I think I've finally figured whats gone wrong with rock

  • 106 results
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

This topic is locked from further discussion.

Avatar image for jimmygrace
jimmygrace

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#51 jimmygrace
Member since 2007 • 2405 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]

The Killers don't sound anything like 80's rock.They sound like a bad combination of U2, Jet, and Coldplay.

LJS9502_basic

Wrong. The Killers are channeling 80's rock. What 80's bands are you familiar with?

When I think 80's rock I think of AC/DC, Aerosmith, Van Halen, Ozzy Osbourne, KISS, Metallica, and so on.

Avatar image for jimmygrace
jimmygrace

2405

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#52 jimmygrace
Member since 2007 • 2405 Posts

i don't like those bands either, but im getting a little tired of you making these threads over and overscary_snake

Were you forced to click on it?

Avatar image for scary_snake
scary_snake

4546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#53 scary_snake
Member since 2006 • 4546 Posts

[QUOTE="scary_snake"]i don't like those bands either, but im getting a little tired of you making these threads over and overjimmygrace

Were you forced to click on it?

pedobear made me:cry:

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#54 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts
[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"][QUOTE="jimmygrace"]

The Killers don't sound anything like 80's rock.They sound like a bad combination of U2, Jet, and Coldplay.

jimmygrace

Wrong. The Killers are channeling 80's rock. What 80's bands are you familiar with?

When I think 80's rock I think of AC/DC, Aerosmith, Van Halen, Ozzy Osbourne, KISS, Metallica, and so on.

So...exactly one genre. Here's a hint....listen to 80's post punk/new wave...you'll see some of the influences of The Killers.

Avatar image for peeviness
peeviness

2023

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#55 peeviness
Member since 2004 • 2023 Posts
Don't use "rock" as a general statement. Some sub-genres of rock are thriving.
Avatar image for Insane00
Insane00

1267

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#56 Insane00
Member since 2003 • 1267 Posts
[QUOTE="TERMINAT0R1"]

Problems:

1. Girly, nasal-only voices
2. Guitars are only power chords. No more awesome solos.
3. Emos
4. Most bands revolve solely around the color black
5. No awesome lyrics anymore
6. Too much computer/synthesizer use. Guitar, bass, drums, maybe piano. That's all you need.
7. Too much depression. Sing about something positive, like, say, LOVE. The best bands ever wrote about love, not depression.

I'm sure there's more I forgot about.

NearTheEnd

The only one you had right was "Major label's unwillingness to sign anyone who might not make boatloads of money."

Oh, wait.

You also forgot the fact that people only make music that's gonna sell. People don't buy real rock anymore. One of the greatest guitarists of the last decade (Jack White) doesn't sell nearly as many records as these rappers and cookie cutter stars (I'm looking at you Britney, Jessica, Christina, Linsey, etc). That isn't to say that it's all bad, just to say that rock doesn't sell like it used to.

But great music is still around. Stadium Arcadium has some hot guitar licks, on the otherhand I saw this video of The Killers playing Romeo and Juliet by Dire Straits and they totally left out the lead guitar part (the best part) probably cause no one in the band has enough talent to actually pull of Knofler's amazing lead guitar parts.

Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#57 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

Hey, I think synthesizers aregreat if the band plays them live. Like if a member plays the keyboards, but uses a synthesizer keyboard.

I love new wave, and if a band plays everything electronic live, by themselves, its cool by me.

(Synthesizers require you to know how to play piano, but programming the sound onboard is the electro part.

Avatar image for Shmiity
Shmiity

6625

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 26

User Lists: 0

#58 Shmiity
Member since 2006 • 6625 Posts

I personally liked The Killers version of Romeo and juliet.

Dont rag on the guitar player, you don't know if he has the talent or not.

Avatar image for scary_snake
scary_snake

4546

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#59 scary_snake
Member since 2006 • 4546 Posts

I personally liked The Killers version of Romeo and juliet.

Dont rag on the guitar player, you don't know if he has the talent or not.

Shmiity

me too, i like that version a lot

Avatar image for MoonSpoon
MoonSpoon

9970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#60 MoonSpoon
Member since 2005 • 9970 Posts
Everything is wrong with this thread.
Avatar image for guitboxdude25
guitboxdude25

2120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#61 guitboxdude25
Member since 2006 • 2120 Posts

Problems:

1. Girly, nasal-only voices
2. Guitars are only power chords. No more awesome solos.
3. Emos
4. Most bands revolve solely around the color black
5. No awesome lyrics anymore
6. Too much computer/synthesizer use. Guitar, bass, drums, maybe piano. That's all you need.
7. Too much depression. Sing about something positive, like, say, LOVE. The best bands ever wrote about love, not depression.

