This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="unholymight"] If you look at Charles Sanders Peirce's solution to the liar's paradox, the answer for our case here would be: "Not nothing can be shown to be true". Vandalvideo
If it is not not X, then isn't that X? Not nothing can be shown to be true means something can be shown to be true right.
Not nothing here should mean "some things can be shown to be true but not necessarily everything". This is because the given solution would only conclude that our statement is false.
Yes that is what it means. Do you have something else to say about it?
Ghosts don't exists, you're telling me in a world were everyone and there mother has a cellphone which has a camera there isn't a single convincing ghost caught on camera? Brainkiller05
not everyone has a cellphone in fact 1.5 out of every 2 people dont have cell phones
lmao if u took this seriously and flame me for it i will lose faith in humanity
How has this thread gone on so long when there was a logical fallacy in the very first post?
1) There is no concrete evidence of the supernatural.
2) Even if there was that would be evidence of the supernatural, not [insert here].
In the Protestant Bible, one of the gospel authors describes Jesus walking on water, like a ghost or spirit hovering above the waters. There have always been the awareness of spirits, or "Ghosts" for thousands of years, whether they are real or not.
I believe in spirits. Demon possesion is a real thing, not going to get into that, but I believe there are evil spirits among us that many aren't even aware of. Being a man of faith, I believe that many of these spirits are demons trying to toy with us. Satan is the ruler of Earth and im sure his minions are these spirits that often "haunt" areas. With this being said, I think that 99% of what is seen as evidence on TV, the internet, or even books is bogus. I have encountered two "ghostly" instances in my life, one of which can be explained by techtonic plates in the earth. There is a hill in Maryland where you can put your car in neutral and get out, and watch your car slowly climb the hill. (I have done this several times) But this doesn't even prove ghosts exist. Many locals like to believe in this hill, but science can prove it wrong.
The only time I have heard something unexplainable, is when two of my friends and I during highschool decided to go check out Antietam battle field late at night. (Apparently one of the most haunted areas around...) We didn't encounter anything for an hour until we heard gunshots and heard three different screams. It was like the gunshots were around 50 yards behind us and the screams were pretty far ahead. We all **** ran like hell back to the car and none of us really know what to make of it lol.
Just something I wanted to know from anAtheist's point of view...
Steameffekt
They don't exist. Wow, you are really scraping the bottom of the barrel now.
This is a good explanation. However this provides little to no proof of anything.In the Protestant Bible, one of the gospel authors describes Jesus walking on water, like a ghost or spirit hovering above the waters. There have always been the awareness of spirits, or "Ghosts" for thousands of years, whether they are real or not.
I believe in spirits. Demon possesion is a real thing, not going to get into that, but I believe there are evil spirits among us that many aren't even aware of. Being a man of faith, I believe that many of these spirits are demons trying to toy with us. Satan is the ruler of Earth and im sure his minions are these spirits that often "haunt" areas. With this being said, I think that 99% of what is seen as evidence on TV, the internet, or even books is bogus. I have encountered two "ghostly" instances in my life, one of which can be explained by techtonic plates in the earth. There is a hill in Maryland where you can put your car in neutral and get out, and watch your car slowly climb the hill. (I have done this several times) But this doesn't even prove ghosts exist. Many locals like to believe in this hill, but science can prove it wrong.
The only time I have heard something unexplainable, is when two of my friends and I during highschool decided to go check out Antietam battle field late at night. (Apparently one of the most haunted areas around...) We didn't encounter anything for an hour until we heard gunshots and heard three different screams. It was like the gunshots were around 50 yards behind us and the screams were pretty far ahead. We all **** ran like hell back to the car and none of us really know what to make of it lol.
seimagery
The only time I have heard something unexplainable, is when two of my friends and I during highschool decided to go check out Antietam battle field late at night. (Apparently one of the most haunted areas around...) We didn't encounter anything for an hour until we heard gunshots and heard three different screams. It was like the gunshots were around 50 yards behind us and the screams were pretty far ahead. We all **** ran like hell back to the car and none of us really know what to make of it lol.seimageryMaybe someone shot a gun and someone else was screaming? Or, more likely, it was something like fireworks that just make a "bang" sound, rather than an actual gun.
I will admit there is no concrete evidence for what I believe.
And there wouldn't be anyone firing a gun killing three people on Antietam battle field...trust me, we were in a clearing about half a mile from the entrance, we would have seen someone, or seen fireworks. We all tried to come up with a logical explanation, as my one friend def. doesn't believe in this kind of stuff, but we still can't haha.
Antietam is notorious for this kind of stuff, google it and find all kinds of nutjobs with their "evidence". But this is the closest thing to an encounter for me personally.
[QUOTE="Vandalvideo"][QUOTE="Brainkiller05"]Ghosts don't exists, you're telling me in a world were everyone and there mother has a cellphone which has a camera there isn't a single convincing ghost caught on camera? Brainkiller05Who says ghosts CAN be caught on camera? If they're visible to the eye I'm pretty sure they'd be visible on a camera too :|Weird story? Ok. When my step brother lit the christmas pudding him and his wife baked for the family there was a huger blue flame. My mom took a picture of it. You could see the smoke but the blue flame didn;t appear on the picture. Reason being it was a different wavelength that the camera couldn't pic up. It was almost ultraviolet.
They knew how to do art, hence the paintings. No one knows how Jesus or God looks. The modern image of God was made by paintings in the middle ages.You saw the Bleeding Host? The Host is a Representation of the Body of Jesus.
Seeing as there were no Cameras BAck then, where would an artist formulate this exact Image? Why are there so many similar paintings of God, they all represent the same image? Did all the artists copy this one Image?
Snipes_2
If they're visible to the eye I'm pretty sure they'd be visible on a camera too :|Weird story? Ok. When my step brother lit the christmas pudding him and his wife baked for the family there was a huger blue flame. My mom took a picture of it. You could see the smoke but the blue flame didn;t appear on the picture. Reason being it was a different wavelength that the camera couldn't pic up. It was almost ultraviolet.[QUOTE="Brainkiller05"][QUOTE="Vandalvideo"] Who says ghosts CAN be caught on camera? BumFluff122
And there are cameras that can detect ultraviolet. As well as infrared.
Sure, the majority of people don't have IR or UV capable cameras. But if we're simply talking merely about cameras not being able to detect a small range of visible wavelengths, then I'd wager that these Ghost Hunters would be utilizing well-known and fairly inexpensive technology. It actually doesn't take a whole lot to convert a lot of common digital cameras into cameras that can detect UV or IR (or all of the above).
I'm almost positive where I live is haunted. It makes me sound like I've gone coocoo, but I've had cabinet doors shut, I've had a lid on a listerine bottle close while I was going to the bathroom, and creepiest of all, I've had the keys on my (piano) keyboard pressed while I was sitting right next to it. Its not like it happens every day, something like it usually happens about once every other month, but when it happens, it creeps the poop out of me.
Who mentioned anything about ghost hunters? I'm also well aware that they have camera to pic up most wavelengths. However, cheap cameras that the average user buys is not one of them.And there are cameras that can detect ultraviolet. As well as infrared.
Sure, the majority of people don't have IR or UV capable cameras. But if we're simply talking merely about cameras not being able to detect a small range of visible wavelengths, then I'd wager that these Ghost Hunters would be utilizing well-known and fairly inexpensive technology. It actually doesn't take a whole lot to convert a lot of common digital cameras into cameras that can detect UV or IR (or all of the above).
MrGeezer
Sounds like you need to see a psychiatrist.I'm almost positive where I live is haunted. It makes me sound like I've gone coocoo, but I've had cabinet doors shut, I've had a lid on a listerine bottle close while I was going to the bathroom, and creepiest of all, I've had the keys on my (piano) keyboard pressed while I was sitting right next to it. Its not like it happens every day, something like it usually happens about once every other month, but when it happens, it creeps the poop out of me.
magnax1
[QUOTE="magnax1"]Sounds like you need to see a psychiatrist.I'm almost positive where I live is haunted. It makes me sound like I've gone coocoo, but I've had cabinet doors shut, I've had a lid on a listerine bottle close while I was going to the bathroom, and creepiest of all, I've had the keys on my (piano) keyboard pressed while I was sitting right next to it. Its not like it happens every day, something like it usually happens about once every other month, but when it happens, it creeps the poop out of me.
KHAndAnime
Lol, I knew some one would say that, but I saw a doctor about it a couple years ago, and they said I'm fine. It didn't happen when I lived somewhere else, it doesn't happen when I'm somewhere other than my home, and I've actually had a friend that said hes had something happen to him in my house. Its freakin creepy. I never believed in anything like that before I moved here, but its hard not to when its happening to you.
Who mentioned anything about ghost hunters? I'm also well aware that they have camera to pic up most wavelengths. However, cheap cameras that the average user buys is not one of them.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]
And there are cameras that can detect ultraviolet. As well as infrared.
Sure, the majority of people don't have IR or UV capable cameras. But if we're simply talking merely about cameras not being able to detect a small range of visible wavelengths, then I'd wager that these Ghost Hunters would be utilizing well-known and fairly inexpensive technology. It actually doesn't take a whole lot to convert a lot of common digital cameras into cameras that can detect UV or IR (or all of the above).
BumFluff122
Look up MaxMax and LifePixel.
Again, these kinds of conversions are relatively cheap and easy. You can actually save money and do these conversions yourself, if you've got a clean room and know what you're doing.
In any case, you're talking about a camera conversion of a few hundred bucks, at most. In any case, that's cheap. Ghost "EXPERTS" may do these kinds of conversions, and they still don't find ghosts (even though they are "experts").
Aside from that, ghost hunters are not even remotely the only people usiing IR and UV capable cameras. And still, no ghosts.
Explain unproven phenomenon... Yeah, I think you actually need definitive proof of ghosts before you try and come up with a scientific explanation for them.
My original post was concerning why ghosts that we could see didn't turn up on cameras. I gave an explanation similar to "well obviously they are using cameras that can't catch the wavelength they are looking at" and you misread that to say somethign completely different and are arguing against that thing which I did not say.Look up MaxMax and LifePixel.
Again, these kinds of conversions are relatively cheap and easy. You can actually save money and do these conversions yourself, if you've got a clean room and know what you're doing.
In any case, you're talking about a camera conversion of a few hundred bucks, at most. In any case, that's cheap. Ghost "EXPERTS" may do these kinds of conversions, and they still don't find ghosts (even though they are "experts").
Aside from that, ghost hunters are not even remotely the only people usiing IR and UV capable cameras. And still, no ghosts.
MrGeezer
[QUOTE="Steameffekt"][QUOTE="Brainkiller05"]Ghosts don't exists leperphiliac
Explain this
Ok It think you must be joking now if you think that is real, it's a damn dog.lmao are you serious, it's a dog, nothing more, nothing less.....maybe it's the chupacabra!!!!
If God exist, why would he leave wondering spirits in this world if it's in the realm of his powers of something he can take care of since he can't do anything about actual humans? Explain this. He must be doing a lousy job if he can't escort a simple ghost to his destination...
My original post was concerning why ghosts that we could see didn't turn up on cameras. I gave an explanation similar to "well obviously they are using cameras that can't catch the wavelength they are looking at" and you misread that to say somethign completely different and are arguing against that thing which I did not say.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]
Look up MaxMax and LifePixel.
Again, these kinds of conversions are relatively cheap and easy. You can actually save money and do these conversions yourself, if you've got a clean room and know what you're doing.
In any case, you're talking about a camera conversion of a few hundred bucks, at most. In any case, that's cheap. Ghost "EXPERTS" may do these kinds of conversions, and they still don't find ghosts (even though they are "experts").
Aside from that, ghost hunters are not even remotely the only people usiing IR and UV capable cameras. And still, no ghosts.
BumFluff122
but cameras mostly DO "see" the same wavelengths of light as us. Most modern cameras are DESIGNED to see the same light that we do, in order to more better result in an image which is approximately what we saw. Conventional digital camera sensors are sensitive to a significantly GREATER range of light than the human eye. Just, the extra wavelengths often get "cut off" by the camera designer so as not to throw off things such as color balance.
The whole "we can see wavelengths that the camera can't" argument fails because most cameras today are DESIGNED to be sensitive to approximately the same wavelengths of light as the human eye.
I hope you mean they do see in the same wavelength as us besides the example I gave in my first post. It is just a new camera.but cameras mostly DO "see" the same wavelengths of light as us. Most modern cameras are DESIGNED to see the same light that we do, in order to more better result in an image which is approximately what we saw. Conventional digital camera sensors are sensitive to a significantly GREATER range of light than the human eye. Just, the extra wavelengths often get "cut off" by the camera designer so as not to throw off things such as color balance.
The whole "we can see wavelengths that the camera can't" argument fails because most cameras today are DESIGNED to be sensitive to approximately the same wavelengths of light as the human eye.
MrGeezer
I hope you mean they do see in the same wavelength as us besides the example I gave in my first post. It is just a new camera.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]
but cameras mostly DO "see" the same wavelengths of light as us. Most modern cameras are DESIGNED to see the same light that we do, in order to more better result in an image which is approximately what we saw. Conventional digital camera sensors are sensitive to a significantly GREATER range of light than the human eye. Just, the extra wavelengths often get "cut off" by the camera designer so as not to throw off things such as color balance.
The whole "we can see wavelengths that the camera can't" argument fails because most cameras today are DESIGNED to be sensitive to approximately the same wavelengths of light as the human eye.
BumFluff122
Of course it's not EXACT. Hell, not all people see exactly the same. You might be able to sense a slightly broader range of sounds and colors than me.
But we can make general and approximate statements.
Energy cannot be created nor destroyed /thread. This being the millionth incarnation of this thread i tell all the believers not to bother, the skeptics will never believe. And if you ask them to go ghost hunting they will just chicken out. X360PS3AMD05
Ah yes, again with the mystical "energy".
As before, when my computer suddenly breaks, where did the energy go? Ooooh, creepy!
Ok. That is my entire point. They weren't using the correct camera, which is the reason why some can see things that do not display in photographs.Of course it's not EXACT. Hell, not all people see exactly the same. You might be able to sense a slightly broader range of sounds and colors than me.
But we can make general and approximate statements.
MrGeezer
Ok. That is my entire point. They weren't using the correct camera, which is the reason why some can see things that do not display in photographs.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]
Of course it's not EXACT. Hell, not all people see exactly the same. You might be able to sense a slightly broader range of sounds and colors than me.
But we can make general and approximate statements.
BumFluff122
Yeah, coincidentally the ONLY ones who see ghosts are the ones who just happen to be using "the wrong camera".
And it's just coincidence that the guys with "the right camera" somehow manage to NEVER accidentally film a ghost.
They probably don't exist. http://rationalwiki.com/wiki/GhostlinkthewindowThat site is far worse than Conservapedia, the site that RationalWiki despises. I hate RationalWiki. There's nothing rational about it.
Energy cannot be created nor destroyed /thread. This being the millionth incarnation of this thread i tell all the believers not to bother, the skeptics will never believe. And if you ask them to go ghost hunting they will just chicken out. X360PS3AMD05:lol: Are you trolling? Or are you serious? I just want to know before I quote you.
There have been many instances when ghost hunters claim to have seen a ghost.Yeah, coincidentally the ONLY ones who see ghosts are the ones who just happen to be using "the wrong camera".
And it's just coincidence that the guys with "the right camera" somehow manage to NEVER accidentally film a ghost.
MrGeezer
There have been many instances when ghost hunters claim to have seen a ghost.[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]
Yeah, coincidentally the ONLY ones who see ghosts are the ones who just happen to be using "the wrong camera".
And it's just coincidence that the guys with "the right camera" somehow manage to NEVER accidentally film a ghost.
BumFluff122
And I claim to have once seen Pumpkinhead.
Now ask me for evidence. I dare you.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment