will always try to gain more power than the others.

Avatar image for Reed_Bowie
Reed_Bowie

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#3 Reed_Bowie
Member since 2011 • 506 Posts

There is a double standard in life. That is all I will tell you.

Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#4 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

There is a double standard in life. That is all I will tell you.

Reed_Bowie
Oh, ok. So are you saying we should just accept it, then? Like when people say power corrupts, which basically gives an excuse to anyone who abuses their power. Like, yeah, they could do some actual good but hey, it's ok, because power corrupts. There's your standard answer that didn't take any thinking whatsoever and will never solve anything.
Avatar image for Reed_Bowie
Reed_Bowie

506

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#5 Reed_Bowie
Member since 2011 • 506 Posts

[QUOTE="Reed_Bowie"]

There is a double standard in life. That is all I will tell you.

Skull-Fire

Oh, ok. So are you saying we should just accept it, then? Like when people say power corrupts, which basically gives an excuse to anyone who abuses their power. Like, yeah, they could do some actual good but hey, it's ok, because power corrupts. There's your standard answer that didn't take any thinking whatsoever and will never solve anything.

I never told you what to do or not to do. I just told you what it is.

Avatar image for fastesttruck
fastesttruck

25353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#6 fastesttruck
Member since 2005 • 25353 Posts
I blame all those people that came up with whats "right and wrong". I hate this world. I"m all for it just ending
Avatar image for dercoo
dercoo

12555

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#7 dercoo
Member since 2006 • 12555 Posts

Man?

*edit: Blast, you changed the topic title away from whats wrong with the world

Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#8 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts
I blame all those people that came up with whats "right and wrong". I hate this world. I"m all for it just ending fastesttruck
If no one did that, there would be total chaos and life would be even worse. If people were allowed to do literally whatever they wanted, it'd be a world where people either live in fear, or have to have a 'kill or be killed' mentallity.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#9 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
Greed is likely the primary cause of most suffering in the world at the moment. That said we as a species are in a pretty nice spot right now.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#11 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
No one agrees on what's best.
Avatar image for fastesttruck
fastesttruck

25353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#12 fastesttruck
Member since 2005 • 25353 Posts
[QUOTE="fastesttruck"] I blame all those people that came up with whats "right and wrong". I hate this world. I"m all for it just ending Skull-Fire
If no one did that, there would be total chaos and life would be even worse. If people were allowed to do literally whatever they wanted, it'd be a world where people either live in fear, or have to have a 'kill or be killed' mentallity.

Which would keep the population way down and people could have their own cults and stuff and yeah. Now days the earth isn't big enough for all the people.
Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#13 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

Ok people. Just reading the topic, isn't contributing the thread at all. You end up talking about something that this thread isn't even about.

Avatar image for fastesttruck
fastesttruck

25353

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#14 fastesttruck
Member since 2005 • 25353 Posts

Ok people. Just reading the topic, isn't contributing the thread at all. You end up talking about something that this thread isn't even about.

Skull-Fire
Thats OT for ya. Oh look a kitten! Kittens make the world a better place
Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#15 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts
[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"]

Ok people. Just reading the topic, isn't contributing the thread at all. You end up talking about something that this thread isn't even about.

fastesttruck
Thats OT for ya. Oh look a kitten! Kittens make the world a better place

True ^_^
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#16 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
Bossy topic creators
Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#17 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts
Bossy topic creators Ace6301
Trolls. Anyway, I'm changing what the topic says now
Avatar image for SilentFireX
SilentFireX

1956

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#18 SilentFireX
Member since 2005 • 1956 Posts

Doesn't sound right, does it?

There are many other things that don't sound right when you really think about it and see the bigger picture.Skull-Fire

That's because you're talking about the difference between order and anarchy. Society cannot survive without order.

Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#19 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"] Doesn't sound right, does it?

There are many other things that don't sound right when you really think about it and see the bigger picture.SilentFireX

That's because you're talking about the difference between order and anarchy. Society cannot survive without order.

No, it can't. But the point is, if the Government does something, it's meant to be ok. Regardless of how bad it would be if someone did it without the Governments permission. I don't see how sending hundreds of people out to kill hundreds of other people is 'order'. It's just destruction and murder. We're told that killing people is wrong, then we're told to go out and kill people.
And you can defend from attacks but there really is no need to launch an attack. Especially one that lasts 10 years.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#20 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

It's not murder when you kill an enemy combatant as a soldier.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#21 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

It's no secret that this world has many problems.
I want to live in a better world, as I'm sure you do as well. So why can't we have that better world?
What is it that holds us back? If the leaders of our countries are working toward a better, peaceful world, why can't we ever seem to achieve it?