I'm sure there's more I forgot about.

TERMINAT0R1

sounds about right too me.

Avatar image for MarineJcksn
MarineJcksn

1675

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 1

User Lists: 0

#62 MarineJcksn
Member since 2007 • 1675 Posts

Exactly, JW never sells as much as he should but he freakin jams. The new white stripes album is pretty good, but then again all the music they made was pretty good especially when compairing it to the fallout boy/PATD crap thats all over the place these days.

Whatever happened to rockers gangbanging groupies 10 at a time, trashing hotel rooms and stage-diving while nailing a 6 minute guitar solo and spitting blood on the crowd? :?

Avatar image for bmoreangel
bmoreangel

1582

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 11

User Lists: 0

#63 bmoreangel
Member since 2007 • 1582 Posts
I think rock could use more cow bell
Avatar image for GodLovesDead
GodLovesDead

9755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#64 GodLovesDead
Member since 2007 • 9755 Posts

Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.jimmygrace

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

Avatar image for 99RanchMarket
99RanchMarket

279

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#65 99RanchMarket
Member since 2006 • 279 Posts
Does it matter? Get used to the "rock" you hear today because thats just the way it is. There are always non-famous ones for you to listen.
Avatar image for MoonSpoon
MoonSpoon

9970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#66 MoonSpoon
Member since 2005 • 9970 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.GodLovesDead

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

Who the hell are you to say what is artistic and meaningful to someone?

Avatar image for guitboxdude25
guitboxdude25

2120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#67 guitboxdude25
Member since 2006 • 2120 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.GodLovesDead

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

led zep and the beatles suck?lol wut!
all(underlined all)rock music is only in it for the money!
your full of crap.
the beatles,not meaningfull lol.funniest thing ive heard all day.
what exactly do you listen too?lets all bow down to you because your "cl@sical music" (i assume your talking about flutes,trumpets,violins,ect)is sooooooo much better.

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#68 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.GodLovesDead

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

Classical music was created for money.....

Avatar image for Stevo_the_gamer
Stevo_the_gamer

50074

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 49

User Lists: 0

#69 Stevo_the_gamer  Moderator
Member since 2004 • 50074 Posts
Emo music has ruined rock. :(
Avatar image for GodLovesDead
GodLovesDead

9755

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 8

User Lists: 0

#70 GodLovesDead
Member since 2007 • 9755 Posts
[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.guitboxdude25

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

led zep and the beatles suck?lol wut!
all(underlined all)rock music is only in it for the money!
your full of crap.
the beatles,not meaningfull lol.funniest thing ive heard all day.
what exactly do you listen too?lets all bow down to you because your "cl@sical music" (i assume your talking about flutes,trumpets,violins,ect)is sooooooo much better.


Obviously not all rock is in it for the most, but just about all of it is. I guess The Beatles is meaningful, if you are as shallow as a puddle of water musically. Good post too, It's so "well done" that I don't even need to make an argument.

[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those **** because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.LJS9502_basic

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a ****cal album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

Cl*ssical music was created for money.....

Since all Cl*assical composers are filthy rich =

Oh...wait..

Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#71 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Classical music was created for money.....

GodLovesDead

Since all Cl*assical composers are filthy rich =

Oh...wait..

Modern composers are not poor...and back in the day the composers had patrons....that paid them...GET THIS...to create music for them.

Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#72 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts
[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]Classical music was created for money.....

LJS9502_basic

Since all Cl*assical composers are filthy rich =

Oh...wait..

Modern composers are not poor...and back in the day the composers had patrons....that paid them...GET THIS...to create music for them.

So, they were SELLOUTS!!
Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#73 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.GodLovesDead

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

This is the worst attempt at sounding really smart I've ever heard.
Avatar image for MoonSpoon
MoonSpoon

9970

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#74 MoonSpoon
Member since 2005 • 9970 Posts
[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.NearTheEnd

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

This is the worst attempt at sounding really smart I've ever heard.

lol Seriously.

"When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art." lol

Avatar image for guitboxdude25
guitboxdude25

2120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#75 guitboxdude25
Member since 2006 • 2120 Posts
[QUOTE="guitboxdude25"][QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.GodLovesDead

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

led zep and the beatles suck?lol wut!
all(underlined all)rock music is only in it for the money!
your full of crap.
the beatles,not meaningfull lol.funniest thing ive heard all day.
what exactly do you listen too?lets all bow down to you because your "cl@sical music" (i assume your talking about flutes,trumpets,violins,ect)is sooooooo much better.


