[QUOTE="Shacrob"] I know it's an old one but well, i liked this movie.
I was relieved when I saw that Lecter didn't cut off her hand, becasue i didn't wanted Clarice to be harmed by him. I was happy that he CUT his hand and not her hand (^^ lol).
And it was disturbing at certain scenes. So what do you think about this movie? And also, in the final scene when Dr. Lecter harm the FBI dude, is that true, that it can be done that kind of thing?
MrGeezer
I hated it.
They took the previous movies and turned Hannibal into "the good Guy", and made it a ****ing comedy about people getting murdered.
I hated it. Not only was it morally repugnant, it was also ridiculous to the point of being laughable.
It was a comedy where we are supposed to sympathse with a serial killer who feeds people to pigs, and makes them eat their own brains. And we're supposed to cheer when he catches the one decent guy who's trying to stop him, and spills the dude's intestines onto the street in front of mothers and sons and daughters.
**** that movie. Even Red Dragon, directed by ****ing BRETT RATNER was a far better movie.
And that's saying a LOT. The fact that Hannibal was also directed by RIDLEY SCOTT should be enough to fill Ridley Scott with deep shame.
Horrible movie.
You've just taken the words out of my mouth. I'm glad someone else shares this view. I didn't like it at all. The Silence of the Lambs totally owns Red Dragon and Hannibal.
Log in to comment