If everyone I loved was in the same building and it got blown up by someone, then I went on a vandetta and killed that murderer, do you think I'd be a hero? Would I get a medal?
Of course not. I'd be thrown in jail.
Then why should the Government and Military be any different? Why is it ok for the Military to invade other countries using the excuse that they're just fighting back/defending their country? Then they get praise for doing it. Celebrated for murdering people. And not all of them would be bad. Some would no doubt be defending their own country and family.

Doesn't sound right, does it?
There are many other things that don't sound right when you really think about it and see the bigger picture.

Skull-Fire

If you killed that murderer you probably would be a hero...but you would be arrested because we have Rule of Law, with no man being above the law....

Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#22 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

It's not murder when you kill an enemy combatant as a soldier.

airshocker
Yes, it is. Maybe not in the eyes of the law but you've still just killed a fellow human being. A human being that may have a wife and children. Children that must now grow up without their father. All in the name of so-called justice, because people have been made to believe it's ok, if the Government says it is.
Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#23 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"]

It's no secret that this world has many problems.
I want to live in a better world, as I'm sure you do as well. So why can't we have that better world?
What is it that holds us back? If the leaders of our countries are working toward a better, peaceful world, why can't we ever seem to achieve it?

If everyone I loved was in the same building and it got blown up by someone, then I went on a vandetta and killed that murderer, do you think I'd be a hero? Would I get a medal?
Of course not. I'd be thrown in jail.
Then why should the Government and Military be any different? Why is it ok for the Military to invade other countries using the excuse that they're just fighting back/defending their country? Then they get praise for doing it. Celebrated for murdering people. And not all of them would be bad. Some would no doubt be defending their own country and family.

Doesn't sound right, does it?
There are many other things that don't sound right when you really think about it and see the bigger picture.

SpartanMSU

If you killed that murderer you probably would be a hero...but you would be arrested because we have Rule of Law, with no man being above the law....

Unless you're a Prime Minster, President or in the Military.

Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#24 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Yes, it is. Maybe not in the eyes of the law but you've still just killed a fellow human being. A human being that may have a wife and children. Children that must now grow up without their father. All in the name of so-called justice, because people have been made to believe it's ok, if the Government says it is.Skull-Fire

And the law is the only thing that matters. The law says it isn't murder. So it isn't.

Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#25 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"]Yes, it is. Maybe not in the eyes of the law but you've still just killed a fellow human being. A human being that may have a wife and children. Children that must now grow up without their father. All in the name of so-called justice, because people have been made to believe it's ok, if the Government says it is.airshocker

And the law is the only thing that matters. The law says it isn't murder. So it isn't.

Are you actually being serious? Law is the only thing that matters... do you actually believe that? o.O What about Human rights and freedom? While there has to be Law, our rights and freedom should always come first, with the law built around them. With law being the only thing that matters, you can say bye bye to freedom of speech, or just the freedom to drive to another State whenever you want. Hell, if you want to take it even further, with law being all that matters, let's bring about Martial Law, so you can't go where you want, when you want. Even in your own city.
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#26 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Are you actually being serious? Law is the only thing that matters... do you actually believe that? o.O What about Human rights and freedom? While there has to be Law, our rights and freedom should always come first, with the law built around them. With law being the only thing that matters, you can say bye bye to freedom of speech, or just the freedom to drive to another State whenever you want. Hell, if you want to take it even further, with law being all that matters, let's bring about Martial Law, so you can't go where you want, when you want. Even in your own city.Skull-Fire

In regards to this one subject, since I don't feel like having a whole strawman-fest, the law is the only thing that matters to me. My government says it is a-okay to kill another human being in defense of your country. That isn't murder.

Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#27 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts

[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"]Yes, it is. Maybe not in the eyes of the law but you've still just killed a fellow human being. A human being that may have a wife and children. Children that must now grow up without their father. All in the name of so-called justice, because people have been made to believe it's ok, if the Government says it is.airshocker

And the law is the only thing that matters. The law says it isn't murder. So it isn't.