Obviously not all rock is in it for the most, but just about all of it is. I guess The Beatles is meaningful, if you are as shallow as a puddle of water musically. Good post too, It's so "well done" that I don't even need to make an argument.

[QUOTE="GodLovesDead"]

really?is that so?tell me,whats so shallow about let it be?
oes nos!my post wasnt wells dun!omg!please,stop trying to act like a smart ass.

Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#76 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts

really?is that so?tell me,whats so shallow about let it be?
oes nos!my post wasnt wells dun!omg!please,stop trying to act like a smart ass.guitboxdude25

dumb post for him =/= smart post for you

Avatar image for Aquat1cF1sh
Aquat1cF1sh

11096

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#77 Aquat1cF1sh
Member since 2006 • 11096 Posts
Music is also a lot less catchy now a days. :? And yeah, the big depression theme brings things down a lot too.
Avatar image for SolidSnake35
SolidSnake35

58971

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 7

User Lists: 3

#78 SolidSnake35
Member since 2005 • 58971 Posts
Maybe girly singing voices are hip now. Get with the times, old man. ^_^
Avatar image for iloverikku11
iloverikku11

11039

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#79 iloverikku11
Member since 2005 • 11039 Posts
[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]There's nothing wrong with rock. It would have died out if everyone continued to make the same music as the 60's and 70's. Alternative FTW.d51man

Well thats only because you like today's rock.

Yeah, well he's right. Rock wouldn't even be around if it was the same as the 60's and 70's. People would've been bored with it after 30 or 40 years :roll: It's the same for Fall Out Boy and My Chemical Romance and all those other garbage bands. They'll all be gone soon enough.



almost as ignorant as first poster. the fact you even put MCR and FoB in the same category is blashemophy. Just because they don't dress like you, they are bad people, and therfore make bad music? (i understand they arent the best musicians, but they aren't terrible.)
Avatar image for NearTheEnd
NearTheEnd

12184

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#80 NearTheEnd
Member since 2002 • 12184 Posts
[QUOTE="d51man"][QUOTE="jimmygrace"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]There's nothing wrong with rock. It would have died out if everyone continued to make the same music as the 60's and 70's. Alternative FTW.iloverikku11

Well thats only because you like today's rock.

Yeah, well he's right. Rock wouldn't even be around if it was the same as the 60's and 70's. People would've been bored with it after 30 or 40 years :roll: It's the same for Fall Out Boy and My Chemical Romance and all those other garbage bands. They'll all be gone soon enough.



almost as ignorant as first poster. the fact you even put MCR and FoB in the same category is blashemophy. Just because they don't dress like you, they are bad people, and therfore make bad music? (i understand they arent the best musicians, but they aren't terrible.)

I'm not even sure what you're trying to say.
Avatar image for EboyLOL
EboyLOL

5358

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#81 EboyLOL
Member since 2006 • 5358 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.GodLovesDead

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

No... rock is art. It's value is determined by the person who is listening to it however.
Avatar image for solidscryer
solidscryer

5661

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 2

User Lists: 0

#82 solidscryer
Member since 2005 • 5661 Posts

[QUOTE="jimmygrace"]Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.GodLovesDead

Glad someone came out with this. But I'll take this one further: All rock is garbage. Complete garbage. When you're buying a rock album, you're basically buying a product. If you bought a classical album - you'd be buying art. The point of rock music is to be as catchy as you can, while trying to look "cool" while you're at it. It's a crock of crap. Only a few bands in rock are worth mentioning as being decent. I don't care what you tell me either, Led Zep and The Beatles suck. I'm not even going to bother saying "they're only in it for the money" because that's the purpose of rock in the first place. I'd rather listen to meaningful or artistic music atleast.

Music is a form of art, therefore rock music is art. Lucy in the Sky With Diamonds is basically a painting done in a song.

Avatar image for Fortier
Fortier

7728

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#83 Fortier
Member since 2004 • 7728 Posts
If rock stayed exactlythe same throughout the past 4 decades, then something would be wrong with it.
Avatar image for d51man
d51man

6143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#84 d51man
Member since 2005 • 6143 Posts
[QUOTE="d51man"][QUOTE="jimmygrace"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]There's nothing wrong with rock. It would have died out if everyone continued to make the same music as the 60's and 70's. Alternative FTW.iloverikku11

Well thats only because you like today's rock.

