If Romney is the Republican candidate I am voting President Obama.

I like Ron Paul, but I'm smart enough to know that he will never be the nominee. I also like Santorum, but I still know better. I hope that Gingrich gets the nomination because I still think he has a chance to beat Obama. If this election has shown me anything, it's that Gingrich knows how to speak! The media hates him, but even after that interview with his ex wife was released, he dominated South Carolina! I think he has a shot, he's defintly who I am voting for when the primary reaches Illinois.

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"] ron paul could beat obama 1v1 romney and obama are 2 sides of the same coin. they will both put us in more and more debt and continue the corrupt federal reserve and military industrial complexmingmao3046

:| No Ron Paul couldn't, he isn't even liked by his supposed BASE when it comes to party.. His ideas are sure as hell too extreme if they scare off the Republican base, forget about the common voter.

:| Ok you have no clue what your talking about, he is not the ultimate constiutionalist when he in fact rejects certain parts of the constitution TO BEGIN WITH.. Thats pretty much the contradiction to what being a constitutionalist is.

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

:| No Ron Paul couldn't, he isn't even liked by his supposed BASE when it comes to party.. His ideas are sure as hell too extreme if they scare off the Republican base, forget about the common voter.

sSubZerOo

:| Ok you have no clue what your talking about, he is not the ultimate constiutionalist when he in fact rejects certain parts of the constitution TO BEGIN WITH.. Thats pretty much the contradiction to what being a constitutionalist is.

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"] He is the ultimate constitutionalist who supports liberty, sound money, no unneccessary spending, and is the only one willing to bring the troops home his ideas are the bestmingmao3046

:| Ok you have no clue what your talking about, he is not the ultimate constiutionalist when he in fact rejects certain parts of the constitution TO BEGIN WITH.. Thats pretty much the contradiction to what being a constitutionalist is.

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

:| Ok you have no clue what your talking about, he is not the ultimate constiutionalist when he in fact rejects certain parts of the constitution TO BEGIN WITH.. Thats pretty much the contradiction to what being a constitutionalist is.

SF_KiLLaMaN

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"]such as what, the 16th amendment? what exactly does he reject? Ron is also the only one who is willing to make significant cuts to lessen our debtmingmao3046

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"]

[QUOTE="SF_KiLLaMaN"] Do you think it would even matter? Nobody in congress is stupid enough to enact Paul's ridiculous policies, he wouldn't get anything done. Congress is stupid, but not THAT stupid. If he doesn't have the backing of most republicans, nothing would ever be done.DroidPhysX

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"] which of his ideas do you find "ridiculous"? and just because someone is getting things through congress doesn't mean they are good things

mingmao3046

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"] He is the ultimate constitutionalist who supports liberty, sound money, no unneccessary spending, and is the only one willing to bring the troops home his ideas are the bestmingmao3046

:| Ok you have no clue what your talking about, he is not the ultimate constiutionalist when he in fact rejects certain parts of the constitution TO BEGIN WITH.. Thats pretty much the contradiction to what being a constitutionalist is.

.. Lets try with the most basic, for instance he believes (along with his son) that the state has the right to deny things like the first amendment such as flag burning.. He is against abortion, something Roe V Wade set the standard.. He is not a Constiutionalist that is a made up term to make him sound like he knows what the constiution is.. He hashsi own idea.s.. And yet again what candidate hasn't claimed they would cut the debt? Thats literally on eof the main platform ideas for EVERY candidate this coming election..

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Contrary to popular belief, Ron Paul does indeed support big government in a lot of ways and thats what makes his ideas ridiculous.

DroidPhysX

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"] such as?mingmao3046

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"] such as?mingmao3046

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

:| Ok you have no clue what your talking about, he is not the ultimate constiutionalist when he in fact rejects certain parts of the constitution TO BEGIN WITH.. Thats pretty much the contradiction to what being a constitutionalist is.

sSubZerOo

.. Lets try with the most basic, for instance he believes (along with his son) that the state has the right to deny things like the first amendment such as flag burning.. He is against abortion, something Roe V Wade set the standard.. He is not a Constiutionalist that is a made up term to make him sound like he knows what the constiution is.. He hashsi own idea.s.. And yet again what candidate hasn't claimed they would cut the debt? Thats literally on eof the main platform ideas for EVERY candidate this coming election..

[QUOTE="ThumpyBowser"]Why even talk about the Republican candidate... Does anyone really think they would be a great president after Bush? President Obama needs 8 years to fix the mess that took 8 years to make give him time.mingmao3046

Ron Paul approved racially provacative newsletters to make his way through medical score I can not vote for him.

I do not trust any of the others in the Republicans

Santorum would bring America to the era of the Salem Witch trials.

Gingrich would provoke WW3 because he said he just wants to kill Americas enemies, and he is unfaithful to his vows of love (I have zero respect for this man and it disgusts me so many men are eager to high five and praise him for this because any Woman running for office would be slandered as a "ho").

