how high is your IQ?

I took a 2 day, nationally renowned IQ evaluation in Houston a few years ago. I ended up with a 143. I also scored a 172 out of 180 on the LSAT, which is more or less an intense IQ test, before I went to law school several years back. I'm pretty much a genius.

Not sure, I've never taken one, nor do I really care to.

I'm doing well at an excellent college, so that's enough for me.

I took a 2 day, nationally renowned IQ evaluation in Houston a few years ago. I ended up with a 143. I also scored a 172 out of 180 on the LSAT, which is more or less an intense IQ test, before I went to law school several years back. I'm pretty much a genius.

Mark_the_Lie

What was the name of the program?

Also, IQ tests (and, for that matter, LSATs) aren't a very good measure of intelligence...

I took a 2 day, nationally renowned IQ evaluation in Houston a few years ago. I ended up with a 143. I also scored a 172 out of 180 on the LSAT, which is more or less an intense IQ test, before I went to law school several years back. I'm pretty much a genius.

Mark_the_Lie

About 112-120 bcroger2

Don't bump seven-month-old topics.

I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed. :P

Jamiemydearx3

...

:cry:

[QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

I took a 2 day, nationally renowned IQ evaluation in Houston a few years ago. I ended up with a 143. I also scored a 172 out of 180 on the LSAT, which is more or less an intense IQ test, before I went to law school several years back. I'm pretty much a genius.

chessmaster1989

What was the name of the program?

Also, IQ tests (and, for that matter, LSATs) aren't a very good measure of intelligence...

69

IQ tests are crap. And online IQ tests are even worse. And the younger you are, the higher the score you will get. Something I've noticed.

And I'd also like to admit, it is pretty funny to look at all you so called geniuses, cause trying to gloat about being a genius on an internet forum makes you look more like a child. Kinda the opposite of what you say you are lol

Can no one admit that they are just average?

[QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

I took a 2 day, nationally renowned IQ evaluation in Houston a few years ago. I ended up with a 143. I also scored a 172 out of 180 on the LSAT, which is more or less an intense IQ test, before I went to law school several years back. I'm pretty much a genius.

chessmaster1989

What was the name of the program?

Also, IQ tests (and, for that matter, LSATs) aren't a very good measure of intelligence...

It was done at the Johnson O'Connor Research Center. They measure your perception of spatial relations and patterns, your capacity to learn, your ability to teach, and a few other facets of intelligence that aren't normally on standard IQ tests. They then take the percentile that each of your results were in, average them, and give you an intelligence quotient between 0 and 160. Then they do very extensive aptitude testing, which is what they are widely known for, to give you a solid idea of what your strengths and weaknesses are. But the IQ test they give prior to the aptitude testing is one of the most comprehensive you can take.

The LSAT is an extremely good indicator of intelligence. Take it, and thet get back to me.

[QUOTE="Famiking"]Yep, this is one of the harder IQ tests: http://www.highiqsociety.org/iq_tests/Jamiemydearx3

I'm not the sharpest tool in the shed. :P Still slightly above average though. ;)

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

I took a 2 day, nationally renowned IQ evaluation in Houston a few years ago. I ended up with a 143. I also scored a 172 out of 180 on the LSAT, which is more or less an intense IQ test, before I went to law school several years back. I'm pretty much a genius.

Mark_the_Lie

What was the name of the program?

Also, IQ tests (and, for that matter, LSATs) aren't a very good measure of intelligence...

It was done at the Johnson O'Connor Research Center. They measure your perception of spatial relations and patterns, your capacity to learn, your ability to teach, and a few other facets of intelligence that aren't normally on standard IQ tests. They then take the percentile that each of your results were in, average them, and give you an intelligence quotient between 0 and 160. Then they do very extensive aptitude testing, which is what they are widely known for, to give you a solid idea of what your strengths and weaknesses are. But the IQ test they give prior to the aptitude testing is one of the most comprehensive you can take.

The LSAT is an extremely good indicator of intelligence. Take it, and thet get back to me.

I have no intention of going to law school, so I'm not going to spend time and energy studying for and taking the LSAT (which, by the way, I still do not accept as a good measure of intelligence). I'm planning to either do graduate work in economics, or to go to business school.