Yeah, well he's right. Rock wouldn't even be around if it was the same as the 60's and 70's. People would've been bored with it after 30 or 40 years :roll: It's the same for Fall Out Boy and My Chemical Romance and all those other garbage bands. They'll all be gone soon enough.



almost as ignorant as first poster. the fact you even put MCR and FoB in the same category is blashemophy. Just because they don't dress like you, they are bad people, and therfore make bad music? (i understand they arent the best musicians, but they aren't terrible.)

Hahaha. I didn't put MCR and FoB in the same category. I said that they were 'phases'. I don't care how they dress or how they act. What I do care about is the music. They have no talent. They are terrible. There's nothing spectacular about anything they make. It's catchy, people like catchy music. It's only a matter of time until everyone gets tired of this, and wants something different.

Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#85 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts

Problems:

1. Girly, nasal-only voices
2. Guitars are only power chords. No more awesome solos.
3. Emos
4. Most bands revolve solely around the color black
5. No awesome lyrics anymore
6. Too much computer/synthesizer use. Guitar, bass, drums, maybe piano. That's all you need.
7. Too much depression. Sing about something positive, like, say, LOVE. The best bands ever wrote about love, not depression.

I'm sure there's more I forgot about.

TERMINAT0R1

I agree, actually.

Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#86 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts
whats gone wrong with rock is mtv and everybody emulating what's "popular".
Avatar image for Eddie-Vedder
Eddie-Vedder

7810

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#87 Eddie-Vedder
Member since 2003 • 7810 Posts
Rock went progressive, you either evolved with it and went along, or stayed listening to the same songs forever... Progressive Rock is where it´s at.
Avatar image for mistervengeance
mistervengeance

6769

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 3

User Lists: 0

#88 mistervengeance
Member since 2006 • 6769 Posts
[QUOTE="TERMINAT0R1"]

Problems:

1. Girly, nasal-only voices
2. Guitars are only power chords. No more awesome solos.
3. Emos
4. Most bands revolve solely around the color black
5. No awesome lyrics anymore
6. Too much computer/synthesizer use. Guitar, bass, drums, maybe piano. That's all you need.
7. Too much depression. Sing about something positive, like, say, LOVE. The best bands ever wrote about love, not depression.

I'm sure there's more I forgot about.

Hewkii

I agree, actually.

me too but you forgot screamo. that isn't music. especially bands like arch enemy. they're freaking hilarious, but they aren't music.

Avatar image for quiglythegreat
quiglythegreat

16886

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#89 quiglythegreat
Member since 2006 • 16886 Posts
Or there could be bands that introduce original concepts and bands that love music and just want to keep playing it.
Avatar image for mattg90520
mattg90520

3115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#90 mattg90520
Member since 2006 • 3115 Posts

Bands imitate what is popular because they obviously see it as the easiest way to make the most money.That's why in the 70s and 80s and very early 90s you saw so many similar types of music.But then once bands like Korn, Limp Bizkit, Linkin Park, Fall Out Boy and so on became the most popular music you see so many other bands who might actually have talent imitate those styles because its the surest thing to make money.I think if we had a great band once again who made big hit after big hit and didn't have the girly singing voice and whatnot we would see more bands trying to imitate good music again.jimmygrace

basically thegarbage rock that they have on mtv, making it "good" for people who watch mtv and dont know how to distinguish good from bad. bands copy this trash and therin become popular and make money.

Avatar image for blooddemon666
blooddemon666

22587

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#91 blooddemon666
Member since 2003 • 22587 Posts
whats gone wrong with rock is mtv and everybody emulating what's "popular". mistervengeance
its too difficult to be original
Avatar image for Hewkii
Hewkii

26339

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#92 Hewkii
Member since 2006 • 26339 Posts


I guess The Beatles is meaningful, if you are as shallow as a puddle of water musically.

GodLovesDead

Elaborate, if you will.

Avatar image for Shiggums
Shiggums

21436

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 30

User Lists: 0

#93 Shiggums
Member since 2007 • 21436 Posts
I think the problem with rock (namely modern rock and the hair metal of the 80's) is that money is all they get into it for. Back in the 60's and 70's, the musicians got ripped off monetarily speaking. But they still did it, because they loved the music. Screw anything after 1996, and forget about roughly 80% of 80's rock.
Avatar image for mattg90520
mattg90520

3115

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#94 mattg90520
Member since 2006 • 3115 Posts
[QUOTE="iloverikku11"][QUOTE="d51man"][QUOTE="jimmygrace"]

[QUOTE="LJS9502_basic"]There's nothing wrong with rock. It would have died out if everyone continued to make the same music as the 60's and 70's. Alternative FTW.d51man

Well thats only because you like today's rock.

Yeah, well he's right. Rock wouldn't even be around if it was the same as the 60's and 70's. People would've been bored with it after 30 or 40 years :roll: It's the same for Fall Out Boy and My Chemical Romance and all those other garbage bands. They'll all be gone soon enough.



almost as ignorant as first poster. the fact you even put MCR and FoB in the same category is blashemophy. Just because they don't dress like you, they are bad people, and therfore make bad music? (i understand they arent the best musicians, but they aren't terrible.)

Hahaha. I didn't put MCR and FoB in the same category. I said that they were 'phases'. I don't care how they dress or how they act. What I do care about is the music. They have no talent. They are terrible. There's nothing spectacular about anything they make. It's catchy, people like catchy music. It's only a matter of time until everyone gets tired of this, and wants something different.

haha i agree. mcr and fob really have no talent. theyve just been labeled good by mtv and became super popular. i cant get over how much of a fanboy that one post is, though, claiming they cant be in the same category. sure they can cause theyre both poopoo

Avatar image for Bauers-Twin
Bauers-Twin

14150

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#95 Bauers-Twin
Member since 2007 • 14150 Posts

Problems:

1. Girly, nasal-only voices
2. Guitars are only power chords. No more awesome solos.
3. Emos
4. Most bands revolve solely around the color black
5. No awesome lyrics anymore
6. Too much computer/synthesizer use. Guitar, bass, drums, maybe piano. That's all you need.
7. Too much depression. Sing about something positive, like, say, LOVE. The best bands ever wrote about love, not depression.

I'm sure there's more I forgot about.

TERMINAT0R1

dude, girly nasly singers are awesome, listn to Placebo they rock! and i dont think theres anything wrong with Rock, theres alot of rockbands I'm sure theres a group of them you still enjoy. Is something wrong with mainsream society? probably, but to say that somethings worng with a whole music genre is dumb. Its stil rock or ele it wouldnt be called rock anymore.

Avatar image for Mumbles527
Mumbles527

7706

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#96 Mumbles527
Member since 2004 • 7706 Posts
I know whats wrong with Rock. Boulders are bigger and better, people are just now starting to realize it!
Avatar image for LJS9502_basic
LJS9502_basic

180110

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#97 LJS9502_basic
Member since 2003 • 180110 Posts

I think the problem with rock (namely modern rock and the hair metal of the 80's) is that money is all they get into it for. Back in the 60's and 70's, the musicians got ripped off monetarily speaking. But they still did it, because they loved the music. Screw anything after 1996, and forget about roughly 80% of 80's rock.Shiggums

You're mistaken if you think the bands from the 60's and 70's weren't interested in money....or didn't make any.

Avatar image for guitboxdude25
guitboxdude25

2120

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 4

User Lists: 0

#98 guitboxdude25
Member since 2006 • 2120 Posts

[QUOTE="guitboxdude25"]really?is that so?tell me,whats so shallow about let it be?
oes nos!my post wasnt wells dun!omg!please,stop trying to act like a smart ass.NearTheEnd

dumb post for him =/= smart post for you

ever hear of sarcasm?
Avatar image for d51man
d51man

6143

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 5

User Lists: 0

#99 d51man
Member since 2005 • 6143 Posts
[QUOTE="Hewkii"][QUOTE="TERMINAT0R1"]

Problems:

1. Girly, nasal-only voices
2. Guitars are only power chords. No more awesome solos.
3. Emos
4. Most bands revolve solely around the color black
5. No awesome lyrics anymore
6. Too much computer/synthesizer use. Guitar, bass, drums, maybe piano. That's all you need.
7. Too much depression. Sing about something positive, like, say, LOVE. The best bands ever wrote about love, not depression.

I'm sure there's more I forgot about.

mistervengeance

I agree, actually.

me too but you forgot screamo. that isn't music. especially bands like arch enemy. they're freaking hilarious, but they aren't music.

Ha! Arch Enemy aren't screamo! :lol: They're melodic death metal :roll:

Avatar image for rockguy92
rockguy92

21559

Forum Posts

0

Wiki Points

0

Followers

Reviews: 0

User Lists: 0

#100 rockguy92
Member since 2007 • 21559 Posts

Personally, I think rock is dead. The 80s were the last years of good rock, and pretty much as soon as it was 1990, rock died. But that's just my opinion.King_Creole_35

I agree.