Will MJ be remembered as the king of pop, or the black/white paeodophile with a primate fetish
Discuss
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Will MJ be remembered as the king of pop, or the black/white paeodophile with a primate fetish
Discuss
They never proved he was a pedophile.GAMESHARQ
??? He confessed on national television that he took them to bed with him.
He'll be remembered for his music. Like it or not.Wilfred_Owen
This. I think people will want to discredit him now that he's dead but his legacy is too strong for it to happen.
Kinda like Elvis only 10 times better.
[QUOTE="GAMESHARQ"]They never proved he was a pedophile.Oleg_Huzwog
??? He confessed on national television that he took them to bed with him.
that statment is taken out of context...
King of Pop.
All the radio stations around my area are playing his music, whether it fits into the genre they normally play or not.
King of Pop in my book. They never proved he was a pedophile.GAMESHARQThen why was he in bed with young children? I will remember him not for his music that is for sure.
[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]
[QUOTE="GAMESHARQ"]They never proved he was a pedophile.xxxAdvocatexxx
??? He confessed on national television that he took them to bed with him.
that statment is taken out of context...
He slept... with children... in the same bed... under the same sheets... REPEATEDLY.
Under what context could that NOT make you say "what the hell"?
He will be remembered for his outstanding Talent and Prior Charisma. You guys have to remember he had a skin disease called Viltigo. He did not "bleach" himself just to look white. Anyway I will always be a fan of his and he will remain my fav artist of all time. RIP Michael.
He will be remembered for by his death till a couple months pass and people go Micheal who?
CoolSkAGuy
Completely wrong. Yes, people will obviously forget the man who made the best selling album of all time :roll:
[QUOTE="xxxAdvocatexxx"]
[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]
??? He confessed on national television that he took them to bed with him.
Oleg_Huzwog
that statment is taken out of context...
He slept... with children... in the same bed... under the same sheets... REPEATEDLY.
Under what context could that NOT make you say what the hell?
Yeah I wonder if the guy down the street was doing that if it would be considered okay. You know because he didn't sing some songs.he's not a pedo and his private amusement park he built it for the kids. You see MJ had a bad childhood and never got to experience any of those things a child should and to experience it with other kids. I guess it hit him when he was older so that he could spend time with kkids and experience the things he should have. Granted it's a little bit disturbing but it can be justified.
[QUOTE="xxxAdvocatexxx"]
[QUOTE="Oleg_Huzwog"]
??? He confessed on national television that he took them to bed with him.
Oleg_Huzwog
that statment is taken out of context...
He slept... with children... in the same bed... under the same sheets... REPEATEDLY.
Under what context could that NOT make you say what the hell?
MJ had adult issues. He never grew up. That's why he liked kids, not because he was a perv.
MJ had adult issues. He never grew up. That's why he liked kids, not because he was a perv.Mikey132
Correction: MJ had adult issues. He never grew up. Which is WHY he became a perv.
Yes and he gave them wine because he didn't have wine as a child....:|he's not a pedo and his private amusement park he built it for the kids. You see MJ had a bad childhood and never got to experience any of those things a child should and to experience it with other kids. I guess it hit him when he was older so that he could spend time with kkids and experience the things he should have. Granted it's a little bit disturbing but it can be justified.
Trinners
He had so much plastic surgery that they are going to melt him down and turn him into lego's so that kids can play with him for a chance.clash76-grungerI may not be able to look at legos the same way. :lol: :cry:
Then why was he in bed with young children? I will remember him not for his music that is for sure.[QUOTE="GAMESHARQ"]King of Pop in my book. They never proved he was a pedophile.LJS9502_basic
I don't know but he never did anything bad to any kids. It was never proven he did so I don't believe he did.
All I have to say is if someone really molested my kid, no amount of money would stop me from going after him. The family took 20 million and decided nothing happen, then the kid tried to get another 60 million which he lost the case. Then every other family that he ever made contact with their kid came with their hands out, not one of them said "I want to see this guy put to justice". Sound fishy to me.
Then why was he in bed with young children? I will remember him not for his music that is for sure.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
[QUOTE="GAMESHARQ"]King of Pop in my book. They never proved he was a pedophile.joshrocks2245
I don't know but he never did anything bad to any kids. It was never proven he did so I don't believe he did.
Just because it wasn't proven doesn't mean he didn't.Yes and he gave them wine because he didn't have wine as a child....:|[QUOTE="Trinners"]
he's not a pedo and his private amusement park he built it for the kids. You see MJ had a bad childhood and never got to experience any of those things a child should and to experience it with other kids. I guess it hit him when he was older so that he could spend time with kkids and experience the things he should have. Granted it's a little bit disturbing but it can be justified.
LJS9502_basic
And this is wrong how? :|
Then why was he in bed with young children? I will remember him not for his music that is for sure.[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
[QUOTE="GAMESHARQ"]King of Pop in my book. They never proved he was a pedophile.joshrocks2245
I don't know but he never did anything bad to any kids. It was never proven he did so I don't believe he did.
Because it wasn't proven means the jury didn't want to believe the word of the child. It was a celebrity and they RARELY get convicted. That does NOT mean he was innocent. Just that the state couldn't prove it's case. Seriously, there was more than one accusation.Yes and he gave them wine because he didn't have wine as a child....:| He was found innocent of intoxicating a minor on 2 counts meaning it was never actually proven he gave them wine.[QUOTE="Trinners"]
he's not a pedo and his private amusement park he built it for the kids. You see MJ had a bad childhood and never got to experience any of those things a child should and to experience it with other kids. I guess it hit him when he was older so that he could spend time with kkids and experience the things he should have. Granted it's a little bit disturbing but it can be justified.
LJS9502_basic
[QUOTE="joshrocks2245"][QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Then why was he in bed with young children? I will remember him not for his music that is for sure.
DrSponge
I don't know but he never did anything bad to any kids. It was never proven he did so I don't believe he did.
Just because it wasn't proven doesn't mean he didn't.but as far as we know he didn't. No proof means the claim is dismissed.
It is fishy, but the guy's general behavior kind of made him an easy target in that regard IMO.All I have to say is if someone really molested my kid, no amount of money would stop me from going after him. The family took 20 million and decided nothing happen, then the kid tried to get another 60 million which he lost the case. Then every other family that he ever made contact with their kid came with their hands out, not one of them said "I want to see this guy put to justice". Sound fishy to me.
Ace_WondersX
And an innocent person doesn't cave to blackmail.;)All I have to say is if someone really molested my kid, no amount of money would stop me from going after him. The family took 20 million and decided nothing happen, then the kid tried to get another 60 million which he lost the case. Then every other family that he ever made contact with their kid came with their hands out, not one of them said "I want to see this guy put to justice". Sound fishy to me.
Ace_WondersX
Just because it wasn't proven doesn't mean he didn't.[QUOTE="DrSponge"][QUOTE="joshrocks2245"]
I don't know but he never did anything bad to any kids. It was never proven he did so I don't believe he did.
Trinners
but as far as we know he didn't. No proof means the claim is dismissed.
Dismissed legally. From a philosophical point of view, just because something isn't proved, doesn't mean it's not true.[QUOTE="Mikey132"]MJ had adult issues. He never grew up. That's why he liked kids, not because he was a perv.
Oleg_Huzwog
Correction: MJ had adult issues. He never grew up. Which is WHY he became a perv.
So liking all the things that kids do makessomeone a perv?
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Yes and he gave them wine because he didn't have wine as a child....:| He was found innocent of intoxicating a minor on 2 counts meaning it was never actually proven he gave them wine.How exactly would you prove that after the fact? People that worked for him did say he gave the wine. He called it Jesus juice. Nothing the state can do if no one comes forward though. With all the various allegations I don't get the unshakable belief in him.[QUOTE="Trinners"]
he's not a pedo and his private amusement park he built it for the kids. You see MJ had a bad childhood and never got to experience any of those things a child should and to experience it with other kids. I guess it hit him when he was older so that he could spend time with kkids and experience the things he should have. Granted it's a little bit disturbing but it can be justified.
