[QUOTE="carrot-cake"]
[QUOTE="foxhound_fox"]
What about Eris? Its bigger than Pluto, has its own moon and orbits the Sun at a distance three times that of Pluto.topsemag55
NOPE NOPE NOPE, Im smarter than the scientists and I know a thing or two about planets, and thats that Pluto is one.
Alan Stern is involved with a satellite fly-by of Pluto, which will occur in 2015. He disagrees with the IAU's third criteria for calling a planet.
Here are the three criteria the IAU came up with in 2006 for an object to be called a planet:
1. The object must be in orbit around the Sun.
2. The object must be massive enough to be a sphere by its own gravitational force. More specifically, its own gravity should pull it into a shape of hydrostatic equilibrium.
3. It must have cleared the neighbourhood around its orbit.
Alan Stern, principal investigator with NASA's New Horizons mission to Pluto, has publicly derided the IAU resolution, stating that "the definition stinks, for technical reasons." Stern's contention is that by the terms of the new definition Earth, Mars, Jupiter, and Neptune, all of which share their orbits with asteroids, would be excluded.
You do realise that I'm kidding right? :P
Log in to comment