It would be just like the book 1984 and a lot of us wouldn't be alive....
This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="Phoenix6359"]No Cold War, no Communism, quite possibly a more stable planet. Who knows? It might have been better or it might have been worse.CrimsaderYour prefer nazism over communism... Please. Grow up.
Yeah man, the hell are you thinking not having the same tastes as him, wtf?
[QUOTE="Phoenix6359"]No Cold War, no Communism, quite possibly a more stable planet. Who knows? It might have been better or it might have been worse.CrimsaderYour prefer nazism over communism... Please. Grow up.
They were both terrible. I don't see why one would prefer one over another.
Another thing, the Nazis did in no way want to kill other races. The killed the jews because they thought they were the engineers of Germany's ww1 defeat. Why do you guys think the german's allowed blacks, muslims, indians etc. to serve?Osaka-06
Becuase they needed strong and fast soldiers, kamikazee extremist, and soldiers that could starve for days.
Your prefer nazism over communism... Please. Grow up.[QUOTE="Crimsader"][QUOTE="Phoenix6359"]No Cold War, no Communism, quite possibly a more stable planet. Who knows? It might have been better or it might have been worse.SgtKevali
They were both terrible. I don't see why one would prefer one over another.
You fail to realize that communism is really an umbrella term that encompasses many sub-ideals, such as trotkyism, Stalinism, Maoism, Leninism, marxism, and so on. No two communist countries are exactly alike. In terms of brutality, Stalinism was probably the worst. Something around 50 million people are extimated to have been executed or murdered under his rule. In some ways, then, Stalin was worse than Hitler
[QUOTE="Zerocrossings"][QUOTE="Osaka-06"] The National socialists used to jews to get into power by blaming them for 1918. In 1933 they had to make good on what they promised back during the election, but they needed something to overshadow it so they put the holocaust on hold until world war 2 broke out.Osaka-06
Sorry but i didnt get the post. :P
surprising since it's probably as basic as it gets.Nope. What are you trying to say by throwing these facts as me?
If they one then I'd probably assume there would be another world war between the Japanese empire and the third reich, which would inevitably involve nuclear weapons since we weren't the only ones trying to build a giant bomb. The reason being that hitler's main goal was a perfect world via a perfect race, and even though Japan and germany were allies, it did not mean Hitler thought Japanese should have been included in that perfect world. A means to an end, like many things.
Depending on who won we'd either be looking at a world where the dominant if not only race is arian, or where Japan controls almost all of the means of production and world resources(much like they thought would happen in the 80s). From there how far humanity spans up until present day is anyone's guess. They could excel in certain fields where we falter, and falter in certain fields where we excel. There would certainly be no amorality in experimenting with 'nonpure' humans in the world, therefore major medicle breakthroughs might be more likely. The nuclear development, expansion and eventual decomission would probably run similar to ours if occurences similar to chernobyl happen in that eventuality. Culture wise there would be no rock music, therefore none of the major musical breakthroughs we see today (rap, rock, metal, techno, ect.). Nationalism would be a mjor driving force behind pretty much everything, and assuming that bandwagon didn't burn out due to unseen circumstances, a large nation state would be likely.
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment