@brimmul777 said:
@foxhound_fox said:
Professional athletes are incredibly skilled at what they do (I'd like to see anyone who complains about how much they get paid play alongside them competitively) and the market in which they work is a huge money-maker, demanding they receive large salaries to keep up with the rate at which money comes in.
What, would you rather they make much less money and all the other advertising and beer revenues go to the owners?
I do agree to some point.But in the NHL,both sides of the border,almost half the teams are losing money.The employees{players}are making more money the a majority of the owners.Thats no lie.If yourself opened up a EB Games,a bussiness of your own and you paid all expenses but no profit for yourself at all,and you went on like that for as long as you had your bussiness,would'nt you shit and complain.Players really need to make $50 million a lifetime or alot more.???????
Half the teams are in markets that don't make money on a winter sport because they never see winter. People in Georgia didn't care about hockey because it's always 80+ degrees there. They moved the team to here (Winnipeg) and it, in a single season, became one of the most profitable teams in the league (behind Detroit and a couple others). People in Canada LOVE their hockey, and pay whatever it takes to see it (season tickets here require a three-year commitment, and costs start at ~$6000 a seat, and they all disappeared originally in a few minutes).
The players know they can demand higher salaries if their skill sets them apart from the rest of the league (I'm surprised Sidney Crosby isn't making WAY more than he is now). The market of the NHL allows them to make that money because people give their money to the business willingly.
You should really be complaining about the NFL, NBA and MLB. They make WAY more money than NHL players. Like, almost a disgusting amount more (some MLB players are making like $25 million a year now).
Log in to comment