Out of curiosity I took there Test For Above Average Abilities and scored a 134. It also told me that I was in the top 5% of the population. I don't really know how to get a picture of the web page like you did or else I'd have it up there. If someone wants to tell me how I'll add it for proof. RAMRODtheMASTER

234

[QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

I took a 2 day, nationally renowned IQ evaluation in Houston a few years ago. I ended up with a 143. I also scored a 172 out of 180 on the LSAT, which is more or less an intense IQ test, before I went to law school several years back. I'm pretty much a genius.

BiancaDK

As I said previously, most legitimate IQ tests top out at 160 or 180. The one I took happened to be 160, and it was scaled by percentile. The 200 point scale is obsolete.

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

[QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

I took a 2 day, nationally renowned IQ evaluation in Houston a few years ago. I ended up with a 143. I also scored a 172 out of 180 on the LSAT, which is more or less an intense IQ test, before I went to law school several years back. I'm pretty much a genius.

Mark_the_Lie

What was the name of the program?

Also, IQ tests (and, for that matter, LSATs) aren't a very good measure of intelligence...

It was done at the Johnson O'Connor Research Center. They measure your perception of spatial relations and patterns, your capacity to learn, your ability to teach, and a few other facets of intelligence that aren't normally on standard IQ tests. They then take the percentile that each of your results were in, average them, and give you an intelligence quotient between 0 and 160. Then they do very extensive aptitude testing, which is what they are widely known for, to give you a solid idea of what your strengths and weaknesses are. But the IQ test they give prior to the aptitude testing is one of the most comprehensive you can take.

The LSAT is an extremely good indicator of intelligence. Take it, and thet get back to me.

I did an IQ test when I was 13 and I got 142.

[QUOTE="RAMRODtheMASTER"]

Out of curiosity I took there Test For Above Average Abilities and scored a 134. It also told me that I was in the top 5% of the population. I don't really know how to get a picture of the web page like you did or else I'd have it up there. If someone wants to tell me how I'll add it for proof. WhaDIPuN

That's too much trouble. I'll take a picture on my phone and email it to myself.

[QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

What was the name of the program?

Also, IQ tests (and, for that matter, LSATs) aren't a very good measure of intelligence...

GTA_dude

It was done at the Johnson O'Connor Research Center. They measure your perception of spatial relations and patterns, your capacity to learn, your ability to teach, and a few other facets of intelligence that aren't normally on standard IQ tests. They then take the percentile that each of your results were in, average them, and give you an intelligence quotient between 0 and 160. Then they do very extensive aptitude testing, which is what they are widely known for, to give you a solid idea of what your strengths and weaknesses are. But the IQ test they give prior to the aptitude testing is one of the most comprehensive you can take.

The LSAT is an extremely good indicator of intelligence. Take it, and thet get back to me.

[QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

What was the name of the program?

Also, IQ tests (and, for that matter, LSATs) aren't a very good measure of intelligence...

chessmaster1989

It was done at the Johnson O'Connor Research Center. They measure your perception of spatial relations and patterns, your capacity to learn, your ability to teach, and a few other facets of intelligence that aren't normally on standard IQ tests. They then take the percentile that each of your results were in, average them, and give you an intelligence quotient between 0 and 160. Then they do very extensive aptitude testing, which is what they are widely known for, to give you a solid idea of what your strengths and weaknesses are. But the IQ test they give prior to the aptitude testing is one of the most comprehensive you can take.

The LSAT is an extremely good indicator of intelligence. Take it, and thet get back to me.

I have no intention of going to law school, so I'm not going to spend time and energy studying for and taking the LSAT (which, by the way, I still do not accept as a good measure of intelligence). I'm planning to either do graduate work in economics, or to go to business school.

Again, take the LSAT, and get back to me. If you don't believe me and refuse to take it, well, I guess that your issue.

I went to graduate school also. I earned an LL.M. (Master of Laws) after I finished law school. Now I can practice law as an attorney or teach it at an institution as a professor. If you're planning to go through any sort of graduate program, you will have to prep for the GRE. That's another fun exam, though not nearly as difficult as the LSAT. Good luck.

