This topic is locked from further discussion.
[QUOTE="TheAngryPelican"]I only want two so if I have anymore than two I will put up all of the kids I have after that up for adoption.rawsavonI would think having a competition to see who is worth to stay a better idea than that A battle royale?
None or two. I'm still in school and marriage isn't in my plans for the forseeeable future so I haven't really given this much thought. It would be something my future wife and I would obviously have to discuss.
[QUOTE="TheAngryPelican"]I only want two so if I have anymore than two I will put up all of the kids I have after that up for adoption.worlock77
Or you could take steps to ensure that you don't have anymore than that, rather than creating more children then abandoning them.
I am not going to do that, I would want in the future to be able to have more children if change my mind.[QUOTE="TheAngryPelican"]I only want two so if I have anymore than two I will put up all of the kids I have after that up for adoption.rawsavonI would think having a competition to see who is worth to stay a better idea than thatThat is a good idea, so are you suggesting only keeping two of the fittest kids and have the others fight to the death ?
zero no interest in children or anything they do if i do it will be in my thirties because if what career i want plus i want to experience life before childs
[QUOTE="worlock77"][QUOTE="TheAngryPelican"]I only want two so if I have anymore than two I will put up all of the kids I have after that up for adoption.TheAngryPelican
Or you could take steps to ensure that you don't have anymore than that, rather than creating more children then abandoning them.
I am not going to do that, I would want in the future to be able to have more children if change my mind.So you'd leave a bunch of children parentless to become wards of the state and a burden on society, or to be raised in foster homes under God knows what kind of conditions, rather than take some personal responsibility?
Welcome to America! :DSo you'd leave a bunch of children parentless to become wards of the state and a burden on society, or to be raised in foster homes under God knows what kind of conditions, rather than take some personal responsibility?
worlock77
I am not going to do that, I would want in the future to be able to have more children if change my mind.[QUOTE="TheAngryPelican"][QUOTE="worlock77"]
Or you could take steps to ensure that you don't have anymore than that, rather than creating more children then abandoning them.
worlock77
So you'd leave a bunch of children parentless to become wards of the state and a burden on society, or to be raised in foster homes under God knows what kind of conditions, rather than take some personal responsibility?
I would not be that cruel, I would personally screen adoptive parents and find them a home before they would be born.[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="TheAngryPelican"]I only want two so if I have anymore than two I will put up all of the kids I have after that up for adoption.TheAngryPelicanI would think having a competition to see who is worth to stay a better idea than thatThat is a good idea, so are you suggesting only keeping two of the fittest kids and have the others fight to the death ? They all fight to the death...you keep the last two standing. You can always make more combatants
[QUOTE="TheAngryPelican"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] I would think having a competition to see who is worth to stay a better idea than thatrawsavonThat is a good idea, so are you suggesting only keeping two of the fittest kids and have the others fight to the death ? They all fight to the death...you keep the last two standing. You can always make more combatantsGenius ! Do you have any more genius ideas ? I mean I never would of thought about that, I was just about to give them up for adoption and out of no where you came up with this idea !
[QUOTE="rawsavon"][QUOTE="TheAngryPelican"]That is a good idea, so are you suggesting only keeping two of the fittest kids and have the others fight to the death ? TheAngryPelicanThey all fight to the death...you keep the last two standing. You can always make more combatantsGenius ! Do you have any more genius ideas ? I mean I never would of thought about that, I was just about to give them up for adoption and out of no where you came up with this idea ! Why not grind up the winners and feed them to the losers to transfer their superiority, and continue this process until you have ubermensches?
I am not really into cleaning up other people's messes ... Nah, I'll let that one sail on by :P[QUOTE="DaBlastaMasta"]I think I would adopt.
rawsavon
I am not really into cleaning up other people's messes[QUOTE="DaBlastaMasta"]I think I would adopt.
rawsavon
Did you just call my future family a mess? How dare you! :x:P
But seriously, adoption just seems like the best option for me.
[QUOTE="rawsavon"]
[QUOTE="DaBlastaMasta"]I think I would adopt.
I am not really into cleaning up other people's messesDid you just call my future family a mess? How dare you! :x:P
But seriously, adoption just seems like the best option for me.
Well I wish I was able to make a mess for you to cean up then :PNone.
After having the worst father ever i think i would do a pretty good job though. I just dont see myself meeting a woman whom i would want to be the mother of my children.
[QUOTE="TheAngryPelican"][QUOTE="rawsavon"] I would think having a competition to see who is worth to stay a better idea than thatrawsavonThat is a good idea, so are you suggesting only keeping two of the fittest kids and have the others fight to the death ? They all fight to the death...you keep the last two standing. You can always make more combatants
This is awesome! Reminds me of the spartans in 300. Plus it ensures you get plenty of "special hugs" time to make all the combatants.
Just remember to name your kids with Street Fighterish names like Zangief :D Nothing worse than a DEATHMATCH BLOODBATH ROYALE between Terence and Geoffrey. Lol
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment