I got a question for all you Catholic Democrates out there...

  • 78 results
  • 1
  • 2

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#51 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts
[QUOTE="Lord__Darkstorn"]

The way I see it:

Abortion=destroying ONE life.

Not getting an abortion=destryoing 2+ lives.

The baby would grow up in a tense or broken household, and the mother wouldn't be able to balance school with caring for a child. She will make a very low income for the rest of her life, and the baby will be born into a low income household, from which it is hard to get out of without a college education (rags to riches is extrememly rare, btw). That's the way I see it.

x_Martyr_x

your views disgust me. who are you to decide who is too poor to live?

In an abortion scenario, I don't think that he would be the one actually making the decision.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180031

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 LJS9502_basic  Online
Member since 2003 • 180031 Posts

Single issue voting is never a good idea. Not all Democrats are pro-abortion.

Avatar image for EMOEVOLUTION
EMOEVOLUTION

8998

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 EMOEVOLUTION
Member since 2008 • 8998 Posts
I feel bad for anyone who isn't pro choice.
Avatar image for htekemerald
htekemerald

7325

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#54 htekemerald
Member since 2004 • 7325 Posts
America is in a major finacial crisis, involved in two wars, and has an ever increasing debt load. BUT NO IGNORE THOSE and vote based on abortion polcies.
Avatar image for Eman5805
Eman5805

4494

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#55 Eman5805
Member since 2004 • 4494 Posts

Funny, I've always thought of Catholics as more likely to be Republicans, anyway.

Now Baptists on the other hand...

Avatar image for x_Martyr_x
x_Martyr_x

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#56 x_Martyr_x
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts

well I'm not Catholic but I am Christian and i am pro choiceSerraph105

Thou shall not kill.

Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#57 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

[QUOTE="Serraph105"]well I'm not Catholic but I am Christian and i am pro choicex_Martyr_x

Thou shall not kill.

That's the whole point, if pro-choicers really thought that this was killing, they wouldn't be in favour of it.

Avatar image for x_Martyr_x
x_Martyr_x

839

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#58 x_Martyr_x
Member since 2008 • 839 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] It is ironic to see alot of these people who claim to be "pro-life" have no real problems with war or the death penalty.. -Jiggles-

Pro-life =/= pacifism. Ad hominem.

Pro-life is to suggst you are for all life.. Why is the death penalty and War not a issue that should be under that? And I am not ad hominem I am just pointing out.. Perhapes you should just turn your self to you lknow, anti abortion approach? When you use pro-life its to insinuate that you find all life sacred.. If that is so why arn't these people against the death penalty and war?

Capital punishment is a sensitive issue, and I am personally against it, but there are simply some cases where the criminal cannot possibly contribute any redeeming factors to society. Keeping him locked up inside a prison for life may be more justifiable than sending him straight to the gallows, but that's opinion-based and could differ from person to person. I'm not afraid to admit that some people simply need to be killed.

War is not simply about senseless killing as you may portray it to be, because many wars are fought with the intentions of protecting the citizens of it's land, preventing more lives from being lost than if they simply didn't go to war whatsoever. World War II was a horrific war that led to the deaths of millions of people, but there would have been millions upon millions of more casualties if the Allied Forces simply sat back and drank lemonade while Nazi Germany had their way with eastern Europe and the Jewish inhabitants of said area.

No wars are justifiable. Especially not World War 2. Corporate America had every intention of going to war, and when it was said and done, an elite few had a chokehold on the US and britain. And since you want to bring up WW2 it might interest some to know, guess who else thought that they had the right to decide who lived or died? the nazis. they would burn jews in ovens believing that they were evolutionarily equivellent to dog-humans.

and to those of you crying about the victims of incest and rape; get real. woman get abortions all the time, its become a cheap tactic used by the sexually irresponsible. besides that, i ask you, what does the rape victim gain by killing the baby? can she not give it up for adoption?

Avatar image for ragek1ll589
ragek1ll589

8650

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#59 ragek1ll589
Member since 2007 • 8650 Posts

Democratic/Liberal Catholic here.

I don't think abortion should be used as a form of birth control, which unfortunately it is these days. However I think the option to getting an abortion should be available in case the mothers life is threatened or it is a case of rape/incest.

Remember, pro choice does not mean pro abortion.

Avatar image for MetalGear_Ninty
MetalGear_Ninty

6337

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#60 MetalGear_Ninty
Member since 2008 • 6337 Posts
I suppose if you were a catholic, pro-choice views held by a lot of democrat candidates could pose a problem.
Avatar image for dsmccracken
dsmccracken

7307

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#61 dsmccracken
Member since 2003 • 7307 Posts

and to those of you crying about the victims of incest and rape; get real. woman get abortions all the time, its become a cheap tactic used by the sexually irresponsible. besides that, i ask you, what does the rape victim gain by killing the baby? can she not give it up for adoption? just admit it, you have no logical reasoning to support pro life.

x_Martyr_x

What does a woman gain from aborting a baby created by rape? Nothing, I guess... except for not having to watch for the next 9 months as the spawn of a monster gestates inside her. As for the last sentence, why would anyone admit anything when they believe that the opposite is true?

Avatar image for comp_atkins
comp_atkins

38922

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#62 comp_atkins
Member since 2005 • 38922 Posts
to me abortion is such a non-issue.. i really do not care what a candidate's views on it are. there are more important things
Avatar image for SamusFreak
SamusFreak

1932

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#63 SamusFreak
Member since 2004 • 1932 Posts
[QUOTE="Lord__Darkstorn"]

The way I see it:

Abortion=destroying ONE life.

Not getting an abortion=destryoing 2+ lives.

The baby would grow up in a tense or broken household(1) , and the mother wouldn't be able to balance school with caring for a child. (2, 3) She will make a very low income for the rest of her life (4), and the baby will be born into a low income household (5), from which it is hard to get out of without a college education (6) (rags to riches is extrememly rare, btw). That's the way I see it.

Theokhoth

That's a lot of unfounded assumptions.

he just going on the assumptyion of what is( I believe it is anyway) the #1 reason abortions happen, which is teen pregnancy.

Avatar image for euphzilla03
euphzilla03

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#64 euphzilla03
Member since 2007 • 395 Posts

I think it's the individuals choice. Don't quote the ten commandments, and don't use God as an argument.It is the individuals choice not yours, not mine, and certainly not the governments!

Avatar image for streak000
streak000

6802

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#65 streak000
Member since 2007 • 6802 Posts

I think it's the individuals choice. Don't quote the ten commandments, and don't use God as an argument.It is the individuals choice not yours, not mine, and certainly not the governments!

euphzilla03

Exactly.

Just a couple of things, pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion. I hate abortion. I've had some personal experience, and it's a downright horrible thing for everyone involved. But it's better than having a child you have no means or desire to care for. It's also better than destroying the rest of your life because of a few moments of stupidity. Of course, many people would think differently, which is why there is CHOICE. If you don't want an abortion, noone is forcing you to have one.

I know it's been said before, but anti-abortion activists ARE NOT pro-life. Most of them are conservative religious nuts, many of whom don't think anything of taking lives in other circumstances. Anyone who calls themselves pro-life, but supports the Iraq war and the death penalty is a massive hypocrite, not deserving of being taken seriously.

Avatar image for illegalimigrant
illegalimigrant

1402

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 illegalimigrant
Member since 2008 • 1402 Posts
[QUOTE="euphzilla03"]

I think it's the individuals choice. Don't quote the ten commandments, and don't use God as an argument.It is the individuals choice not yours, not mine, and certainly not the governments!

streak000

Exactly.

Just a couple of things, pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion. I hate abortion. I've had some personal experience, and it's a downright horrible thing for everyone involved. But it's better than having a child you have no means or desire to care for. It's also better than destroying the rest of your life because of a few moments of stupidity. Of course, many people would think differently, which is why there is CHOICE. If you don't want an abortion, noone is forcing you to have one.

I know it's been said before, but anti-abortion activists ARE NOT pro-life. Most of them are conservative religious nuts, many of whom don't think anything of taking lives in other circumstances. Anyone who calls themselves pro-life, but supports the Iraq war and the death penalty is a massive hypocrite, not deserving of being taken seriously.