Romney would use America to increase his net worth.

I may be disappointed with the President but atleast I know his heart is in the right place.

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"]

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Federal amendment to ban abortion for starters. DroidPhysX

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"][QUOTE="mingmao3046"] you do realize he delivered over 4k babies in his career, right? he saw first hand how disgusting abortion is.

mingmao3046

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="ThumpyBowser"]Why even talk about the Republican candidate... Does anyone really think they would be a great president after Bush? President Obama needs 8 years to fix the mess that took 8 years to make give him time.ThumpyBowser

Ron Paul approved racially provacative newsletters to make his way through medical score I can not vote for him.

I do not trust any of the others in the Republicans

Santorum would bring America to the era of the Salem Witch trials.

Gingrich would provoke WW3 because he said he just wants to kill Americas enemies, and he is unfaithful to his vows of love (I have zero respect for this man and it disgusts me so many men are eager to high five and praise him for this because any Woman running for office would be slandered as a "ho").

Romney would use America to increase his net worth.

I may be disappointed with the President but atleast I know his heart is in the right place.

[QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"]such as what, the 16th amendment? what exactly does he reject? Ron is also the only one who is willing to make significant cuts to lessen our debtmingmao3046

.. Lets try with the most basic, for instance he believes (along with his son) that the state has the right to deny things like the first amendment such as flag burning.. He is against abortion, something Roe V Wade set the standard.. He is not a Constiutionalist that is a made up term to make him sound like he knows what the constiution is.. He hashsi own idea.s.. And yet again what candidate hasn't claimed they would cut the debt? Thats literally on eof the main platform ideas for EVERY candidate this coming election..

Huh? What? Obama just released in wanting to cut a huge % of military just recently.. And he isn't the only one..

besides, abortion is a very touchy issue. its all about where you believe life begins. ron paul as a doctor believes it begins at conception so he tries to protect that life.

Yet again.. This has nothing to do with being a Constiutionalist.. A judge is suppose to be one, in which regardless of the views they uphold the LETTER OF THE LAW, not their own personal views.

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] So? He still supports big government intervening in peoples lives when he sponsored that amendment.DroidPhysX

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"] again this is about where you believe life begins, with ron being so pro life obviously he is against abortion heavily in defense of the babies livesmingmao3046

He specifically said that it should be the right of the states to ban it, not the federal government.. He is not a constiutionalist.. Stop trying to claim he is one.

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="sSubZerOo"]

.. Lets try with the most basic, for instance he believes (along with his son) that the state has the right to deny things like the first amendment such as flag burning.. He is against abortion, something Roe V Wade set the standard.. He is not a Constiutionalist that is a made up term to make him sound like he knows what the constiution is.. He hashsi own idea.s.. And yet again what candidate hasn't claimed they would cut the debt? Thats literally on eof the main platform ideas for EVERY candidate this coming election..

sSubZerOo

Huh? What? Obama just released in wanting to cut a huge % of military just recently.. And he isn't the only one..

besides, abortion is a very touchy issue. its all about where you believe life begins. ron paul as a doctor believes it begins at conception so he tries to protect that life.

Yet again.. This has nothing to do with being a Constiutionalist.. A judge is suppose to be one, in which regardless of the views they uphold the LETTER OF THE LAW, not their own personal views.

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Being a strict constitutionalist as he is, he should know that the constitution only talks about persons in post natal form. Thus meaning he has no valid constitutional reasons for outlawing abortion. And that shows his views are not rooted from the constitution in some cases like abortion.

sSubZerOo

He specifically said that it should be the right of the states to ban it, not the federal government.. He is not a constiutionalist.. Stop trying to claim he is one.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"] again this is about where you believe life begins, with ron being so pro life obviously he is against abortion heavily in defense of the babies livesmingmao3046

And no. Paul introduced and has sponsored bills similar to the Sanctity of Life Act that says life begins at conception which de facto outlaws abortion.

those newsletters that happened over 20 years ago have been explained time and time again...ron did not read them. he is not a racist. even the leader of NAACP has said this. this is such a minor issue if your whole opinion is on just that then you should rethink yourself. lol@ obama's heart being in the right place. all he cares about is getting re-elected. he appointed many of the same people bush had and is in the pocket of the big banks and corporations.

mingmao3046

I never said he was racist... He let others use his image to spread racism though.

President Obama put them in charge because he felt they were the best qualified, ask yourself this... Do you hate President Obama that much that you are willing to vote in the type of people who caused this mess?

[QUOTE="TheWZRD"][QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Ron Paul is gonna win FloridaSuper_MooRio

Hopefully Santorum or Gingrich.... Ron Paul says 9/11 is our fault. He scares me as president, I like his economics though.

9/11 was our fault. I find it hilarious that people think we were attacked out of the blue because "we are free and prosperous". I blame the media.

I'm not American by citizenship so I don't have a right to vote in America. But if I was born in America and had American citzenship then I wouldn't vote for either Republican or Democrat because I think both of these parties are extremely corrupt and self-serving. Both of these parties are parties of greed which only do what their big Corporate masters tell them to do.

If I was American then I would probably vote for Socialist or Independent.

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"]

those newsletters that happened over 20 years ago have been explained time and time again...ron did not read them. he is not a racist. even the leader of NAACP has said this. this is such a minor issue if your whole opinion is on just that then you should rethink yourself. lol@ obama's heart being in the right place. all he cares about is getting re-elected. he appointed many of the same people bush had and is in the pocket of the big banks and corporations.

ThumpyBowser

I never said he was racist... He let others use his image to spread racism though.

President Obama put them in charge because he felt they were the best qualified, ask yourself this... Do you hate President Obama that much that you are willing to vote in the type of people who caused this mess?

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Being a strict constitutionalist as he is, he should know that the constitution only talks about persons in post natal form. Thus meaning he has no valid constitutional reasons for outlawing abortion. And that shows his views are not rooted from the constitution in some cases like abortion.

DroidPhysX

And no. Paul introduced and has sponsored bills similar to the Sanctity of Life Act that says life begins at conception which de facto outlaws abortion.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"] where does the constitution say this? and the ban you are talking about is PARTIAL BIRTH. ie the baby is already formed and is a long way into pregnancy. not just a clump of cells mingmao3046

And no. Paul introduced and has sponsored bills similar to the Sanctity of Life Act that says life begins at conception which de facto outlaws abortion.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"] where does the constitution say this? and the ban you are talking about is PARTIAL BIRTH. ie the baby is already formed and is a long way into pregnancy. not just a clump of cells mingmao3046

And no. Paul introduced and has sponsored bills similar to the Sanctity of Life Act that says life begins at conception which de facto outlaws abortion.

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Being a strict constitutionalist as he is, he should know that the constitution only talks about persons in post natal form. Thus meaning he has no valid constitutional reasons for outlawing abortion. And that shows his views are not rooted from the constitution in some cases like abortion.

DroidPhysX

And no. Paul introduced and has sponsored bills similar to the Sanctity of Life Act that says life begins at conception which de facto outlaws abortion.

That is really open to interpretation whether or not it refers to a post or pre natal form.

[QUOTE="DroidPhysX"]

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"] where does the constitution say this? and the ban you are talking about is PARTIAL BIRTH. ie the baby is already formed and is a long way into pregnancy. not just a clump of cells Pikdum

And no. Paul introduced and has sponsored bills similar to the Sanctity of Life Act that says life begins at conception which de facto outlaws abortion.

That is really open to interpretation whether or not it refers to a post or pre natal form.

America voted Bush into presidency twice.... As a country I don't trust there average voter to form an intellegent opinion on it's goverment.

I hate the American two party system and think it is stupid.nightshade869

I hate the American two party system and think it is stupid.nightshade869

[QUOTE="nightshade869"]I hate the American two party system and think it is stupid.DevilMightCry

[QUOTE="nightshade869"]I hate the American two party system and think it is stupid.DevilMightCry

[QUOTE="mingmao3046"][QUOTE="DroidPhysX"] Being a strict constitutionalist as he is, he should know that the constitution only talks about persons in post natal form. Thus meaning he has no valid constitutional reasons for outlawing abortion. And that shows his views are not rooted from the constitution in some cases like abortion.

sSubZerOo

He specifically said that it should be the right of the states to ban it, not the federal government.. He is not a constiutionalist.. Stop trying to claim he is one.

America voted Bush into presidency twice.... As a country I don't trust there average voter to form an intellegent opinion on it's goverment.

MattDistillery

[QUOTE="TheWZRD"][QUOTE="ZumaJones07"]Ron Paul is gonna win FloridaSuper_MooRio

Hopefully Santorum or Gingrich.... Ron Paul says 9/11 is our fault. He scares me as president, I like his economics though.

So it's irrational to think that after half a century of bombing, propping up dictators, military base building and coups that someone would attack us?

I hate the American two party system and think it is stupid.nightshade869

Yeah I hate it too. All it does is limit our choices.

[QUOTE="MattDistillery"]

America voted Bush into presidency twice.... As a country I don't trust there average voter to form an intellegent opinion on it's goverment.

Serraph105

[QUOTE="Super_MooRio"]

[QUOTE="TheWZRD"] hopefully. he's only worth running for imoscoots9

Hopefully Santorum or Gingrich.... Ron Paul says 9/11 is our fault. He scares me as president, I like his economics though.

So it's irrational to think that after half a century of bombing, propping up dictators, military base building and coups that someone would attack us?

Hopefully Santorum or Gingrich.... Ron Paul says 9/11 is our fault. He scares me as president, I like his economics though.

Super_MooRio