[QUOTE="JudgementEden"]Dont bother with MrGeezer, he mindlessly believes the world works the way it seems to. By the way, MrGeezer, these reports would NEVER end up in a so-called "respectable" journal. If 9/11 was indeed caused by the government, do you really think they would let them publish it? Plain common sense. So either look it up for yourself, or just admit you are close minded. Your definitely not open, that's for sure.MrGeezer
Right, sort of like how the government never let respectable journals reveal the truth about Watergate.
If there WAS any evidence that the United States government had any involvement in the 9/11 attacks, there's no ****ing way that stuff would get held back. The cover-up idea is just frankly moronic, because it ignores just how much people would BENEFIT from "exposing the truth". If the New York Times or something was absolutely able to come up with real tangible proof for this, they could get the story out to millions of people before the evil government had a chance to do a goddamn thing. Whoever provided the evidence proving that the 9/11 attacks were orchestrated by our own government would be hailed as one of the greatest heroes in America's history. They'd have book deals, get paid to do interviews, you name it. You don't think that instant fame, fortune, and national adulation would be enough for SOMEONE to come forward?
Don't make me laugh.
If there was evidence, bona-fide hard evidence rather than just some nutcase saying ****, then it would ABSOLUTELY end up in a respectable journal. To say otherwise is to be completely and utterly ignorant about the entire concept of selfish motives. Even if we accept that all these sources on't CARE about bringing to justice the people responsible, we STILL have to remember that whoever breaks this story first, and has the evidence to back it up, would be hailed as a ****ing king.
Funny thing about conspiracy theorists is just how SILLY what they're saying usually is. The excuse their lack of evidence by saying "think about it! Even if there was evidence, they'd never reveal it!"
Alright...I just DID think about it, and that line of reasoning is freaking STUPID. If any respectable journal had solid evidence for this, they'd ****ing absolutely reveal it. There's absolutely no goddamn reason for them NOT to.
Fine, i'll tell you why everything you just said would NEVER happen. The news papers you rely on so much, are OWNED by the very people who were in charge of the attacks in the first place. When I said "government" I didn't necessarily mean the US government. I meant what some call the "Shadow Government". I called them "Illuminati" in another post. Whatever ends up in a paper is in there because they let it. Every single media outlet you know of, whether its print, radio, tv, they control it. What goes in and what goes out. You research it if you want.
Log in to comment