OMG I just hate it so much!
Have you also noticed some people in the South say "axe" instead of "ask"?
This topic is locked from further discussion.
OMG I just hate it so much!
Have you also noticed some people in the South say "axe" instead of "ask"?
The southern accent in general makes me cringe, possibly because I associate it with very stupid people.domatron23Same:?
I am indifferent about the word and its usage. Personally I don't ever use it.
As for the pronunciation of the word "ask" I have noticed that but only after someone else pointed it out to me.
Wtf? I've lived in Georgia for 12 years now and never heard somebody say "axe" instead of "ask". Actually, you're confusing "black southern" with "white southern". I'm used to "y'all" now. I can actually say it pretty good, but when I go back North, I say "you guys".
I live in Texas. I've gotten used to hearing it.
Blood-Scribe
Same. I don't think I myself have ever said it though.
[QUOTE="Blood-Scribe"]I live in Texas. I've gotten used to hearing it.
UnrighteousFury
Same. I don't think I myself have ever said it though.
I use it very sparingly.
I also have grown up in Georgia and have never heard that before,as for Y'all I use it all the time ;).Wtf? I've lived in Georgia for 12 years now and never heard somebody say "axe" instead of "ask". Actually, you're confusing "black southern" with "white southern". I'm used to "y'all" now. I can actually say it pretty good, but when I go back North, I say "you guys".
GamerForca
I think it is a perfectly viable word, as there aren't any other particularly valid and concise means of saying "you" in plural.thepwninatorWhy not try "people of like thought" or "similar-minded people"- at least such does not make you sound like an "ejit"...
[QUOTE="thepwninator"]I think it is a perfectly viable word, as there aren't any other particularly valid and concise means of saying "you" in plural.fellybatWhy not try "people of like thought" or "similar-minded people"- at least such does not make you sound like an "ejit"... Which is easier to say-"similar-minded people" or "y'all"? ;)
Southern accents make me wanna puke, I generally make a comment every time I hear one.trickmyster13Not within earshot of the person, I assume.
[QUOTE="fellybat"][QUOTE="thepwninator"]I think it is a perfectly viable word, as there aren't any other particularly valid and concise means of saying "you" in plural.thepwninatorWhy not try "people of like thought" or "similar-minded people"- at least such does not make you sound like an "ejit"... Which is easier to say-"similar-minded people" or "y'all"? ;) Which is more articulate and specific? (which is less likely to single you out as a hick in the eyes of the rest of the world?)
The southern accent in general makes me cringe, possibly because I associate it with very stupid people.domatron23Bush is why i associate it with stupid people.
[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="fellybat"] Why not try "people of like thought" or "similar-minded people"- at least such does not make you sound like an "ejit"...fellybatWhich is easier to say-"similar-minded people" or "y'all"? ;) Which is more articulate and specific?
The one that's harder to say, given its specific nature. Y'all is meant to just be a general term for a group of people, not so much a specific set of individuals that hold similar interests. I don't get why you brought forth that suggestion as a replacement.
[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="fellybat"] Why not try "people of like thought" or "similar-minded people"- at least such does not make you sound like an "ejit"...fellybatWhich is easier to say-"similar-minded people" or "y'all"? ;) Which is more articulate and specific?
1) "Articulate" is subjective.
2) "Y'all" has far wider use than "similar-minded people" and similar phrases by virtue of the fact that it is less specific.
3) It is a highly efficient and sufficient means of expressing one's self.
Wtf? I've lived in Georgia for 12 years now and never heard somebody say "axe" instead of "ask". Actually, you're confusing "black southern" with "white southern". I'm used to "y'all" now. I can actually say it pretty good, but when I go back North, I say "you guys".
GamerForca
i live in Georgia as well and i can't say i don't use the word occasionally but i haven't heard axe used a whole lot eitherÂ
i guess there's only one thing left to say now,Â
"well y'all come back now"....lolÂ
Which is more articulate and specific?[QUOTE="fellybat"][QUOTE="thepwninator"] Which is easier to say-"similar-minded people" or "y'all"? ;)thepwninator
1) "Articulate" is subjective.
2) "Y'all" has far wider use than "similar-minded people" and similar phrases by virtue of the fact that it is less specific.
3) It is a highly efficient and sufficient means of expressing one's self.
Why do the simple folk constantly try to justify themselves via idiosyncratic conjecture?[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="fellybat"] Which is more articulate and specific?fellybat
1) "Articulate" is subjective.
2) "Y'all" has far wider use than "similar-minded people" and similar phrases by virtue of the fact that it is less specific.
3) It is a highly efficient and sufficient means of expressing one's self.
Why do the simple folk constantly try to justify themselves via idiosyncratic conjecture?Simple folk? Your mistaken use of an ad hominem argument shows the extent of your supposed superiority, my good sir. My use of a dialect of which you are not particularly fond does not, by any means, make me a lesser being (or a member of the "simple folk", as you put it), nor does it, in and of itself, make anyone inferior, in any way, to anyone else.Â
[QUOTE="fellybat"][QUOTE="thepwninator"]Why do the simple folk constantly try to justify themselves via idiosyncratic conjecture?Â
1) "Articulate" is subjective.
2) "Y'all" has far wider use than "similar-minded people" and similar phrases by virtue of the fact that it is less specific.
3) It is a highly efficient and sufficient means of expressing one's self.
thepwninator
Simple folk? Your mistaken use of an ad hominem argument shows the extent of your supposed superiority, my good sir. My use of a dialect of which you are not particularly fond does not, by any means, make me a lesser being (or a member of the "simple folk", as you put it), nor does it, in and of itself, make anyone inferior, in any way, to anyone else.Â
Why not respect and use the language that you have unwittingly adopted to it's fullest extent, without degenerating yourself in the process?If mediocrity is what you seek, then proceed as you were.Â
[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="fellybat"] Why do the simple folk constantly try to justify themselves via idiosyncratic conjecture?fellybat
Â
Simple folk? Your mistaken use of an ad hominem argument shows the extent of your supposed superiority, my good sir. My use of a dialect of which you are not particularly fond does not, by any means, make me a lesser being (or a member of the "simple folk", as you put it), nor does it, in and of itself, make anyone inferior, in any way, to anyone else.Â
Why not respect and use the language that you have unwittingly adopted to it's fullest extent, without degenerating yourself in the process?Change and degradation to a language are not one and the same. Indeed, many linguists believe that it is impossible for a language to "degrade" unless function is lost, and "y'all" is most definitely not an instance of a loss of function. In addition, it is, in no way, degenerating* to myself. If you believe that it, indeed, is, please tell me-I am ever so happy to prevent myself from "degeneration".
*I'm assuming you intended to use "denigrating"...?
[QUOTE="fellybat"][QUOTE="thepwninator"]Why not respect and use the language that you have unwittingly adopted to it's fullest extent, without degenerating yourself in the process?Â
Simple folk? Your mistaken use of an ad hominem argument shows the extent of your supposed superiority, my good sir. My use of a dialect of which you are not particularly fond does not, by any means, make me a lesser being (or a member of the "simple folk", as you put it), nor does it, in and of itself, make anyone inferior, in any way, to anyone else.Â
thepwninator
Change and degradation to a language are not one and the same. Indeed, many linguists believe that it is impossible for a language to "degrade" unless function is lost, and "y'all" is most definitely not an instance of a loss of function. In addition, it is, in no way, degenerating* to myself. If you believe that it, indeed, is, please tell me-I am ever so happy to prevent myself from "degeneration".
*I'm assuming you intended to use "denigrating"...?
Consider the anthropological origin of "y'all". While it may serve a utilitarian purpose, how can you expect anyone from the rest of the world to take you seriously, using such terminology?[QUOTE="thepwninator"][QUOTE="fellybat"] Why not respect and use the language that you have unwittingly adopted to it's fullest extent, without degenerating yourself in the process?fellybat
Â
Change and degradation to a language are not one and the same. Indeed, many linguists believe that it is impossible for a language to "degrade" unless function is lost, and "y'all" is most definitely not an instance of a loss of function. In addition, it is, in no way, degenerating* to myself. If you believe that it, indeed, is, please tell me-I am ever so happy to prevent myself from "degeneration".
*I'm assuming you intended to use "denigrating"...?
Consider the anthropological origin of "y'all". While it may serve a utilitarian purpose, how can you expect anyone from the rest of the world to take you seriously, using such terminology?As I have said before-the English language, like all other languages, evolves. This is a completely undeniable fact. Highly functional colloquialisms that have no viable alternatives often permeate through languages, no matter their origin nor their destination.
I find your intense dislike of a simple and functional word somewhat...bizarre, to say the least, by the way.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment