This topic is locked from further discussion.
Nope. As much as I like Trent Reznors version, Johnny Cash gave that song an intangible wisdom and powerful meaning that Trent could never bring. You can feel the pain and remorse when Johnny Cash sings that song.
Theyre both awesome.
NIN deserves credit for creating the song.
However, from a performance standpoint, I'd say theyre equal.
no good music ever came from nin or cashbuckwildbob
They need to put a bangin' donk on it. Then their music would be sick, arrrgh.
Nope. As much as I like Trent Reznors version, Johnny Cash gave that song an intangible wisdom and powerful meaning that Trent could never bring. You can feel the pain and remorse when Johnny Cash sings that song.
warbmxjohn
Agreed. There is an ancient, somber "earthen" tone to Cash when he sings it. I even like his decision to change the onecurse word to "Thorns". It fit Cash's style better.
Reznor = new, acute pain
Cash = old, weary pain
I thought the original was better. Not to say Johnny Cash did a poor a job covering it. His cover was great in it's own way. I just prefer NINs.
I don't know why people think Johnny Cash's cover was better. It actually sucks. He made it boring, and...old.gewbjewbI don't think Cash's was boring, it's actually my favorite cash song because NIN's is so good.
Same. I don't think Cash's version would've had as much impact had he done it when he was younger. But because he was in the twilight of his career, and because of the type of history he had, it made his version very deep and haunting. The words felt like they we're his. ( well except the crown of thorns part...boo:P) That said, the original is still solid, and a great song to play when feeling down.I personally like both for different reasons.
kayn83
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment