Also do you think Osama Bin Laden himself has had any type of battle training.
This topic is locked from further discussion.
Obviously he doesn't. He's a rich kid and that's all they ever used him for, his money. He is absolutely nothing but a pocket book to al Queda.Also do you think Osama Bin Laden himself has had any type of battle training.
leegar88
[QUOTE="leegar88"]Obviously he doesn't. He's a rich kid and that's all they ever used him for, his money. He is absolutely nothing but a pocket book to al Queda.Also do you think Osama Bin Laden himself has had any type of battle training.
quiglythegreat
he created al Queda, and yes he does have battle training, he fought the soviets back in da 80's, nd won
[QUOTE="quiglythegreat"][QUOTE="leegar88"]Obviously he doesn't. He's a rich kid and that's all they ever used him for, his money. He is absolutely nothing but a pocket book to al Queda.Also do you think Osama Bin Laden himself has had any type of battle training.
nyczfinest2300
he created al Queda, and yes he does have battle training, he fought the soviets back in da 80's, nd won
Yes, in the Soviet Afghan war. The mujahadeen there won only because of money, both Arabian and American in origin. bin Laden got in there very late and because he was from the esteemed bin Laden family would never do anything as lowly as practicing with a weapon, let alone using one.from the people I've talked to that have actually seen members of Al-Qaeda fight in battle they aren't really well trained. I guess they would be rated better than civilians, but worse than any "serious" army in the world. I'd even go as far to say that semi-trained American civilians could beat them in battle (those that know how to fire a weapon, and have some knowledge of strategy).jrhawk42well, a bunch of farmers did beat the brits. :D
[QUOTE="jrhawk42"]from the people I've talked to that have actually seen members of Al-Qaeda fight in battle they aren't really well trained. I guess they would be rated better than civilians, but worse than any "serious" army in the world. I'd even go as far to say that semi-trained American civilians could beat them in battle (those that know how to fire a weapon, and have some knowledge of strategy).Def_Jef88well, a bunch of farmers did beat the brits. :D
They train extensively on the monkey bars.KiIIyou
[QUOTE="KiIIyou"]They train extensively on the monkey bars.Powerhitter0418
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"][QUOTE="jrhawk42"]from the people I've talked to that have actually seen members of Al-Qaeda fight in battle they aren't really well trained. I guess they would be rated better than civilians, but worse than any "serious" army in the world. I'd even go as far to say that semi-trained American civilians could beat them in battle (those that know how to fire a weapon, and have some knowledge of strategy).quiglythegreatwell, a bunch of farmers did beat the brits. :D
[QUOTE="Def_Jef88"]by farmers, i meant amreicans
jrhawk42
Some of the older ones are very well trained, because we trained them when they were fighting the soviets, that sure came bck to bite us in the ass huh?LS07
thats what happens when us funds things and then changing their mind about them once they no longer benefit them. yes history tends to repeat itself
Please Log In to post.
Log in to comment