Lawful Neutral is a rather interesting stance to take on things...
Avatar image for deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
deactivated-6127ced9bcba0

31700

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#28 deactivated-6127ced9bcba0
Member since 2006 • 31700 Posts

Lawful Neutral is a rather interesting stance to take on things...Ace6301

Sometimes.

My NWN2 characters are always Lawful evil, though.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#29 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="airshocker"]

It's not murder when you kill an enemy combatant as a soldier.

Skull-Fire

Yes, it is. Maybe not in the eyes of the law but you've still just killed a fellow human being. A human being that may have a wife and children. Children that must now grow up without their father. All in the name of so-called justice, because people have been made to believe it's ok, if the Government says it is.

It's not because the government says it is, it's because common sense says it is. I have no problem shooting at someone who's shooting at me. I do have a problem with killing someone who is unarmed and not a threat to myself or others. THAT is murder. Pretty simple, really.

Honestly, it seems like you're a naive teenager who doesn't see reality.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#30 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"]

It's no secret that this world has many problems.
I want to live in a better world, as I'm sure you do as well. So why can't we have that better world?
What is it that holds us back? If the leaders of our countries are working toward a better, peaceful world, why can't we ever seem to achieve it?

If everyone I loved was in the same building and it got blown up by someone, then I went on a vandetta and killed that murderer, do you think I'd be a hero? Would I get a medal?
Of course not. I'd be thrown in jail.
Then why should the Government and Military be any different? Why is it ok for the Military to invade other countries using the excuse that they're just fighting back/defending their country? Then they get praise for doing it. Celebrated for murdering people. And not all of them would be bad. Some would no doubt be defending their own country and family.

Doesn't sound right, does it?
There are many other things that don't sound right when you really think about it and see the bigger picture.

Skull-Fire

If you killed that murderer you probably would be a hero...but you would be arrested because we have Rule of Law, with no man being above the law....

Unless you're a Prime Minster, President or in the Military.

How so?

Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#31 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"][QUOTE="airshocker"]

It's not murder when you kill an enemy combatant as a soldier.

SpartanMSU

Yes, it is. Maybe not in the eyes of the law but you've still just killed a fellow human being. A human being that may have a wife and children. Children that must now grow up without their father. All in the name of so-called justice, because people have been made to believe it's ok, if the Government says it is.

It's not because the government says it is, it's because common sense says it is. I have no problem shooting at someone who's shooting at me. I do have a problem with killing someone who is unarmed and not a threat to myself or others. THAT is murder. Pretty simple, really.

Honestly, it seems like you're a naive teenager who doesn't see reality.

This thread isn't about whether or not it's acceptable to kill someone in self defence. Your argument is invalid. Oh and I think about the state of the world and the people in it a lot. Not to an obsessive amount, of course. I actually question things. Ask 'why?', 'how?', what if?' I've learned to think for myself and not just accept whatever I'm being told. Evidently, you haven't learned how to do that. Which is why you can see an imaginary difference. You or someone else will probably mention how what I said about not accepting what I'm told, can be applied to everyone reading this thread. This is true. The reason I made this thread was in hopes that I'd get people thinking. Everyone would express their own opionions and hopefully learn something and start thinking and not just accepting. And no, I'm not saying what I believe is the only thing that's right.
Avatar image for Saturos3091
Saturos3091

14937

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#32 Saturos3091
Member since 2005 • 14937 Posts

Because the state has the monopoly over power, always has since it's inception and the death of feudalism.

It's not perfect, but it's the best (current) method of government that we could come up with and still maintain stable, enforceable laws. Anarchy and disorder results from most other forms of government, although nearly every nation on the planet has adopted a state system by this point.

Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#33 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"] Yes, it is. Maybe not in the eyes of the law but you've still just killed a fellow human being. A human being that may have a wife and children. Children that must now grow up without their father. All in the name of so-called justice, because people have been made to believe it's ok, if the Government says it is.Skull-Fire

It's not because the government says it is, it's because common sense says it is. I have no problem shooting at someone who's shooting at me. I do have a problem with killing someone who is unarmed and not a threat to myself or others. THAT is murder. Pretty simple, really.

Honestly, it seems like you're a naive teenager who doesn't see reality.

This thread isn't about whether or not it's acceptable to kill someone in self defence. Your argument is invalid. Oh and I think about the state of the world and the people in it a lot. Not to an obsessive amount, of course. I actually question things. Ask 'why?', 'how?', what if?' I've learned to think for myself and not just accept whatever I'm being told. Evidently, you haven't learned how to do that. Which is why you can see an imaginary difference. You or someone else will probably mention how what I said about not accepting what I'm told, can be applied to everyone reading this thread. This is true. The reason I made this thread was in hopes that I'd get people thinking. Everyone would express their own opionions and hopefully learn something and start thinking and not just accepting. And no, I'm not saying what I believe is the only thing that's right.

You said soldiers are murderers if I'm not mistaken...soooo....yeaaaah....

But you're right, I never question anything. Must be why I'm a libertarian.:lol:

Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#34 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"][QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

It's not because the government says it is, it's because common sense says it is. I have no problem shooting at someone who's shooting at me. I do have a problem with killing someone who is unarmed and not a threat to myself or others. THAT is murder. Pretty simple, really.

Honestly, it seems like you're a naive teenager who doesn't see reality.

SpartanMSU

This thread isn't about whether or not it's acceptable to kill someone in self defence. Your argument is invalid. Oh and I think about the state of the world and the people in it a lot. Not to an obsessive amount, of course. I actually question things. Ask 'why?', 'how?', what if?' I've learned to think for myself and not just accept whatever I'm being told. Evidently, you haven't learned how to do that. Which is why you can see an imaginary difference. You or someone else will probably mention how what I said about not accepting what I'm told, can be applied to everyone reading this thread. This is true. The reason I made this thread was in hopes that I'd get people thinking. Everyone would express their own opionions and hopefully learn something and start thinking and not just accepting. And no, I'm not saying what I believe is the only thing that's right.

You said soldiers are murderers if I'm not mistaken...soooo....yeaaaah....

But you're right, I never question anything. Must be why I'm a libertarian.:lol:

Soo....what? :/ To answer your previous question 'how so?': Osama Bin Laden. They said the Navy killed him, right? That was for revenge and justice. Yet, if I was in the situation I posted about in the beginning, I'd go to jail. It should be no different for anyone. But it is supposedly ok for them, because a single person told them to do it. Because who needs jail when you have bullets? Do you think that without a leader, Al Queda is just going to sit back and do nothing? It hasn't really accomplished anything.
Avatar image for MagnumPI
MagnumPI

9617

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#35 MagnumPI
Member since 2002 • 9617 Posts

You want a world that can't exist. This world isa product of conquest fueled by greed. We get along when it's convenient. The flaw in your logic is thinking the violence is due toconflicting customs. But there isn't a way to satisfy or appease Greed mongers,haters & psychopaths. They DON'Twant to be reasoned with, they don't want peace. They want destruction and chaos.

Why can they do what they do? Because the government makes the laws, not you. Why can they invade other countries and kill whoever they want? Who's gonna stop them? You? Hey, they convinced the country to go to war with propaganda. What should they have done? Just ignore the attack. Ifthey can't policetheir territory and we believetheyharbor criminals a task force will be visiting.

Avatar image for Skull-Fire
Skull-Fire

2267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#36 Skull-Fire
Member since 2008 • 2267 Posts

You want a world that can't exist. This world isa product of conquest fueled by greed. We get along when it's convenient. The flaw in your logic is thinking the violence is due toconflicting customs. But there isn't a way to satisfy or appease Greed mongers,haters & psychopaths. They DON'Twant to be reasoned with, they don't want peace. They want destruction and chaos.

Why can they do what they do? Because the government makes the laws, not you. Why can they invade other countries and kill whoever they want? Who's gonna stop them? You? Hey, they convinced the country to go to war with propaganda. What should they have done? Just ignore the attack. Ifthey can't policetheir territory and we believetheyharbor criminals a task force will be visiting.

MagnumPI
So only what you know now, is all that can ever exist? I do not think violence is due to conflicting cutoms and I never said that. Ahh ok, the Government makes the laws. Well that makes everything alright then! Phew, I was worried there for a sec. But now that I realize everythings ok because they decide what's ok and what isn't, I can just switch my brain off. No need for me to think anymore. Just blindly put my trust into these people who obviously know whats best for everyone and are totally trustworthy. But seriously, I don't care who makes the laws. Just because they exist, doesn't mean they should all be accepted. Surely there is at least one law that you don't agree with. Of course I can't stop them by myself but if everyone took a stand.... I'm not saying any attack should ever be ignored but the retaliation that has happened, is ridiculous and just plain stupid.
Avatar image for SpartanMSU
SpartanMSU

3440

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#37 SpartanMSU
Member since 2009 • 3440 Posts

[QUOTE="SpartanMSU"]

[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"] This thread isn't about whether or not it's acceptable to kill someone in self defence. Your argument is invalid. Oh and I think about the state of the world and the people in it a lot. Not to an obsessive amount, of course. I actually question things. Ask 'why?', 'how?', what if?' I've learned to think for myself and not just accept whatever I'm being told. Evidently, you haven't learned how to do that. Which is why you can see an imaginary difference. You or someone else will probably mention how what I said about not accepting what I'm told, can be applied to everyone reading this thread. This is true. The reason I made this thread was in hopes that I'd get people thinking. Everyone would express their own opionions and hopefully learn something and start thinking and not just accepting. And no, I'm not saying what I believe is the only thing that's right. Skull-Fire

You said soldiers are murderers if I'm not mistaken...soooo....yeaaaah....

But you're right, I never question anything. Must be why I'm a libertarian.:lol:

Soo....what? :/ To answer your previous question 'how so?': Osama Bin Laden. They said the Navy killed him, right? That was for revenge and justice. Yet, if I was in the situation I posted about in the beginning, I'd go to jail. It should be no different for anyone. But it is supposedly ok for them, because a single person told them to do it. Because who needs jail when you have bullets? Do you think that without a leader, Al Queda is just going to sit back and do nothing? It hasn't really accomplished anything.

I think you need to educate yourself on what Rule of Law actually is and why it's important. You're using the same reasoning that other poster did in the "militarization of the police" thread.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#38 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts
Why is it ok for the Military to invade other countries using the excuse that they're just fighting back/defending their country? Skull-Fire
The military functions on orders given by Constitutionally-mandated authority, namely the President. Take a good, long look at the photo below. The first thing said to President Bush when he visited Ground Zero was, "Go get 'em, George!". The people wanted justice for all the needless death and suffering.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#39 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="Skull-Fire"]Why is it ok for the Military to invade other countries using the excuse that they're just fighting back/defending their country? topsemag55
The military functions on orders given by Constitutionally-mandated authority, namely the President. Take a good, long look at the photo below. The first thing said to President Bush when he visited Ground Zero was, "Go get 'em, George!". The people wanted justice for all the needless death and suffering.

What the people want isn't always the right choice. The law doesn't make things right. The photo to me is no different than any other destroyed building. Many more multitudes died because of the reaction to 9/11 than the initial incident. Norway is going about terror the right way. Rather than showing fear they're showing more of what these kind of people hate.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#40 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts
What the people want isn't always the right choice. The law doesn't make things right. The photo to me is no different than any other destroyed building. Many more multitudes died because of the reaction to 9/11 than the initial incident. Norway is going about terror the right way. Rather than showing fear they're showing more of what these kind of people hate.Ace6301
You're not giving credit that many people were from other countries across the globe that died in the WTC, not only Americans. Every civilized nation poured in messages of support and sympathy, some also said they considered it an attack on their country (NATO charter). Very few spoke against retaliation. I would not want to be a President that would have to tell the victims' families that I would do nothing because of pacifism.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#41 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"] What the people want isn't always the right choice. The law doesn't make things right. The photo to me is no different than any other destroyed building. Many more multitudes died because of the reaction to 9/11 than the initial incident. Norway is going about terror the right way. Rather than showing fear they're showing more of what these kind of people hate.topsemag55
You're not giving credit that many people were from other countries across the globe that died in the WTC, not only Americans. Every civilized nation poured in messages of support and sympathy, some also said they considered it an attack on their country (NATO charter). Very few spoke against retaliation. I would not want to be a President that would have to tell the victims' families that I would do nothing because of pacifism.