[QUOTE="gotdangit"]

OVER 9000!!!!

hamstergeddon

[QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

[QUOTE="chessmaster1989"]

What was the name of the program?

Also, IQ tests (and, for that matter, LSATs) aren't a very good measure of intelligence...

GTA_dude

It was done at the Johnson O'Connor Research Center. They measure your perception of spatial relations and patterns, your capacity to learn, your ability to teach, and a few other facets of intelligence that aren't normally on standard IQ tests. They then take the percentile that each of your results were in, average them, and give you an intelligence quotient between 0 and 160. Then they do very extensive aptitude testing, which is what they are widely known for, to give you a solid idea of what your strengths and weaknesses are. But the IQ test they give prior to the aptitude testing is one of the most comprehensive you can take.

The LSAT is an extremely good indicator of intelligence. Take it, and then get back to me.

I'd like to point out that in your attempt to arbitrarily point out a typo I made, you accidentally typed a period outside of the quotation marks that you put around the word "then." As a rule, periods always go inside of quotation marks, no matter the grammatical situation.

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"][QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

It was done at the Johnson O'Connor Research Center. They measure your perception of spatial relations and patterns, your capacity to learn, your ability to teach, and a few other facets of intelligence that aren't normally on standard IQ tests. They then take the percentile that each of your results were in, average them, and give you an intelligence quotient between 0 and 160. Then they do very extensive aptitude testing, which is what they are widely known for, to give you a solid idea of what your strengths and weaknesses are. But the IQ test they give prior to the aptitude testing is one of the most comprehensive you can take.

The LSAT is an extremely good indicator of intelligence. Take it, and then get back to me.

Mark_the_Lie

I'd like to point out that in your attempt to arbitrarily point out a typo I made, you accidentally typed a period outside of the quotation marks that you put around the word "then." As a rule, periods always go inside of quotation marks, no matter the grammatical situation.

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"][QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

It was done at the Johnson O'Connor Research Center. They measure your perception of spatial relations and patterns, your capacity to learn, your ability to teach, and a few other facets of intelligence that aren't normally on standard IQ tests. They then take the percentile that each of your results were in, average them, and give you an intelligence quotient between 0 and 160. Then they do very extensive aptitude testing, which is what they are widely known for, to give you a solid idea of what your strengths and weaknesses are. But the IQ test they give prior to the aptitude testing is one of the most comprehensive you can take.

The LSAT is an extremely good indicator of intelligence. Take it, and thet get back to me.

Teenaged

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"][QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

It was done at the Johnson O'Connor Research Center. They measure your perception of spatial relations and patterns, your capacity to learn, your ability to teach, and a few other facets of intelligence that aren't normally on standard IQ tests. They then take the percentile that each of your results were in, average them, and give you an intelligence quotient between 0 and 160. Then they do very extensive aptitude testing, which is what they are widely known for, to give you a solid idea of what your strengths and weaknesses are. But the IQ test they give prior to the aptitude testing is one of the most comprehensive you can take.

The LSAT is an extremely good indicator of intelligence. Take it, and then get back to me.

Mark_the_Lie

I'd like to point out that in your attempt to arbitrarily point out a typo I made, you accidentally typed a period outside of the quotation marks that you put around the word "then." As a rule, periods always go inside of quotation marks, no matter the grammatical situation.

And I also didn't say that I am a genius. I said that I am average, and I am ok with admiting it.

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"] I'd like to point out that even though you are such a genius, you misspelled "then". The "t" is no where near the "n" key.....GTA_dude

How could I make that mistake? Well, I usually don't make any grammatical mistakes. That is to say that when I type something, it's almost always perfect; I normally don't have to check it twice. I will grant you that I typed a "t" instead of an "n." It was a mistake.

You could say that I make so few grammatical mistakes, I'm actually more likely to miss it if I do make one. Thankfully, as was the case when I wrote for American Political Science Review or The Saint Mary's Law Journal, catching those minor mistakes is the job of the editor.

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]Oh come on, that correction is lame. :P

Mark_the_Lie

How could I make that mistake? Well, I usually don't make any grammatical mistakes. That is to say that when I type something, it's almost always perfect; I normally don't have to check it twice. I will grant you that I typed a "t" instead of an "n." It was a mistake.

You could say that I make so few grammatical mistakes, I'm actually more likely to miss it if I do make one. Thankfully, as was the case when I wrote for American Political Science Review or The Saint Mary's Law Journal, catching those minor mistakes is the job of the editor.

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"]

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]Oh come on, that correction is lame. :P

Mark_the_Lie

How could I make that mistake? Well, I usually don't make any grammatical mistakes. That is to say that when I type something, it's almost always perfect; I normally don't have to check it twice. I will grant you that I typed a "t" instead of an "n." It was a mistake.

You could say that I make so few grammatical mistakes, I'm actually more likely to miss it if I do make one. Thankfully, as was the case when I wrote for American Political Science Review or The Saint Mary's Law Journal, catching those minor mistakes is the job of the editor.

GTA_dude

c´mon, be nice. :/

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"]BiancaDK

c´mon, be nice. :/

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]

I'd like to point out that even though you are such a genius, you misspelled "then". The "t" is no where near the "n" key.....GTA_dude

But geniuses don't make mistakes. GTA_dude

Of course they do. >_>

I did an IQ test 2 years ago and got 109, so its not high, though supposidly above average.

but I think IQ tests dont show real intellegence, I know people who have a higher IQ then me and yet are not as smart as me.

[QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"] I'm big on grammar and spelling. Seriously, how could he make that mistake and not notice?

T_P_O

How could I make that mistake? Well, I usually don't make any grammatical mistakes. That is to say that when I type something, it's almost always perfect; I normally don't have to check it twice. I will grant you that I typed a "t" instead of an "n." It was a mistake.

You could say that I make so few grammatical mistakes, I'm actually more likely to miss it if I do make one. Thankfully, as was the case when I wrote for American Political Science Review or The Saint Mary's Law Journal, catching those minor mistakes is the job of the editor.

Gamespot is extremely far left, as is most of the political science literature out there. Most of what I wrote were moderate discussions on the politics of private property, or discussions about how the energy industry is being used as a political tool. I wrote about the constitution, its relationship to state laws, and how their interaction affects more micro-level political issues. It is possible to write moderate or neutral pieces for a poli-sci journal, but they definitely won't publish much conservative literature. Just because I'm conservative, however, doesn't mean I can't find common ground to write about.

[QUOTE="Teenaged"]Oh come on, that correction is lame. :P

I don't trust IQ tests, especially ones on the internet.

dog64

[QUOTE="_7h0m_"][QUOTE="GTA_dude"] I'm big on grammar and spelling. Seriously, how could he make that mistake and not notice?

GTA_dude

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"]

But geniuses don't make mistakes. Theokhoth

Of course they do. >_>

I took four IQ tests when i was young,on two i scored in top 2% of population on one i scored on par with a chimp remaining one told me average .Tests are either crap or i am able to turn half of my brain off at will :shock:

[QUOTE="T_P_O"][QUOTE="Mark_the_Lie"]

How could I make that mistake? Well, I usually don't make any grammatical mistakes. That is to say that when I type something, it's almost always perfect; I normally don't have to check it twice. I will grant you that I typed a "t" instead of an "n." It was a mistake.

You could say that I make so few grammatical mistakes, I'm actually more likely to miss it if I do make one. Thankfully, as was the case when I wrote for American Political Science Review or The Saint Mary's Law Journal, catching those minor mistakes is the job of the editor.

Mark_the_Lie

Gamespot is extremely far left, as is most of the political science literature out there. Most of what I wrote were moderate discussions on the politics of private property, or discussions about how the energy industry is being used as a political tool. I wrote about the constitution, its relationship to state laws, and how their interaction affects more micro-level political issues. It is possible to write moderate or neutral pieces for a poli-sci journal, but they definitely won't publish much conservative literature. Just because I'm conservative, however, doesn't mean I can't find common ground to write about.

[QUOTE="GTA_dude"][QUOTE="_7h0m_"] No you're not: You keep writing "and" after commas._7h0m_

No, you get yours straight. Haven't you ever heard of the serial comma?

I'd like to point out that you have little humility.

T_P_O