How do you feel about UFOs?

  • 92 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#51 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

Aliens exist, but we will never meet them because they are too far away.

tocklestein2005

Other stars are too far away for us to reach with our current technology, but it's arrogant to assume that the distance is too far for another intelligent species to traverse.

Avatar image for MrGeezer
MrGeezer

59765

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 MrGeezer
Member since 2002 • 59765 Posts

[QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

Aliens exist, but we will never meet them because they are too far away.

hartsickdiscipl

Other stars are too far away for us to reach with our current technology, but it's arrogant to assume that the distance is too far for another intelligent species to traverse.

Are you proposing magical technology which allows the aliens to break physics?

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

Aliens exist, but we will never meet them because they are too far away.

hartsickdiscipl

Other stars are too far away for us to reach with our current technology, but it's arrogant to assume that the distance is too far for another intelligent species to traverse.

No it's not; it's simply an application of Occam's razor
Avatar image for bgalin
bgalin

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 bgalin
Member since 2009 • 32 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

Aliens exist, but we will never meet them because they are too far away.

MrGeezer

Other stars are too far away for us to reach with our current technology, but it's arrogant to assume that the distance is too far for another intelligent species to traverse.

Are you proposing magical technology which allows the aliens to break physics?

In Stephen Hawking's special about aliens he suggested the possibility that there could be alien species that are so advanced that they're only limited by how much energy they can attain.

Avatar image for Aquat1cF1sh
Aquat1cF1sh

11096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#55 Aquat1cF1sh
Member since 2006 • 11096 Posts
I think people just like to make stories. >_> I do believe life exists out there though. But those other lifeforms aren't near us.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#56 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

Aliens exist, but we will never meet them because they are too far away.

MrGeezer

Other stars are too far away for us to reach with our current technology, but it's arrogant to assume that the distance is too far for another intelligent species to traverse.

Are you proposing magical technology which allows the aliens to break physics?

Are you suggesting that our species currently has a good understand of all the elements at work in our physical universe?

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#57 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Other stars are too far away for us to reach with our current technology, but it's arrogant to assume that the distance is too far for another intelligent species to traverse.

bgalin

Are you proposing magical technology which allows the aliens to break physics?

In Stephen Hawking's special about aliens he suggested the possibility that there could be alien species that are so advanced that they're only limited by how much energy they can attain.

Based on all current human understanding of the universe, no amount of energy would allow superluminal travel...
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#58 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"]

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Other stars are too far away for us to reach with our current technology, but it's arrogant to assume that the distance is too far for another intelligent species to traverse.

hartsickdiscipl

Are you proposing magical technology which allows the aliens to break physics?

Are you suggesting that our species currently has a good understand of all the elements at work in our physical universe?

Are you suggesting that we just assume everything we have learned about the universe should be regarded as false because you don't care for some of the implications? :?
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#59 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="tocklestein2005"]

Aliens exist, but we will never meet them because they are too far away.

xaos

Other stars are too far away for us to reach with our current technology, but it's arrogant to assume that the distance is too far for another intelligent species to traverse.

No it's not; it's simply an application of Occam's razor

Despite what you seem to believe judging from numerous posts, Occam's razor is not infallible. It also depends largely on people's judgment, which will often lead us to completely different conclusions given the same data.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Other stars are too far away for us to reach with our current technology, but it's arrogant to assume that the distance is too far for another intelligent species to traverse.

hartsickdiscipl

No it's not; it's simply an application of Occam's razor

Despite what you seem to believe judging from numerous posts, Occam's razor is not infallible. It also depends largely on people's judgment, which will often lead us to completely different conclusions given the same data.

Of course not, but a good guideline in evaluating extraordinary claims is what extraordinary evidence exists to support them; as mentioned above, not all theories that cannot be disproven automatically have an equal probability of being true.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#61 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts
I feel that I'm getting tired of people misusing the term "UFO" to mean alien spacecraft.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#62 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"] Are you proposing magical technology which allows the aliens to break physics?

xaos

Are you suggesting that our species currently has a good understand of all the elements at work in our physical universe?

