[QUOTE="Rhazakna"][QUOTE="dackchaar"][QUOTE="im_really_rich"][QUOTE="DarkSmokeNinja"][QUOTE="Rhazakna"] [QUOTE="DarkSmokeNinja"]Get a bible(I prefer the King James Version) and turn to the last book called Revelations.dackchaar
You missed the point of my comment, it seems. He asked for proof that god and the antiChrist and so forth are real. You told him to read Revelations for proof. But how do we know Revelations is correct? By reading Revelations?
You really didn't get my point you fool. *sigh* Everything in the bible is true don't worry if you have enough sense to read the bible you would know the signs of the last days.You know, the Qu'ran claims to be all true as well. So why shouldn't I believe everything in the Qu'ran if it claims to be true, since The Bible does the same thing? Because the Bible just IS true? But why? Because it says so? But why does it saying so make it correct? Is it ONLY because it says so? If I say a bunch of things and say 'Everything I just said is completely TRUE,' does that make them true? If all I have to do is, in verse, claim their authenticity, am I good to go?
Again, please read my earlier post and also read the link I gave.
Why do you assume I haven't? I know about all the supposed fulfilled prophecies. People have seen these prophecies fulfilled before. You are looking at current events through the view of the bible. By doing that, biblical prophecies are always coming true.
I wasn't qaouting you.....anyways... No they havn't Red heifer? Rise of Russia?, and also, these prophecies show that the end of the world is NEARING, some of the prophecies have come true in the last few years, yet there are still a few left like the reconstruction of the temple (blueprints are made, also dome of the rock will not need to be dismantled, for the Bible already predicted it's position there and said to leave out the court yard (exactly where the dome of the rock is) and to rebuild the reast of the temple as was. The technology for the mark of the beast and the anti-christ also there may be a few more, not entirely sure, you can read the link for the rest of the signs/proofMy point is there has been "proof" all throughout history as long as you look for it. This is nothing new. Why is the Christian that saw the signs 1000 years ago arong, but you are right? Why are these signs more valid than all the other signs over the past 2000 years?
Log in to comment