Well said.

Avatar image for darkmoney52
darkmoney52

4332

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#67 darkmoney52
Member since 2004 • 4332 Posts
[QUOTE="Sajo7"]

Please don't. Abortion is really a nonissue when it comes to public figures, I'd rather they spent time on more important things.

Theokhoth

There is nothing more important than protecting the lives and rights of the people.

Neither candidate will actually change laws reguarding abortion. Oboma does not have the support for his more extreme views, and McCain's views on abortion are dishonest(As anyone who followed him during his last presidential run knows.) Also, from what I can tell the president does not have authority on the issue anyway, other than appointing Judges. And even then a case has to go to the judges for them to overturn Roe V Wade.

Avatar image for Tolwan
Tolwan

2575

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#68 Tolwan
Member since 2003 • 2575 Posts
[QUOTE="euphzilla03"]

I think it's the individuals choice. Don't quote the ten commandments, and don't use God as an argument.It is the individuals choice not yours, not mine, and certainly not the governments!

streak000

Exactly.

Just a couple of things, pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion. I hate abortion. I've had some personal experience, and it's a downright horrible thing for everyone involved. But it's better than having a child you have no means or desire to care for. It's also better than destroying the rest of your life because of a few moments of stupidity. Of course, many people would think differently, which is why there is CHOICE. If you don't want an abortion, noone is forcing you to have one.

I know it's been said before, but anti-abortion activists ARE NOT pro-life. Most of them are conservative religious nuts, many of whom don't think anything of taking lives in other circumstances. Anyone who calls themselves pro-life, but supports the Iraq war and the death penalty is a massive hypocrite, not deserving of being taken seriously.

Question for you. I grab a gun, i walk outside, and i shoot my kid in the head. Do you say no one has the right to complain about that? No, because its murder. Despite kids of ages 0-2 being of equal intelligence only to an ape, society, and you, consider him a human being with rights. It would be sick of me to ask anyone in our society to ignore that, and leave it to parental consent. Weather or not that kid started hampering them severely financially.

Its the same with abortion. How? Pro-lifers, for the most part, believe life begins at conception. That means, as far as pro-lifers are concerned, Mass genocide is being performed in this country, and you are asking them to disregaurd murder. So, you are doing one of two things here. You are either A) Telling them to ignore mass genocide because the parent is more important than the child, or B) Telling them their beliefs are wrong and should be ignored. Either way, you are not respecting pro-lifers.

It is a serious issue, NEVER forget that. Because for anyone who is a pro-lifer, this country is currently undergoing genocide on a near unprecendented scale.

Avatar image for dlp21
dlp21

2116

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#69 dlp21
Member since 2003 • 2116 Posts

1) The USofA is not founded on Christian Morales or Principles.

2) The President has no way of influencing the Pro-Life/Choice debate

3) The Supreme Court which does influence whether Roe v. Wade is overturned has basically said it won't relook at the case and every state that has tried to come up with some sort of law that is Pro-Life has been overturned.

4) Morale issues should be a non-issue at this point in America with a Failing Economy, Education System, and the reliance on Middle Eastern countries for our oil, and Rapid Global Climate Change.

5) Countries that have laws against abortion have a tendancy to have the same abortion rate that America has. Becuase making them illeagal doesn't make them stop. In fact it eliminates things like clean sterile enviorments, and sometimes fail causing physically and mentally deformed children.

Avatar image for euphzilla03
euphzilla03

395

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#70 euphzilla03
Member since 2007 • 395 Posts
[QUOTE="streak000"][QUOTE="euphzilla03"]

I think it's the individuals choice. Don't quote the ten commandments, and don't use God as an argument.It is the individuals choice not yours, not mine, and certainly not the governments!

Tolwan

Exactly.

Just a couple of things, pro-choice does not mean pro-abortion. I hate abortion. I've had some personal experience, and it's a downright horrible thing for everyone involved. But it's better than having a child you have no means or desire to care for. It's also better than destroying the rest of your life because of a few moments of stupidity. Of course, many people would think differently, which is why there is CHOICE. If you don't want an abortion, noone is forcing you to have one.

I know it's been said before, but anti-abortion activists ARE NOT pro-life. Most of them are conservative religious nuts, many of whom don't think anything of taking lives in other circumstances. Anyone who calls themselves pro-life, but supports the Iraq war and the death penalty is a massive hypocrite, not deserving of being taken seriously.

Question for you. I grab a gun, i walk outside, and i shoot my kid in the head. Do you say no one has the right to complain about that? No, because its murder. Despite kids of ages 0-2 being of equal intelligence only to an ape, society, and you, consider him a human being with rights. It would be sick of me to ask anyone in our society to ignore that, and leave it to parental consent. Weather or not that kid started hampering them severely financially.

Its the same with abortion. How? Pro-lifers, for the most part, believe life begins at conception. That means, as far as pro-lifers are concerned, Mass genocide is being performed in this country, and you are asking them to disregaurd murder. So, you are doing one of two things here. You are either A) Telling them to ignore mass genocide because the parent is more important than the child, or B) Telling them their beliefs are wrong and should be ignored. Either way, you are not respecting pro-lifers.

It is a serious issue, NEVER forget that. Because for anyone who is a pro-lifer, this country is currently undergoing genocide on a near unprecendented scale.

You know respect is a two way street and have pro-lifers really shown any respect to pro-choicers? The people who are pro-choice in the eyes of the church are worse than a monster and will burn for eternity and this can be expressed quite vividly as a few priests and religious people have done so in front of me.and yet this is also the same group that would prefer you not to use birth control or condoms(potentially negating the problem in general if you follow the unwanted child or financial problem train of thought) just be abstinent because that's the way to be. I seem to recall many abortion clinics being attacked or it's workers harassed..wow is that how respect is shown. Does life really begin at conception? Who can say? But blindly trusting in one answer over another is why problems and violence erupt in the first place.

I said what I said for the following reasons 1) it is the parents choice be it for the "right" reasons or the "wrong"reasons(though I do not feel aborting because of some issue of financial means is a reason to abort). 2)As it is their choice they will have to live with the guilt and regret and there could be some repercussions for this action. So if you went out and shot your kids as you so put it you'd suffer the consequences.

I said don't quote the ten commandments or use God as an excuse because not everyone buys into that whole mind set. And to tell someone who doesn't believe in God something ain't right because he said so isn't very fair. Something you don't believe in is telling you it isn't right well I guess we better listen to this thing we don't believe in. And then there is the tried and true it was God's plan well maybe the abortion is God's plan as well? I mean because if it was a case of rape and was God's plan and it has to be if anyone uses the God's plan defense then why wouldn't the abortion figure in as well?

I understand some people out there feel like this is a genocide. Perhaps that label is suited to this. But that's an opinion and an opinion is not always everyones. It may be a serious issue but it is one fought over "morals" and "morals" are an ambiguous creature. And everyone has different "moral standards" do these differences make on person better than another or right? Not always, human beings are never a black and white they are usually a grey area of ambiguity.

Now I'm sure I've been labled a monster for stating these things but I'm not really. I honestly when you come right down to it don't think a child should die. I think abortions are wrong but under certain circumstances they may be the only option. When it comes down to a mothers life vs a childslife or lose them both thats a terrible decision to make. If it were a victim of rape you'd never know how that mother would respond to the child and then the child could be in harms way anyway. Then again it could go the other way and there would never be a problem. It's speculation at best. And to make a judgement on a speculation is a bad idea.

To the person I quoted this from this is not an attack against you and honestly I can see where you're coming from. But with that said I can see both sides to this issue. It comes down to opinions based on morals and a mindset of an individual. I still stick by my answer of it is the individuals choice and noone elses because not everyones morals are held by everyone else and even if there were a ban the abortions would still continue..they happened when it wasn't legal. There is no definite way to stop it..unless you were to somehow strictly opress the people and dictate their every movement. Is it cold for me to have this stance? I suppose but even though I have prolife tendencies this isn't my fight to fight one way or the other. I'm just being practicle.