Sadly our idealism back then was quite the downfall. Look where said retaliation has gotten us and how much liberty and freedom in the US has fallen since then. In the end the reaction we had was more than the terrorists ever could have hoped for.
Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#42 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts
Sadly our idealism back then was quite the downfall. Look where said retaliation has gotten us and how much liberty and freedom in the US has fallen since then. In the end the reaction we had was more than the terrorists ever could have hoped for.Ace6301
Idealism is the wrong word, I would say. 90% of the people who died were above the points of impact, so they suffered. At least 200 people jumped to their deaths to escape the flames. FDNY lost 341 firefighters and 2 paramedics while trying to rescue survivors - want to tell them about idealism? NYPD lost 23 officers. Port Authority police lost 37 officers.
Avatar image for Ace6301
Ace6301

21389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#43 Ace6301
Member since 2005 • 21389 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"]Sadly our idealism back then was quite the downfall. Look where said retaliation has gotten us and how much liberty and freedom in the US has fallen since then. In the end the reaction we had was more than the terrorists ever could have hoped for.topsemag55
Idealism is the wrong word, I would say. 90% of the people who died were above the points of impact, so they suffered. At least 200 people jumped to their deaths to escape the flames. FDNY lost 341 firefighters and 2 paramedics while trying to rescue survivors - want to tell them about idealism? NYPD lost 23 officers. Port Authority police lost 37 officers.

Thinking you can just invade 2 countries and avenge the dead is idealism. People thought it would be a quick stomp and showing of how powerful America is and the dead would be avenged. Instead here we are, nothing worked out like that and we're much worse off as a world for it. You can throw the deaths of people out there and show an American flag but it doesn't mean anything to me or really the vast, vast majority of the world. An American life is no more valuable than that of any other innocent life. The end result is America caved to terrorism and did exactly what they wanted and much, much more. Norway's showing idealism in the face of terror as well but theirs isn't violent. Mark my word it's going to be much more effective than what America did after 9/11.
Avatar image for ZEYAAM898
ZEYAAM898

1921

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#44 ZEYAAM898
Member since 2009 • 1921 Posts
Excuse with the army is Union of many peoples(soldiers) and Power itself; whilst a single man can do nothing and doesnt have a meaning of his life. So if a single man kills a mad man then he is mental but if one army kills a man they are cool. There are two things involved: Majority and Power.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#45 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts

if you stick around here you will find out anything the government does is right and just, if you ever question their motives or actions you will be flamed.

Avatar image for topsemag55
topsemag55

19063

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 16

User Lists: 0

#46 topsemag55
Member since 2007 • 19063 Posts
An American life is no more valuable than that of any other innocent life. The end result is America caved to terrorism and did exactly what they wanted and much, much more. Norway's showing idealism in the face of terror as well but theirs isn't violent. Mark my word it's going to be much more effective than what America did after 9/11.Ace6301
See, again you're missing the point and generalizing. I already told you that people who died in the WTC weren't just Americans, but people from every nation on the globe. Every death was important to us, it didn't matter where they came from. Norway hasn't got the military strength to avenge terrorist acts - the U.S. does, and if the President orders an attack, then the military complies.
Avatar image for deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51

57548

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 19

User Lists: 0

#47 deactivated-5f9e3c6a83e51
Member since 2004 • 57548 Posts
Greed is likely the primary cause of most suffering in the world at the moment. That said we as a species are in a pretty nice spot right now.Ace6301
I'd say its still disease.
Avatar image for surrealnumber5
surrealnumber5

23044

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#48 surrealnumber5
Member since 2008 • 23044 Posts
[QUOTE="Ace6301"]Greed is likely the primary cause of most suffering in the world at the moment. That said we as a species are in a pretty nice spot right now.sonicare
I'd say its still disease.

politics by far.
Avatar image for Scoob64
Scoob64

2635

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#49 Scoob64
Member since 2008 • 2635 Posts

The invasion of Iraq had NOTHING to do with 9/11... it was all about oil, and tightening the reigns on American liberties in or to increase govenment control... just look at the Patiot Act... you could be arrested tomorrow, be held indefinitely without a trial, and all theyd have to say is they "suspect" you of terrorism... they don't need any evidence or any proof... but if u start putting leaders feet to the fire (what the media used to do) then people will speak out against you and say you love the terrorists or you are in Al-qaeda...

we killed thousands of innoncent Iraqi civilians since this war started, tortured innocent people in secret military prisons, and all for what?

just look at the mess that is TSA.

one thing i've noticed is that so many Americans dont care if they lose all their freedoms, as long as it makes them feel safer...

Avatar image for Wasdie
Wasdie

53622

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 23

User Lists: 0

#50 Wasdie  Moderator
Member since 2003 • 53622 Posts

It's simple, we live in a world of finite resources. Each country does what it can to secure resources for its own people. All problems in the world usually come down to that. You also have different cultures, races, and religions throughout the world.

If everybody believed in the same everything, the world would be a much better place. Though that's not really realistic is it?