Are you suggesting that we just assume everything we have learned about the universe should be regarded as false because you don't care for some of the implications? :?

Absolutely not. But I think it's much more ridiculous to stick to our current, limited understanding of physics while denying many unexplainable UFO phenomenon that have hundreds if not thousands of witnesses. The more we learn, the less we really know. Each "fact" that we think we establish should teach us how little we really understand.

Avatar image for bgalin
bgalin

32

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 bgalin
Member since 2009 • 32 Posts

[QUOTE="bgalin"]

[QUOTE="MrGeezer"] Are you proposing magical technology which allows the aliens to break physics?

xaos

In Stephen Hawking's special about aliens he suggested the possibility that there could be alien species that are so advanced that they're only limited by how much energy they can attain.

Based on all current human understanding of the universe, no amount of energy would allow superluminal travel...

That's a good point and I suppose I should have elaborated. He did talk quite a bit about the use of worm holes to travel great distances quickly though, and how they could potentially power them using stars. I'm not sure if those are a possibility or not though.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#64 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

I feel that I'm getting tired of people misusing the term "UFO" to mean alien spacecraft.StopThePresses

I think the idea behind the current popular use of the term "UFO" is that we are able to identify anything in our skies that is native to our planet. Obviously, this isn't always true.. and untrained observers sometimes see what they want to see. However, I tend to think that we as a species have at least a decent grasp on what we have put in the air, and what naturally flies within our atmosphere. Anything else logically would have to be extraterrestrial.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

[QUOTE="xaos"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

Are you suggesting that our species currently has a good understand of all the elements at work in our physical universe?

hartsickdiscipl

Are you suggesting that we just assume everything we have learned about the universe should be regarded as false because you don't care for some of the implications? :?

Absolutely not. But I think it's much more ridiculous to stick to our current, limited understanding of physics while denying many unexplainable UFO phenomenon that have hundreds if not thousands of witnesses. The more we learn, the less we really know. Each "fact" that we think we establish should teach us how little we really understand.

Our current limited understanding of physics (which will be limited as far as can be projected into the future, science is a process of refining models, really) notwithstanding. it just seems to me a pretty huge leap to ascribe unexplained atmospheric phenomena as evidence that physics is wrong and aliens are visiting us. I do tend to be very conservative, but given strong empirical evidence, of course I'd have to acknowledge alien contact. I feel comfortable with my current inferences based on the absence of that evidence, though.
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]I feel that I'm getting tired of people misusing the term "UFO" to mean alien spacecraft.hartsickdiscipl

I think the idea behind the current popular use of the term "UFO" is that we are able to identify anything in our skies that is native to our planet. Obviously, this isn't always true.. and untrained observers sometimes see what they want to see. However, I tend to think that we as a species have at least a decent grasp on what we have put in the air, and what naturally flies within our atmosphere. Anything else logically would have to be extraterrestrial.

Many UFO's have historically been government experiments. Someone knows what they are. That doesn't mean everyone does.
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#67 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="xaos"] No it's not; it's simply an application of Occam's razorxaos

Despite what you seem to believe judging from numerous posts, Occam's razor is not infallible. It also depends largely on people's judgment, which will often lead us to completely different conclusions given the same data.

Of course not, but a good guideline in evaluating extraordinary claims is what extraordinary evidence exists to support them; as mentioned above, not all theories that cannot be disproven automatically have an equal probability of being true.

I don't understand why so many people think that the events surrounding UFO reports are so extraordinary that they're hard to believe. Once you've eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable (or extraordinary in some people's view), must be the truth. Many conventional explanations for UFO sightings/Alien abductions are impossible. Therefore the most likely conclusion is that the people making the report are telling the truth. I find it much more scientific to believe in the logical implications of an unprecedented event than to try to categorize all such events as something that they clearly are not.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#68 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"]I feel that I'm getting tired of people misusing the term "UFO" to mean alien spacecraft.StopThePresses

I think the idea behind the current popular use of the term "UFO" is that we are able to identify anything in our skies that is native to our planet. Obviously, this isn't always true.. and untrained observers sometimes see what they want to see. However, I tend to think that we as a species have at least a decent grasp on what we have put in the air, and what naturally flies within our atmosphere. Anything else logically would have to be extraterrestrial.

Many UFO's have historically been government experiments. Someone knows what they are. That doesn't mean everyone does.

The level of technology needed to accelerate a mile-wide object from zero to out-of-sight of a commercial airline pilot within a second or 2 would be in use if we had it. Things like that would be of tremendous use to both the military and the private sector. If we had developed such a thing on our own, it wouldn't sit on the sidelines.

Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts

I don't understand why so many people think that the events surrounding UFO reports are so extraordinary that they're hard to believe. Once you've eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable (or extraordinary in some people's view), must be the truth. Many conventional explanations for UFO sightings/Alien abductions are impossible. Therefore the most likely conclusion is that the people making the report are telling the truth. I find it much more scientific to believe in the logical implications of an unprecendented event than to try to categorize all such events as something that they clearly are not.

hartsickdiscipl
Can you give some examples of specific instances where you feel like extraterrestrials are the most parsimonious explanation?
Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#70 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I don't understand why so many people think that the events surrounding UFO reports are so extraordinary that they're hard to believe. Once you've eliminated the impossible, whatever remains, however improbable (or extraordinary in some people's view), must be the truth. Many conventional explanations for UFO sightings/Alien abductions are impossible. Therefore the most likely conclusion is that the people making the report are telling the truth. I find it much more scientific to believe in the logical implications of an unprecendented event than to try to categorize all such events as something that they clearly are not.

xaos

Can you give some examples of specific instances where you feel like extraterrestrials are the most parsimonious explanation?

Now you want me to give examples of things that are publicly available on the internet? I'm not going to do the work for you. All it takes is watching a few episodes of UFO hunters, UFO files, etc.. to get a half-dozen examples of such events. Gordon Cooper, a former Apollo astronaut came out and said that he has seen Alien craft in space, as well as chased them with a jet fighter within our atmosphere. Numerous commerical and military pilots have given accounts of craft over a mile wide nearly intersecting the flight path of their planes. The evidence is there, but if you go in with the idea that credible people are lying or delusional, you'll find a way not to believe.

Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

I think the idea behind the current popular use of the term "UFO" is that we are able to identify anything in our skies that is native to our planet. Obviously, this isn't always true.. and untrained observers sometimes see what they want to see. However, I tend to think that we as a species have at least a decent grasp on what we have put in the air, and what naturally flies within our atmosphere. Anything else logically would have to be extraterrestrial.

hartsickdiscipl

Many UFO's have historically been government experiments. Someone knows what they are. That doesn't mean everyone does.

The level of technology needed to accelerate a mile-wide object from zero to out-of-sight of a commercial airline pilot within a second or 2 would be in use if we had it. Things like that would be of tremendous use to both the military and the private sector. If we had developed such a thing on our own, it wouldn't sit on the sidelines.

Uh, none of that is necessary for an object to be "unidentified." Now you're using the incorrect definition to justify itself...or something.
Avatar image for 194197844077667059316682358889
194197844077667059316682358889

49173

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 194197844077667059316682358889
Member since 2003 • 49173 Posts
[QUOTE="xaos"]Can you give some examples of specific instances where you feel like extraterrestrials are the most parsimonious explanation?hartsickdiscipl

Now you want me to give examples of things that are publicly available on the internet? I'm not going to do the work for you.

I thought we were doing well, but that is a pretty disappointing response. I'm also not going to do the work for you. Oh well.
Avatar image for killerkool07
killerkool07

1210

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 killerkool07
Member since 2007 • 1210 Posts

I think they're all BP's fault.Engrish_Major

i thought it was that commie obama's fault

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#74 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"][QUOTE="xaos"]Can you give some examples of specific instances where you feel like extraterrestrials are the most parsimonious explanation?xaos

Now you want me to give examples of things that are publicly available on the internet? I'm not going to do the work for you.

I thought we were doing well, but that is a pretty disappointing response. I'm also not going to do the work for you. Oh well.

I've already done the work for myself and come to my own conclusion. I take the fact that you have come to a different conclusion as evidence that you haven't sought out the same information. This is not something that's going to be handed to you, you have to go get it.

Avatar image for hartsickdiscipl
hartsickdiscipl

14787

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 10

User Lists: 0

#75 hartsickdiscipl
Member since 2003 • 14787 Posts

[QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"] Many UFO's have historically been government experiments. Someone knows what they are. That doesn't mean everyone does.StopThePresses

The level of technology needed to accelerate a mile-wide object from zero to out-of-sight of a commercial airline pilot within a second or 2 would be in use if we had it. Things like that would be of tremendous use to both the military and the private sector. If we had developed such a thing on our own, it wouldn't sit on the sidelines.

Uh, none of that is necessary for an object to be "unidentified." Now you're using the incorrect definition to justify itself...or something.

So now you're saying that you can identify such an object? Please, let me and the pilots who saw these things in on the secret.

Avatar image for ehhwhatever
ehhwhatever

1463

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 ehhwhatever
Member since 2010 • 1463 Posts

In 1979 they filmed a UFO and tracked it on military radar. That is pretty convincing. It was off New Zealand coast.

Avatar image for arad96
arad96

7783

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 6

User Lists: 0

#77 arad96
Member since 2009 • 7783 Posts

I think they are tasty.

Avatar image for metroidfood
metroidfood

11175

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 metroidfood
Member since 2007 • 11175 Posts

I think that logically, if aliens were able to build a FTL travel system and travel the thousands (millions? billions?) of light years to reach us, there would be more evidence than grainy black and white photos and ambiguous Youtube videos.

Avatar image for SgtKevali
SgtKevali

5763

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#79 SgtKevali
Member since 2009 • 5763 Posts

I don't believe in them. If aliens are really visiting earth, I wonder what the **** they've been doing. They've done a pretty good job of never being caught.

Case in point, even if you for some reason or another you believe that green men are visiting this planet, you shouldn't worry, as they haven't done anything.

Avatar image for Perd1t1on
Perd1t1on

1031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 Perd1t1on
Member since 2009 • 1031 Posts
I'm only going to say this because I know none of you can prove it or believe it (so no threat to me): I am an alien. I was sent in a pod while in hibernation. The trip took 2.45 million light years from an unknown star in the adromeda galaxy. Several of us were sent in random directions to spread scientific information to accelerate an intergalactic superstructure plan. My vessel planet no longer exists, and earth was an estimated target for my trajectory. The fact that I am alive is proof that my particular mission is a semi success. My design was based on the estimated shape of human beings based on several variables on the environment of this planet and the length of time from the beginning of life on this planet. I do not look like you completely, but I have been able to pass off as an asian/white/afro carribean unit. The russian government are the ones that found me during the cold war, but I wasn't unhibernated until early 1988 and transported to a Canadian family.
Avatar image for Rougehunter
Rougehunter

5873

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#81 Rougehunter
Member since 2004 • 5873 Posts

I think it's highly unlikely that aliens have ever visited Earth. For a civilization that advanced what significance would a "young" and "primitive"" civilization like us have to do to get their attention.

Avatar image for Dudewrsmygame
Dudewrsmygame

382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#82 Dudewrsmygame
Member since 2010 • 382 Posts

I believe the UFOs are most of the time fake, but based on archaeological samples of sculptures andhieroglyphs i assume they exist, probably not in the earth but across the galaxy maybe, besides i really don't think we are alone in the universe otherwise this is the lamest universe i've ever been.

Avatar image for Xx_Hopeless_xX
Xx_Hopeless_xX

16562

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Xx_Hopeless_xX
Member since 2009 • 16562 Posts

Don't believe in them..

Avatar image for Dudewrsmygame
Dudewrsmygame

382

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#84 Dudewrsmygame
Member since 2010 • 382 Posts

I think it's highly unlikely that aliens have ever visited Earth. For a civilization that advanced what significance would a "young" and "primitive"" civilization like us have to do to get their attention.

Rougehunter
Probing???
Avatar image for StopThePresses
StopThePresses

2767

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 StopThePresses
Member since 2010 • 2767 Posts

[QUOTE="StopThePresses"][QUOTE="hartsickdiscipl"]

The level of technology needed to accelerate a mile-wide object from zero to out-of-sight of a commercial airline pilot within a second or 2 would be in use if we had it. Things like that would be of tremendous use to both the military and the private sector. If we had developed such a thing on our own, it wouldn't sit on the sidelines.

hartsickdiscipl

Uh, none of that is necessary for an object to be "unidentified." Now you're using the incorrect definition to justify itself...or something.

So now you're saying that you can identify such an object? Please, let me and the pilots who saw these things in on the secret.

No, that's not what I said at all, actually. I don't feel any need to explain how it isn't, as it seems rather straightforward and obvious.
Avatar image for phillo99
phillo99

2369

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#86 phillo99
Member since 2005 • 2369 Posts

I think that aliens and the like do exist, but that they've been to earth, I don't think so.

Avatar image for iowastate
iowastate

7922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 35

User Lists: 0

#87 iowastate
Member since 2004 • 7922 Posts

Well i have most definitely, and recently saw some UFO's.... which means Unidentified Flying Objects. I know there were not satellites, cause they dont move the way what I saw did, which also means it wasnt a shooting star or anything like that. So, yea, UFOS... I dunno what they are so who am i to say they are "alien craft"? xhellcatx

I have also seen UFOs on a couple of occasions that could not be identified as "sputnik" or any other satellite and I could not place as any type of air craft and I was rather spooked by a hovering light one night but it also was a fairly short distance from an Air Force Base which I later discovered ran flight tests from time to time.

maybe I saw an early version of one of the things that I later saw on a flight line in Kuwait ....

.......there are some things we will always have to wonder about because the answer just never comes.

also I do am sure there is intelligent life out there somewhere.

humanity is surely NOT the apex of existence - any really advanced civilization will avoid the barrio district of the universe.

there will not be any traffic here as long as we are on an unpaved road so to speak which is probably for the best as far as we are concerned.

my final thought on this matter:

The human race........was probably created as comic relief

Avatar image for Fall_of_Reach
Fall_of_Reach

4389

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#88 Fall_of_Reach
Member since 2008 • 4389 Posts
the one if LEGO Indiana Jones 2 handles like a *****. that's about the extent of it really,
Avatar image for WushuFighter
WushuFighter

1837

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 WushuFighter
Member since 2007 • 1837 Posts

Whether or not aliens/UFOs, or etc. have actually visited earth, you'd have to be one ignorant and naive person to believe that there isn't a possibility of other life in such a vast universe.

Avatar image for jun_aka_pekto
jun_aka_pekto

25255

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#90 jun_aka_pekto
Member since 2010 • 25255 Posts

So long as it's a UFO with no ET involved, then I believe in UFOs.

I remember traveling along Nevada Highway 95 down south towards Las Vegas back in 1982. We saw something flying through the evening twilight sky very far away. We couldn't figure out what it was. It turned out later it was an F-117.

ET? I'll believe it when I see it.

Avatar image for edwise18
edwise18

1533

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 edwise18
Member since 2008 • 1533 Posts

I think all these ufo's people see are just advanced, experimental air craft that militaries are testing. Imo.

Avatar image for poptart
poptart

7298

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 poptart
Member since 2003 • 7298 Posts

Same way as I feel about ghosts - skeptical. Shame really as I wouldn't mind having an alien around for dinner one evening.

That reminds of a TV prank in the UK back in the eightieshere where they tricked a lady in believing a UFO had crashed in her back garden. After singing to craft, an alien appeared and in a quintessential English manner she asked it if wanted a cup of tea. Ridiculous...