Ace_WondersX
I remember him as the king of pop and the black/white paeodophile with a primate fetish. Generally I think people will remember him for his music.Will MJ be remembered as the king of pop, or the black/white paeodophile with a primate fetish
Discuss
ace-of-spades93
[QUOTE="joshrocks2245"]
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Then why was he in bed with young children? I will remember him not for his music that is for sure.
LJS9502_basic
I don't know but he never did anything bad to any kids. It was never proven he did so I don't believe he did.
Because it wasn't proven means the jury didn't want to believe the word of the child. It was a celebrity and they RARELY get convicted. That does NOT mean he was innocent. Just that the state couldn't prove it's case. Seriously, there was more than one accusation.Lots of people accuse famous people of crimes, thats how they get their 15 minutes of fame and get a chance to be rich by getting money from the celebrity. I believe he was innocent, I really don't think he could have done anything bad to kids.
Hes not like a big guy, and most kids probably weight more then him. So I doubt he did anything bad to kids.
And an innocent person doesn't cave to blackmail.;)[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"]
All I have to say is if someone really molested my kid, no amount of money would stop me from going after him. The family took 20 million and decided nothing happen, then the kid tried to get another 60 million which he lost the case. Then every other family that he ever made contact with their kid came with their hands out, not one of them said "I want to see this guy put to justice". Sound fishy to me.
LJS9502_basic
A guy with a good legal staff that knows he'll lose if 5 different families make the same accusation will.
Just because it wasn't proven doesn't mean he didn't.[QUOTE="DrSponge"][QUOTE="joshrocks2245"]
I don't know but he never did anything bad to any kids. It was never proven he did so I don't believe he did.
Trinners
but as far as we know he didn't. No proof means the claim is dismissed.
There was proof but the jury opted not to believe it. Nonetheless, not being able to prove something does not mean it didn't happen.[QUOTE="Trinners"][QUOTE="DrSponge"] Just because it wasn't proven doesn't mean he didn't. DrSponge
but as far as we know he didn't. No proof means the claim is dismissed.
Dismissed legally. From a philosophical point of view, just because something isn't proved, doesn't mean it's not true.it's a good thing courts don't have to deal with philosophical point of views then or else we won't get anywhere.
And an innocent person doesn't cave to blackmail.;)[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]
[QUOTE="Ace_WondersX"]
All I have to say is if someone really molested my kid, no amount of money would stop me from going after him. The family took 20 million and decided nothing happen, then the kid tried to get another 60 million which he lost the case. Then every other family that he ever made contact with their kid came with their hands out, not one of them said "I want to see this guy put to justice". Sound fishy to me.
Ace_WondersX
A guy with a good legal staff that knows he'll lose if 5 different families make the same accusation will.
The last family turned down the money for court....[QUOTE="clash76-grunger"]He had so much plastic surgery that they are going to melt him down and turn him into lego's so that kids can play with him for a chance.raven_squadI may not be able to look at legos the same way. :lol: :cry: There is going to be $1000 MJ Lego Adventure Set. Baseball bat included!
[QUOTE="Trinners"]
[QUOTE="DrSponge"] Just because it wasn't proven doesn't mean he didn't. LJS9502_basic
but as far as we know he didn't. No proof means the claim is dismissed.
There was proof but the jury opted not to believe it. Nonetheless, not being able to prove something does not mean it didn't happen.if the jury didn't believe it, the proof must not have been very compelling.
Dismissed legally. From a philosophical point of view, just because something isn't proved, doesn't mean it's not true.[QUOTE="DrSponge"][QUOTE="Trinners"]
but as far as we know he didn't. No proof means the claim is dismissed.
Trinners
it's a good thing courts don't have to deal with philosophical point of views then or else we won't get anywhere.
I didn't say that they should. I was pointing out a mistake in the post.Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment