[QUOTE="fellybat"][QUOTE="thepwninator"]Â
Change and degradation to a language are not one and the same. Indeed, many linguists believe that it is impossible for a language to "degrade" unless function is lost, and "y'all" is most definitely not an instance of a loss of function. In addition, it is, in no way, degenerating* to myself. If you believe that it, indeed, is, please tell me-I am ever so happy to prevent myself from "degeneration".
*I'm assuming you intended to use "denigrating"...?
thepwninator
Consider the anthropological origin of "y'all". While it may serve a utilitarian purpose, how can you expect anyone from the rest of the world to take you seriously, using such terminology?As I have said before-the English language, like all other languages, evolves. This is a completely undeniable fact. Highly functional colloquialisms that have no viable alternatives often permeate through languages, no matter their origin nor their destination.
I find your intense dislike of a simple and functional word somewhat...bizarre, to say the least, by the way.
While I appreciate the nature of the evolution of languages, I would argue that, never will "y'all" ever be noted in any future classic text, other than those primitive texts defining the decline of commercial culture in the early 21'st century.
Log in to comment