Avatar image for Dark-Sithious
Dark-Sithious

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 Dark-Sithious
Member since 2008 • 3914 Posts
[QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] It is ironic to see alot of these people who claim to be "pro-life" have no real problems with war or the death penalty.. sSubZerOo

Pro-life =/= pacifism. Ad hominem.

Pro-life is to suggst you are for all life.. Why is the death penalty and War not a issue that should be under that? And I am not ad hominem I am just pointing out.. Perhapes you should just turn your self to you lknow, anti abortion approach? When you use pro-life its to insinuate that you find all life sacred.. If that is so why arn't these people against the death penalty and war?

Yeah I agree, Thekhoth often uses the arguement (as far as i remember), who are we to decide who lives or not?

contradictios ftw

Avatar image for Dark-Sithious
Dark-Sithious

3914

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 Dark-Sithious
Member since 2008 • 3914 Posts

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] It is ironic to see alot of these people who claim to be "pro-life" have no real problems with war or the death penalty.. Theokhoth

Pro-life =/= pacifism. Ad hominem.

As far as I've read it kinda does, as this is their main view: "Any deliberate destruction of human life is considered ethically or morally wrong" That is their main agenda, Quid pro quo.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51561 Posts

Can't be Catholic and pro-abortion.

I hope that Biden's Priest is denying him Communion if he even attends mass.

Avatar image for Chutebox
Chutebox

51561

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#75 Chutebox
Member since 2007 • 51561 Posts

Democratic/Liberal Catholic here.

I don't think abortion should be used as a form of birth control, which unfortunately it is these days. However I think the option to getting an abortion should be available in case the mothers life is threatened or it is a case of rape/incest.

Remember, pro choice does not mean pro abortion.

ragek1ll589

That is the only time it is alright to have an abortion.

Avatar image for MattUD1
MattUD1

20715

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 MattUD1
Member since 2004 • 20715 Posts

Can't be Catholic and pro-abortion.

I hope that Biden's Priest is denying him Communion if he even attends mass.

Chutebox
No person in their right mind would be for abortions. There are situtations which are out of the person's hands which may lead to unwanted pregnancy. Those who are for "pro-abortion" are actually for individual rights. ;)
Avatar image for darkIink
darkIink

2705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#77 darkIink
Member since 2006 • 2705 Posts
[QUOTE="Lord__Darkstorn"]

The way I see it:

Abortion=destroying ONE life.

Not getting an abortion=destryoing 2+ lives.

The baby would grow up in a tense or broken household(1) , and the mother wouldn't be able to balance school with caring for a child. (2, 3) She will make a very low income for the rest of her life (4), and the baby will be born into a low income household (5), from which it is hard to get out of without a college education (6) (rags to riches is extrememly rare, btw). That's the way I see it.

Theokhoth

That's a lot of unfounded assumptions.

but the assumptions he said turn out that way MUCH more often that if he said the opposite in every sentence you put a number next to. After all, most unplanned pregnancies that are in poor families will turn out bad if the poor family can't feed themselves without a baby (what will they do with a baby?).

Avatar image for darkIink
darkIink

2705

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#78 darkIink
Member since 2006 • 2705 Posts
[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"][QUOTE="Theokhoth"]

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"] It is ironic to see alot of these people who claim to be "pro-life" have no real problems with war or the death penalty.. Dark-Sithious

Pro-life =/= pacifism. Ad hominem.

Pro-life is to suggst you are for all life.. Why is the death penalty and War not a issue that should be under that? And I am not ad hominem I am just pointing out.. Perhapes you should just turn your self to you lknow, anti abortion approach? When you use pro-life its to insinuate that you find all life sacred.. If that is so why arn't these people against the death penalty and war?

Yeah I agree, Thekhoth often uses the arguement (as far as i remember), who are we to decide who lives or not?

contradictios ftw

I remember conservatives at an ann coulter supporting her as she said that violence and kiling innocents in iraq is better than being careful to avoid casualties because the "ragheads" are getting americans killed. I wonder what those conservatives would say if I asked if an ethnic minority baby should be aborted.