Lets say 15 years down the line scientists have the technology and resources to create artificial humans from exisiting DNA of dead humansJust-Breathe
I believe they already have that. And they're just choosing not to use it. I'd think the cndition of the person the DNA came from wouldn't matter, as long as the DNA's valid.
[QUOTE="Just-Breathe"]Lets say 15 years down the line scientists have the technology and resources to create artificial humans from exisiting DNA of dead humansRisethNameless
I believe they already have that. And they're just choosing not to use it. I'd think the cndition of the person the DNA came from wouldn't matter, as long as the DNA's valid. My thought exactly, if we can already clone animals, plants, humans can't be more complicated. It has to do with moral values, I assume.
I don't think the creation of a human through such means should be taken lightly. Have a psychiatric evaluation mandatory and have to go through the government before being given permission. However I think using cloning to replicate organs would be/is great. Takes a heavy burden off of the healthcare system and ensures the organ will be accepted without any issue. You could also remove or at least severely lighten the load on blood donations. Theoretically it would allow the creation of replacement limbs as well.
hell yea clone, i already think we should be pumping sperm from our leading astrophysicists and shipping it to a sperm bank like milk to a convenience store.
"Mommy, who's my dad?" "Sorry sweetie, you don't have one." Great. This wouldn't be traumatic for a child to learn. I don't even want to begin taking into consideration the ethical implications cloning brings to the table. One more thing to be prejudiced against. F*ck f*ck f*ck no.
You can't clone someone like that. You can make a copy of their DNA, but their memories, experiences, etc. can't be cloned. You can't make the same person from their DNA, the best is that you could make a identical twin.
[QUOTE="MirkoS77"]"Mommy, who's my dad?" "Sorry sweetie, you don't have one." Great. This wouldn't be traumatic for a child to learn. I don't even want to begin taking into consideration the ethical implications cloning brings to the table. One more thing to be prejudiced against. F*ck f*ck f*ck no.
I dunno how traumatic that'd be... I'd not freak out, sure I'm no kid anymore, but I don't think it'd cause me to have freaked out when I was little, especially before I understood how the whole procreation thing worked.
I don't really see a purpose for an actual clone, but I don't see a problem with artificial insemination with synthetic or non-synthetic DNA, the result of either is a valid human.
I can only see terrifying scenarios coming from this.
Dy_WarriorsXoXo
Replacement organs, very scary... Increased human lifespan must be bad right?
If they can clone a sperm than we could eliminate men and the world would experience alot less violent crime.
And the world will be much easier on the eyes! :lol:
But, that means I have to either: Die, Get a sex change or... ? There's that immortality thread, I wanna take that route, so death isn't an option :cry:
There is no poin tin cloning, experiences remains a vital in the prices in life. A clone is simply a new human being that looks exactly the same. If I could upload my consciousness on the Internet and then download myself in these clones, now that would be a nice start of a new world order.
Log in to comment